Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry
Mathematical programming is used to examine the economic potential of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies in US agriculture and forestry. Mitigation practices are entered into a spatially differentiated sector model and are jointly assessed with conventional agricultural production. Competition amo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Agricultural systems 2007-05, Vol.94 (2), p.128-140 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 140 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 128 |
| container_title | Agricultural systems |
| container_volume | 94 |
| creator | Schneider, Uwe A. McCarl, Bruce A. Schmid, Erwin |
| description | Mathematical programming is used to examine the economic potential of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies in US agriculture and forestry. Mitigation practices are entered into a spatially differentiated sector model and are jointly assessed with conventional agricultural production. Competition among practices is examined under a wide range of hypothetical carbon prices. Simulation results demonstrate a changing portfolio of mitigation strategies across carbon price. For lower prices preferred strategies involve soil and livestock options, higher prices, however, promote mainly bioenergy generation. Results demonstrate the sensitivity of individual strategy potentials to assumptions about alternative opportunities. Assessed impacts also include market shifts, regional strategy diversity, economic surplus distribution, and environmental co-effects. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agsy.2006.08.001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14822537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308521X06001028</els_id><sourcerecordid>14822537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-1d31de6ec720921649839e05cfa928c8727981b7209ec861f91d99a07d28bc853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVoods0L5BLdOrNzkj22hL0EkLTpgR6SBdyE4o8drR47a3GG_Dbd1yXHHsYzcDMN_PzS4hLBbkCVV3vc9_RnGuAKgeTA6gzsVGmLjKtq_qd2EABJttq9fRBfCTaA4BVYDbi6aZLMZz66ZR8LwnDNCbpB9_PFEmOg-wS4vAynghl50ke4hQ7P0XuxEHuHqV_45G5RrZjQprS_Em8b31PePEvn4vd3ddft9-zh5_f7m9vHrJQaj1lqilUgxWGWoPVqiqtKSzCNrTeahNMrWtr1PPSxWAq1VrVWOuhbrR5DmZbnIvP695jGn-f-LQ7RArY935AVu1UabTeFjUP6nUwpJEoYeuOKR58mp0Ct5jo9m4x0S0mOjCOTWToxwolPGJ4IxDRd5Fmcq-u8LbkZ-ZgsuYUl5LjyKG0YQngXqYDL7tal7V-dItv5HaPmq8wZkr9V-OXdQLZsdeIyVGIOARsYuKvcc0Y_6f2D43HnfE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14822537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry</title><source>RePEc</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Schneider, Uwe A. ; McCarl, Bruce A. ; Schmid, Erwin</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Uwe A. ; McCarl, Bruce A. ; Schmid, Erwin</creatorcontrib><description>Mathematical programming is used to examine the economic potential of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies in US agriculture and forestry. Mitigation practices are entered into a spatially differentiated sector model and are jointly assessed with conventional agricultural production. Competition among practices is examined under a wide range of hypothetical carbon prices. Simulation results demonstrate a changing portfolio of mitigation strategies across carbon price. For lower prices preferred strategies involve soil and livestock options, higher prices, however, promote mainly bioenergy generation. Results demonstrate the sensitivity of individual strategy potentials to assumptions about alternative opportunities. Assessed impacts also include market shifts, regional strategy diversity, economic surplus distribution, and environmental co-effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-521X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2006.08.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abatement function ; agricultural management models ; Agricultural sector model ; Carbon sequestration ; Economic potential ; gas emissions ; Greenhouse gas emission ; greenhouse gases ; Mathematical programming ; Multiple technical change ; Policy simulation</subject><ispartof>Agricultural systems, 2007-05, Vol.94 (2), p.128-140</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-1d31de6ec720921649839e05cfa928c8727981b7209ec861f91d99a07d28bc853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-1d31de6ec720921649839e05cfa928c8727981b7209ec861f91d99a07d28bc853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.08.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,3996,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeagisys/v_3a94_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a128-140.