Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province

A survey was conducted using a face to face questionnaire with 92 sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) producers from 10 villages in five districts of the Isparta province where there is intensive sweet cherry production. The data collected was analyzed for the energy and economics of sweet cherry produc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management 2006-08, Vol.47 (13), p.1761-1769
Hauptverfasser: Demircan, Vecdi, Ekinci, Kamil, Keener, Harold M., Akbolat, Davut, Ekinci, Caglar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1769
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1761
container_title Energy conversion and management
container_volume 47
creator Demircan, Vecdi
Ekinci, Kamil
Keener, Harold M.
Akbolat, Davut
Ekinci, Caglar
description A survey was conducted using a face to face questionnaire with 92 sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) producers from 10 villages in five districts of the Isparta province where there is intensive sweet cherry production. The data collected was analyzed for the energy and economics of sweet cherry production. The results showed that the most energy consuming input for the different operations investigated was chemical fertilisers (45.35%), especially nitrogen (38.05%). The energy consumption for Diesel fuel was 21.53% of the total energy input. Although chemicals for plant protection had a small portion (1.45%) of the total energy input, the use of pesticide in sweet cherry production per hectare in the Isparta province was 5.36 times higher than that of Turkey’s average, increasing the environmental risk problem. The energy use efficiency, defined as energy produced per unit of energy used, was 1.23. The specific energy of sweet cherry production was determined to be 3163.43 MJ tonnes −1. It was found that the direct and indirect energy inputs were 34.48% and 54.91% of the total energy input, respectively. Among the inputs, renewable energy sources constituted 16.34% of the total energy input, which was lower than that of the non-renewable resources (chemical fertilisers and Diesel fuel). The results showed that the net return from sweet cherry production in the surveyed farms was satisfactory, as demonstrated by the benefit–cost ratio of 2.53 calculated by dividing the gross value of production by the total cost of production per hectare.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14770400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S019689040500258X</els_id><sourcerecordid>14770400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-8fbbfb746b0e30828fe9cfbca3f2afa8653f68ef2da9e13032761449506055d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1P3DAUtKoidbvwF5Av5ZatHSd20hMIbSkSEhc4W47z3Hqb2Fu_BJR_X0cL6rGnpzeaD80QcsnZjjMuvx52EGwMowm7krE6gzvGxAey4Y1qi7Is1UeyYbyVRdOy6hP5jHhgmVEzuSGwD5B-LtSEnkJ2iaO3-THDgh5pdBRfASZqf0FKCz2m2M928jFQH-jTnH7D8o3eUGsQKE5zv1CX4kjv8WjSZFb-iw8WzsmZMwPCxdvdkufv-6fbH8XD49397c1DYYUSU9G4rnOdqmTHQLCmbBy01nXWCFcaZxpZCycbcGVvWuCCiVJJXlVtbsLquq_FllydfHPwnxlw0qNHC8NgAsQZNa-UYlXuviXyRLQpIiZw-pj8aNKiOdPrqvqg31fV66ornnVZ-OUtwaA1g0smWI__1Eoq3vA14PrEg1z3xUPSaH12hN4nsJPuo_9f1F9U4ZI9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14770400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Demircan, Vecdi ; Ekinci, Kamil ; Keener, Harold M. ; Akbolat, Davut ; Ekinci, Caglar</creator><creatorcontrib>Demircan, Vecdi ; Ekinci, Kamil ; Keener, Harold M. ; Akbolat, Davut ; Ekinci, Caglar</creatorcontrib><description>A survey was conducted using a face to face questionnaire with 92 sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) producers from 10 villages in five districts of the Isparta province where there is intensive sweet cherry production. The data collected was analyzed for the energy and economics of sweet cherry production. The results showed that the most energy consuming input for the different operations investigated was chemical fertilisers (45.35%), especially nitrogen (38.05%). The energy consumption for Diesel fuel was 21.53% of the total energy input. Although chemicals for plant protection had a small portion (1.45%) of the total energy input, the use of pesticide in sweet cherry production per hectare in the Isparta province was 5.36 times higher than that of Turkey’s average, increasing the environmental risk problem. The energy use efficiency, defined as energy produced per unit of energy used, was 1.23. The specific energy of sweet cherry production was determined to be 3163.43 MJ tonnes −1. It was found that the direct and indirect energy inputs were 34.48% and 54.91% of the total energy input, respectively. Among the inputs, renewable energy sources constituted 16.34% of the total energy input, which was lower than that of the non-renewable resources (chemical fertilisers and Diesel fuel). The results showed that the net return from sweet cherry production in the surveyed farms was satisfactory, as demonstrated by the benefit–cost ratio of 2.53 calculated by dividing the gross value of production by the total cost of production per hectare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECMADL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bioenergy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Economic data ; Economics ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy use efficiency ; Exact sciences and technology ; Food industries ; Fruit and vegetable industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Sweet cherry</subject><ispartof>Energy conversion and management, 2006-08, Vol.47 (13), p.1761-1769</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-8fbbfb746b0e30828fe9cfbca3f2afa8653f68ef2da9e13032761449506055d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-8fbbfb746b0e30828fe9cfbca3f2afa8653f68ef2da9e13032761449506055d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17671810$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demircan, Vecdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekinci, Kamil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keener, Harold M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbolat, Davut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekinci, Caglar</creatorcontrib><title>Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province</title><title>Energy conversion and management</title><description>A survey was conducted using a face to face questionnaire with 92 sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) producers from 10 villages in five districts of the Isparta province where there