Increased Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation After Effects During Concurrent Peripheral Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Abstract In this study we tested the hypothesis whether a lasting change in the excitability of cortical output circuits can be obtained in healthy humans by combining a peripheral nerve stimulation during a concomitant depolarization and/or hyperpolarization of motor cortex. To reach this aim we co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain stimulation 2014, Vol.7 (1), p.113-121
Hauptverfasser: Rizzo, Vincenzo, Terranova, Carmen, Crupi, Domenica, Sant'angelo, Antonino, Girlanda, Paolo, Quartarone, Angelo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 1
container_start_page 113
container_title Brain stimulation
container_volume 7
creator Rizzo, Vincenzo
Terranova, Carmen
Crupi, Domenica
Sant'angelo, Antonino
Girlanda, Paolo
Quartarone, Angelo
description Abstract In this study we tested the hypothesis whether a lasting change in the excitability of cortical output circuits can be obtained in healthy humans by combining a peripheral nerve stimulation during a concomitant depolarization and/or hyperpolarization of motor cortex. To reach this aim we combined two different neurophysiological techniques each of them able to induce a lasting increase of cortical excitability by them self: namely median nerve repetitive electrical stimulation (rEPNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Ten normal young volunteers were enrolled in the present study. All subjects underwent five different protocols of stimulation: (1, 2) tDCS alone (anodal or cathodal); (3) Sham tDCS plus rEPNS; (4, 5) anodal or cathodal tDCS plus rEPNS. The baseline MEP amplitude from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle, the FCR H-reflex were compared with that obtained immediately after and 10, 20, 30, 60 min after the stimulation protocol. Anodal tDCS alone induced a significant transient increase of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while anodal tDCS + rEPNS determined MEP changes which persisted for up 60 min. Cathodal tDCS alone induced a significant reduction of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while cathodal tDCS + rEPNS prolonged the effects for up to 60 min. Sham tDCS + rEPNS did not induce significant changes in corticospinal excitability. Anodal or cathodal tDCS + rEPNS and sham tDCS + rEPNS caused a lasting facilitation of H-reflex. These findings suggest that by providing afferent input to the motor cortex while its excitability level is increased or decreased by tDCS may be a highly effective means for inducing an enduring bi-directional plasticity. The mechanism of this protocol may be complex, involving either cortical and spinal after effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490709224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1935861X13002970</els_id><sourcerecordid>1490709224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-eb715646b740f62a00d576423f867564aa72e33a5efa6d124d60887b496437163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EomXhA3BBOXLJ4n-xHSEhVdulrVTRSi0SN8txJuAl6yzjpNJ-exx2qSoOXDzj8XtP8m8IecvoklGmPmyWDaYlp0zk-5JS_oycMqNVKXUln-e-FlVpFPt2Ql6ltKG0qmujX5ITLoUx3IhTsr-KHsElaIt7dDH5fATXF-cBwY_FakKEOBZ3Y9hOvRvDEIuzbgQs1l2XBak4nzDE78VqiP6ovQUMux-AOWXdZw0Gn9svgA_wNOc1edG5PsGbY12Qr5_X96vL8vrm4mp1dl16qeVYQqNZpaRqtKSd4o7SttJKctEZpfODc5qDEK6CzqmWcdkqaoxuZK2k0EyJBXl_yN3h8GuCNNptSB763kUYpmSZrKmmNc9MFoQdpB6HlBA6u8Owdbi3jNqZuN3YTNzOxOdRJp49747xU7OF9tHxF3EWfDwIIH_yIQDa5ANED-0fxLYdwn_jP_3j9n2IM9GfsIe0GSaMmZ5lNnFL7d288nnjTGR3ran4Da9npww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490709224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation After Effects During Concurrent Peripheral Electrical Nerve Stimulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rizzo, Vincenzo ; Terranova, Carmen ; Crupi, Domenica ; Sant'angelo, Antonino ; Girlanda, Paolo ; Quartarone, Angelo</creator><creatorcontrib>Rizzo, Vincenzo ; Terranova, Carmen ; Crupi, Domenica ; Sant'angelo, Antonino ; Girlanda, Paolo ; Quartarone, Angelo</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract In this study we tested the hypothesis whether a lasting change in the excitability of cortical output circuits can be obtained in healthy humans by combining a peripheral nerve stimulation during a concomitant depolarization and/or hyperpolarization of motor cortex. To reach this aim we combined two different neurophysiological techniques each of them able to induce a lasting increase of cortical excitability by them self: namely median nerve repetitive electrical stimulation (rEPNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Ten normal young volunteers were enrolled in the present study. All subjects underwent five different protocols of stimulation: (1, 2) tDCS alone (anodal or cathodal); (3) Sham tDCS plus rEPNS; (4, 5) anodal or cathodal tDCS plus rEPNS. The baseline MEP amplitude from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle, the FCR H-reflex were compared with that obtained immediately after and 10, 20, 30, 60 min after the stimulation protocol. Anodal tDCS alone induced a significant transient increase of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while anodal tDCS + rEPNS determined MEP changes which persisted