Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil
Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agroforestry systems 2013-12, Vol.87 (6), p.1321-1338 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1338 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1321 |
container_title | Agroforestry systems |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Francesconi, Wendy Nair, P. K. R. Levey, Douglas J. Daniels, Jaret Cullen, Laury |
description | Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butterflies was studied using a systematic approach that compared butterfly species richness in six land-use practices (Eucalyptus [
Eucalyptus
spp.], Shaded Coffee, Homegardens, Secondary Growth, Pastures, and monocultures of Cassava [
Manihot esculenta
] and Sugarcane [
Saccharum officinarum
]), and in natural habitat (secondary Forest Edge and Interior) in two study areas (agricultural landscapes). In each study area, Van Someren-Rydon butterfly traps were placed as a grid every 150 m, creating quadrants of 2.2 and 2.4 km
2
that encompassed the different land-use practices. Land-use, plot area, number of traps and distance to the forest were set as covariates to compare species richness values. Butterfly species composition was compared using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). With the exception of Pastures, Cassava and Sugarcane, significant differences were not identified between the rest of the agricultural land-use practices and the forest habitats (edge and interior). The species composition in the agricultural practices was however, different to that found in forest habitats. Overall, Shaded Coffee practices that represent long-term mixed tree and crop stands have a better potential of conserving forest butterfly species compared to monoculture practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1468348523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1468348523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2f0497f813cdd763d9281bc525672ecd63ed21ef5768dab6424f4350e546a99d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1rFTEYhYNU8Lb2B3Q3IIKbqfnOZNkWtULBhboOufm4TZmbXJPMYvz1vuWWIoWuQshzDicPQhcEXxKM1edGMBdqxISNWnI8rm_QhghF4TbhE7TBRKqRMynfodPWHjDGWqppg-6vl95DjfM6-NR6Tdulp5KHlIdY7W4fcg9-mG32zdlDaIMruduUU94NdldLLDVAbB0O1bqeHBAQ_VmWfh9sg-Y8XFf7N83v0dto5xbOn84z9Pvrl183t-Pdj2_fb67uRseU7iONmGsVJ8Kc90oyr-lEtk5QIRUNzksWPCUhCiUnb7eSUx45EzgILq3Wnp2hT8feQy1_Fthm9qm5MMMXQlmaIVxOjE-CMkA_vEAfylIzrANKTAoLjhVQ5Ei5WlqrIZpDTXtbV0OweXRvju4NuDeP7s0KmY9PzRa0zWAyu9Seg1RpJbQgwNEj1-Ap70L9b8Gr5f8ATDGWEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1458705407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Francesconi, Wendy ; Nair, P. K. R. ; Levey, Douglas J. ; Daniels, Jaret ; Cullen, Laury</creator><creatorcontrib>Francesconi, Wendy ; Nair, P. K. R. ; Levey, Douglas J. ; Daniels, Jaret ; Cullen, Laury</creatorcontrib><description>Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butterflies was studied using a systematic approach that compared butterfly species richness in six land-use practices (Eucalyptus [
Eucalyptus
spp.], Shaded Coffee, Homegardens, Secondary Growth, Pastures, and monocultures of Cassava [
Manihot esculenta
] and Sugarcane [
Saccharum officinarum
]), and in natural habitat (secondary Forest Edge and Interior) in two study areas (agricultural landscapes). In each study area, Van Someren-Rydon butterfly traps were placed as a grid every 150 m, creating quadrants of 2.2 and 2.4 km
2
that encompassed the different land-use practices. Land-use, plot area, number of traps and distance to the forest were set as covariates to compare species richness values. Butterfly species composition was compared using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). With the exception of Pastures, Cassava and Sugarcane, significant differences were not identified between the rest of the agricultural land-use practices and the forest habitats (edge and interior). The species composition in the agricultural practices was however, different to that found in forest habitats. Overall, Shaded Coffee practices that represent long-term mixed tree and crop stands have a better potential of conserving forest butterfly species compared to monoculture practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGSYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies & moths ; Coffee ; Dispersal ; Eucalyptus ; Forest conservation ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitats ; Land degradation ; Land use ; Life Sciences ; Manihot esculenta ; Monoculture ; Pasture ; Saccharum officinarum ; Species composition ; Species richness ; Sugarcane</subject><ispartof>Agroforestry systems, 2013-12, Vol.87 (6), p.1321-1338</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2f0497f813cdd763d9281bc525672ecd63ed21ef5768dab6424f4350e546a99d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2f0497f813cdd763d9281bc525672ecd63ed21ef5768dab6424f4350e546a99d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27975951$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Francesconi, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, P. K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levey, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Jaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Laury</creatorcontrib><title>Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil</title><title>Agroforestry systems</title><addtitle>Agroforest Syst</addtitle><description>Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butterflies was studied using a systematic approach that compared butterfly species richness in six land-use practices (Eucalyptus [
Eucalyptus
spp.], Shaded Coffee, Homegardens, Secondary Growth, Pastures, and monocultures of Cassava [
Manihot esculenta
] and Sugarcane [
Saccharum officinarum
]), and in natural habitat (secondary Forest Edge and Interior) in two study areas (agricultural landscapes). In each study area, Van Someren-Rydon butterfly traps were placed as a grid every 150 m, creating quadrants of 2.2 and 2.4 km