is intensive sweet cherry production. The data collected was analyzed for the energy and economics of sweet cherry production. The results showed that the most energy consuming input for the different operations investigated was chemical fertilisers (45.35%), especially nitrogen (38.05%). The energy consumption for Diesel fuel was 21.53% of the total energy input. Although chemicals for plant protection had a small portion (1.45%) of the total energy input, the use of pesticide in sweet cherry production per hectare in the Isparta province was 5.36 times higher than that of Turkey’s average, increasing the environmental risk problem. The energy use efficiency, defined as energy produced per unit of energy used, was 1.23. The specific energy of sweet cherry production was determined to be 3163.43 MJ tonnes −1. It was found that the direct and indirect energy inputs were 34.48% and 54.91% of the total energy input, respectively. Among the inputs, renewable energy sources constituted 16.34% of the total energy input, which was lower than that of the non-renewable resources (chemical fertilisers and Diesel fuel). The results showed that the net return from sweet cherry production in the surveyed farms was satisfactory, as demonstrated by the benefit–cost ratio of 2.53 calculated by dividing the gross value of production by the total cost of production per hectare.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bioenergy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy use efficiency</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fruit and vegetable industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Sweet cherry</subject><issn>0196-8904</issn><issn>1879-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1P3DAUtKoidbvwF5Av5ZatHSd20hMIbSkSEhc4W47z3Hqb2Fu_BJR_X0cL6rGnpzeaD80QcsnZjjMuvx52EGwMowm7krE6gzvGxAey4Y1qi7Is1UeyYbyVRdOy6hP5jHhgmVEzuSGwD5B-LtSEnkJ2iaO3-THDgh5pdBRfASZqf0FKCz2m2M928jFQH-jTnH7D8o3eUGsQKE5zv1CX4kjv8WjSZFb-iw8WzsmZMwPCxdvdkufv-6fbH8XD49397c1DYYUSU9G4rnOdqmTHQLCmbBy01nXWCFcaZxpZCycbcGVvWuCCiVJJXlVtbsLquq_FllydfHPwnxlw0qNHC8NgAsQZNa-UYlXuviXyRLQpIiZw-pj8aNKiOdPrqvqg31fV66ornnVZ-OUtwaA1g0smWI__1Eoq3vA14PrEg1z3xUPSaH12hN4nsJPuo_9f1F9U4ZI9</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>Demircan, Vecdi</creator><creator>Ekinci, Kamil</creator><creator>Keener, Harold M.</creator><creator>Akbolat, Davut</creator><creator>Ekinci, Caglar</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province</title><author>Demircan, Vecdi ; Ekinci, Kamil ; Keener, Harold M. ; Akbolat, Davut ; Ekinci, Caglar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-8fbbfb746b0e30828fe9cfbca3f2afa8653f68ef2da9e13032761449506055d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bioenergy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy use efficiency</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fruit and vegetable industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Sweet cherry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demircan, Vecdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekinci, Kamil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keener, Harold M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbolat, Davut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekinci, Caglar</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demircan, Vecdi</au><au>Ekinci, Kamil</au><au>Keener, Harold M.</au><au>Akbolat, Davut</au><au>Ekinci, Caglar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province</atitle><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1761</spage><epage>1769</epage><pages>1761-1769</pages><issn>0196-8904</issn><eissn>1879-2227</eissn><coden>ECMADL</coden><abstract>A survey was conducted using a face to face questionnaire with 92 sweet cherry ( Prunus avium L.) producers from 10 villages in five districts of the Isparta province where there is intensive sweet cherry production. The data collected was analyzed for the energy and economics of sweet cherry production. The results showed that the most energy consuming input for the different operations investigated was chemical fertilisers (45.35%), especially nitrogen (38.05%). The energy consumption for Diesel fuel was 21.53% of the total energy input. Although chemicals for plant protection had a small portion (1.45%) of the total energy input, the use of pesticide in sweet cherry production per hectare in the Isparta province was 5.36 times higher than that of Turkey’s average, increasing the environmental risk problem. The energy use efficiency, defined as energy produced per unit of energy used, was 1.23. The specific energy of sweet cherry production was determined to be 3163.43 MJ tonnes −1. It was found that the direct and indirect energy inputs were 34.48% and 54.91% of the total energy input, respectively. Among the inputs, renewable energy sources constituted 16.34% of the total energy input, which was lower than that of the non-renewable resources (chemical fertilisers and Diesel fuel). The results showed that the net return from sweet cherry production in the surveyed farms was satisfactory, as demonstrated by the benefit–cost ratio of 2.53 calculated by dividing the gross value of production by the total cost of production per hectare.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8904
ispartof Energy conversion and management, 2006-08, Vol.47 (13), p.1761-1769
issn 0196-8904
1879-2227
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14770400
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Applied sciences
Bioenergy
Biological and medical sciences
Economic data
Economics
Energy
Energy economics
Energy use efficiency
Exact sciences and technology
Food industries
Fruit and vegetable industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General, economic and professional studies
Sweet cherry
title Energy and economic analysis of sweet cherry production in Turkey: A case study from Isparta province
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T01%3A59%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20and%20economic%20analysis%20of%20sweet%20cherry%20production%20in%20Turkey:%20A%20case%20study%20from%20Isparta%20province&rft.jtitle=Energy%20conversion%20and%20management&rft.au=Demircan,%20Vecdi&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1761&rft.epage=1769&rft.pages=1761-1769&rft.issn=0196-8904&rft.eissn=1879-2227&rft.coden=ECMADL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14770400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14770400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S019689040500258X&rfr_iscdi=true