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Uwe A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarl, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Erwin</creatorcontrib><title>Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry</title><title>Agricultural systems</title><description>Mathematical programming is used to examine the economic potential of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies in US agriculture and forestry. Mitigation practices are entered into a spatially differentiated sector model and are jointly assessed with conventional agricultural production. Competition among practices is examined under a wide range of hypothetical carbon prices. Simulation results demonstrate a changing portfolio of mitigation strategies across carbon price. For lower prices preferred strategies involve soil and livestock options, higher prices, however, promote mainly bioenergy generation. Results demonstrate the sensitivity of individual strategy potentials to assumptions about alternative opportunities. Assessed impacts also include market shifts, regional strategy diversity, economic surplus distribution, and environmental co-effects.</description><subject>Abatement function</subject><subject>agricultural management models</subject><subject>Agricultural sector model</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Economic potential</subject><subject>gas emissions</subject><subject>Greenhouse gas emission</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Mathematical programming</subject><subject>Multiple technical change</subject><subject>Policy simulation</subject><issn>0308-521X</issn><issn>1873-2267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVoods0L5BLdOrNzkj22hL0EkLTpgR6SBdyE4o8drR47a3GG_Dbd1yXHHsYzcDMN_PzS4hLBbkCVV3vc9_RnGuAKgeTA6gzsVGmLjKtq_qd2EABJttq9fRBfCTaA4BVYDbi6aZLMZz66ZR8LwnDNCbpB9_PFEmOg-wS4vAynghl50ke4hQ7P0XuxEHuHqV_45G5RrZjQprS_Em8b31PePEvn4vd3ddft9-zh5_f7m9vHrJQaj1lqilUgxWGWoPVqiqtKSzCNrTeahNMrWtr1PPSxWAq1VrVWOuhbrR5DmZbnIvP695jGn-f-LQ7RArY935AVu1UabTeFjUP6nUwpJEoYeuOKR58mp0Ct5jo9m4x0S0mOjCOTWToxwolPGJ4IxDRd5Fmcq-u8LbkZ-ZgsuYUl5LjyKG0YQngXqYDL7tal7V-dItv5HaPmq8wZkr9V-OXdQLZsdeIyVGIOARsYuKvcc0Y_6f2D43HnfE</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Schneider, Uwe A.</creator><creator>McCarl, Bruce A.</creator><creator>Schmid, Erwin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry</title><author>Schneider, Uwe A. ; McCarl, Bruce A. ; Schmid, Erwin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-1d31de6ec720921649839e05cfa928c8727981b7209ec861f91d99a07d28bc853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Abatement function</topic><topic>agricultural management models</topic><topic>Agricultural sector model</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Economic potential</topic><topic>gas emissions</topic><topic>Greenhouse gas emission</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Mathematical programming</topic><topic>Multiple technical change</topic><topic>Policy simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Uwe A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarl, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Erwin</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Uwe A.</au><au>McCarl, Bruce A.</au><au>Schmid, Erwin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>128-140</pages><issn>0308-521X</issn><eissn>1873-2267</eissn><abstract>Mathematical programming is used to examine the economic potential of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies in US agriculture and forestry. Mitigation practices are entered into a spatially differentiated sector model and are jointly assessed with conventional agricultural production. Competition among practices is examined under a wide range of hypothetical carbon prices. Simulation results demonstrate a changing portfolio of mitigation strategies across carbon price. For lower prices preferred strategies involve soil and livestock options, higher prices, however, promote mainly bioenergy generation. Results demonstrate the sensitivity of individual strategy potentials to assumptions about alternative opportunities. Assessed impacts also include market shifts, regional strategy diversity, economic surplus distribution, and environmental co-effects.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agsy.2006.08.001</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0308-521X |
| ispartof | Agricultural systems, 2007-05, Vol.94 (2), p.128-140 |
| issn | 0308-521X 1873-2267 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14822537 |
| source | RePEc; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Abatement function agricultural management models Agricultural sector model Carbon sequestration Economic potential gas emissions Greenhouse gas emission greenhouse gases Mathematical programming Multiple technical change Policy simulation |
| title | Agricultural sector analysis on greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture and forestry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A34%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agricultural%20sector%20analysis%20on%20greenhouse%20gas%20mitigation%20in%20US%20agriculture%20and%20forestry&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20systems&rft.au=Schneider,%20Uwe%20A.&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=128-140&rft.issn=0308-521X&rft.eissn=1873-2267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14822537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14822537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0308521X06001028&rfr_iscdi=true |