Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: A Systematic Review of 85 Cases

Background Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a nonatherosclerotic, noninflammatory arteriopathy of unknown etiology with life-threatening manifestations. With advances in endovascular techniques, SAM is increasingly being managed without the need for major surgery. Methods A systematic review o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2014, Vol.28 (1), p.269-277
Hauptverfasser: Shenouda, Michael, Riga, Celia, Naji, Yaser, Renton, Sophie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 277
container_issue 1
container_start_page 269
container_title Annals of vascular surgery
container_volume 28
creator Shenouda, Michael
Riga, Celia
Naji, Yaser
Renton, Sophie
description Background Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a nonatherosclerotic, noninflammatory arteriopathy of unknown etiology with life-threatening manifestations. With advances in endovascular techniques, SAM is increasingly being managed without the need for major surgery. Methods A systematic review of the literature published on SAM between 1976 and 2012 was performed, focusing on arterial involvement, diagnostic imaging modalities, mortality and morbidity rates, and in particular treatment outcomes with open versus endovascular intervention. Results Sixty-two studies reporting on 85 cases of SAM were reviewed. Sixty-nine percent of cases were diagnosed histologically (24% on autopsy). Angiography was the most common form of diagnostic imaging modality (56% of cases). Arterial involvement was largely abdominal or cranial, with splenic arterial involvement being the most prevalent (29% of cases). There was a total SAM-related mortality of 26%. Endovascular intervention, most commonly in the form of coil embolization of aneurysmal vessel(s), was successful in 88% of cases where attempted, with no reported mortality. There was a mortality rate of 9% where open surgery was attempted. Conclusions Catheter-based endovascular techniques can be a successful, minimally invasive treatment option in the management of this potentially life-threatening condition, and may also provide a temporary bailout measure in the acute phase before definitive surgical treatment at a later stage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.03.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1477554945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0890509613002070</els_id><sourcerecordid>1477554945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d65e81666b8ad1090ffd48b6f8745ba6e04d917f1e8b847b2c254ec6d8c44ebf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1r3DAQxUVpaLZp_4Eeio-9eDtjS7JcSmBZ0g9ICGTbs5DlcdDWH6nGm7L_fWU27aGHwsDM4b0H83tCvEFYI6B-v1-7R75fF4DlGtJA-UysUKPKVS2r52IFpoZcQa3PxUvmPQAWRpoX4rwoa2OUKlfickf3A42z67NNnCmGdNxQG6b-yIE_ZJtsd-SZBjcHn93RY6Bf2dRlRmVbx8SvxFnneqbXT_tCfP909W37Jb--_fx1u7nOvUSc81YrMqi1boxrEWroulaaRnemkqpxmkC2NVYdkmmMrJrCF0qS163xUlLTlRfi3Sn3IU4_D8SzHQJ76ns30nRgi7KqlJK1VElanKQ-TsyROvsQw-Di0SLYhZvd24WbXbhZSANlMr19yj80A7V_LX9AJcHHk4DSl4lCtOwDjT6hiuRn207h__mX_9h9H8bgXf-DjsT76RDHxM-i5cKC3S3NLcVhCVBABeVvumCSHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1477554945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: A Systematic Review of 85 Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Shenouda, Michael ; Riga, Celia ; Naji, Yaser ; Renton, Sophie</creator><creatorcontrib>Shenouda, Michael ; Riga, Celia ; Naji, Yaser ; Renton, Sophie</creatorcontrib><description>Background Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a nonatherosclerotic, noninflammatory arteriopathy of unknown etiology with life-threatening manifestations. With advances in endovascular techniques, SAM is increasingly being managed without the need for major surgery. Methods A systematic review of the literature published on SAM between 1976 and 2012 was performed, focusing on arterial involvement, diagnostic imaging modalities, mortality and morbidity rates, and in particular treatment outcomes with open versus endovascular intervention. Results Sixty-two studies reporting on 85 cases of SAM were reviewed. Sixty-nine percent of cases were diagnosed histologically (24% on autopsy). Angiography was the most common form of diagnostic imaging modality (56% of cases). Arterial involvement was largely abdominal or cranial, with splenic arterial involvement being the most prevalent (29% of cases). There was a total SAM-related mortality of 26%. Endovascular intervention, most commonly in the form of coil embolization of aneurysmal vessel(s), was successful in 88% of cases where attempted, with no reported mortality. There was a mortality rate of 9% where open surgery was attempted. Conclusions Catheter-based endovascular techniques can be a successful, minimally invasive treatment option in the management of this potentially life-threatening condition, and may also provide a temporary bailout measure in the acute phase before definitive surgical treatment at a later stage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23988553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arteries - surgery ; Diagnostic Imaging ; Disease Progression ; Endovascular Procedures ; Humans ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Factors ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Diseases - complications ; Vascular Diseases - diagnosis ; Vascular Diseases - mortality ; Vascular Diseases - therapy ; Vascular Surgical Procedures</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2014, Vol.28 (1), p.269-277</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d65e81666b8ad1090ffd48b6f8745ba6e04d917f1e8b847b2c254ec6d8c44ebf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d65e81666b8ad1090ffd48b6f8745ba6e04d917f1e8b847b2c254ec6d8c44ebf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2013.03.