The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) for assessing stress of seafarers on board merchant ships
In their working activity, seafarers are exposed to high levels of stress that should be accuratelyinvestigated, measured, followed up and, if possible, countered. This is also required by regulations recently entered into force such as the Maritime Labour Convention 2006, recommending to consider s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International maritime health 2013-01, Vol.64 (4), p.215-220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 215 |
container_title | International maritime health |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Carotenuto, Anna Fasanaro, Angiola M Molino, Ivana Sibilio, Fabio Saturnino, Andrea Traini, Enea Amenta, Francesco |
description | In their working activity, seafarers are exposed to high levels of stress that should be accuratelyinvestigated, measured, followed up and, if possible, countered. This is also required by regulations recently entered into force such as the Maritime Labour Convention 2006, recommending to consider special physiological or psychological problems created by the shipboard environment. The choice of the tools for this evaluation is challenging, and a common basic standard usable in a large scale should be identified.
The aim of this study was to evaluate: 1) the suitability of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) questionnaire conducted on board for assessing stress in the sailing seafarers, 2) The presenceof stress in seafarers of different categories (deck officers, engine officers, deck crew, engine crew, chiefstewards/catering staff) monitored by the PGWBI.
162 male seafarers on board of 7 tankers belonging to the same shipping companywere evaluated through the PGWB questionnaire. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse thedifferences in the scores of the questionnaire.
Engine officers exhibited significantly higher anxiety levels than the deck or engine crew, andshowed lower satisfaction than the deck crew. Deck and engine officers revealed higher self-control levelsthan the engine crew. Chief stewards/catering staff showed lower vitality levels than the deck crew.
Deck or engine officers should achieve a greater self-control than the crew and this is documentedby the present study. Our findings support the view that management responsibility is more often associated with higher levels of stress. In our opinion, the PGWB questionnaire is a reasonable compromise forobtaining a global evaluation of psychological conditions, including stress of seafarers. It should be therefore considered as a large scale tool for assessing the well-being and eventual stress levels of sailing seafarers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5603/IMH.2013.0007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490723271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2464221630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-71e5a1604c8aa519f0fa5fd00c3a82a04a4c9a1a4428b05c941863ccd2d21d073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1LA0EMxQdRbFGPXmXASz1szXzs19EWbQuKHpQeh3R21q5sd-qkBfvfO8XqwdNLyI9HksfYpYBhmoG6nT1NhxKEGgJAfsT6EgqRKJnKY9YXmRZJKVPRYxdEH5EAXUqli1PWk1pHUqs-a1-Xjr_Qzi59698biy2fuM6FqHPXtsnINd07n3WV--KDl8l8NLvhtQ8ciRzRfkabECvua04OawwuxKbjC4-h4isX7BK7Dadls6ZzdlJjS-7ioGfs7eH-dTxNHp8ns_HdY2JVBpskFy5FkYG2BWIqyhpqTOsKwCosJIJGbUsUqLUsFpDaUosiU9ZWspKiglydscGP7zr4z62jjVk1ZOM52Dm_JSN0CblUMhcRvf6Hfvht6OJ2RupMSykyBZFKfigbPFFwtVmHZoVhZwSYfRImJmH2SZh9EpG_OrhuFytX_dG_f1fforaBew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464221630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) for assessing stress of seafarers on board merchant ships</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Carotenuto, Anna ; Fasanaro, Angiola M ; Molino, Ivana ; Sibilio, Fabio ; Saturnino, Andrea ; Traini, Enea ; Amenta, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Carotenuto, Anna ; Fasanaro, Angiola M ; Molino, Ivana ; Sibilio, Fabio ; Saturnino, Andrea ; Traini, Enea ; Amenta, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>In their working activity, seafarers are exposed to high levels of stress that should be accuratelyinvestigated, measured, followed up and, if possible, countered. This is also required by regulations recently entered into force such as the Maritime Labour Convention 2006, recommending to consider special physiological or psychological problems created by the shipboard environment. The choice of the tools for this evaluation is challenging, and a common basic standard usable in a large scale should be identified.
The aim of this study was to evaluate: 1) the suitability of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) questionnaire conducted on board for assessing stress in the sailing seafarers, 2) The presenceof stress in seafarers of different categories (deck officers, engine officers, deck crew, engine crew, chiefstewards/catering staff) monitored by the PGWBI.