2
that encompassed the different land-use practices. Land-use, plot area, number of traps and distance to the forest were set as covariates to compare species richness values. Butterfly species composition was compared using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). With the exception of Pastures, Cassava and Sugarcane, significant differences were not identified between the rest of the agricultural land-use practices and the forest habitats (edge and interior). The species composition in the agricultural practices was however, different to that found in forest habitats. Overall, Shaded Coffee practices that represent long-term mixed tree and crop stands have a better potential of conserving forest butterfly species compared to monoculture practices.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Manihot esculenta</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Saccharum officinarum</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><issn>0167-4366</issn><issn>1572-9680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1rFTEYhYNU8Lb2B3Q3IIKbqfnOZNkWtULBhboOufm4TZmbXJPMYvz1vuWWIoWuQshzDicPQhcEXxKM1edGMBdqxISNWnI8rm_QhghF4TbhE7TBRKqRMynfodPWHjDGWqppg-6vl95DjfM6-NR6Tdulp5KHlIdY7W4fcg9-mG32zdlDaIMruduUU94NdldLLDVAbB0O1bqeHBAQ_VmWfh9sg-Y8XFf7N83v0dto5xbOn84z9Pvrl183t-Pdj2_fb67uRseU7iONmGsVJ8Kc90oyr-lEtk5QIRUNzksWPCUhCiUnb7eSUx45EzgILq3Wnp2hT8feQy1_Fthm9qm5MMMXQlmaIVxOjE-CMkA_vEAfylIzrANKTAoLjhVQ5Ei5WlqrIZpDTXtbV0OweXRvju4NuDeP7s0KmY9PzRa0zWAyu9Seg1RpJbQgwNEj1-Ap70L9b8Gr5f8ATDGWEQ</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Francesconi, Wendy</creator><creator>Nair, P. K. R.</creator><creator>Levey, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Daniels, Jaret</creator><creator>Cullen, Laury</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil</title><author>Francesconi, Wendy ; Nair, P. K. R. ; Levey, Douglas J. ; Daniels, Jaret ; Cullen, Laury</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2f0497f813cdd763d9281bc525672ecd63ed21ef5768dab6424f4350e546a99d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Manihot esculenta</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Saccharum officinarum</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Francesconi, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, P. K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levey, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniels, Jaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Laury</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Francesconi, Wendy</au><au>Nair, P. K. R.</au><au>Levey, Douglas J.</au><au>Daniels, Jaret</au><au>Cullen, Laury</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle><stitle>Agroforest Syst</stitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1321</spage><epage>1338</epage><pages>1321-1338</pages><issn>0167-4366</issn><eissn>1572-9680</eissn><coden>AGSYE6</coden><abstract>Agroforestry practices, such as Shaded Coffee and Homegardens, may provide habitat for forest butterflies and contribute to their conservation in fragmented agricultural landscapes. To determine the influence of agroforestry practices in an agricultural mosaic, the distribution of fruit-feeding butterflies was studied using a systematic approach that compared butterfly species richness in six land-use practices (Eucalyptus [
Eucalyptus
spp.], Shaded Coffee, Homegardens, Secondary Growth, Pastures, and monocultures of Cassava [
Manihot esculenta
] and Sugarcane [
Saccharum officinarum
]), and in natural habitat (secondary Forest Edge and Interior) in two study areas (agricultural landscapes). In each study area, Van Someren-Rydon butterfly traps were placed as a grid every 150 m, creating quadrants of 2.2 and 2.4 km
2
that encompassed the different land-use practices. Land-use, plot area, number of traps and distance to the forest were set as covariates to compare species richness values. Butterfly species composition was compared using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). With the exception of Pastures, Cassava and Sugarcane, significant differences were not identified between the rest of the agricultural land-use practices and the forest habitats (edge and interior). The species composition in the agricultural practices was however, different to that found in forest habitats. Overall, Shaded Coffee practices that represent long-term mixed tree and crop stands have a better potential of conserving forest butterfly species compared to monoculture practices.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4366 |
ispartof | Agroforestry systems, 2013-12, Vol.87 (6), p.1321-1338 |
issn | 0167-4366 1572-9680 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1468348523 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural practices Agricultural production Agriculture Agroforestry Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Butterflies & moths Coffee Dispersal Eucalyptus Forest conservation Forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitats Land degradation Land use Life Sciences Manihot esculenta Monoculture Pasture Saccharum officinarum Species composition Species richness Sugarcane |
title | Butterfly distribution in fragmented landscapes containing agroforestry practices in Southeastern Brazil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Butterfly%20distribution%20in%20fragmented%20landscapes%20containing%20agroforestry%20practices%20in%20Southeastern%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Agroforestry%20systems&rft.au=Francesconi,%20Wendy&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1321&rft.epage=1338&rft.pages=1321-1338&rft.issn=0167-4366&rft.eissn=1572-9680&rft.coden=AGSYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10457-013-9640-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1468348523%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1458705407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |