Barn Swallow Coloniality: A Net Cost for Group Breeding in the Adirondacks?

To explore the costs and benefits of groups living in a facultatively social bird, we studied the reproductive ecology of a marked population of Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) as the Cranberry Lake Biological Station in the Adirondack Mountains of New York State. Throughout its range, the Barn Swal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 1987-10, Vol.68 (5), p.1373-1386
Hauptverfasser: Shields, William M., Crook, Janice R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1386
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1373
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 68
creator Shields, William M.
Crook, Janice R.
description To explore the costs and benefits of groups living in a facultatively social bird, we studied the reproductive ecology of a marked population of Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) as the Cranberry Lake Biological Station in the Adirondack Mountains of New York State. Throughout its range, the Barn Swallow breeds solitarily or in small groups. From 1979 through 1985 we gathered reproductive and mortality data in colonies varying in size and density. Birds living in larger colonies tended to be younger and to breed later, on average, than solitary breeders. Breeding success was less for birds in large colonies than for birds breeding solitarily or in small groups. Larger colonies did not provide obvious benefits that offset the reduced reproductive success. Nests in larger colonies were infested more by a bloodsucking blow fly larva (Protocalliphora hirundo) than were nests in smaller colonies. The fraction of nests infested and the mean number of parasites per nestling also increased as the breeding season progressed. Since parasitism appeared to be the major source of nestling mortality, the increased parasite loads were probably the major cost of living in larger groups in our area. Birds in large colonies suffered a net reproductive loss relative to those breeding alone or in smaller groups. Thus, our data consistent with Snapp's (1976) conclusion that shortages of nesting habitat rather than direct benefits of group living are responsible for swallow coloniality.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1939221
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14796904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1939221</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1939221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4743-9034a1b7f5028fe64417839baba9db0238a6d15e94fbf335473ca06e70dc6ff83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U9LHDEYBvBQWujWih_BQIueRvNvkkkvsi5WRdGDevAU3plJbNY4WZNZlv32jexiodDmkhB-PHl5gtAeJUeME3VMNdeM0Q9o8naqNFXkI5oQQlmlZd18Rl9ynpOyqGgm6OoU0oDvVhBCXOFZDHHwEPy4_oGn-MaO5SqP2MWEz1NcLvBpsrb3wxP2Ax5_WTztfYpDD91zPvmKPjkI2e5u9x308PPsfnZRXd-eX86m11UnlOCVJlwAbZWrCWuclUJQ1XDdQgu6bwnjDcie1lYL1zrOa6F4B0RaRfpOOtfwHXSwyV2k-Lq0eTQvPnc2BBhsXGZDhdJSE1Hgt7_gPC7TUGYzlGkpmGCkLupwo7oUc07WmUXyL5DWhhLzVqnZVlrk920e5A6CSzB0Pr9zJRUvrRbGN2zlg13_K82czR6pbpRsasoV_xM-z2NM_5lhf8McRANPqbz_cMcIleVDFROU89-MlZUX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296424205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barn Swallow Coloniality: A Net Cost for Group Breeding in the Adirondacks?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Shields, William M. ; Crook, Janice R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shields, William M. ; Crook, Janice R.</creatorcontrib><description>To explore the costs and benefits of groups living in a facultatively social bird, we studied the reproductive ecology of a marked population of Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) as the Cranberry Lake Biological Station in the Adirondack Mountains of New York State. Throughout its range, the Barn Swallow breeds solitarily or in small groups. From 1979 through 1985 we gathered reproductive and mortality data in colonies varying in size and density. Birds living in larger colonies tended to be younger and to breed later, on average, than solitary breeders. Breeding success was less for birds in large colonies than for birds breeding solitarily or in small groups. Larger colonies did not provide obvious benefits that offset the reduced reproductive success. Nests in larger colonies were infested more by a bloodsucking blow fly larva (Protocalliphora hirundo) than were nests in smaller colonies. The fraction of nests infested and the mean number of parasites per nestling also increased as the breeding season progressed. Since parasitism appeared to be the major source of nestling mortality, the increased parasite loads were probably the major cost of living in larger groups in our area. Birds in large colonies suffered a net reproductive loss relative to those breeding alone or in smaller groups. Thus, our data consistent with Snapp's (1976) conclusion that shortages of nesting habitat rather than direct benefits of group living are responsible for swallow coloniality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1939221</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal nesting ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Aves ; Aviculture ; Barns ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Breeding ; Demecology ; Eggs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hirundo rustica ; Mortality ; Parasitism ; Reproductive success ; Swallows ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1987-10, Vol.68 (5), p.1373-1386</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1987 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4743-9034a1b7f5028fe64417839baba9db0238a6d15e94fbf335473ca06e70dc6ff83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1939221$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1939221$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7673014$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shields, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crook, Janice R.</creatorcontrib><title>Barn Swallow Coloniality: A Net Cost for Group Breeding in the Adirondacks?