Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation

USA peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop protection 2004-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1085-1088
Hauptverfasser: Branch, W.D., Fletcher, S.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1088
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1085
container_title Crop protection
container_volume 23
creator Branch, W.D.
Fletcher, S.M.
description USA peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs and without irrigation to evaluate the performance of several advanced Georgia breeding lines at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station. Each year, reduced inputs for disease control included only four fungicide applications at recommended rates on a 28 d schedule beginning 30 d after planting. No insecticides, nematicides, miticides, or irrigation were applied during the three growing seasons. Two recently released runner-type cultivars ‘Georgia-01R’ (GA 942511) and ‘Georgia-02C’ (GA 982508) were found to consistently out perform the five check cultivars each and every year under these test regimes of reduced input production practices and without irrigation. Both Georgia-01R and Georgia-02C also had comparable or significantly better tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance at midseason and total disease (TD) resistance at harvest than the best TSWV-resistant check cultivars. Peanut growers competitiveness should be enhanced with utilization of such new and improved cultivars.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14719443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261219404000948</els_id><sourcerecordid>14719443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-19cfda764440074e7481b8d6bc2f0e51c075b0cf89a487831ec3cb270c6bbfd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwD5DoiVuL06RfFyQ0jYE0iQPsSpQmbsnUNSNph_j3ZJQzJ1vWY1vvQ8g1hYQCze-2iXJ272ySAvAEWAI0OyEzWhYszivgp2QGaU7jlFb8nFx4vwWAlLF0Rt6XB9mNcjC2j2wTSX2QvUIdrdC61shoj7Ifh6h2iNr0bdSZHn30ZYaPyKEeAxqbfh8I2evfsQ29cc60vzcvyVkjO49Xf3VONo_Lt8VTvH5ZPS8e1rFiWTXEtFKNlkXOOQcoOBa8pHWp81qlDWBGFRRZDaopK8nLomQUFVN1WoDK67rRJZuT2-lusPA5oh_EzniFXSd7tKMXlBchO2cB5BMYjHnvsBF7Z3bSfQsK4ihTbMUkUxxlCmAiyAxrN9NaI62QrTNebF5ToAygymgVZM7J_URgiHkw6IRXBo8ujUM1CG3N_y9-AMymilk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14719443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Branch, W.D. ; Fletcher, S.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Branch, W.D. ; Fletcher, S.M.</creatorcontrib><description>USA peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs and without irrigation to evaluate the performance of several advanced Georgia breeding lines at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station. Each year, reduced inputs for disease control included only four fungicide applications at recommended rates on a 28 d schedule beginning 30 d after planting. No insecticides, nematicides, miticides, or irrigation were applied during the three growing seasons. Two recently released runner-type cultivars ‘Georgia-01R’ (GA 942511) and ‘Georgia-02C’ (GA 982508) were found to consistently out perform the five check cultivars each and every year under these test regimes of reduced input production practices and without irrigation. Both Georgia-01R and Georgia-02C also had comparable or significantly better tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance at midseason and total disease (TD) resistance at harvest than the best TSWV-resistant check cultivars. Peanut growers competitiveness should be enhanced with utilization of such new and improved cultivars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Arachis hypogaea ; Arachis hypogaea L ; breeding lines ; crop yield ; Cultivars ; disease control ; Disease incidence ; disease resistance ; Dollar values ; economic analysis ; field experimentation ; Groundnut ; growing season ; input costs ; irrigation ; peanuts ; pesticide application ; plant viruses ; tebuconazole ; Tomato spotted wilt virus ; TSWV-resistance ; variety trials</subject><ispartof>Crop protection, 2004-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1085-1088</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-19cfda764440074e7481b8d6bc2f0e51c075b0cf89a487831ec3cb270c6bbfd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-19cfda764440074e7481b8d6bc2f0e51c075b0cf89a487831ec3cb270c6bbfd83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Branch, W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, S.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation</title><title>Crop protection</title><description>USA peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs and without irrigation to evaluate the performance of several advanced Georgia breeding lines at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station. Each year, reduced inputs for disease control included only four fungicide applications at recommended rates on a 28 d schedule beginning 30 d after planting. No insecticides, nematicides, miticides, or irrigation were applied during the three growing seasons. Two recently released runner-type cultivars ‘Georgia-01R’ (GA 942511) and ‘Georgia-02C’ (GA 982508) were found to consistently out perform the five check cultivars each and every year under these test regimes of reduced input production practices and without irrigation. Both Georgia-01R and Georgia-02C also had comparable or significantly better tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance at midseason and total disease (TD) resistance at harvest than the best TSWV-resistant check cultivars. Peanut growers competitiveness should be enhanced with utilization of such new and improved cultivars.