2009 Accreditation Requirements: Comparison of CIDA and NAAB
This investigation studied interior design and architecture education with respect to their specialized and shared knowledge areas (KAs). Education, formalized via accrediation requirements, is available to both disciplines. KAs within discipline-specific accrediatation requirements content were ide...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of interior design 2010-01, Vol.35 (2), p.ix-xxxii |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | xxxii |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | ix |
| container_title | Journal of interior design |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Martin, Caren S. Kroelinger, Michael D. |
| description | This investigation studied interior design and architecture education with respect to their specialized and shared knowledge areas (KAs). Education, formalized via accrediation requirements, is available to both disciplines. KAs within discipline-specific accrediatation requirements content were identified, categorized, and then compared to differentiate the specialized, parallel, and shared knowledge gained by students graduating from accredited programs. The findings of this study could contribute to the dialog about what makes interior design and architecture unique professions. . (Author abstract) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1939-1668.2009.01038.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1473813550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1111_j.1939-1668.2009.01038.x</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1473813550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3788-985f012d5e2e91fa69ea217ed933a79d04c3b4e1fa16fae1f5c893d510379ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQhYMoWKv_IUcvibvZbDYrIqSt1kptpRQEL8OaTCQ1TdrdFNt_78aI585lBt68N8znOC4lPrV1s_KpZNKjURT7ASHSJ5Sw2N-fOL1_4dTORFBPRCE9dy6MWRHCeBjKnnPXetwkTTVmRaOaoq7cBW53hcY1Vo25dYf1eqN0YaxQ5-5wMkpcVWXuLEkGl85ZrkqDV3-97ywfH5bDJ286H0-GydRLmYhjT8Y8JzTIOAYoaa4iiSqgAjPJmBIyI2HKPkK0Co1yZTtPY8kybh8RUiHrO9dd7EbX2x2aBtaFSbEsVYX1zgANBYsp45zY1bhbTXVtjMYcNrpYK30ASqDlBStosUCLBdrf4ZcX7K31vrN-FyUejvbB83wyakcbwLsAoz4RVvVOVxbKMYe9zleYBvf_h5X-gkgwweFtNgbBFvTl9X0AA_YDGvSN3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1473813550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>2009 Accreditation Requirements: Comparison of CIDA and NAAB</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Martin, Caren S. ; Kroelinger, Michael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Caren S. ; Kroelinger, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><description>This investigation studied interior design and architecture education with respect to their specialized and shared knowledge areas (KAs). Education, formalized via accrediation requirements, is available to both disciplines. KAs within discipline-specific accrediatation requirements content were identified, categorized, and then compared to differentiate the specialized, parallel, and shared knowledge gained by students graduating from accredited programs. The findings of this study could contribute to the dialog about what makes interior design and architecture unique professions. . (Author abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-7641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1668</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1668.2009.01038.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of interior design, 2010-01, Vol.35 (2), p.ix-xxxii</ispartof><rights>2010 Interior Design Educators Council</rights><rights>Copyright 2010, Interior Design Educators Council</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3788-985f012d5e2e91fa69ea217ed933a79d04c3b4e1fa16fae1f5c893d510379ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3788-985f012d5e2e91fa69ea217ed933a79d04c3b4e1fa16fae1f5c893d510379ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2009.01038.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2009.01038.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Caren S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroelinger, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><title>2009 Accreditation Requirements: Comparison of CIDA and NAAB</title><title>Journal of interior design</title><description>This investigation studied interior design and architecture education with respect to their specialized and shared knowledge areas (KAs). Education, formalized via accrediation requirements, is available to both disciplines. KAs within discipline-specific accrediatation requirements content were identified, categorized, and then compared to differentiate the specialized, parallel, and shared knowledge gained by students graduating from accredited programs. The findings of this study could contribute to the dialog about what makes interior design and architecture unique professions. . (Author abstract)</description><issn>1071-7641</issn><issn>1939-1668</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQhYMoWKv_IUcvibvZbDYrIqSt1kptpRQEL8OaTCQ1TdrdFNt_78aI585lBt68N8znOC4lPrV1s_KpZNKjURT7ASHSJ5Sw2N-fOL1_4dTORFBPRCE9dy6MWRHCeBjKnnPXetwkTTVmRaOaoq7cBW53hcY1Vo25dYf1eqN0YaxQ5-5wMkpcVWXuLEkGl85ZrkqDV3-97ywfH5bDJ286H0-GydRLmYhjT8Y8JzTIOAYoaa4iiSqgAjPJmBIyI2HKPkK0Co1yZTtPY8kybh8RUiHrO9dd7EbX2x2aBtaFSbEsVYX1zgANBYsp45zY1bhbTXVtjMYcNrpYK30ASqDlBStosUCLBdrf4ZcX7K31vrN-FyUejvbB83wyakcbwLsAoz4RVvVOVxbKMYe9zleYBvf_h5X-gkgwweFtNgbBFvTl9X0AA_YDGvSN3A</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Martin, Caren S.</creator><creator>Kroelinger, Michael D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F29</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>2009 Accreditation Requirements: Comparison of CIDA and NAAB</title><author>Martin, Caren S. ; Kroelinger, Michael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3788-985f012d5e2e91fa69ea217ed933a79d04c3b4e1fa16fae1f5c893d510379ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Caren S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroelinger, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><jtitle>Journal of interior design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Caren S.</au><au>Kroelinger, Michael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2009 Accreditation Requirements: Comparison of CIDA and NAAB</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interior design</jtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>ix</spage><epage>xxxii</epage><pages>ix-xxxii</pages><issn>1071-7641</issn><eissn>1939-1668</eissn><abstract>This investigation studied interior design and architecture education with respect to their specialized and shared knowledge areas (KAs). Education, formalized via accrediation requirements, is available to both disciplines. KAs within discipline-specific accrediatation requirements content were identified, categorized, and then compared to differentiate the specialized, parallel, and shared knowledge gained by students graduating from accredited programs. The findings of this study could contribute to the dialog about what makes interior design and architecture unique professions. . (Author abstract)</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1939-1668.2009.01038.x</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1071-7641 |
| ispartof | Journal of interior design, 2010-01, Vol.35 (2), p.ix-xxxii |
| issn | 1071-7641 1939-1668 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1473813550 |
| source | Wiley Online Library All Journals; SAGE Complete |
| title | 2009 Accreditation Requirements: Comparison of CIDA and NAAB |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A25%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2009%20Accreditation%20Requirements:%20Comparison%20of%20CIDA%20and%20NAAB&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interior%20design&rft.au=Martin,%20Caren%20S.&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=ix&rft.epage=xxxii&rft.pages=ix-xxxii&rft.issn=1071-7641&rft.eissn=1939-1668&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2009.01038.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1473813550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1473813550&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1111_j.1939-1668.2009.01038.x&rfr_iscdi=true |