The Stability of the Monofixation Syndrome

Purpose To determine etiology, characteristics, and stability of the monofixation syndrome (MFS) in a chart review of 63 consecutive patients in a private practice of pediatric ophthalmology. Design Retrospective, consecutive chart review. Methods The charts of 63 consecutive patients with MFS, enco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2014, Vol.157 (1), p.248-253.e1
Hauptverfasser: Ing, Malcolm R, Roberts, Kathryn M, Lin, Alexander, Chen, John J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253.e1
container_issue 1
container_start_page 248
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 157
creator Ing, Malcolm R
Roberts, Kathryn M
Lin, Alexander
Chen, John J
description Purpose To determine etiology, characteristics, and stability of the monofixation syndrome (MFS) in a chart review of 63 consecutive patients in a private practice of pediatric ophthalmology. Design Retrospective, consecutive chart review. Methods The charts of 63 consecutive patients with MFS, encountered from 2007-2012 followed for a minimum of 3 years were included. Best visual acuity, motor angle deviation at near, fusion, and stereoacuity as recorded on the most recent visit during the follow-up period were examined. Stability of the MFS was determined by comparing the dates of diagnosis with the last examination for those patients who remained stable. Decompensated patients were also studied for characteristics and results of secondary surgery. Results The etiology of the MFS was esotropia in 58 (92.1%), anisometropia in 2 (3.2%), and exotropia in 3 patients (4.8%). The majority of patients, 57 of 63 (92%), had stable MFS for a mean of 13.9 years. Six esotropic patients decompensated after a mean of 6 years; 5 of these patients were restored to MFS by secondary surgery and 1 spontaneously recovered. Five patients were found to have improved stereoacuity to 60 arc seconds or better by the end of the study. Conclusions The MFS is a relatively stable binocular status during the first 2 decades of follow-up. A small percentage of patients decompensated, requiring secondary surgery to restore the MFS binocular status. A similar small percentage of MFS patients developed a higher grade of stereoacuity when followed for a sufficient interval of time.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1477553824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002939413005849</els_id><sourcerecordid>3152470751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-11c4875a097a0b8cd4310ecaf253673bff0854cfb2995e6e1152a64ef1735f2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9Ad7IgjcizHjynSAUpPgFLV5svQ6ZzAlmnJ3Uyay4_75Ztyr0olfh5DznJXkOIS8otBSoeju0fsgtA8pbMC0w8YisqNG2ocbSx2QFAKyx3IpT8rSUoZZKC_2EnDLBaovzFXlz_R3Xm8V3aUzLfp3jeqkXV3nKMf32S8rTerOf-jlv8Rk5iX4s-PzuPCPfPn64vvjcXH799OXi_WUTBFdLQ2kQRksPVnvoTOgFp4DBRya50ryLEYwUIXbMWokKKZXMK4GRai4j8_yMvD7m3sz55w7L4rapBBxHP2HeFUeF1lJyw0RFX91Dh7ybp_q6SikllRUcKkWPVJhzKTNGdzOnrZ_3joI7iHSDqyLdQaQD4-BP8su75F23xf7fxF9zFXh3BLCq-JVwdiUknAL2acawuD6nB-PP702HMU0p-PEH7rH8_4UrzIHbHDZ5WCTlANIIy28BEv2VKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1466569430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Stability of the Monofixation Syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ing, Malcolm R ; Roberts, Kathryn M ; Lin, Alexander ; Chen, John J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ing, Malcolm R ; Roberts, Kathryn M ; Lin, Alexander ; Chen, John J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine etiology, characteristics, and stability of the monofixation syndrome (MFS) in a chart review of 63 consecutive patients in a private practice of pediatric ophthalmology. Design Retrospective, consecutive chart review. Methods The charts of 63 consecutive patients with MFS, encountered from 2007-2012 followed for a minimum of 3 years were included. Best visual acuity, motor angle deviation at near, fusion, and stereoacuity as recorded on the most recent visit during the follow-up period were examined. Stability of the MFS was determined by comparing the dates of diagnosis with the last examination for those patients who remained stable. Decompensated patients were also studied for characteristics and results of secondary surgery. Results The etiology of the MFS was esotropia in 58 (92.1%), anisometropia in 2 (3.2%), and exotropia in 3 patients (4.8%). The majority of patients, 57 of 63 (92%), had stable MFS for a mean of 13.9 years. Six esotropic patients decompensated after a mean of 6 years; 5 of these patients were restored to MFS by secondary surgery and 1 spontaneously recovered. Five patients were found to have improved stereoacuity to 60 arc seconds or better by the end of the study. Conclusions The MFS is a relatively stable binocular status