Matched survival data in a co-twin control design

When using the co-twin control design for analysis of event times, one needs a model to address the possible within-pair association. One such model is the shared frailty model in which the random frailty variable creates the desired within-pair association. Standard inference for this model require...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lifetime data analysis 2014, Vol.20 (1), p.38-50
Hauptverfasser: Gerster, Mette, Madsen, Mia, Andersen, Per Kragh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Lifetime data analysis
container_volume 20
creator Gerster, Mette
Madsen, Mia
Andersen, Per Kragh
description When using the co-twin control design for analysis of event times, one needs a model to address the possible within-pair association. One such model is the shared frailty model in which the random frailty variable creates the desired within-pair association. Standard inference for this model requires independence between the random effect and the covariates. We study how violations of this assumption affect inference for the regression coefficients and conclude that substantial bias may occur. We propose an alternative way of making inference for the regression parameters by using a fixed-effects models for survival in matched pairs. Fitting this model to data generated from the frailty model provides consistent and asymptotically normal estimates of regression coefficients, no matter whether the independence assumption is met.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10985-013-9256-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490728802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1490728802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-70ed411cd94362bde4b857b1448f219caea69fa9e5fa961fa13ebede36ff60a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMozjj6A9xIwY2baF7NYyniC0bc6Dqk6e3YodOOSTvivzdDRxHBzb033O-cGw5Cp5RcUkLUVaTE6BwTyrFhucRyD01prlh6CbOfZq4JVlqRCTqKcUmSxkhziCaMaymYNlNEn1zv36DM4hA29cY1Wel6l9Vt5jLf4f4jTb5r-9ClDcR60R6jg8o1EU52fYZe725fbh7w_Pn-8eZ6jj1XrMeKQCko9aURXLKiBFHoXBVUCF0xarwDJ03lDOSpSFo5yqGAErisKkkc4zN0MfquQ_c-QOztqo4emsa10A3RUmGIYlqTLXr-B112Q2jT7xKlcsKUMSRRdKR86GIMUNl1qFcufFpK7DZPO-ZpU552m6eVSXO2cx6KFZQ_iu8AE8BGIKZVu4Dw6_S_rl_2NX7U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1475027990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Matched survival data in a co-twin control design</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gerster, Mette ; Madsen, Mia ; Andersen, Per Kragh</creator><creatorcontrib>Gerster, Mette ; Madsen, Mia ; Andersen, Per Kragh</creatorcontrib><description>When using the co-twin control design for analysis of event times, one needs a model to address the possible within-pair association. One such model is the shared frailty model in which the random frailty variable creates the desired within-pair association. Standard inference for this model requires independence between the random effect and the covariates. We study how violations of this assumption affect inference for the regression coefficients and conclude that substantial bias may occur. We propose an alternative way of making inference for the regression parameters by using a fixed-effects models for survival in matched pairs. Fitting this model to data generated from the frailty model provides consistent and asymptotically normal estimates of regression coefficients, no matter whether the independence assumption is met.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-7870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10985-013-9256-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23864289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Bias ; Biostatistics ; Breast cancer ; Computer Simulation ; Data analysis ; Economics ; Education ; Finance ; Frailty ; Generalized linear models ; Health Sciences ; Humans ; Insurance ; Management ; Marginal analysis ; Mathematics and Statistics ; Medicine ; Models, Statistical ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Quality Control ; Reliability ; Research Design ; Safety and Risk ; Statistics ; Statistics for Business ; Statistics for Life Sciences ; Studies ; Survival analysis ; Twin Studies as Topic - methods ; Twins</subject><ispartof>Lifetime data analysis, 2014, Vol.20 (1), p.38-50</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-70ed411cd94362bde4b857b1448f219caea69fa9e5fa961fa13ebede36ff60a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-70ed411cd94362bde4b857b1448f219caea69fa9e5fa961fa13ebede36ff60a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10985-013-9256-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10985-013-9256-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23864289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gerster, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Mia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Per Kragh</creatorcontrib><title>Matched survival data in a co-twin control design</title><title>Lifetime data analysis</title><addtitle>Lifetime Data Anal</addtitle><addtitle>Lifetime Data Anal</addtitle><description>When using the co-twin control design for analysis of event times, one needs a model to address the possible within-pair association. One such model is the shared frailty model in which the random frailty variable creates the desired within-pair association. Standard inference for this model requires independence between the random effect and the covariates. We study how violations of this assumption affect inference for the regression coefficients and conclude that substantial bias may occur. We propose an alternative way of making inference for the regression parameters by using a fixed-effects models for survival in matched pairs. Fitting this model to data generated from the frailty model provides consistent and asymptotically normal estimates of regression coefficients, no matter whether the independence assumption is met.