Predicting the Type of Hearing Loss Using Click Auditory Brainstem Response in Babies Referred From Newborn Hearing Screening

OBJECTIVES:This study examined the ability of click auditory brainstem response (ABR) undertaken below the age of 6 months (from expected date of delivery) to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), using the latency of wave V measured 20 dB above threshold. DESIGN:Su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ear and hearing 2014-01, Vol.35 (1), p.1-9
Hauptverfasser: Baldwin, Margaret, Watkin, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Ear and hearing
container_volume 35
creator Baldwin, Margaret
Watkin, Peter
description OBJECTIVES:This study examined the ability of click auditory brainstem response (ABR) undertaken below the age of 6 months (from expected date of delivery) to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), using the latency of wave V measured 20 dB above threshold. DESIGN:Subjects were recruited if they had an ABR threshold of ≥ 40 dB nHL and ≤ 70 dB nHL in one or both ears measured below the age of 6 months and they had also attended follow-up appointments for behavioral assessment of their hearing in which the type of hearing loss had been confirmed. Forty-five children (84 ears) with SNHL, 82 children (141 ears) with temporary conductive hearing loss (TCHL), and 5 children (10 ears) with permanent conductive hearing loss (PCHL) were recruited. The differences between mean wave V latencies measured 20 dB above ABR threshold were examined using the independent t-test for the groups of cases with SNHL, TCHL, and PCHL. Signal-detection theory was used to examine the relationship between sensitivity and specificity when the latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was used to identify the presence of SNHL. Receiver operating characteristics were generated and the coordinates of the curve examined for the best compromise between sensitivity and false-alarm rate. The specificity, positive predictive value, and probability of missing a true case were determined for the most promising criteria. RESULTS:There were significant differences between the two groups with SNHL and TCHL. The mean latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was 1 msec shorter in those with SNHL compared with those with TCHL. There were significant differences between children with PCHL and SNHL but no difference between those with PCHL and TCHL. When a criterion of < 7.6 msec was chosen to predict the presence of SNHL the test sensitivity was 0.98, test specificity 0.71, and positive predictive value was 0.66. Nine out of 10 of those with a latency 20 dB above threshold of < 7.0 msec had an SNHL. CONCLUSIONS:The latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold measured using click ABR is a useful indicator of the type of hearing loss in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829e0718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490754701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1490754701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-d3bcd8262ef3165637171ddaee8f36ee52fcca29272e8258e8027d60dba3e9303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9P4zAQxa0VaCllv8EK-cgl4D-J7RxLoQtStSBoz5FjT6ghiYudqOqB776pWjhw2NM8jd57o_kh9JuSS0pyeTVZ3lySklAOnCqWA5FU_UAjmnGVpELIIzQiNBcJYYSdoNMYXwmhLBfpT3TCUkoyJtQIfTwGsM50rn3B3QrwYrsG7Ct8BzrsdnMfI17GnZzWzrzhSW9d58MWXwft2thBg58grn0bAbsWX-vSQRxWFYShGc-Cb_Bf2JQ-tF-lzyYAtIM6Q8eVriP8OswxWs5uF9O7ZP7w5346mSeGZ0IllpfGKiYYVJyKTHBJJbVWA6iKC4CMVcZoljPJQLFMgSJMWkFsqTnknPAxutj3roN_7yF2ReOigbrWLfg-FjTNicxSOdAco3RvNWF4PUBVrINrdNgWlBQ78MUAvvgOfoidHy70ZQP2K_RJejCovWHj6w5CfKv7DYRiBbruVv_v_geoy5HY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490754701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting the Type of Hearing Loss Using Click Auditory Brainstem Response in Babies Referred From Newborn Hearing Screening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Baldwin, Margaret ; Watkin, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Margaret ; Watkin, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:This study examined the ability of click auditory brainstem response (ABR) undertaken below the age of 6 months (from expected date of delivery) to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), using the latency of wave V measured 20 dB above threshold. DESIGN:Subjects were recruited if they had an ABR threshold of ≥ 40 dB nHL and ≤ 70 dB nHL in one or both ears measured below the age of 6 months and they had also attended follow-up appointments for behavioral assessment of their hearing in which the type of hearing loss had been confirmed. Forty-five children (84 ears) with SNHL, 82 children (141 ears) with temporary conductive hearing loss (TCHL), and 5 children (10 ears) with permanent conductive hearing loss (PCHL) were recruited. The differences between mean wave V latencies measured 20 dB above ABR threshold were examined using the independent t-test for the groups of cases with SNHL, TCHL, and PCHL. Signal-detection theory was used to examine the relationship between sensitivity and specificity when the latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was used to identify the