162 male seafarers on board of 7 tankers belonging to the same shipping companywere evaluated through the PGWB questionnaire. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse thedifferences in the scores of the questionnaire.
Engine officers exhibited significantly higher anxiety levels than the deck or engine crew, andshowed lower satisfaction than the deck crew. Deck and engine officers revealed higher self-control levelsthan the engine crew. Chief stewards/catering staff showed lower vitality levels than the deck crew.
Deck or engine officers should achieve a greater self-control than the crew and this is documentedby the present study. Our findings support the view that management responsibility is more often associated with higher levels of stress. In our opinion, the PGWB questionnaire is a reasonable compromise forobtaining a global evaluation of psychological conditions, including stress of seafarers. It should be therefore considered as a large scale tool for assessing the well-being and eventual stress levels of sailing seafarers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1641-9251</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2081-3252</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5603/IMH.2013.0007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24408143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Wydawnictwo Via Medica</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety - diagnosis ; Commerce ; Depression - diagnosis ; Health Status ; Humans ; Male ; Mental Fatigue - diagnosis ; Mental Health ; Middle Aged ; Naval Medicine ; Occupational Diseases - diagnosis ; Questionnaires ; Ships ; Stress ; Stress, Psychological - diagnosis ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tanker ships ; Variance analysis ; Well being ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International maritime health, 2013-01, Vol.64 (4), p.215-220</ispartof><rights>2013. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-71e5a1604c8aa519f0fa5fd00c3a82a04a4c9a1a4428b05c941863ccd2d21d073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24408143$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carotenuto, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasanaro, Angiola M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molino, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibilio, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saturnino, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traini, Enea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amenta, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) for assessing stress of seafarers on board merchant ships</title><title>International maritime health</title><addtitle>Int Marit Health</addtitle><description>In their working activity, seafarers are exposed to high levels of stress that should be accuratelyinvestigated, measured, followed up and, if possible, countered. This is also required by regulations recently entered into force such as the Maritime Labour Convention 2006, recommending to consider special physiological or psychological problems created by the shipboard environment. The choice of the tools for this evaluation is challenging, and a common basic standard usable in a large scale should be identified.
The aim of this study was to evaluate: 1) the suitability of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) questionnaire conducted on board for assessing stress in the sailing seafarers, 2) The presenceof stress in seafarers of different categories (deck officers, engine officers, deck crew, engine crew, chiefstewards/catering staff) monitored by the PGWBI.
162 male seafarers on board of 7 tankers belonging to the same shipping companywere evaluated through the PGWB questionnaire. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse thedifferences in the scores of the questionnaire.
Engine officers exhibited significantly higher anxiety levels than the deck or engine crew, andshowed lower satisfaction than the deck crew. Deck and engine officers revealed higher self-control levelsthan the engine crew. Chief stewards/catering staff showed lower vitality levels than the deck crew.
Deck or engine officers should achieve a greater self-control than the crew and this is documentedby the present study. Our findings support the view that management responsibility is more often associated with higher levels of stress. In our opinion, the PGWB questionnaire is a reasonable compromise forobtaining a global evaluation of psychological conditions, including stress of seafarers. It should be therefore considered as a large scale tool for assessing the well-being and eventual stress levels of sailing seafarers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety - diagnosis</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Fatigue - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Naval Medicine</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Ships</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - diagnosis</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tanker ships</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1641-9251</issn><issn>2081-3252</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1LA0EMxQdRbFGPXmXASz1szXzs19EWbQuKHpQeh3R21q5sd-qkBfvfO8XqwdNLyI9HksfYpYBhmoG6nT1NhxKEGgJAfsT6EgqRKJnKY9YXmRZJKVPRYxdEH5EAXUqli1PWk1pHUqs-a1-Xjr_Qzi59698biy2fuM6FqHPXtsnINd07n3WV--KDl8l8NLvhtQ8ciRzRfkabECvua04OawwuxKbjC4-h4isX7BK7Dadls6ZzdlJjS-7ioGfs7eH-dTxNHp8ns_HdY2JVBpskFy5FkYG2BWIqyhpqTOsKwCosJIJGbUsUqLUsFpDaUosiU9ZWspKiglydscGP7zr4z62jjVk1ZOM52Dm_JSN0CblUMhcRvf6Hfvht6OJ2RupMSykyBZFKfigbPFFwtVmHZoVhZwSYfRImJmH2SZh9EpG_OrhuFytX_dG_f1fforaBew</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Carotenuto, Anna</creator><creator>Fasanaro, Angiola