Longitudinal Patterns of Ecosystem Processes and Community Structure in a Subarctic River Continuum

Ecosystem processes and community structure in running waters of the boreal forests of Quebec, Canada, are strongly influenced by climate and channel geomorphology. Here we present an overview of a project examining longitudinal trends as small streams gradually coalesce into large rivers, summarizi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 1987-10, Vol.68 (5), p.1139-1156
Hauptverfasser: Naiman, Robert J., Melillo, Jerry M., Lock, Maurice A., Ford, Tim E., Reice, Seth R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1156
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1139
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 68
creator Naiman, Robert J.
Melillo, Jerry M.
Lock, Maurice A.
Ford, Tim E.
Reice, Seth R.
description Ecosystem processes and community structure in running waters of the boreal forests of Quebec, Canada, are strongly influenced by climate and channel geomorphology. Here we present an overview of a project examining longitudinal trends as small streams gradually coalesce into large rivers, summarizing our results in a series of budgets and predictive equations describing changes in organic carbon dynamics and community structure. There were significant trends with stream order for 70% of the 73 components, processes, and ratios examined. Of 46 independent components examined, 63% showed a significant trend with stream order. As stream size increased from 1st to 9th order there was a decrease in total carbon inputs (i.e., precipitation, throughfall, primary production, and allochthonous materials) followed by a gradual increase due to greater primary production in streams >6th order. The standing stock of carbon decreased exponentially downstream, and total carbon outputs (i.e., respiration, leaching, methane evasion, and insect emergence) increased slightly downstream. Nevertheless, some ecosystem—level processes, as well as community structure, showed equivocal trends, which were apparently due to the hierarchical scale of examination and the relative degree of physicochemical vs. biological control, of the processes and communities. The data, when placed in a watershed perspective, showed that total carbon inputs were evenly distributed by stream order throughout the 19 871—km² Moisie River drainage network. Most carbon was stored in the small 1st to 3rd order streams, whereas the majority of organic carbon was metabolized in the 7th to 9th order rivers. Fluvial transport of organic carbon to the Gulf of St. Lawrence was nearly three times that of the measured total annual input, suggesting that inputs of dissolved organic carbon in groundwater were more important than previously expected. Ecosystem—level measurements of carbon retention and utilization also showed significant trends with stream order. The spiraling length for carbon increased exponentially from 8—15 km in small streams to 426 km in the 9th order river. There was a concomitant decrease in reach retention with stream order, while the rate coefficient of respiration and rate of downstream movement increased with order. The stream metabolism index, a measure of ecosystem efficiency, increased from 1st to 7th order, thereafter decreasing as streams became larger. These trends with stream ord
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1939199
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14806998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1939199</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1939199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-9ffa68b52c8d6a23985c2ed3e962143dbc69fced971719f1e8737106ae3ee0353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90V1rUzEYB_AwFFY38SMYULarzrz05OVSSjeFgsO6C68Oac6TkXJOMvPi6Lc3pUVE0NwkFz_-efIPQm8ouWGcyA9Uc021PkOzw2muqSQv0IwQyuZadOocvcp5R9qiCzVDdh3Doy918MGM-N6UAilkHB1e2Zj3ucCE71O0kDNkbMKAl3GaavBljzclVVtqAuwDNnhTtybZ4i3-6n9CajAUH2qdLtFLZ8YMr0_7BXq4XX1bfpqvv9x9Xn5czy1Xuk3qnBFq2zGrBmEY16qzDAYOWjC64MPWCu0sDFpSSbWjoCSXlAgDHIDwjl-gq2PuU4o_KuTSTz5bGEcTINbctwcTobVq8N1fcBdragU0w7RYMEWUbur6qGyKOSdw_VPyk0n7npL-UHV_qrrJ96c8k60ZXTLB-vyby05Kzg7z8SN79iPs_5XWr5bfqVZSqI5S_kf4LpeY_jPD2yNzJvbmMbX7HzaMUNE-WrIFlfwX6NigWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296428089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Longitudinal Patterns of Ecosystem Processes and Community Structure in a Subarctic River Continuum</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Naiman, Robert J. ; Melillo, Jerry M. ; Lock, Maurice A. ; Ford, Tim E. ; Reice, Seth R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Naiman, Robert J. ; Melillo, Jerry M. ; Lock, Maurice A. ; Ford, Tim E. ; Reice, Seth R.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem processes and community structure in running waters of the boreal forests of Quebec, Canada, are strongly influenced by climate and channel geomorphology. Here we present an overview of a project examining longitudinal trends as small streams gradually coalesce into large rivers, summarizing our results in a series of budgets and predictive equations describing changes in organic carbon dynamics and community structure. There were significant trends with stream order for 70% of the 73 components, processes, and ratios examined. Of 46 independent components examined, 63% showed a significant trend with stream order. As stream size increased from 1st to 9th order there was a decrease in total carbon inputs (i.e., precipitation, throughfall, primary production, and allochthonous materials) followed by a gradual increase due to greater primary production in streams &gt;6th order. The standing stock of carbon decreased exponentially downstream, and total carbon outputs (i.e., respiration, leaching, methane evasion, and insect emergence) increased slightly downstream. Nevertheless, some ecosystem—level processes, as well as community structure, showed equivocal trends, which were apparently due to the hierarchical scale of examination and the relative degree of physicochemical vs. biological control, of the processes and communities. The data, when placed in a watershed perspective, showed that total carbon inputs were evenly distributed by stream order throughout the 19 871—km² Moisie River drainage network. Most carbon was stored in the small 1st to 3rd order