Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation

Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin gra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Burns 2014-02, Vol.40 (1), p.106-112
Hauptverfasser: Desai, Chiragkumar, Wood, Fiona M, Schug, Stephan A, Parsons, Richard W, Fridlender, Charles, Sunderland, Vivian Bruce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 112
container_issue 1
container_start_page 106
container_title Burns
container_volume 40
creator Desai, Chiragkumar
Wood, Fiona M
Schug, Stephan A
Parsons, Richard W
Fridlender, Charles
Sunderland, Vivian Bruce
description Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin graft donor sites. Methods A double-blind randomised controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 29 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft surgery. Subjects were randomised to either a 3% lidocaine emulsion formulation “Treatment E” (NOPAYNE™) or a 4% aqueous solution “Treatment A” (Xylocaine™). Subjects received one spray per 3 cm2 of donor site area followed by up to two further spays as required. Endpoints included pain intensity measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) up to 1 h after dressing change commencement, sting sensation, overall satisfaction and lidocaine plasma concentration. Results The 60 min pain scores for E and A were 1.3 ± 0.3 (mean ± SEM) and 1.8 ± 0.4 ( p = 0.98) respectively. Nearly 90% of patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The mean plasma concentrations of lidocaine for A and E were 0.132 mg/l and 0.040 mg/l respectively ( p = 0.069). Conclusion The topical local anaesthetic formulations achieved low pain scores during dressing changes. The safety profile was potentially improved with the emulsion formulation of lidocaine.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490709216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0305417913001605</els_id><sourcerecordid>1490709216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3dfd7e53b3bddff3cc6d23dc26c364cbd6a99581f002df9dc4e3243de87824143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIbgu_AAn5yCXBjvOJBFJVlYJUiQNwthx73PXi2MFOivan8e8Ys4UDF3zwWKP33sz4TVG8YLRilHWvD9W0RZ-qmjJe0bbC8KjYsaEfS9bQ8XGxo5y2ZcP68aw4T-lA8bQDfVqc1XxgtO7Zrvh5bQyo1d6Dh5RIMESSNSxWSUdcyLf0EtK6h9UqkpYoj0SmnHR3kKwkJkSiI3KtvyNqLz2m35BLosM2OSgnZ70GTaL0Osw24XOxLqxkjRbFVZgXGTNVegLz5pINnvyw6z4n5PcNwpaIsxpbsR5yNQTJFVHPiidGugTPH-JF8fX99ZerD-Xtp5uPV5e3pWoaupZcG91Dyyc-aW0MV6rTNdeq7hTvGjXpTo5jOzBDaa3NqFUDvG64hqEf6oY1_KJ4ddJdYsB-0ipwDAXOSZ-bE6wZaU_HmnUI5SeoiiGlCEYs0c4yHgWjInsmDuK3ZyJ7JmgrMCDr5UOBbZpB_-X8MQkBb08AwDHvLUSRlAWvQNuI3gkd7H8KvPuHr9CVbPE3OEI6BGTgDwomUi2o-JzXJm8N4xQlact_AZFkw0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490709216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Desai, Chiragkumar ; Wood, Fiona M ; Schug, Stephan A ; Parsons, Richard W ; Fridlender, Charles ; Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Desai, Chiragkumar ; Wood, Fiona M ; Schug, Stephan A ; Parsons, Richard W ; Fridlender, Charles ; Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin graft donor sites. Methods A double-blind randomised controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 29 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft surgery. Subjects were randomised to either a 3% lidocaine emulsion formulation “Treatment E” (NOPAYNE™) or a 4% aqueous solution “Treatment A” (Xylocaine™). Subjects received one spray per 3 cm2 of donor site area followed by up to two further spays as required. Endpoints included pain intensity measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) up to 1 h after dressing change commencement, sting sensation, overall satisfaction and lidocaine plasma concentration. Results The 60 min pain scores for E and A were 1.3 ± 0.3 (mean ± SEM) and 1.8 ± 0.4 ( p = 0.98) respectively. Nearly 90% of patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The mean plasma concentrations of lidocaine for A and E were 0.132 mg/l and 0.040 mg/l respectively ( p = 0.069). Conclusion The topical local anaesthetic formulations achieved low pain scores during dressing changes. The safety profile was potentially improved with the emulsion formulation of lidocaine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23810271</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Cutaneous ; Adult ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Bandages ; Burn pain ; Burns ; Burns - surgery ; Critical Care ; Donor site dressing change ; Double-Blind Method ; Emulsion ; Emulsions - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Lidocaine ; Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage ; Lidocaine spray ; Local anaesthetic formulation ; Male ; Pain - drug therapy ; Pain Measurement ; Partial thickness skin graft ; Pilot Projects ; Skin graft wound ; Skin Transplantation - methods ; Solutions - therapeutic use ; Transplant Donor Site ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Burns, 2014-02, Vol.40 (1), p.106-112</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3dfd7e53b3bddff3cc6d23dc26c364cbd6a99581f002df9dc4e3243de87824143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3dfd7e53b3bddff3cc6d23dc26c364cbd6a99581f002df9dc4e3243de87824143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417913001605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23810271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Desai, Chiragkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Fiona M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schug, Stephan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridlender, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin graft donor sites. Methods A double-blind randomised controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 29 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft surgery. Subjects were randomised to either a 3% lidocaine emulsion formulation “Treatment E” (NOPAYNE™) or a 4% aqueous solution “Treatment A” (Xylocaine™). Subjects received one spray per 3 cm2 of donor site area followed by up to two further spays as required. Endpoints included pain intensity measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) up to 1 h after dressing change commencement, sting sensation, overall satisfaction and lidocaine plasma concentration. Results The 60 min pain scores for E and A were 1.3 ± 0.3 (mean ± SEM) and 1.8 ± 0.4 ( p = 0.98) respectively. Nearly 90% of patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The mean plasma concentrations of lidocaine for A and E were 0.132 mg/l and 0.040 mg/l respectively ( p = 0.069). Conclusion The topical local anaesthetic formulations achieved low pain scores during dressing changes. The safety profile was potentially improved with the emulsion formulation of lidocaine.