A comparison among different techniques for human ERG signals processing and classification
Abstract Feature detection in biomedical signals is crucial for deepening our knowledge about the involved physiological processes. To achieve this aim, many analytic approaches can be applied but only few are able to deal with signals whose time dependent features provide useful clinical informatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physica medica 2014-02, Vol.30 (1), p.86-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 86 |
container_title | Physica medica |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Barraco, R Persano Adorno, D Brai, M Tranchina, L |
description | Abstract Feature detection in biomedical signals is crucial for deepening our knowledge about the involved physiological processes. To achieve this aim, many analytic approaches can be applied but only few are able to deal with signals whose time dependent features provide useful clinical information. Among the biomedical signals, the electroretinogram (ERG), that records the retinal response to a light flash, can improve our comprehension of the complex photoreceptoral activities. The present study is focused on the analysis of the early response of the photoreceptoral human system, known as a -wave ERG-component. This wave reflects the functional integrity of the photoreceptors, rods and cones, whose activation dynamics are not yet completely understood. Moreover, since in incipient photoreceptoral pathologies eventual anomalies in a -wave are not always detectable with a “naked eye” analysis of the traces, the possibility to discriminate pathologic from healthy traces, by means of appropriate analytical techniques, could help in clinical diagnosis. In the present paper, we discuss and compare the efficiency of various techniques of signal processing, such as Fourier analysis (FA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Wavelet Analysis (WA) in recognising pathological traces from the healthy ones. The investigated retinal pathologies are Achromatopsia, a cone disease and Congenital Stationary Night Blindness, affecting the photoreceptoral signal transmission. Our findings prove that both PCA and FA of conventional ERGs, don't add clinical information useful for the diagnosis of ocular pathologies, whereas the use of a more sophisticated analysis, based on the wavelet transform, provides a powerful tool for routine clinical examinations of patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.03.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1477557718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1120179713000331</els_id><sourcerecordid>1477557718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-fd61345bee6d3cf348f885061503ba9e1690f83c8274b60a9f9436141934151e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1rFTEUxQdRbK3-Ay4kSzfzzM3XTECEUtoqFAQ_QHAR8jI3bcaZ5JnMCP3vzfCqCxfChSRwzuHmd5rmJdAdUFBvxh2O82HHKPAdrUPVo-YUOiZa0PDtcb0Doy10ujtpnpUyUsoZk_Jpc8K41FT3cNp8PycuzQebQ0mR2DnFWzIE7zFjXMiC7i6GnysW4lMmd-tsI7n8dE1KuI12KuSQk8NSQnXZOBA32frwwdklpPi8eeKrCF88nGfN16vLLxfv25uP1x8uzm9aJ6RcWj8o4ELuEdXAneei930vqQJJ-d5qBKWp77nrWSf2ilrtteAKBGguQALys-b1Mbdus-26mDkUh9NkI6a1GBBdJ2XXQV-l7Ch1OZWS0ZtDDrPN9wao2aCa0WxQzQbV0DpUVdOrh_x1P-Pw1_KHYhW8PQqw_vJXwGyKCxgdDiGjW8yQwv_z3_1jd1OIFeL0A--xjGnNG2wDpjBDzeet1q1V4LRWyoH_BlNMnLY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1477557718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison among different techniques for human ERG signals processing and classification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Barraco, R ; Persano Adorno, D ; Brai, M ; Tranchina, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Barraco, R ; Persano Adorno, D ; Brai, M ; Tranchina, L</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Feature detection in biomedical signals is crucial for deepening our knowledge about the involved physiological processes. To achieve this aim, many analytic approaches can be applied but only few are able to deal with signals whose time dependent features provide useful clinical information. Among the biomedical signals, the electroretinogram (ERG), that records the retinal response to a light flash, can improve our comprehension of the complex photoreceptoral activities. The present study is focused on the analysis of the early response of the photoreceptoral human system, known as a -wave ERG-component. This wave reflects the functional integrity of the photoreceptors, rods and cones, whose activation dynamics are not yet completely understood. Moreover, since in incipient photoreceptoral pathologies eventual anomalies in a -wave are not always detectable with a “naked eye” analysis of the traces, the possibility to discriminate pathologic from healthy traces, by means of appropriate analytical techniques, could help in clinical diagnosis. In