Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation
Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin gra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 2014-02, Vol.40 (1), p.106-112 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 112 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 106 |
container_title | Burns |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Desai, Chiragkumar Wood, Fiona M Schug, Stephan A Parsons, Richard W Fridlender, Charles Sunderland, Vivian Bruce |
description | Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin graft donor sites. Methods A double-blind randomised controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 29 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft surgery. Subjects were randomised to either a 3% lidocaine emulsion formulation “Treatment E” (NOPAYNE™) or a 4% aqueous solution “Treatment A” (Xylocaine™). Subjects received one spray per 3 cm2 of donor site area followed by up to two further spays as required. Endpoints included pain intensity measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) up to 1 h after dressing change commencement, sting sensation, overall satisfaction and lidocaine plasma concentration. Results The 60 min pain scores for E and A were 1.3 ± 0.3 (mean ± SEM) and 1.8 ± 0.4 ( p = 0.98) respectively. Nearly 90% of patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The mean plasma concentrations of lidocaine for A and E were 0.132 mg/l and 0.040 mg/l respectively ( p = 0.069). Conclusion The topical local anaesthetic formulations achieved low pain scores during dressing changes. The safety profile was potentially improved with the emulsion formulation of lidocaine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490709216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0305417913001605</els_id><sourcerecordid>1490709216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3dfd7e53b3bddff3cc6d23dc26c364cbd6a99581f002df9dc4e3243de87824143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIbgu_AAn5yCXBjvOJBFJVlYJUiQNwthx73PXi2MFOivan8e8Ys4UDF3zwWKP33sz4TVG8YLRilHWvD9W0RZ-qmjJe0bbC8KjYsaEfS9bQ8XGxo5y2ZcP68aw4T-lA8bQDfVqc1XxgtO7Zrvh5bQyo1d6Dh5RIMESSNSxWSUdcyLf0EtK6h9UqkpYoj0SmnHR3kKwkJkSiI3KtvyNqLz2m35BLosM2OSgnZ70GTaL0Osw24XOxLqxkjRbFVZgXGTNVegLz5pINnvyw6z4n5PcNwpaIsxpbsR5yNQTJFVHPiidGugTPH-JF8fX99ZerD-Xtp5uPV5e3pWoaupZcG91Dyyc-aW0MV6rTNdeq7hTvGjXpTo5jOzBDaa3NqFUDvG64hqEf6oY1_KJ4ddJdYsB-0ipwDAXOSZ-bE6wZaU_HmnUI5SeoiiGlCEYs0c4yHgWjInsmDuK3ZyJ7JmgrMCDr5UOBbZpB_-X8MQkBb08AwDHvLUSRlAWvQNuI3gkd7H8KvPuHr9CVbPE3OEI6BGTgDwomUi2o-JzXJm8N4xQlact_AZFkw0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490709216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Desai, Chiragkumar ; Wood, Fiona M ; Schug, Stephan A ; Parsons, Richard W ; Fridlender, Charles ; Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Desai, Chiragkumar ; Wood, Fiona M ; Schug, Stephan A ; Parsons, Richard W ; Fridlender, Charles ; Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin graft donor sites. Methods A double-blind randomised controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 29 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft surgery. Subjects were randomised to either a 3% lidocaine emulsion formulation “Treatment E” (NOPAYNE™) or a 4% aqueous solution “Treatment A” (Xylocaine™). Subjects received one spray per 3 cm2 of donor site area followed by up to two further spays as required. Endpoints included pain intensity measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) up to 1 h after dressing change commencement, sting sensation, overall satisfaction and lidocaine plasma concentration. Results The 60 min pain scores for E and A were 1.3 ± 0.3 (mean ± SEM) and 1.8 ± 0.4 ( p = 0.98) respectively. Nearly 90% of patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The mean plasma concentrations of lidocaine for A and E were 0.132 mg/l and 0.040 mg/l respectively ( p = 0.069). Conclusion The topical local anaesthetic formulations achieved low pain scores during dressing changes. The safety profile was potentially improved with the emulsion formulation of lidocaine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23810271</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Cutaneous ; Adult ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Bandages ; Burn pain ; Burns ; Burns - surgery ; Critical Care ; Donor site dressing change ; Double-Blind Method ; Emulsion ; Emulsions - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Lidocaine ; Lidocaine - administration & dosage ; Lidocaine spray ; Local anaesthetic formulation ; Male ; Pain - drug therapy ; Pain Measurement ; Partial thickness skin graft ; Pilot Projects ; Skin graft wound ; Skin Transplantation - methods ; Solutions - therapeutic use ; Transplant Donor Site ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Burns, 2014-02, Vol.40 (1), p.106-112</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3dfd7e53b3bddff3cc6d23dc26c364cbd6a99581f002df9dc4e3243de87824143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3dfd7e53b3bddff3cc6d23dc26c364cbd6a99581f002df9dc4e3243de87824143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417913001605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23810271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Desai, Chiragkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Fiona M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schug, Stephan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridlender, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin graft donor sites. Methods A double-blind randomised controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 29 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft surgery. Subjects were randomised to either a 3% lidocaine emulsion formulation “Treatment E” (NOPAYNE™) or a 4% aqueous solution “Treatment A” (Xylocaine™). Subjects received one spray per 3 cm2 of donor site area followed by up to two further spays as required. Endpoints included pain intensity measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) up to 1 h after dressing change commencement, sting sensation, overall satisfaction and lidocaine plasma concentration. Results The 60 min pain scores for E and A were 1.3 ± 0.3 (mean ± SEM) and 1.8 ± 0.4 ( p = 0.98) respectively. Nearly 90% of patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The mean plasma concentrations of lidocaine for A and E were 0.132 mg/l and 0.040 mg/l respectively ( p = 0.069). Conclusion The topical local anaesthetic formulations achieved low pain scores during dressing changes. The safety profile was potentially improved with the emulsion formulation of lidocaine.