</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>To explore the costs and benefits of groups living in a facultatively social bird, we studied the reproductive ecology of a marked population of Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) as the Cranberry Lake Biological Station in the Adirondack Mountains of New York State. Throughout its range, the Barn Swallow breeds solitarily or in small groups. From 1979 through 1985 we gathered reproductive and mortality data in colonies varying in size and density. Birds living in larger colonies tended to be younger and to breed later, on average, than solitary breeders. Breeding success was less for birds in large colonies than for birds breeding solitarily or in small groups. Larger colonies did not provide obvious benefits that offset the reduced reproductive success. Nests in larger colonies were infested more by a bloodsucking blow fly larva (Protocalliphora hirundo) than were nests in smaller colonies. The fraction of nests infested and the mean number of parasites per nestling also increased as the breeding season progressed. Since parasitism appeared to be the major source of nestling mortality, the increased parasite loads were probably the major cost of living in larger groups in our area. Birds in large colonies suffered a net reproductive loss relative to those breeding alone or in smaller groups. Thus, our data consistent with Snapp's (1976) conclusion that shortages of nesting habitat rather than direct benefits of group living are responsible for swallow coloniality.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Aviculture</subject><subject>Barns</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hirundo rustica</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Reproductive success</subject><subject>Swallows</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U9LHDEYBvBQWujWih_BQIueRvNvkkkvsi5WRdGDevAU3plJbNY4WZNZlv32jexiodDmkhB-PHl5gtAeJUeME3VMNdeM0Q9o8naqNFXkI5oQQlmlZd18Rl9ynpOyqGgm6OoU0oDvVhBCXOFZDHHwEPy4_oGn-MaO5SqP2MWEz1NcLvBpsrb3wxP2Ax5_WTztfYpDD91zPvmKPjkI2e5u9x308PPsfnZRXd-eX86m11UnlOCVJlwAbZWrCWuclUJQ1XDdQgu6bwnjDcie1lYL1zrOa6F4B0RaRfpOOtfwHXSwyV2k-Lq0eTQvPnc2BBhsXGZDhdJSE1Hgt7_gPC7TUGYzlGkpmGCkLupwo7oUc07WmUXyL5DWhhLzVqnZVlrk920e5A6CSzB0Pr9zJRUvrRbGN2zlg13_K82czR6pbpRsasoV_xM-z2NM_5lhf8McRANPqbz_cMcIleVDFROU89-MlZUX</recordid><startdate>198710</startdate><enddate>198710</enddate><creator>Shields, William M.</creator><creator>Crook, Janice R.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198710</creationdate><title>Barn Swallow Coloniality: A Net Cost for Group Breeding in the Adirondacks?</title><author>Shields, William M. ; Crook, Janice R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4743-9034a1b7f5028fe64417839baba9db0238a6d15e94fbf335473ca06e70dc6ff83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Aviculture</topic><topic>Barns</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hirundo rustica</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Reproductive success</topic><topic>Swallows</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shields, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crook, Janice R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shields, William M.</au><au>Crook, Janice R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barn Swallow Coloniality: A Net Cost for Group Breeding in the Adirondacks?</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1987-10</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1373</spage><epage>1386</epage><pages>1373-1386</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>To explore the costs and benefits of groups living in a facultatively social bird, we studied the reproductive ecology of a marked population of Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) as the Cranberry Lake Biological Station in the Adirondack Mountains of New York State. Throughout its range, the Barn Swallow breeds solitarily or in small groups. From 1979 through 1985 we gathered reproductive and mortality data in colonies varying in size and density. Birds living in larger colonies tended to be younger and to breed later, on average, than solitary breeders. Breeding success was less for birds in large colonies than for birds breeding solitarily or in small groups. Larger colonies did not provide obvious benefits that offset the reduced reproductive success. Nests in larger colonies were infested more by a bloodsucking blow fly larva (Protocalliphora hirundo) than were nests in smaller colonies. The fraction of nests infested and the mean number of parasites per nestling also increased as the breeding season progressed. Since parasitism appeared to be the major source of nestling mortality, the increased parasite loads were probably the major cost of living in larger groups in our area. Birds in large colonies suffered a net reproductive loss relative to those breeding alone or in smaller groups. Thus, our data consistent with Snapp's (1976) conclusion that shortages of nesting habitat rather than direct benefits of group living are responsible for swallow coloniality.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1939221</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 1987-10, Vol.68 (5), p.1373-1386
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14796904
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal nesting
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Aves
Aviculture
Barns
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Breeding
Demecology
Eggs
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hirundo rustica
Mortality
Parasitism
Reproductive success
Swallows
Vertebrata
title Barn Swallow Coloniality: A Net Cost for Group Breeding in the Adirondacks?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A20%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barn%20Swallow%20Coloniality:%20A%20Net%20Cost%20for%20Group%20Breeding%20in%20the%20Adirondacks?&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Shields,%20William%20M.&rft.date=1987-10&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1373&rft.epage=1386&rft.pages=1373-1386&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1939221&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1939221%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296424205&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1939221&rfr_iscdi=true