the present paper, we discuss and compare the efficiency of various techniques of signal processing, such as Fourier analysis (FA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Wavelet Analysis (WA) in recognising pathological traces from the healthy ones. The investigated retinal pathologies are Achromatopsia, a cone disease and Congenital Stationary Night Blindness, affecting the photoreceptoral signal transmission. Our findings prove that both PCA and FA of conventional ERGs, don't add clinical information useful for the diagnosis of ocular pathologies, whereas the use of a more sophisticated analysis, based on the wavelet transform, provides a powerful tool for routine clinical examinations of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-1797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-191X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.03.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23590981</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Color Vision Defects - diagnosis ; Color Vision Defects - genetics ; Electroretinography ; ERG signals ; Fourier Analysis ; Humans ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; Principal Component Analysis ; Radiology ; Retinal pathologies ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Wavelet Analysis</subject><ispartof>Physica medica, 2014-02, Vol.30 (1), p.86-95</ispartof><rights>Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica</rights><rights>2013 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-fd61345bee6d3cf348f885061503ba9e1690f83c8274b60a9f9436141934151e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-fd61345bee6d3cf348f885061503ba9e1690f83c8274b60a9f9436141934151e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179713000331$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23590981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barraco, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persano Adorno, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brai, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranchina, L</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison among different techniques for human ERG signals processing and classification</title><title>Physica medica</title><addtitle>Phys Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Feature detection in biomedical signals is crucial for deepening our knowledge about the involved physiological processes. To achieve this aim, many analytic approaches can be applied but only few are able to deal with signals whose time dependent features provide useful clinical information. Among the biomedical signals, the electroretinogram (ERG), that records the retinal response to a light flash, can improve our comprehension of the complex photoreceptoral activities. The present study is focused on the analysis of the early response of the photoreceptoral human system, known as a -wave ERG-component. This wave reflects the functional integrity of the photoreceptors, rods and cones, whose activation dynamics are not yet completely understood. Moreover, since in incipient photoreceptoral pathologies eventual anomalies in a -wave are not always detectable with a “naked eye” analysis of the traces, the possibility to discriminate pathologic from healthy traces, by means of appropriate analytical techniques, could help in clinical diagnosis. In the present paper, we discuss and compare the efficiency of various techniques of signal processing, such as Fourier analysis (FA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Wavelet Analysis (WA) in recognising pathological traces from the healthy ones. The investigated retinal pathologies are Achromatopsia, a cone disease and Congenital Stationary Night Blindness, affecting the photoreceptoral signal transmission. Our findings prove that both PCA and FA of conventional ERGs, don't add clinical information useful for the diagnosis of ocular pathologies, whereas the use of a more sophisticated analysis, based on the wavelet transform, provides a powerful tool for routine clinical examinations of patients.</description><subject>Color Vision Defects - diagnosis</subject><subject>Color Vision Defects - genetics</subject><subject>Electroretinography</subject><subject>ERG signals</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retinal pathologies</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Wavelet Analysis</subject><issn>1120-1797</issn><issn>1724-191X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1rFTEUxQdRbK3-Ay4kSzfzzM3XTECEUtoqFAQ_QHAR8jI3bcaZ5JnMCP3vzfCqCxfChSRwzuHmd5rmJdAdUFBvxh2O82HHKPAdrUPVo-YUOiZa0PDtcb0Doy10ujtpnpUyUsoZk_Jpc8K41FT3cNp8PycuzQebQ0mR2DnFWzIE7zFjXMiC7i6GnysW4lMmd-tsI7n8dE1KuI12KuSQk8NSQnXZOBA32frwwdklpPi8eeKrCF88nGfN16vLLxfv25uP1x8uzm9aJ6RcWj8o4ELuEdXAneei930vqQJJ-d5qBKWp77nrWSf2ilrtteAKBGguQALys-b1Mbdus-26mDkUh9NkI6a1GBBdJ2XXQV-l7Ch1OZWS0ZtDDrPN9wao2aCa0WxQzQbV0DpUVdOrh_x1P-Pw1_KHYhW8PQqw_vJXwGyKCxgdDiGjW8yQwv_z3_1jd1OIFeL0A--xjGnNG2wDpjBDzeet1q1V4LRWyoH_BlNMnLY</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Barraco, R</creator><creator>Persano