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23988553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shenouda, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riga, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naji, Yaser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renton, Sophie</creatorcontrib><title>Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: A Systematic Review of 85 Cases</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Background Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a nonatherosclerotic, noninflammatory arteriopathy of unknown etiology with life-threatening manifestations. With advances in endovascular techniques, SAM is increasingly being managed without the need for major surgery. Methods A systematic review of the literature published on SAM between 1976 and 2012 was performed, focusing on arterial involvement, diagnostic imaging modalities, mortality and morbidity rates, and in particular treatment outcomes with open versus endovascular intervention. Results Sixty-two studies reporting on 85 cases of SAM were reviewed. Sixty-nine percent of cases were diagnosed histologically (24% on autopsy). Angiography was the most common form of diagnostic imaging modality (56% of cases). Arterial involvement was largely abdominal or cranial, with splenic arterial involvement being the most prevalent (29% of cases). There was a total SAM-related mortality of 26%. Endovascular intervention, most commonly in the form of coil embolization of aneurysmal vessel(s), was successful in 88% of cases where attempted, with no reported mortality. There was a mortality rate of 9% where open surgery was attempted. Conclusions Catheter-based endovascular techniques can be a successful, minimally invasive treatment option in the management of this potentially life-threatening condition, and may also provide a temporary bailout measure in the acute phase before definitive surgical treatment at a later stage.</description><subject>Arteries - surgery</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Vascular Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Vascular Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Vascular Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1r3DAQxUVpaLZp_4Eeio-9eDtjS7JcSmBZ0g9ICGTbs5DlcdDWH6nGm7L_fWU27aGHwsDM4b0H83tCvEFYI6B-v1-7R75fF4DlGtJA-UysUKPKVS2r52IFpoZcQa3PxUvmPQAWRpoX4rwoa2OUKlfickf3A42z67NNnCmGdNxQG6b-yIE_ZJtsd-SZBjcHn93RY6Bf2dRlRmVbx8SvxFnneqbXT_tCfP909W37Jb--_fx1u7nOvUSc81YrMqi1boxrEWroulaaRnemkqpxmkC2NVYdkmmMrJrCF0qS163xUlLTlRfi3Sn3IU4_D8SzHQJ76ns30nRgi7KqlJK1VElanKQ-TsyROvsQw-Di0SLYhZvd24WbXbhZSANlMr19yj80A7V_LX9AJcHHk4DSl4lCtOwDjT6hiuRn207h__mX_9h9H8bgXf-DjsT76RDHxM-i5cKC3S3NLcVhCVBABeVvumCSHg</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Shenouda, Michael</creator><creator>Riga, Celia</creator><creator>Naji, Yaser</creator><creator>Renton, Sophie</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: A Systematic Review of 85 Cases</title><author>Shenouda, Michael ; Riga, Celia ; Naji, Yaser ; Renton, Sophie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d65e81666b8ad1090ffd48b6f8745ba6e04d917f1e8b847b2c254ec6d8c44ebf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Arteries - surgery</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Vascular Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Vascular Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Vascular Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shenouda, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riga, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naji, Yaser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renton, Sophie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shenouda, Michael</au><au>Riga, Celia</au><au>Naji, Yaser</au><au>Renton, Sophie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: A Systematic Review of 85 Cases</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>269-277</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><abstract>Background Segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) is a nonatherosclerotic, noninflammatory arteriopathy of unknown etiology with life-threatening manifestations. With advances in endovascular techniques, SAM is increasingly being managed without the need for major surgery. Methods A systematic review of the literature published on SAM between 1976 and 2012 was performed, focusing on arterial involvement, diagnostic imaging modalities, mortality and morbidity rates, and in particular treatment outcomes with open versus endovascular intervention. Results Sixty-two studies reporting on 85 cases of SAM were reviewed. Sixty-nine percent of cases were diagnosed histologically (24% on autopsy). Angiography was the most common form of diagnostic imaging modality (56% of cases). Arterial involvement was largely abdominal or cranial, with splenic arterial involvement being the most prevalent (29% of cases). There was a total SAM-related mortality of 26%. Endovascular intervention, most commonly in the form of coil embolization of aneurysmal vessel(s), was successful in 88% of cases where attempted, with no reported mortality. There was a mortality rate of 9% where open surgery was attempted. Conclusions Catheter-based endovascular techniques can be a successful, minimally invasive treatment option in the management of this potentially life-threatening condition, and may also provide a temporary bailout measure in the acute phase before definitive surgical treatment at a later stage.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23988553</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.avsg.2013.03.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5096
ispartof Annals of vascular surgery, 2014, Vol.28 (1), p.269-277
issn 0890-5096
1615-5947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1477554945
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Arteries - surgery
Diagnostic Imaging
Disease Progression
Endovascular Procedures
Humans
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk Factors
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Diseases - complications
Vascular Diseases - diagnosis
Vascular Diseases - mortality
Vascular Diseases - therapy
Vascular Surgical Procedures
title Segmental Arterial Mediolysis: A Systematic Review of 85 Cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A36%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Segmental%20Arterial%20Mediolysis:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%2085%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Shenouda,%20Michael&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=269-277&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.avsg.2013.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1477554945%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1477554945&rft_id=info:pmid/23988553&rft_els_id=S0890509613002070&rfr_iscdi=true