streams, whereas the majority of organic carbon was metabolized in the 7th to 9th order rivers. Fluvial transport of organic carbon to the Gulf of St. Lawrence was nearly three times that of the measured total annual input, suggesting that inputs of dissolved organic carbon in groundwater were more important than previously expected. Ecosystem—level measurements of carbon retention and utilization also showed significant trends with stream order. The spiraling length for carbon increased exponentially from 8—15 km in small streams to 426 km in the 9th order river. There was a concomitant decrease in reach retention with stream order, while the rate coefficient of respiration and rate of downstream movement increased with order. The stream metabolism index, a measure of ecosystem efficiency, increased from 1st to 7th order, thereafter decreasing as streams became larger. These trends with stream order were related to physical gradients in channel dimensions, hydrology, riparian influences, and sunlight. We conclude that these subarctic lotic ecosystems have numerous strong relationships with stream order and that the dynamics can be described by a relatively small set of predictive equations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1939199</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; biogeochemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; boreal forest ; carbon ; Coarse woody debris ; Creeks ; ecosystem ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecology ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Groundwater ; Lotic systems ; Maisie River ; Periphyton ; Quebec ; Respiration ; river ; stream ; stream order ; Streams ; subarctic ; Synecology ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1987-10, Vol.68 (5), p.1139-1156</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1987 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-9ffa68b52c8d6a23985c2ed3e962143dbc69fced971719f1e8737106ae3ee0353</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1939199$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1939199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7577325$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naiman, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melillo, Jerry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lock, Maurice A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Tim E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reice, Seth R.</creatorcontrib><title>Longitudinal Patterns of Ecosystem Processes and Community Structure in a Subarctic River Continuum</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Ecosystem processes and community structure in running waters of the boreal forests of Quebec, Canada, are strongly influenced by climate and channel geomorphology. Here we present an overview of a project examining longitudinal trends as small streams gradually coalesce into large rivers, summarizing our results in a series of budgets and predictive equations describing changes in organic carbon dynamics and community structure. There were significant trends with stream order for 70% of the 73 components, processes, and ratios examined. Of 46 independent components examined, 63% showed a significant trend with stream order. As stream size increased from 1st to 9th order there was a decrease in total carbon inputs (i.e., precipitation, throughfall, primary production, and allochthonous materials) followed by a gradual increase due to greater primary production in streams &gt;6th order. The standing stock of carbon decreased exponentially downstream, and total carbon outputs (i.e., respiration, leaching, methane evasion, and insect emergence) increased slightly downstream. Nevertheless, some ecosystem—level processes, as well as community structure, showed equivocal trends, which were apparently due to the hierarchical scale of examination and the relative degree of physicochemical vs. biological control, of the processes and communities. The data, when placed in a watershed perspective, showed that total carbon inputs were evenly distributed by stream order throughout the 19 871—km² Moisie River drainage network. Most carbon was stored in the small 1st to 3rd order streams, whereas the majority of organic carbon was metabolized in the 7th to 9th order rivers. Fluvial transport of organic carbon to the Gulf of St. Lawrence was nearly three times that of the measured total annual input, suggesting that inputs of dissolved organic carbon in groundwater were more important than previously expected. Ecosystem—level measurements of carbon retention and utilization also showed significant trends with stream order. The spiraling length for carbon increased exponentially from 8—15 km in small streams to 426 km in the 9th order river. There was a concomitant decrease in reach retention with stream order, while the rate coefficient of respiration and rate of downstream movement increased with order. The stream metabolism index, a measure of ecosystem efficiency, increased from 1st to 7th order, thereafter decreasing as streams became larger. These trends with stream order were related to physical gradients in channel dimensions, hydrology, riparian influences, and sunlight. We conclude that these subarctic lotic ecosystems have numerous strong relationships with stream order and that the dynamics can be described by a relatively small set of predictive equations.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>boreal forest</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Coarse woody debris</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>ecosystem</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Lotic systems</subject><subject>Maisie River</subject><subject>Periphyton</subject><subject>Quebec</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>river</subject><subject>stream</subject><subject>stream order</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>subarctic</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp90V1rUzEYB_AwFFY38SMYULarzrz05OVSSjeFgsO6C68Oac6TkXJOMvPi6Lc3pUVE0NwkFz_-efIPQm8ouWGcyA9Uc021PkOzw2muqSQv0IwQyuZadOocvcp5R9qiCzVDdh3Doy918MGM-N6UAilkHB1e2Zj3ucCE71O0kDNkbMKAl3GaavBljzclVVtqAuwDNnhTtybZ4i3-6n9CajAUH2qdLtFLZ8YMr0_7BXq4XX1bfpqvv9x9Xn5czy1Xuk3qnBFq2zGrBmEY16qzDAYOWjC64MPWCu0sDFpSSbWjoCSXlAgDHIDwjl-gq2PuU4o_KuTSTz5bGEcTINbctwcTobVq8N1fcBdragU0w7RYMEWUbur6qGyKOSdw_VPyk0n7npL-UHV_qrrJ96c8k60ZXTLB-vyby05Kzg7z8SN79iPs_5XWr5bfqVZSqI5S_kf4LpeY_jPD2yNzJvbmMbX7HzaMUNE-WrIFlfwX6NigWw</recordid><startdate>198710</startdate><enddate>198710</enddate><creator>Naiman, Robert J.