Adorno, D</creator><creator>Brai, M</creator><creator>Tranchina, L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>A comparison among different techniques for human ERG signals processing and classification</title><author>Barraco, R ; Persano Adorno, D ; Brai, M ; Tranchina, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-fd61345bee6d3cf348f885061503ba9e1690f83c8274b60a9f9436141934151e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Color Vision Defects - diagnosis</topic><topic>Color Vision Defects - genetics</topic><topic>Electroretinography</topic><topic>ERG signals</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retinal pathologies</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Wavelet Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barraco, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persano Adorno, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brai, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranchina, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physica medica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barraco, R</au><au>Persano Adorno, D</au><au>Brai, M</au><au>Tranchina, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison among different techniques for human ERG signals processing and classification</atitle><jtitle>Physica medica</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>86-95</pages><issn>1120-1797</issn><eissn>1724-191X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Feature detection in biomedical signals is crucial for deepening our knowledge about the involved physiological processes. To achieve this aim, many analytic approaches can be applied but only few are able to deal with signals whose time dependent features provide useful clinical information. Among the biomedical signals, the electroretinogram (ERG), that records the retinal response to a light flash, can improve our comprehension of the complex photoreceptoral activities. The present study is focused on the analysis of the early response of the photoreceptoral human system, known as a -wave ERG-component. This wave reflects the functional integrity of the photoreceptors, rods and cones, whose activation dynamics are not yet completely understood. Moreover, since in incipient photoreceptoral pathologies eventual anomalies in a -wave are not always detectable with a “naked eye” analysis of the traces, the possibility to discriminate pathologic from healthy traces, by means of appropriate analytical techniques, could help in clinical diagnosis. In the present paper, we discuss and compare the efficiency of various techniques of signal processing, such as Fourier analysis (FA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Wavelet Analysis (WA) in recognising pathological traces from the healthy ones. The investigated retinal pathologies are Achromatopsia, a cone disease and Congenital Stationary Night Blindness, affecting the photoreceptoral signal transmission. Our findings prove that both PCA and FA of conventional ERGs, don't add clinical information useful for the diagnosis of ocular pathologies, whereas the use of a more sophisticated analysis, based on the wavelet transform, provides a powerful tool for routine clinical examinations of patients.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23590981</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.03.006</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1120-1797 |
ispartof | Physica medica, 2014-02, Vol.30 (1), p.86-95 |
issn | 1120-1797 1724-191X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1477557718 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Color Vision Defects - diagnosis Color Vision Defects - genetics Electroretinography ERG signals Fourier Analysis Humans Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods Principal Component Analysis Radiology Retinal pathologies Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Wavelet Analysis |
title | A comparison among different techniques for human ERG signals processing and classification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20among%20different%20techniques%20for%20human%20ERG%20signals%20processing%20and%20classification&rft.jtitle=Physica%20medica&rft.au=Barraco,%20R&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=86-95&rft.issn=1120-1797&rft.eissn=1724-191X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.03.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1477557718%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1477557718&rft_id=info:pmid/23590981&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1120179713000331&rfr_iscdi=true |