for up 60 min. Cathodal tDCS alone induced a significant reduction of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while cathodal tDCS + rEPNS prolonged the effects for up to 60 min. Sham tDCS + rEPNS did not induce significant changes in corticospinal excitability. Anodal or cathodal tDCS + rEPNS and sham tDCS + rEPNS caused a lasting facilitation of H-reflex. These findings suggest that by providing afferent input to the motor cortex while its excitability level is increased or decreased by tDCS may be a highly effective means for inducing an enduring bi-directional plasticity. The mechanism of this protocol may be complex, involving either cortical and spinal after effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-861X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-4754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24388283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electrodes ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Female ; H-Reflex - physiology ; Humans ; Long-Term Potentiation - physiology ; Male ; Median Nerve - physiology ; Motor cortex ; Neurology ; Peripheral electrical current stimulation ; Plasticity ; Transcranial direct current stimulation ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><ispartof>Brain stimulation, 2014, Vol.7 (1), p.113-121</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-eb715646b740f62a00d576423f867564aa72e33a5efa6d124d60887b496437163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-eb715646b740f62a00d576423f867564aa72e33a5efa6d124d60887b496437163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24388283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rizzo, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terranova, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crupi, Domenica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sant'angelo, Antonino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girlanda, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quartarone, Angelo</creatorcontrib><title>Increased Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation After Effects During Concurrent Peripheral Electrical Nerve Stimulation</title><title>Brain stimulation</title><addtitle>Brain Stimul</addtitle><description>Abstract In this study we tested the hypothesis whether a lasting change in the excitability of cortical output circuits can be obtained in healthy humans by combining a peripheral nerve stimulation during a concomitant depolarization and/or hyperpolarization of motor cortex. To reach this aim we combined two different neurophysiological techniques each of them able to induce a lasting increase of cortical excitability by them self: namely median nerve repetitive electrical stimulation (rEPNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Ten normal young volunteers were enrolled in the present study. All subjects underwent five different protocols of stimulation: (1, 2) tDCS alone (anodal or cathodal); (3) Sham tDCS plus rEPNS; (4, 5) anodal or cathodal tDCS plus rEPNS. The baseline MEP amplitude from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle, the FCR H-reflex were compared with that obtained immediately after and 10, 20, 30, 60 min after the stimulation protocol. Anodal tDCS alone induced a significant transient increase of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while anodal tDCS + rEPNS determined MEP changes which persisted for up 60 min. Cathodal tDCS alone induced a significant reduction of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while cathodal tDCS + rEPNS prolonged the effects for up to 60 min. Sham tDCS + rEPNS did not induce significant changes in corticospinal excitability. Anodal or cathodal tDCS + rEPNS and sham tDCS + rEPNS caused a lasting facilitation of H-reflex. These findings suggest that by providing afferent input to the motor cortex while its excitability level is increased or decreased by tDCS may be a highly effective means for inducing an enduring bi-directional plasticity. The mechanism of this protocol may be complex, involving either cortical and spinal after effects.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>H-Reflex - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long-Term Potentiation - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Median Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Motor cortex</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Peripheral electrical current stimulation</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Transcranial direct current stimulation</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><issn>1935-861X</issn><issn>1876-4754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EomXhA3BBOXLJ4n-xHSEhVdulrVTRSi0SN8txJuAl6yzjpNJ-exx2qSoOXDzj8XtP8m8IecvoklGmPmyWDaYlp0zk-5JS_oycMqNVKXUln-e-FlVpFPt2Ql6ltKG0qmujX5ITLoUx3IhTsr-KHsElaIt7dDH5fATXF-cBwY_FakKEOBZ3Y9hOvRvDEIuzbgQs1l2XBak4nzDE78VqiP6ovQUMux-AOWXdZw0Gn9svgA_wNOc1edG5PsGbY12Qr5_X96vL8vrm4mp1dl16qeVYQqNZpaRqtKSd4o7SttJKctEZpfODc5qDEK6CzqmWcdkqaoxuZK2k0EyJBXl_yN3h8GuCNNptSB763kUYpmSZrKmmNc9MFoQdpB6HlBA6u8Owdbi3jNqZuN3YTNzOxOdRJp49747xU7OF9tHxF3EWfDwIIH_yIQDa5ANED-0fxLYdwn_jP_3j9n2IM9GfsIe0GSaMmZ5lNnFL7d288nnjTGR3ran4Da9npww</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Rizzo, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Terranova, Carmen</creator><creator>Crupi, Domenica</creator><creator>Sant'angelo, Antonino</creator><creator>Girlanda, Paolo</creator><creator>Quartarone, Angelo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Increased Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation After Effects During Concurrent Peripheral Electrical Nerve Stimulation</title><author>Rizzo, Vincenzo ; Terranova, Carmen ; Crupi, Domenica ; Sant'angelo, Antonino ; Girlanda, Paolo ; Quartarone, Angelo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-eb715646b740f62a00d576423f867564aa72e33a5efa6d124d60887b496437163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>H-Reflex - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long-Term Potentiation - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Median Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Motor cortex</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Peripheral electrical current stimulation</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Transcranial direct current stimulation</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rizzo, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terranova, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crupi, Domenica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sant'angelo, Antonino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girlanda, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quartarone, Angelo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain stimulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rizzo, Vincenzo</au><au>Terranova, Carmen</au><au>Crupi, Domenica</au><au>Sant'angelo, Antonino</au><au>Girlanda, Paolo</au><au>Quartarone, Angelo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation After Effects During Concurrent Peripheral Electrical Nerve Stimulation</atitle><jtitle>Brain stimulation</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Stimul</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>113-121</pages><issn>1935-861X</issn><eissn>1876-4754</eissn><abstract>Abstract In this study we tested the hypothesis whether a lasting change in the excitability of cortical output circuits can be obtained in healthy humans by combining a peripheral nerve stimulation during a concomitant depolarization and/or hyperpolarization of motor cortex. To reach this aim we combined two different neurophysiological techniques each of them able to induce a lasting increase of cortical excitability by them self: namely median nerve repetitive electrical stimulation (rEPNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Ten normal young volunteers were enrolled in the present study. All subjects underwent five different protocols of stimulation: (1, 2) tDCS alone (anodal or cathodal); (3) Sham tDCS plus rEPNS; (4, 5) anodal or cathodal tDCS plus rEPNS. The baseline MEP amplitude from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle, the FCR H-reflex were compared with that obtained immediately after and 10, 20, 30, 60 min after the stimulation protocol. Anodal tDCS alone induced a significant transient increase of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while anodal tDCS + rEPNS determined MEP changes which persisted for up 60 min. Cathodal tDCS alone induced a significant reduction of MEP amplitude immediately after the end of stimulation while cathodal tDCS + rEPNS prolonged the effects for up to 60 min. Sham tDCS + rEPNS did not induce significant changes in corticospinal excitability. Anodal or cathodal tDCS + rEPNS and sham tDCS + rEPNS caused a lasting facilitation of H-reflex. These findings suggest that by providing afferent input to the motor cortex while its excitability level is increased or decreased by tDCS may be a highly effective means for inducing an enduring bi-directional plasticity. The mechanism of this protocol may be complex, involving either cortical and spinal after effects.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24388283</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-861X
ispartof Brain stimulation, 2014, Vol.7 (1), p.113-121
issn 1935-861X
1876-4754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490709224
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Brain - physiology
Electric Stimulation - methods
Electrodes
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Female
H-Reflex - physiology
Humans
Long-Term Potentiation - physiology
Male
Median Nerve - physiology
Motor cortex
Neurology
Peripheral electrical current stimulation
Plasticity
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
title Increased Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation After Effects During Concurrent Peripheral Electrical Nerve Stimulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A43%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20Transcranial%20Direct%20Current%20Stimulation%20After%20Effects%20During%20Concurrent%20Peripheral%20Electrical%20Nerve%20Stimulation&rft.jtitle=Brain%20stimulation&rft.au=Rizzo,%20Vincenzo&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=113-121&rft.issn=1935-861X&rft.eissn=1876-4754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1490709224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490709224&rft_id=info:pmid/24388283&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1935861X13002970&rfr_iscdi=true