Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation
USA peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crop protection 2004-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1085-1088 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1088 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1085 |
container_title | Crop protection |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Branch, W.D. Fletcher, S.M. |
description | USA peanut (
Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs and without irrigation to evaluate the performance of several advanced Georgia breeding lines at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station. Each year, reduced inputs for disease control included only four fungicide applications at recommended rates on a 28
d schedule beginning 30
d after planting. No insecticides, nematicides, miticides, or irrigation were applied during the three growing seasons. Two recently released runner-type cultivars ‘Georgia-01R’ (GA 942511) and ‘Georgia-02C’ (GA 982508) were found to consistently out perform the five check cultivars each and every year under these test regimes of reduced input production practices and without irrigation. Both Georgia-01R and Georgia-02C also had comparable or significantly better tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance at midseason and total disease (TD) resistance at harvest than the best TSWV-resistant check cultivars. Peanut growers competitiveness should be enhanced with utilization of such new and improved cultivars. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14719443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261219404000948</els_id><sourcerecordid>14719443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-19cfda764440074e7481b8d6bc2f0e51c075b0cf89a487831ec3cb270c6bbfd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwD5DoiVuL06RfFyQ0jYE0iQPsSpQmbsnUNSNph_j3ZJQzJ1vWY1vvQ8g1hYQCze-2iXJ272ySAvAEWAI0OyEzWhYszivgp2QGaU7jlFb8nFx4vwWAlLF0Rt6XB9mNcjC2j2wTSX2QvUIdrdC61shoj7Ifh6h2iNr0bdSZHn30ZYaPyKEeAxqbfh8I2evfsQ29cc60vzcvyVkjO49Xf3VONo_Lt8VTvH5ZPS8e1rFiWTXEtFKNlkXOOQcoOBa8pHWp81qlDWBGFRRZDaopK8nLomQUFVN1WoDK67rRJZuT2-lusPA5oh_EzniFXSd7tKMXlBchO2cB5BMYjHnvsBF7Z3bSfQsK4ihTbMUkUxxlCmAiyAxrN9NaI62QrTNebF5ToAygymgVZM7J_URgiHkw6IRXBo8ujUM1CG3N_y9-AMymilk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14719443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Branch, W.D. ; Fletcher, S.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Branch, W.D. ; Fletcher, S.M.</creatorcontrib><description>USA peanut (
Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs and without irrigation to evaluate the performance of several advanced Georgia breeding lines at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station. Each year, reduced inputs for disease control included only four fungicide applications at recommended rates on a 28
d schedule beginning 30
d after planting. No insecticides, nematicides, miticides, or irrigation were applied during the three growing seasons. Two recently released runner-type cultivars ‘Georgia-01R’ (GA 942511) and ‘Georgia-02C’ (GA 982508) were found to consistently out perform the five check cultivars each and every year under these test regimes of reduced input production practices and without irrigation. Both Georgia-01R and Georgia-02C also had comparable or significantly better tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance at midseason and total disease (TD) resistance at harvest than the best TSWV-resistant check cultivars. Peanut growers competitiveness should be enhanced with utilization of such new and improved cultivars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Arachis hypogaea ; Arachis hypogaea L ; breeding lines ; crop yield ; Cultivars ; disease control ; Disease incidence ; disease resistance ; Dollar values ; economic analysis ; field experimentation ; Groundnut ; growing season ; input costs ; irrigation ; peanuts ; pesticide application ; plant viruses ; tebuconazole ; Tomato spotted wilt virus ; TSWV-resistance ; variety trials</subject><ispartof>Crop protection, 2004-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1085-1088</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-19cfda764440074e7481b8d6bc2f0e51c075b0cf89a487831ec3cb270c6bbfd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-19cfda764440074e7481b8d6bc2f0e51c075b0cf89a487831ec3cb270c6bbfd83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Branch, W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, S.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation</title><title>Crop protection</title><description>USA peanut (
Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs and without irrigation to evaluate the performance of several advanced Georgia breeding lines at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station. Each year, reduced inputs for disease control included only four fungicide applications at recommended rates on a 28
d schedule beginning 30