</description><subject>Arachis hypogaea</subject><subject>Arachis hypogaea L</subject><subject>breeding lines</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>disease control</subject><subject>Disease incidence</subject><subject>disease resistance</subject><subject>Dollar values</subject><subject>economic analysis</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Groundnut</subject><subject>growing season</subject><subject>input costs</subject><subject>irrigation</subject><subject>peanuts</subject><subject>pesticide application</subject><subject>plant viruses</subject><subject>tebuconazole</subject><subject>Tomato spotted wilt virus</subject><subject>TSWV-resistance</subject><subject>variety trials</subject><issn>0261-2194</issn><issn>1873-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwD5DoiVuL06RfFyQ0jYE0iQPsSpQmbsnUNSNph_j3ZJQzJ1vWY1vvQ8g1hYQCze-2iXJ272ySAvAEWAI0OyEzWhYszivgp2QGaU7jlFb8nFx4vwWAlLF0Rt6XB9mNcjC2j2wTSX2QvUIdrdC61shoj7Ifh6h2iNr0bdSZHn30ZYaPyKEeAxqbfh8I2evfsQ29cc60vzcvyVkjO49Xf3VONo_Lt8VTvH5ZPS8e1rFiWTXEtFKNlkXOOQcoOBa8pHWp81qlDWBGFRRZDaopK8nLomQUFVN1WoDK67rRJZuT2-lusPA5oh_EzniFXSd7tKMXlBchO2cB5BMYjHnvsBF7Z3bSfQsK4ihTbMUkUxxlCmAiyAxrN9NaI62QrTNebF5ToAygymgVZM7J_URgiHkw6IRXBo8ujUM1CG3N_y9-AMymilk</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Branch, W.D.</creator><creator>Fletcher, S.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation</title><author>Branch, W.D. ; Fletcher, S.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-19cfda764440074e7481b8d6bc2f0e51c075b0cf89a487831ec3cb270c6bbfd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Arachis hypogaea</topic><topic>Arachis hypogaea L</topic><topic>breeding lines</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>disease control</topic><topic>Disease incidence</topic><topic>disease resistance</topic><topic>Dollar values</topic><topic>economic analysis</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Groundnut</topic><topic>growing season</topic><topic>input costs</topic><topic>irrigation</topic><topic>peanuts</topic><topic>pesticide application</topic><topic>plant viruses</topic><topic>tebuconazole</topic><topic>Tomato spotted wilt virus</topic><topic>TSWV-resistance</topic><topic>variety trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Branch, W.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, S.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Branch, W.D.</au><au>Fletcher, S.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation</atitle><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1085</spage><epage>1088</epage><pages>1085-1088</pages><issn>0261-2194</issn><eissn>1873-6904</eissn><abstract>USA peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) growers are currently needing disease- and insect-resistant cultivars to lower input production cost to increase net returns and enhance their competitiveness in the global market. Replicated field trials were conducted for 3 years (2000–2002) with reduced inputs and without irrigation to evaluate the performance of several advanced Georgia breeding lines at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station. Each year, reduced inputs for disease control included only four fungicide applications at recommended rates on a 28 d schedule beginning 30 d after planting. No insecticides, nematicides, miticides, or irrigation were applied during the three growing seasons. Two recently released runner-type cultivars ‘Georgia-01R’ (GA 942511) and ‘Georgia-02C’ (GA 982508) were found to consistently out perform the five check cultivars each and every year under these test regimes of reduced input production practices and without irrigation. Both Georgia-01R and Georgia-02C also had comparable or significantly better tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance at midseason and total disease (TD) resistance at harvest than the best TSWV-resistant check cultivars. Peanut growers competitiveness should be enhanced with utilization of such new and improved cultivars.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-2194
ispartof Crop protection, 2004-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1085-1088
issn 0261-2194
1873-6904
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14719443
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea L
breeding lines
crop yield
Cultivars
disease control
Disease incidence
disease resistance
Dollar values
economic analysis
field experimentation
Groundnut
growing season
input costs
irrigation
peanuts
pesticide application
plant viruses
tebuconazole
Tomato spotted wilt virus
TSWV-resistance
variety trials
title Evaluation of advanced Georgia peanut breeding lines with reduced-input and without irrigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A46%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20advanced%20Georgia%20peanut%20breeding%20lines%20with%20reduced-input%20and%20without%20irrigation&rft.jtitle=Crop%20protection&rft.au=Branch,%20W.D.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1085&rft.epage=1088&rft.pages=1085-1088&rft.issn=0261-2194&rft.eissn=1873-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14719443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14719443&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0261219404000948&rfr_iscdi=true