presence of SNHL. Receiver operating characteristics were generated and the coordinates of the curve examined for the best compromise between sensitivity and false-alarm rate. The specificity, positive predictive value, and probability of missing a true case were determined for the most promising criteria. RESULTS:There were significant differences between the two groups with SNHL and TCHL. The mean latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was 1 msec shorter in those with SNHL compared with those with TCHL. There were significant differences between children with PCHL and SNHL but no difference between those with PCHL and TCHL. When a criterion of &lt; 7.6 msec was chosen to predict the presence of SNHL the test sensitivity was 0.98, test specificity 0.71, and positive predictive value was 0.66. Nine out of 10 of those with a latency 20 dB above threshold of &lt; 7.0 msec had an SNHL. CONCLUSIONS:The latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold measured using click ABR is a useful indicator of the type of hearing loss in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829e0718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24105268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Auditory Threshold ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cohort Studies ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hearing Loss, Conductive - diagnosis ; Hearing Loss, Conductive - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonatal Screening ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Signal Detection, Psychological</subject><ispartof>Ear and hearing, 2014-01, Vol.35 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>2014 by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-d3bcd8262ef3165637171ddaee8f36ee52fcca29272e8258e8027d60dba3e9303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-d3bcd8262ef3165637171ddaee8f36ee52fcca29272e8258e8027d60dba3e9303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24105268$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkin, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting the Type of Hearing Loss Using Click Auditory Brainstem Response in Babies Referred From Newborn Hearing Screening</title><title>Ear and hearing</title><addtitle>Ear Hear</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:This study examined the ability of click auditory brainstem response (ABR) undertaken below the age of 6 months (from expected date of delivery) to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), using the latency of wave V measured 20 dB above threshold. DESIGN:Subjects were recruited if they had an ABR threshold of ≥ 40 dB nHL and ≤ 70 dB nHL in one or both ears measured below the age of 6 months and they had also attended follow-up appointments for behavioral assessment of their hearing in which the type of hearing loss had been confirmed. Forty-five children (84 ears) with SNHL, 82 children (141 ears) with temporary conductive hearing loss (TCHL), and 5 children (10 ears) with permanent conductive hearing loss (PCHL) were recruited. The differences between mean wave V latencies measured 20 dB above ABR threshold were examined using the independent t-test for the groups of cases with SNHL, TCHL, and PCHL. Signal-detection theory was used to examine the relationship between sensitivity and specificity when the latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was used to identify the presence of SNHL. Receiver operating characteristics were generated and the coordinates of the curve examined for the best compromise between sensitivity and false-alarm rate. The specificity, positive predictive value, and probability of missing a true case were determined for the most promising criteria. RESULTS:There were significant differences between the two groups with SNHL and TCHL. The mean latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was 1 msec shorter in those with SNHL compared with those with TCHL. There were significant differences between children with PCHL and SNHL but no difference between those with PCHL and TCHL. When a criterion of &lt; 7.6 msec was chosen to predict the presence of SNHL the test sensitivity was 0.98, test specificity 0.71, and positive predictive value was 0.66. Nine out of 10 of those with a latency 20 dB above threshold of &lt; 7.0 msec had an SNHL. CONCLUSIONS:The latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold measured using click ABR is a useful indicator of the type of hearing loss in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.