M</creator><creator>Molino, Ivana</creator><creator>Sibilio, Fabio</creator><creator>Saturnino, Andrea</creator><creator>Traini, Enea</creator><creator>Amenta, Francesco</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) for assessing stress of seafarers on board merchant ships</title><author>Carotenuto, Anna ; Fasanaro, Angiola M ; Molino, Ivana ; Sibilio, Fabio ; Saturnino, Andrea ; Traini, Enea ; Amenta, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-71e5a1604c8aa519f0fa5fd00c3a82a04a4c9a1a4428b05c941863ccd2d21d073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety - diagnosis</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Fatigue - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Naval Medicine</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Ships</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - diagnosis</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tanker ships</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carotenuto, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasanaro, Angiola M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molino, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibilio, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saturnino, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traini, Enea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amenta, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International maritime health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carotenuto, Anna</au><au>Fasanaro, Angiola M</au><au>Molino, Ivana</au><au>Sibilio, Fabio</au><au>Saturnino, Andrea</au><au>Traini, Enea</au><au>Amenta, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) for assessing stress of seafarers on board merchant ships</atitle><jtitle>International maritime health</jtitle><addtitle>Int Marit Health</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>215-220</pages><issn>1641-9251</issn><eissn>2081-3252</eissn><abstract>In their working activity, seafarers are exposed to high levels of stress that should be accuratelyinvestigated, measured, followed up and, if possible, countered. This is also required by regulations recently entered into force such as the Maritime Labour Convention 2006, recommending to consider special physiological or psychological problems created by the shipboard environment. The choice of the tools for this evaluation is challenging, and a common basic standard usable in a large scale should be identified.
The aim of this study was to evaluate: 1) the suitability of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) questionnaire conducted on board for assessing stress in the sailing seafarers, 2) The presenceof stress in seafarers of different categories (deck officers, engine officers, deck crew, engine crew, chiefstewards/catering staff) monitored by the PGWBI.
162 male seafarers on board of 7 tankers belonging to the same shipping companywere evaluated through the PGWB questionnaire. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse thedifferences in the scores of the questionnaire.
Engine officers exhibited significantly higher anxiety levels than the deck or engine crew, andshowed lower satisfaction than the deck crew. Deck and engine officers revealed higher self-control levelsthan the engine crew. Chief stewards/catering staff showed lower vitality levels than the deck crew.
Deck or engine officers should achieve a greater self-control than the crew and this is documentedby the present study. Our findings support the view that management responsibility is more often associated with higher levels of stress. In our opinion, the PGWB questionnaire is a reasonable compromise forobtaining a global evaluation of psychological conditions, including stress of seafarers. It should be therefore considered as a large scale tool for assessing the well-being and eventual stress levels of sailing seafarers.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</pub><pmid>24408143</pmid><doi>10.5603/IMH.2013.0007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1641-9251 |
ispartof | International maritime health, 2013-01, Vol.64 (4), p.215-220 |
issn | 1641-9251 2081-3252 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490723271 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Anxiety - diagnosis Commerce Depression - diagnosis Health Status Humans Male Mental Fatigue - diagnosis Mental Health Middle Aged Naval Medicine Occupational Diseases - diagnosis Questionnaires Ships Stress Stress, Psychological - diagnosis Surveys and Questionnaires Tanker ships Variance analysis Well being Young Adult |
title | The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) for assessing stress of seafarers on board merchant ships |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T03%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Psychological%20General%20Well-Being%20Index%20(PGWBI)%20for%20assessing%20stress%20of%20seafarers%20on%20board%20merchant%20ships&rft.jtitle=International%20maritime%20health&rft.au=Carotenuto,%20Anna&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=215-220&rft.issn=1641-9251&rft.eissn=2081-3252&rft_id=info:doi/10.5603/IMH.2013.0007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2464221630%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464221630&rft_id=info:pmid/24408143&rfr_iscdi=true |