during the first 2 decades of follow-up. A small percentage of patients decompensated, requiring secondary surgery to restore the MFS binocular status. A similar small percentage of MFS patients developed a higher grade of stereoacuity when followed for a sufficient interval of time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24200233</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Anisometropia - complications ; Anisometropia - physiopathology ; Anisometropia - surgery ; Child ; Clinical outcomes ; Depth Perception - physiology ; Esotropia - complications ; Esotropia - physiopathology ; Esotropia - surgery ; Exotropia - complications ; Exotropia - physiopathology ; Exotropia - surgery ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Ophthalmology ; Perceptual Disorders - etiology ; Perceptual Disorders - physiopathology ; Perceptual Disorders - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Vision, Binocular - physiology ; Visual Acuity - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2014, Vol.157 (1), p.248-253.e1</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-11c4875a097a0b8cd4310ecaf253673bff0854cfb2995e6e1152a64ef1735f2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-11c4875a097a0b8cd4310ecaf253673bff0854cfb2995e6e1152a64ef1735f2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939413005849$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24200233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ing, Malcolm R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Kathryn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, John J</creatorcontrib><title>The Stability of the Monofixation Syndrome</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine etiology, characteristics, and stability of the monofixation syndrome (MFS) in a chart review of 63 consecutive patients in a private practice of pediatric ophthalmology. Design Retrospective, consecutive chart review. Methods The charts of 63 consecutive patients with MFS, encountered from 2007-2012 followed for a minimum of 3 years were included. Best visual acuity, motor angle deviation at near, fusion, and stereoacuity as recorded on the most recent visit during the follow-up period were examined. Stability of the MFS was determined by comparing the dates of diagnosis with the last examination for those patients who remained stable. Decompensated patients were also studied for characteristics and results of secondary surgery. Results The etiology of the MFS was esotropia in 58 (92.1%), anisometropia in 2 (3.2%), and exotropia in 3 patients (4.8%). The majority of patients, 57 of 63 (92%), had stable MFS for a mean of 13.9 years. Six esotropic patients decompensated after a mean of 6 years; 5 of these patients were restored to MFS by secondary surgery and 1 spontaneously recovered. Five patients were found to have improved stereoacuity to 60 arc seconds or better by the end of the study. Conclusions The MFS is a relatively stable binocular status during the first 2 decades of follow-up. A small percentage of patients decompensated, requiring secondary surgery to restore the MFS binocular status. A similar small percentage of MFS patients developed a higher grade of stereoacuity when followed for a sufficient interval of time.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anisometropia - complications</subject><subject>Anisometropia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Anisometropia - surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Depth Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Esotropia - complications</subject><subject>Esotropia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Esotropia - surgery</subject><subject>Exotropia - complications</subject><subject>Exotropia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Exotropia - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Perceptual Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Perceptual Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Perceptual Disorders - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vision, Binocular - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9Ad7IgjcizHjynSAUpPgFLV5svQ6ZzAlmnJ3Uyay4_75Ztyr0olfh5DznJXkOIS8otBSoeju0fsgtA8pbMC0w8YisqNG2ocbSx2QFAKyx3IpT8rSUoZZKC_2EnDLBaovzFXlz_R3Xm8V3aUzLfp3jeqkXV3nKMf32S8rTerOf-jlv8Rk5iX4s-PzuPCPfPn64vvjcXH799OXi_WUTBFdLQ2kQRksPVnvoTOgFp4DBRya50ryLEYwUIXbMWokKKZXMK4GRai4j8_yMvD7m3sz55w7L4rapBBxHP2HeFUeF1lJyw0RFX91Dh7ybp_q6SikllRUcKkWPVJhzKTNGdzOnrZ_3joI7iHSDqyLdQaQD4-BP8su75F23xf7fxF9zFXh3BLCq-JVwdiUknAL2acawuD6nB-PP702HMU0p-PEH7rH8_4UrzIHbHDZ5WCTlANIIy28BEv2VKQ</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Ing, Malcolm R</creator><creator>Roberts, Kathryn M</creator><creator>Lin, Alexander</creator><creator>Chen, John J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>The