d after planting. No insecticides, nematicides, miticides, or irrigation were applied during the three growing seasons. Two recently released runner-type cultivars ‘Georgia-01R’ (GA 942511) and ‘Georgia-02C’ (GA 982508) were found to consistently out perform the five check cultivars each and every year under these test regimes of reduced input production practices and without irrigation. Both Georgia-01R and Georgia-02C also had comparable or significantly better tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance at midseason and total disease (TD) resistance at harvest than the best TSWV-resistant check cultivars. Peanut growers competitiveness should be enhanced with utilization of such new and improved cultivars.</description><subject>Arachis hypogaea</subject><subject>Arachis hypogaea L</subject><subject>breeding lines</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>disease control</subject><subject>Disease incidence</subject><subject>disease resistance</subject><subject>Dollar values</subject><subject>economic analysis</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Groundnut</subject><subject>growing season</subject><subject>input costs</subject><subject>irrigation</subject><subject>peanuts</subject><subject>pesticide application</subject><subject>plant viruses</subject><subject>tebuconazole</subject><subject>Tomato spotted wilt virus</subject><subject>TSWV-resistance</subject><subject>variety trials</subject><issn>0261-2194</issn><issn>1873-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwD5DoiVuL06RfFyQ0jYE0iQPsSpQmbsnUNSNph_j3ZJQzJ1vWY1vvQ8g1hYQCze-2iXJ272ySAvAEWAI0OyEzWhYszivgp2QGaU7jlFb8nFx4vwWAlLF0Rt6XB9mNcjC2j2wTSX2QvUIdrdC61shoj7Ifh6h2iNr0bdSZHn30ZYaPyKEeAxqbfh8I2evfsQ29cc60vzcvyVkjO49Xf3VONo_Lt8VTvH5ZPS8e1rFiWTXEtFKNlkXOOQcoOBa8pHWp81qlDWBGFRRZDaopK8nLomQUFVN1WoDK67rRJZuT2-lusPA5oh_EzniFXSd7tKMXlBchO2cB5BMYjHnvsBF7Z3bSfQsK4ihTbMUkUxxlCmAiyAxrN9NaI62QrTNebF5ToAygymgVZM7J_URgiHkw6IRXBo8ujUM1CG3N_y9-AMymilk</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Branch, W.D.</creator><creator>Fletcher, S.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation</title><author>Branch, W.D. ; Fletcher, S.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-19cfda764440074e7481b8d6bc2f0e51c075b0cf89a487831ec3cb270c6bbfd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Arachis hypogaea</topic><topic>Arachis hypogaea L</topic><topic>breeding lines</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>disease control</topic><topic>Disease incidence</topic><topic>disease resistance</topic><topic>Dollar values</topic><topic>economic analysis</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Groundnut</topic><topic>growing season</topic><topic>input costs</topic><topic>irrigation</topic><topic>peanuts</topic><topic>pesticide application</topic><topic>plant viruses</topic><topic>tebuconazole</topic><topic>Tomato spotted wilt virus</topic><topic>TSWV-resistance</topic><topic>variety trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Branch, W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, S.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Branch, W.D.</au><au>Fletcher, S.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation</atitle><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1085</spage><epage>1088</epage><pages>1085-1088</pages><issn>0261-2194</issn><eissn>1873-6904</eissn><abstract>USA peanut (
Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs and without irrigation to evaluate the performance of several advanced Georgia breeding lines at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station. Each year, reduced inputs for disease control included only four fungicide applications at recommended rates on a 28
d schedule beginning 30
d after planting. No insecticides, nematicides, miticides, or irrigation were applied during the three growing seasons. Two recently released runner-type cultivars ‘Georgia-01R’ (GA 942511) and ‘Georgia-02C’ (GA 982508) were found to consistently out perform the five check cultivars each and every year under these test regimes of reduced input production practices and without irrigation. Both Georgia-01R and Georgia-02C also had comparable or significantly better tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance at midseason and total disease (TD) resistance at harvest than the best TSWV-resistant check cultivars. Peanut growers competitiveness should be enhanced with utilization of such new and improved cultivars.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-2194 |
ispartof | Crop protection, 2004-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1085-1088 |
issn | 0261-2194 1873-6904 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14719443 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Arachis hypogaea Arachis hypogaea L breeding lines crop yield Cultivars disease control Disease incidence disease resistance Dollar values economic analysis field experimentation Groundnut growing season input costs irrigation peanuts pesticide application plant viruses tebuconazole Tomato spotted wilt virus TSWV-resistance variety trials |
title | Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A46%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20advanced%20Georgia%20peanut%20breeding%20lines%20with%20reduced-input%20and%20without%20irrigation&rft.jtitle=Crop%20protection&rft.au=Branch,%20W.D.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1085&rft.epage=1088&rft.pages=1085-1088&rft.issn=0261-2194&rft.eissn=1873-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14719443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14719443&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0261219404000948&rfr_iscdi=true |