Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil

Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agroforestry systems 2013-12, Vol.87 (6), p.1321-1338
Hauptverfasser: Francesconi, Wendy, Nair, P. K. R., Levey, Douglas J., Daniels, Jaret, Cullen, Laury
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1338
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1321
container_title Agroforestry systems
container_volume 87
creator Francesconi, Wendy
Nair, P. K. R.
Levey, Douglas J.
Daniels, Jaret
Cullen, Laury
description Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butterflies was studied using a systematic approach that compared butterfly species richness in six land-use practices (Eucalyptus [ Eucalyptus spp.], Shaded Coffee, Homegardens, Secondary Growth, Pastures, and monocultures of Cassava [ Manihot esculenta ] and Sugarcane [ Saccharum officinarum ]), and in natural habitat (secondary Forest Edge and Interior) in two study areas (agricultural landscapes). In each study area, Van Someren-Rydon butterfly traps were placed as a grid every 150 m, creating quadrants of 2.2 and 2.4 km 2 that encompassed the different land-use practices. Land-use, plot area, number of traps and distance to the forest were set as covariates to compare species richness values. Butterfly species composition was compared using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). With the exception of Pastures, Cassava and Sugarcane, significant differences were not identified between the rest of the agricultural land-use practices and the forest habitats (edge and interior). The species composition in the agricultural practices was however, different to that found in forest habitats. Overall, Shaded Coffee practices that represent long-term mixed tree and crop stands have a better potential of conserving forest butterfly species compared to monoculture practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1468348523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1468348523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2f0497f813cdd763d9281bc525672ecd63ed21ef5768dab6424f4350e546a99d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1rFTEYhYNU8Lb2B3Q3IIKbqfnOZNkWtULBhboOufm4TZmbXJPMYvz1vuWWIoWuQshzDicPQhcEXxKM1edGMBdqxISNWnI8rm_QhghF4TbhE7TBRKqRMynfodPWHjDGWqppg-6vl95DjfM6-NR6Tdulp5KHlIdY7W4fcg9-mG32zdlDaIMruduUU94NdldLLDVAbB0O1bqeHBAQ_VmWfh9sg-Y8XFf7N83v0dto5xbOn84z9Pvrl183t-Pdj2_fb67uRseU7iONmGsVJ8Kc90oyr-lEtk5QIRUNzksWPCUhCiUnb7eSUx45EzgILq3Wnp2hT8feQy1_Fthm9qm5MMMXQlmaIVxOjE-CMkA_vEAfylIzrANKTAoLjhVQ5Ei5WlqrIZpDTXtbV0OweXRvju4NuDeP7s0KmY9PzRa0zWAyu9Seg1RpJbQgwNEj1-Ap70L9b8Gr5f8ATDGWEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1458705407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Francesconi, Wendy ; Nair, P. K. R. ; Levey, Douglas J. ; Daniels, Jaret ; Cullen, Laury</creator><creatorcontrib>Francesconi, Wendy ; Nair, P. K. R. ; Levey, Douglas J. ; Daniels, Jaret ; Cullen, Laury</creatorcontrib><description>Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butterflies was studied using a systematic approach that compared butterfly species richness in six land-use practices (Eucalyptus [ Eucalyptus spp.], Shaded Coffee, Homegardens, Secondary Growth, Pastures, and monocultures of Cassava [ Manihot esculenta ] and Sugarcane [ Saccharum officinarum ]), and in natural habitat (secondary Forest Edge and Interior) in two study areas (agricultural landscapes). In each study area, Van Someren-Rydon butterfly traps were placed as a grid every 150 m, creating quadrants of 2.2 and 2.4 km 2 that encompassed the different land-use practices. Land-use, plot area, number of traps and distance to the forest were set as covariates to compare species richness values. Butterfly species composition was compared using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). With the exception of Pastures, Cassava and Sugarcane, significant differences were not identified between the rest of the agricultural land-use practices and the forest habitats (edge and interior). The species composition in the agricultural practices was however, different to that found in forest habitats. Overall, Shaded Coffee practices that represent long-term mixed tree and crop stands have a better potential of conserving forest butterfly species compared to monoculture practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGSYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Coffee ; Dispersal ; Eucalyptus ; Forest conservation ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitats ; Land degradation ; Land use ; Life Sciences ; Manihot esculenta ; Monoculture ; Pasture ; Saccharum officinarum ; Species composition ; Species richness ; Sugarcane</subject><ispartof>Agroforestry systems, 2013-12, Vol.87 (6), p.1321-1338</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2f0497f813cdd763d9281bc525672ecd63ed21ef5768dab6424f4350e546a99d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2f0497f813cdd763d9281bc525672ecd63ed21ef5768dab6424f4350e546a99d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27975951$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Francesconi, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, P. K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levey, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Jaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Laury</creatorcontrib><title>Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil</title><title>Agroforestry systems</title><addtitle>Agroforest Syst</addtitle><description>Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butterflies was studied using a systematic approach that compared butterfly species richness in six land-use practices (Eucalyptus [ Eucalyptus spp.], Shaded Coffee, Homegardens, Secondary Growth, Pastures, and monocultures of Cassava [ Manihot esculenta ] and Sugarcane [ Saccharum officinarum ]), and in natural habitat (secondary Forest Edge and Interior) in two study areas (agricultural landscapes). In each study area, Van Someren-Rydon butterfly traps were placed as a grid every 150 m, creating quadrants of 2.2 and 2.4 km 2 that encompassed the different land-use practices. Land-use, plot area, number of traps and distance to the forest were set as covariates to compare species richness values. Butterfly species composition was compared using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). With the exception of Pastures, Cassava and Sugarcane, significant differences were not identified between the rest of the agricultural land-use practices and the forest habitats (edge and interior). The species composition in the agricultural practices was however, different to that found in forest habitats. Overall, Shaded Coffee practices that represent long-term mixed tree and crop stands have a better potential of conserving forest butterfly species compared to monoculture practices.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Manihot esculenta</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Saccharum officinarum</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><issn>0167-4366</issn><issn>1572-9680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1rFTEYhYNU8Lb2B3Q3IIKbqfnOZNkWtULBhboOufm4TZmbXJPMYvz1vuWWIoWuQshzDicPQhcEXxKM1edGMBdqxISNWnI8rm_QhghF4TbhE7TBRKqRMynfodPWHjDGWqppg-6vl95DjfM6-NR6Tdulp5KHlIdY7W4fcg9-mG32zdlDaIMruduUU94NdldLLDVAbB0O1bqeHBAQ_VmWfh9sg-Y8XFf7N83v0dto5xbOn84z9Pvrl183t-Pdj2_fb67uRseU7iONmGsVJ8Kc90oyr-lEtk5QIRUNzksWPCUhCiUnb7eSUx45EzgILq3Wnp2hT8feQy1_Fthm9qm5MMMXQlmaIVxOjE-CMkA_vEAfylIzrANKTAoLjhVQ5Ei5WlqrIZpDTXtbV0OweXRvju4NuDeP7s0KmY9PzRa0zWAyu9Seg1RpJbQgwNEj1-Ap70L9b8Gr5f8ATDGWEQ</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Francesconi, Wendy</creator><creator>Nair, P. K. R.</creator><creator>Levey, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Daniels, Jaret</creator><creator>Cullen, Laury</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil</title><author>Francesconi, Wendy ; Nair, P. K. R. ; Levey, Douglas J. ; Daniels, Jaret ; Cullen, Laury</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2f0497f813cdd763d9281bc525672ecd63ed21ef5768dab6424f4350e546a99d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Manihot esculenta</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Saccharum officinarum</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Francesconi, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, P. K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levey, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Jaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Laury</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Francesconi, Wendy</au><au>Nair, P. K. R.</au><au>Levey, Douglas J.</au><au>Daniels, Jaret</au><au>Cullen, Laury</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle><stitle>Agroforest Syst</stitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1321</spage><epage>1338</epage><pages>1321-1338</pages><issn>0167-4366</issn><eissn>1572-9680</eissn><coden>AGSYE6</coden><abstract>Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butterflies was studied using a systematic approach that compared butterfly species richness in six land-use practices (Eucalyptus [ Eucalyptus spp.], Shaded Coffee, Homegardens, Secondary Growth, Pastures, and monocultures of Cassava [ Manihot esculenta ] and Sugarcane [ Saccharum officinarum ]), and in natural habitat (secondary Forest Edge and Interior) in two study areas (agricultural landscapes). In each study area, Van Someren-Rydon butterfly traps were placed as a grid every 150 m, creating quadrants of 2.2 and 2.4 km 2 that encompassed the different land-use practices. Land-use, plot area, number of traps and distance to the forest were set as covariates to compare species richness values. Butterfly species composition was compared using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). With the exception of Pastures, Cassava and Sugarcane, significant differences were not identified between the rest of the agricultural land-use practices and the forest habitats (edge and interior). The species composition in the agricultural practices was however, different to that found in forest habitats. Overall, Shaded Coffee practices that represent long-term mixed tree and crop stands have a better potential of conserving forest butterfly species compared to monoculture practices.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4366
ispartof Agroforestry systems, 2013-12, Vol.87 (6), p.1321-1338
issn 0167-4366
1572-9680
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1468348523
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agricultural land
Agricultural practices
Agricultural production
Agriculture
Agroforestry
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Butterflies & moths
Coffee
Dispersal
Eucalyptus
Forest conservation
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitats
Land degradation
Land use
Life Sciences
Manihot esculenta
Monoculture
Pasture
Saccharum officinarum
Species composition
Species richness
Sugarcane
title Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Butterfly%20distribution%20in%20fragmented%20landscapes%20containing%20agroforestry%20practices%20in%20Southeastern%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Agroforestry%20systems&rft.au=Francesconi,%20Wendy&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1321&rft.epage=1338&rft.pages=1321-1338&rft.issn=0167-4366&rft.eissn=1572-9680&rft.coden=AGSYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1468348523%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1458705407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true