Stability of the Monofixation Syndrome</title><author>Ing, Malcolm R ; Roberts, Kathryn M ; Lin, Alexander ; Chen, John J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-11c4875a097a0b8cd4310ecaf253673bff0854cfb2995e6e1152a64ef1735f2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anisometropia - complications</topic><topic>Anisometropia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Anisometropia - surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Depth Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Esotropia - complications</topic><topic>Esotropia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Esotropia - surgery</topic><topic>Exotropia - complications</topic><topic>Exotropia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Exotropia - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Perceptual Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Perceptual Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Perceptual Disorders - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vision, Binocular - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ing, Malcolm R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Kathryn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, John J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ing, Malcolm R</au><au>Roberts, Kathryn M</au><au>Lin, Alexander</au><au>Chen, John J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Stability of the Monofixation Syndrome</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>157</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>253.e1</epage><pages>248-253.e1</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>Purpose To determine etiology, characteristics, and stability of the monofixation syndrome (MFS) in a chart review of 63 consecutive patients in a private practice of pediatric ophthalmology. Design Retrospective, consecutive chart review. Methods The charts of 63 consecutive patients with MFS, encountered from 2007-2012 followed for a minimum of 3 years were included. Best visual acuity, motor angle deviation at near, fusion, and stereoacuity as recorded on the most recent visit during the follow-up period were examined. Stability of the MFS was determined by comparing the dates of diagnosis with the last examination for those patients who remained stable. Decompensated patients were also studied for characteristics and results of secondary surgery. Results The etiology of the MFS was esotropia in 58 (92.1%), anisometropia in 2 (3.2%), and exotropia in 3 patients (4.8%). The majority of patients, 57 of 63 (92%), had stable MFS for a mean of 13.9 years. Six esotropic patients decompensated after a mean of 6 years; 5 of these patients were restored to MFS by secondary surgery and 1 spontaneously recovered. Five patients were found to have improved stereoacuity to 60 arc seconds or better by the end of the study. Conclusions The MFS is a relatively stable binocular status during the first 2 decades of follow-up. A small percentage of patients decompensated, requiring secondary surgery to restore the MFS binocular status. A similar small percentage of MFS patients developed a higher grade of stereoacuity when followed for a sufficient interval of time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24200233</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.024</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2014, Vol.157 (1), p.248-253.e1
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1477553824
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age
Anisometropia - complications
Anisometropia - physiopathology
Anisometropia - surgery
Child
Clinical outcomes
Depth Perception - physiology
Esotropia - complications
Esotropia - physiopathology
Esotropia - surgery
Exotropia - complications
Exotropia - physiopathology
Exotropia - surgery
Female
Fixation, Ocular - physiology
Humans
Male
Medical research
Ophthalmology
Perceptual Disorders - etiology
Perceptual Disorders - physiopathology
Perceptual Disorders - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Vision, Binocular - physiology
Visual Acuity - physiology
Young Adult
title The Stability of the Monofixation Syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A26%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Stability%20of%20the%20Monofixation%20Syndrome&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Ing,%20Malcolm%20R&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=157&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=253.e1&rft.pages=248-253.e1&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3152470751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1466569430&rft_id=info:pmid/24200233&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0002939413005849&rfr_iscdi=true