</description><subject>Administration, Cutaneous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>Burn pain</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - surgery</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Donor site dressing change</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Emulsion</subject><subject>Emulsions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lidocaine</subject><subject>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Lidocaine spray</subject><subject>Local anaesthetic formulation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Partial thickness skin graft</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Skin graft wound</subject><subject>Skin Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Transplant Donor Site</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIbgu_AAn5yCXBjvOJBFJVlYJUiQNwthx73PXi2MFOivan8e8Ys4UDF3zwWKP33sz4TVG8YLRilHWvD9W0RZ-qmjJe0bbC8KjYsaEfS9bQ8XGxo5y2ZcP68aw4T-lA8bQDfVqc1XxgtO7Zrvh5bQyo1d6Dh5RIMESSNSxWSUdcyLf0EtK6h9UqkpYoj0SmnHR3kKwkJkSiI3KtvyNqLz2m35BLosM2OSgnZ70GTaL0Osw24XOxLqxkjRbFVZgXGTNVegLz5pINnvyw6z4n5PcNwpaIsxpbsR5yNQTJFVHPiidGugTPH-JF8fX99ZerD-Xtp5uPV5e3pWoaupZcG91Dyyc-aW0MV6rTNdeq7hTvGjXpTo5jOzBDaa3NqFUDvG64hqEf6oY1_KJ4ddJdYsB-0ipwDAXOSZ-bE6wZaU_HmnUI5SeoiiGlCEYs0c4yHgWjInsmDuK3ZyJ7JmgrMCDr5UOBbZpB_-X8MQkBb08AwDHvLUSRlAWvQNuI3gkd7H8KvPuHr9CVbPE3OEI6BGTgDwomUi2o-JzXJm8N4xQlact_AZFkw0I</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Desai, Chiragkumar</creator><creator>Wood, Fiona M</creator><creator>Schug, Stephan A</creator><creator>Parsons, Richard W</creator><creator>Fridlender, Charles</creator><creator>Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation</title><author>Desai, Chiragkumar ; Wood, Fiona M ; Schug, Stephan A ; Parsons, Richard W ; Fridlender, Charles ; Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3dfd7e53b3bddff3cc6d23dc26c364cbd6a99581f002df9dc4e3243de87824143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Administration, Cutaneous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>Burn pain</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - surgery</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Donor site dressing change</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Emulsion</topic><topic>Emulsions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lidocaine</topic><topic>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Lidocaine spray</topic><topic>Local anaesthetic formulation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Partial thickness skin graft</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Skin graft wound</topic><topic>Skin Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Transplant Donor Site</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Desai, Chiragkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Fiona M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schug, Stephan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridlender, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Desai, Chiragkumar</au><au>Wood, Fiona M</au><au>Schug, Stephan A</au><au>Parsons, Richard W</au><au>Fridlender, Charles</au><au>Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>106-112</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin graft donor sites. Methods A double-blind randomised controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 29 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft surgery. Subjects were randomised to either a 3% lidocaine emulsion formulation “Treatment E” (NOPAYNE™) or a 4% aqueous solution “Treatment A” (Xylocaine™). Subjects received one spray per 3 cm2 of donor site area followed by up to two further spays as required. Endpoints included pain intensity measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) up to 1 h after dressing change commencement, sting sensation, overall satisfaction and lidocaine plasma concentration. Results The 60 min pain scores for E and A were 1.3 ± 0.3 (mean ± SEM) and 1.8 ± 0.4 ( p = 0.98) respectively. Nearly 90% of patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The mean plasma concentrations of lidocaine for A and E were 0.132 mg/l and 0.040 mg/l respectively ( p = 0.069). Conclusion The topical local anaesthetic formulations achieved low pain scores during dressing changes. The safety profile was potentially improved with the emulsion formulation of lidocaine.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23810271</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.013</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-4179
ispartof Burns, 2014-02, Vol.40 (1), p.106-112
issn 0305-4179
1879-1409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490709216
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Administration, Cutaneous
Adult
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Bandages
Burn pain
Burns
Burns - surgery
Critical Care
Donor site dressing change
Double-Blind Method
Emulsion
Emulsions - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Lidocaine
Lidocaine - administration & dosage
Lidocaine spray
Local anaesthetic formulation
Male
Pain - drug therapy
Pain Measurement
Partial thickness skin graft
Pilot Projects
Skin graft wound
Skin Transplantation - methods
Solutions - therapeutic use
Transplant Donor Site
Treatment Outcome
title Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A18%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20a%20topical%20local%20anaesthetic%20spray%20as%20analgesia%20for%20dressing%20changes:%20A%20double-blinded%20randomised%20pilot%20trial%20comparing%20an%20emulsion%20with%20an%20aqueous%20lidocaine%20formulation&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Desai,%20Chiragkumar&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=106-112&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1490709216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490709216&rft_id=info:pmid/23810271&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0305417913001605&rfr_iscdi=true