</description><subject>Administration, Cutaneous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>Burn pain</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - surgery</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Donor site dressing change</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Emulsion</subject><subject>Emulsions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lidocaine</subject><subject>Lidocaine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Lidocaine spray</subject><subject>Local anaesthetic formulation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Partial thickness skin graft</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Skin graft wound</subject><subject>Skin Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Transplant Donor Site</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIbgu_AAn5yCXBjvOJBFJVlYJUiQNwthx73PXi2MFOivan8e8Ys4UDF3zwWKP33sz4TVG8YLRilHWvD9W0RZ-qmjJe0bbC8KjYsaEfS9bQ8XGxo5y2ZcP68aw4T-lA8bQDfVqc1XxgtO7Zrvh5bQyo1d6Dh5RIMESSNSxWSUdcyLf0EtK6h9UqkpYoj0SmnHR3kKwkJkSiI3KtvyNqLz2m35BLosM2OSgnZ70GTaL0Osw24XOxLqxkjRbFVZgXGTNVegLz5pINnvyw6z4n5PcNwpaIsxpbsR5yNQTJFVHPiidGugTPH-JF8fX99ZerD-Xtp5uPV5e3pWoaupZcG91Dyyc-aW0MV6rTNdeq7hTvGjXpTo5jOzBDaa3NqFUDvG64hqEf6oY1_KJ4ddJdYsB-0ipwDAXOSZ-bE6wZaU_HmnUI5SeoiiGlCEYs0c4yHgWjInsmDuK3ZyJ7JmgrMCDr5UOBbZpB_-X8MQkBb08AwDHvLUSRlAWvQNuI3gkd7H8KvPuHr9CVbPE3OEI6BGTgDwomUi2o-JzXJm8N4xQlact_AZFkw0I</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Desai, Chiragkumar</creator><creator>Wood, Fiona M</creator><creator>Schug, Stephan A</creator><creator>Parsons, Richard W</creator><creator>Fridlender, Charles</creator><creator>Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation</title><author>Desai, Chiragkumar ; Wood, Fiona M ; Schug, Stephan A ; Parsons, Richard W ; Fridlender, Charles ; Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-3dfd7e53b3bddff3cc6d23dc26c364cbd6a99581f002df9dc4e3243de87824143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Administration, Cutaneous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>Burn pain</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - surgery</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Donor site dressing change</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Emulsion</topic><topic>Emulsions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lidocaine</topic><topic>Lidocaine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Lidocaine spray</topic><topic>Local anaesthetic formulation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Partial thickness skin graft</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Skin graft wound</topic><topic>Skin Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Transplant Donor Site</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Desai, Chiragkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Fiona M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schug, Stephan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Richard W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridlender, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Desai, Chiragkumar</au><au>Wood, Fiona M</au><au>Schug, Stephan A</au><au>Parsons, Richard W</au><au>Fridlender, Charles</au><au>Sunderland, Vivian Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>106-112</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin graft donor sites. Methods A double-blind randomised controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 29 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft surgery. Subjects were randomised to either a 3% lidocaine emulsion formulation “Treatment E” (NOPAYNE™) or a 4% aqueous solution “Treatment A” (Xylocaine™). Subjects received one spray per 3 cm2 of donor site area followed by up to two further spays as required. Endpoints included pain intensity measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) up to 1 h after dressing change commencement, sting sensation, overall satisfaction and lidocaine plasma concentration. Results The 60 min pain scores for E and A were 1.3 ± 0.3 (mean ± SEM) and 1.8 ± 0.4 ( p = 0.98) respectively. Nearly 90% of patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The mean plasma concentrations of lidocaine for A and E were 0.132 mg/l and 0.040 mg/l respectively ( p = 0.069). Conclusion The topical local anaesthetic formulations achieved low pain scores during dressing changes. The safety profile was potentially improved with the emulsion formulation of lidocaine.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23810271</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.013</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-4179 |
ispartof | Burns, 2014-02, Vol.40 (1), p.106-112 |
issn | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490709216 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Administration, Cutaneous Adult Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Bandages Burn pain Burns Burns - surgery Critical Care Donor site dressing change Double-Blind Method Emulsion Emulsions - therapeutic use Female Humans Lidocaine Lidocaine - administration & dosage Lidocaine spray Local anaesthetic formulation Male Pain - drug therapy Pain Measurement Partial thickness skin graft Pilot Projects Skin graft wound Skin Transplantation - methods Solutions - therapeutic use Transplant Donor Site Treatment Outcome |
title | Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A18%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20a%20topical%20local%20anaesthetic%20spray%20as%20analgesia%20for%20dressing%20changes:%20A%20double-blinded%20randomised%20pilot%20trial%20comparing%20an%20emulsion%20with%20an%20aqueous%20lidocaine%20formulation&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Desai,%20Chiragkumar&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=106-112&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1490709216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490709216&rft_id=info:pmid/23810271&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0305417913001605&rfr_iscdi=true |