Predicting maize and soybean production in a sheltered field in the Cornbelt region of North Central USA

Shelterbelts (field windbreaks) are an important tool for farming in semi-arid areas but are not commonly used. An obstacle to the adoption of shelterbelts is the lack of site-specific information about the benefits and costs associated with establishing and maintaining them. A group of researchers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agroforestry systems 2005-08, Vol.64 (2), p.107-116
Hauptverfasser: MIZE, C. W, EGEH, M. H, BATCHELOR, W. D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116
container_issue 2
container_start_page 107
container_title Agroforestry systems
container_volume 64
creator MIZE, C. W
EGEH, M. H
BATCHELOR, W. D
description Shelterbelts (field windbreaks) are an important tool for farming in semi-arid areas but are not commonly used. An obstacle to the adoption of shelterbelts is the lack of site-specific information about the benefits and costs associated with establishing and maintaining them. A group of researchers has been developing a modeling system that will estimate site-specific effects, benefits, and costs for sheltered fields that produce maize or corn (Zea maize) and soybean (Glycine max) in the U.S. Corn Belt region. Akey component of the modeling system is the use of the CROPGRO-Soybean and CERES-Maize models to simulate yield response to microclimatic changes acrossa sheltered field. In this work, we tested the ability of both models to simulate yield in a sheltered field, evaluated the potential yield increase of shelterbelts based on long-term simulations, and compared the influence of shelter induced changes in temperature and windrun on yield. Both models simulated yield increases due to shelter. The soybean model was more responsive to microclimatic differences than the maize model. Long-term simulations generally showed a field level increase in yield due to shelter for maize and soybeans with an average increase of 4.1 and 3.3, respectively. Change in windrun due to shelter is more important in increasing yield than changes in temperature. The CERES-Maize model seems to be more sensitive to changes in windrun than the CROPGRO-Soybean model.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10457-004-0534-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14740518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2108403621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-f4fe99af2df7219a4f548ad81e355cf2cd80e36c4e5823b9caa62633ad4f06183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLBDEQhIMouD5-gLcg6G00mTznKIsvEBXUc-jNdNyR2USTWVj99c66guCpoeuroihCjjg744yZ88KZVKZiTFZMCVmttsiEK1NXjbZsm0wY16aSQutdslfKG2Os0cZOyPwxY9v5oYuvdAHdF1KILS3pc4YQ6XtO7XIUU6RdpEDLHPsBRwcNHfbt-jnMkU5TjrNRoRlf12wK9D7lYU6nGIcMPX15ujggOwH6goe_d5-8XF0-T2-qu4fr2-nFXeVF0wxVkAGbBkLdBlPzBmRQ0kJrOQqlfKh9axkK7SUqW4tZ4wF0rYWAVgamuRX75HSTO3b_WGIZ3KIrHvseIqZlcVwaydQPePwPfEvLHMduzshaKW20GSG-gXxOpWQM7j13C8ifjjO3Ht5thnfj8G49vFuNnpPfYCge-pAh-q78GbVVVkgjvgHFEIOT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>742556767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting maize and soybean production in a sheltered field in the Cornbelt region of North Central USA</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>MIZE, C. W ; EGEH, M. H ; BATCHELOR, W. D</creator><creatorcontrib>MIZE, C. W ; EGEH, M. H ; BATCHELOR, W. D</creatorcontrib><description>Shelterbelts (field windbreaks) are an important tool for farming in semi-arid areas but are not commonly used. An obstacle to the adoption of shelterbelts is the lack of site-specific information about the benefits and costs associated with establishing and maintaining them. A group of researchers has been developing a modeling system that will estimate site-specific effects, benefits, and costs for sheltered fields that produce maize or corn (Zea maize) and soybean (Glycine max) in the U.S. Corn Belt region. Akey component of the modeling system is the use of the CROPGRO-Soybean and CERES-Maize models to simulate yield response to microclimatic changes acrossa sheltered field. In this work, we tested the ability of both models to simulate yield in a sheltered field, evaluated the potential yield increase of shelterbelts based on long-term simulations, and compared the influence of shelter induced changes in temperature and windrun on yield. Both models simulated yield increases due to shelter. The soybean model was more responsive to microclimatic differences than the maize model. Long-term simulations generally showed a field level increase in yield due to shelter for maize and soybeans with an average increase of 4.1 and 3.3, respectively. Change in windrun due to shelter is more important in increasing yield than changes in temperature. The CERES-Maize model seems to be more sensitive to changes in windrun than the CROPGRO-Soybean model.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10457-004-0534-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGSYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Corn belt ; Crop production ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Soybeans ; Windbreaks</subject><ispartof>Agroforestry systems, 2005-08, Vol.64 (2), p.107-116</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-f4fe99af2df7219a4f548ad81e355cf2cd80e36c4e5823b9caa62633ad4f06183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-f4fe99af2df7219a4f548ad81e355cf2cd80e36c4e5823b9caa62633ad4f06183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16858347$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MIZE, C. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EGEH, M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BATCHELOR, W. D</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting maize and soybean production in a sheltered field in the Cornbelt region of North Central USA</title><title>Agroforestry systems</title><description>Shelterbelts (field windbreaks) are an important tool for farming in semi-arid areas but are not commonly used. An obstacle to the adoption of shelterbelts is the lack of site-specific information about the benefits and costs associated with establishing and maintaining them. A group of researchers has been developing a modeling system that will estimate site-specific effects, benefits, and costs for sheltered fields that produce maize or corn (Zea maize) and soybean (Glycine max) in the U.S. Corn Belt region. Akey component of the modeling system is the use of the CROPGRO-Soybean and CERES-Maize models to simulate yield response to microclimatic changes acrossa sheltered field. In this work, we tested the ability of both models to simulate yield in a sheltered field, evaluated the potential yield increase of shelterbelts based on long-term simulations, and compared the influence of shelter induced changes in temperature and windrun on yield. Both models simulated yield increases due to shelter. The soybean model was more responsive to microclimatic differences than the maize model. Long-term simulations generally showed a field level increase in yield due to shelter for maize and soybeans with an average increase of 4.1 and 3.3, respectively. Change in windrun due to shelter is more important in increasing yield than changes in temperature. The CERES-Maize model seems to be more sensitive to changes in windrun than the CROPGRO-Soybean model.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Corn belt</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Windbreaks</subject><issn>0167-4366</issn><issn>1572-9680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLBDEQhIMouD5-gLcg6G00mTznKIsvEBXUc-jNdNyR2USTWVj99c66guCpoeuroihCjjg744yZ88KZVKZiTFZMCVmttsiEK1NXjbZsm0wY16aSQutdslfKG2Os0cZOyPwxY9v5oYuvdAHdF1KILS3pc4YQ6XtO7XIUU6RdpEDLHPsBRwcNHfbt-jnMkU5TjrNRoRlf12wK9D7lYU6nGIcMPX15ujggOwH6goe_d5-8XF0-T2-qu4fr2-nFXeVF0wxVkAGbBkLdBlPzBmRQ0kJrOQqlfKh9axkK7SUqW4tZ4wF0rYWAVgamuRX75HSTO3b_WGIZ3KIrHvseIqZlcVwaydQPePwPfEvLHMduzshaKW20GSG-gXxOpWQM7j13C8ifjjO3Ht5thnfj8G49vFuNnpPfYCge-pAh-q78GbVVVkgjvgHFEIOT</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>MIZE, C. W</creator><creator>EGEH, M. H</creator><creator>BATCHELOR, W. D</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Predicting maize and soybean production in a sheltered field in the Cornbelt region of North Central USA</title><author>MIZE, C. W ; EGEH, M. H ; BATCHELOR, W. D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-f4fe99af2df7219a4f548ad81e355cf2cd80e36c4e5823b9caa62633ad4f06183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Corn belt</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Windbreaks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MIZE, C. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EGEH, M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BATCHELOR, W. D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MIZE, C. W</au><au>EGEH, M. H</au><au>BATCHELOR, W. D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting maize and soybean production in a sheltered field in the Cornbelt region of North Central USA</atitle><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>107-116</pages><issn>0167-4366</issn><eissn>1572-9680</eissn><coden>AGSYE6</coden><abstract>Shelterbelts (field windbreaks) are an important tool for farming in semi-arid areas but are not commonly used. An obstacle to the adoption of shelterbelts is the lack of site-specific information about the benefits and costs associated with establishing and maintaining them. A group of researchers has been developing a modeling system that will estimate site-specific effects, benefits, and costs for sheltered fields that produce maize or corn (Zea maize) and soybean (Glycine max) in the U.S. Corn Belt region. Akey component of the modeling system is the use of the CROPGRO-Soybean and CERES-Maize models to simulate yield response to microclimatic changes acrossa sheltered field. In this work, we tested the ability of both models to simulate yield in a sheltered field, evaluated the potential yield increase of shelterbelts based on long-term simulations, and compared the influence of shelter induced changes in temperature and windrun on yield. Both models simulated yield increases due to shelter. The soybean model was more responsive to microclimatic differences than the maize model. Long-term simulations generally showed a field level increase in yield due to shelter for maize and soybeans with an average increase of 4.1 and 3.3, respectively. Change in windrun due to shelter is more important in increasing yield than changes in temperature. The CERES-Maize model seems to be more sensitive to changes in windrun than the CROPGRO-Soybean model.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10457-004-0534-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4366
ispartof Agroforestry systems, 2005-08, Vol.64 (2), p.107-116
issn 0167-4366
1572-9680
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14740518
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Corn belt
Crop production
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Soybeans
Windbreaks
title Predicting maize and soybean production in a sheltered field in the Cornbelt region of North Central USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A50%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20maize%20and%20soybean%20production%20in%20a%20sheltered%20field%20in%20the%20Cornbelt%20region%20of%20North%20Central%20USA&rft.jtitle=Agroforestry%20systems&rft.au=MIZE,%20C.%20W&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=107-116&rft.issn=0167-4366&rft.eissn=1572-9680&rft.coden=AGSYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10457-004-0534-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2108403621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=742556767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true