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biostatistics</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Health Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Marginal analysis</subject><subject>Mathematics and Statistics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Safety and Risk</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Statistics for Business</subject><subject>Statistics for Life Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Twin Studies as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Twins</subject><issn>1380-7870</issn><issn>1572-9249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMozjj6A9xIwY2baF7NYyniC0bc6Dqk6e3YodOOSTvivzdDRxHBzb033O-cGw5Cp5RcUkLUVaTE6BwTyrFhucRyD01prlh6CbOfZq4JVlqRCTqKcUmSxkhziCaMaymYNlNEn1zv36DM4hA29cY1Wel6l9Vt5jLf4f4jTb5r-9ClDcR60R6jg8o1EU52fYZe725fbh7w_Pn-8eZ6jj1XrMeKQCko9aURXLKiBFHoXBVUCF0xarwDJ03lDOSpSFo5yqGAErisKkkc4zN0MfquQ_c-QOztqo4emsa10A3RUmGIYlqTLXr-B112Q2jT7xKlcsKUMSRRdKR86GIMUNl1qFcufFpK7DZPO-ZpU552m6eVSXO2cx6KFZQ_iu8AE8BGIKZVu4Dw6_S_rl_2NX7U</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Gerster, Mette</creator><creator>Madsen, Mia</creator><creator>Andersen, Per Kragh</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Matched survival data in a co-twin control design</title><author>Gerster, Mette ; Madsen, Mia ; Andersen, Per Kragh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-70ed411cd94362bde4b857b1448f219caea69fa9e5fa961fa13ebede36ff60a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biostatistics</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Health Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Marginal analysis</topic><topic>Mathematics and Statistics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Safety and Risk</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Statistics for Business</topic><topic>Statistics for Life Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Twin Studies as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Twins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gerster, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Mia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Per Kragh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lifetime data analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gerster, Mette</au><au>Madsen, Mia</au><au>Andersen, Per Kragh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Matched survival data in a co-twin control design</atitle><jtitle>Lifetime data analysis</jtitle><stitle>Lifetime Data Anal</stitle><addtitle>Lifetime Data Anal</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>38-50</pages><issn>1380-7870</issn><eissn>1572-9249</eissn><abstract>When using the co-twin control design for analysis of event times, one needs a model to address the possible within-pair association. One such model is the shared frailty model in which the random frailty variable creates the desired within-pair association. Standard inference for this model requires independence between the random effect and the covariates. We study how violations of this assumption affect inference for the regression coefficients and conclude that substantial bias may occur. We propose an alternative way of making inference for the regression parameters by using a fixed-effects models for survival in matched pairs. Fitting this model to data generated from the frailty model provides consistent and asymptotically normal estimates of regression coefficients, no matter whether the independence assumption is met.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>23864289</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10985-013-9256-6</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1380-7870
ispartof Lifetime data analysis, 2014, Vol.20 (1), p.38-50
issn 1380-7870
1572-9249
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490728802
source MEDLINE; Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Bias
Biostatistics
Breast cancer
Computer Simulation
Data analysis
Economics
Education
Finance
Frailty
Generalized linear models
Health Sciences
Humans
Insurance
Management
Marginal analysis
Mathematics and Statistics
Medicine
Models, Statistical
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Quality Control
Reliability
Research Design
Safety and Risk
Statistics
Statistics for Business
Statistics for Life Sciences
Studies
Survival analysis
Twin Studies as Topic - methods
Twins
title Matched survival data in a co-twin control design
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A17%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Matched%20survival%20data%20in%20a%20co-twin%20control%20design&rft.jtitle=Lifetime%20data%20analysis&rft.au=Gerster,%20Mette&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=38-50&rft.issn=1380-7870&rft.eissn=1572-9249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10985-013-9256-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1490728802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1475027990&rft_id=info:pmid/23864289&rfr_iscdi=true