</description><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Conductive - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Conductive - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Signal Detection, Psychological</subject><issn>0196-0202</issn><issn>1538-4667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9P4zAQxa0VaCllv8EK-cgl4D-J7RxLoQtStSBoz5FjT6ghiYudqOqB776pWjhw2NM8jd57o_kh9JuSS0pyeTVZ3lySklAOnCqWA5FU_UAjmnGVpELIIzQiNBcJYYSdoNMYXwmhLBfpT3TCUkoyJtQIfTwGsM50rn3B3QrwYrsG7Ct8BzrsdnMfI17GnZzWzrzhSW9d58MWXwft2thBg58grn0bAbsWX-vSQRxWFYShGc-Cb_Bf2JQ-tF-lzyYAtIM6Q8eVriP8OswxWs5uF9O7ZP7w5346mSeGZ0IllpfGKiYYVJyKTHBJJbVWA6iKC4CMVcZoljPJQLFMgSJMWkFsqTnknPAxutj3roN_7yF2ReOigbrWLfg-FjTNicxSOdAco3RvNWF4PUBVrINrdNgWlBQ78MUAvvgOfoidHy70ZQP2K_RJejCovWHj6w5CfKv7DYRiBbruVv_v_geoy5HY</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Baldwin, Margaret</creator><creator>Watkin, Peter</creator><general>by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Predicting the Type of Hearing Loss Using Click Auditory Brainstem Response in Babies Referred From Newborn Hearing Screening</title><author>Baldwin, Margaret ; Watkin, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-d3bcd8262ef3165637171ddaee8f36ee52fcca29272e8258e8027d60dba3e9303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Conductive - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Conductive - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Signal Detection, Psychological</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkin, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ear and hearing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baldwin, Margaret</au><au>Watkin, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting the Type of Hearing Loss Using Click Auditory Brainstem Response in Babies Referred From Newborn Hearing Screening</atitle><jtitle>Ear and hearing</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Hear</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0196-0202</issn><eissn>1538-4667</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES:This study examined the ability of click auditory brainstem response (ABR) undertaken below the age of 6 months (from expected date of delivery) to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), using the latency of wave V measured 20 dB above threshold. DESIGN:Subjects were recruited if they had an ABR threshold of ≥ 40 dB nHL and ≤ 70 dB nHL in one or both ears measured below the age of 6 months and they had also attended follow-up appointments for behavioral assessment of their hearing in which the type of hearing loss had been confirmed. Forty-five children (84 ears) with SNHL, 82 children (141 ears) with temporary conductive hearing loss (TCHL), and 5 children (10 ears) with permanent conductive hearing loss (PCHL) were recruited. The differences between mean wave V latencies measured 20 dB above ABR threshold were examined using the independent t-test for the groups of cases with SNHL, TCHL, and PCHL. Signal-detection theory was used to examine the relationship between sensitivity and specificity when the latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was used to identify the presence of SNHL. Receiver operating characteristics were generated and the coordinates of the curve examined for the best compromise between sensitivity and false-alarm rate. The specificity, positive predictive value, and probability of missing a true case were determined for the most promising criteria. RESULTS:There were significant differences between the two groups with SNHL and TCHL. The mean latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold was 1 msec shorter in those with SNHL compared with those with TCHL. There were significant differences between children with PCHL and SNHL but no difference between those with PCHL and TCHL. When a criterion of &lt; 7.6 msec was chosen to predict the presence of SNHL the test sensitivity was 0.98, test specificity 0.71, and positive predictive value was 0.66. Nine out of 10 of those with a latency 20 dB above threshold of &lt; 7.0 msec had an SNHL. CONCLUSIONS:The latency of wave V 20 dB above threshold measured using click ABR is a useful indicator of the type of hearing loss in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>24105268</pmid><doi>10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829e0718</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0202
ispartof Ear and hearing, 2014-01, Vol.35 (1), p.1-9
issn 0196-0202
1538-4667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490754701
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Auditory Threshold
Case-Control Studies
Child
Child, Preschool
Cohort Studies
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology
Follow-Up Studies
Hearing Loss, Conductive - diagnosis
Hearing Loss, Conductive - physiopathology
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - diagnosis
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - physiopathology
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Neonatal Screening
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Signal Detection, Psychological
title Predicting the Type of Hearing Loss Using Click Auditory Brainstem Response in Babies Referred From Newborn Hearing Screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A50%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20the%20Type%20of%20Hearing%20Loss%20Using%20Click%20Auditory%20Brainstem%20Response%20in%20Babies%20Referred%20From%20Newborn%20Hearing%20Screening&rft.jtitle=Ear%20and%20hearing&rft.au=Baldwin,%20Margaret&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0196-0202&rft.eissn=1538-4667&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829e0718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1490754701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490754701&rft_id=info:pmid/24105268&rfr_iscdi=true