</creator><creator>Melillo, Jerry M.</creator><creator>Lock, Maurice A.</creator><creator>Ford, Tim E.</creator><creator>Reice, Seth R.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198710</creationdate><title>Longitudinal Patterns of Ecosystem Processes and Community Structure in a Subarctic River Continuum</title><author>Naiman, Robert J. ; Melillo, Jerry M. ; Lock, Maurice A. ; Ford, Tim E. ; Reice, Seth R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-9ffa68b52c8d6a23985c2ed3e962143dbc69fced971719f1e8737106ae3ee0353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>boreal forest</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Coarse woody debris</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>ecosystem</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Lotic systems</topic><topic>Maisie River</topic><topic>Periphyton</topic><topic>Quebec</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>river</topic><topic>stream</topic><topic>stream order</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>subarctic</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naiman, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melillo, Jerry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lock, Maurice A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Tim E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reice, Seth R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naiman, Robert J.</au><au>Melillo, Jerry M.</au><au>Lock, Maurice A.</au><au>Ford, Tim E.</au><au>Reice, Seth R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Longitudinal Patterns of Ecosystem Processes and Community Structure in a Subarctic River Continuum</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1987-10</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1139</spage><epage>1156</epage><pages>1139-1156</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Ecosystem processes and community structure in running waters of the boreal forests of Quebec, Canada, are strongly influenced by climate and channel geomorphology. Here we present an overview of a project examining longitudinal trends as small streams gradually coalesce into large rivers, summarizing our results in a series of budgets and predictive equations describing changes in organic carbon dynamics and community structure. There were significant trends with stream order for 70% of the 73 components, processes, and ratios examined. Of 46 independent components examined, 63% showed a significant trend with stream order. As stream size increased from 1st to 9th order there was a decrease in total carbon inputs (i.e., precipitation, throughfall, primary production, and allochthonous materials) followed by a gradual increase due to greater primary production in streams &gt;6th order. The standing stock of carbon decreased exponentially downstream, and total carbon outputs (i.e., respiration, leaching, methane evasion, and insect emergence) increased slightly downstream. Nevertheless, some ecosystem—level processes, as well as community structure, showed equivocal trends, which were apparently due to the hierarchical scale of examination and the relative degree of physicochemical vs. biological control, of the processes and communities. The data, when placed in a watershed perspective, showed that total carbon inputs were evenly distributed by stream order throughout the 19 871—km² Moisie River drainage network. Most carbon was stored in the small 1st to 3rd order streams, whereas the majority of organic carbon was metabolized in the 7th to 9th order rivers. Fluvial transport of organic carbon to the Gulf of St. Lawrence was nearly three times that of the measured total annual input, suggesting that inputs of dissolved organic carbon in groundwater were more important than previously expected. Ecosystem—level measurements of carbon retention and utilization also showed significant trends with stream order. The spiraling length for carbon increased exponentially from 8—15 km in small streams to 426 km in the 9th order river. There was a concomitant decrease in reach retention with stream order, while the rate coefficient of respiration and rate of downstream movement increased with order. The stream metabolism index, a measure of ecosystem efficiency, increased from 1st to 7th order, thereafter decreasing as streams became larger. These trends with stream order were related to physical gradients in channel dimensions, hydrology, riparian influences, and sunlight. We conclude that these subarctic lotic ecosystems have numerous strong relationships with stream order and that the dynamics can be described by a relatively small set of predictive equations.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1939199</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 1987-10, Vol.68 (5), p.1139-1156
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14806998
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
biogeochemistry
Biological and medical sciences
boreal forest
carbon
Coarse woody debris
Creeks
ecosystem
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater
Freshwater ecology
Freshwater ecosystems
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Groundwater
Lotic systems
Maisie River
Periphyton
Quebec
Respiration
river
stream
stream order
Streams
subarctic
Synecology
Watersheds
title Longitudinal Patterns of Ecosystem Processes and Community Structure in a Subarctic River Continuum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A45%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Longitudinal%20Patterns%20of%20Ecosystem%20Processes%20and%20Community%20Structure%20in%20a%20Subarctic%20River%20Continuum&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Naiman,%20Robert%20J.&rft.date=1987-10&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1139&rft.epage=1156&rft.pages=1139-1156&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1939199&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1939199%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296428089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1939199&rfr_iscdi=true