Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: A postmortem study
Purpose: Quantification of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI may provide useful information for the early detection of breast cancer. However, the field inhomogeneity can severely challenge the computerized image segmentation process. In this work, the effect of the bias field in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2013-12, Vol.40 (12), p.122305-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 122305 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Ding, Huanjun Johnson, Travis Lin, Muqing Le, Huy Q. Ducote, Justin L. Su, Min-Ying Molloi, Sabee |
description | Purpose:
Quantification of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI may provide useful information for the early detection of breast cancer. However, the field inhomogeneity can severely challenge the computerized image segmentation process. In this work, the effect of the bias field in breast density quantification has been investigated with a postmortem study.
Methods:
T1-weighted images of 20 pairs of postmortem breasts were acquired on a 1.5 T breast MRI scanner. Two computer-assisted algorithms were used to quantify the volumetric breast density. First, standard fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering was used on raw images with the bias field present. Then, the coherent local intensity clustering (CLIC) method estimated and corrected the bias field during the iterative tissue segmentation process. Finally, FCM clustering was performed on the bias-field-corrected images produced by CLIC method. The left–right correlation for breasts in the same pair was studied for both segmentation algorithms to evaluate the precision of the tissue classification. Finally, the breast densities measured with the three methods were compared to the gold standard tissue compositions obtained from chemical analysis. The linear correlation coefficient, Pearson'sr, was used to evaluate the two image segmentation algorithms and the effect of bias field.
Results:
The CLIC method successfully corrected the intensity inhomogeneity induced by the bias field. In left–right comparisons, the CLIC method significantly improved the slope and the correlation coefficient of the linear fitting for the glandular volume estimation. The left–right breast density correlation was also increased from 0.93 to 0.98. When compared with the percent fibroglandular volume (%FGV) from chemical analysis, results after bias field correction from both the CLIC the FCM algorithms showed improved linear correlation. As a result, the Pearson'sr increased from 0.86 to 0.92 with the bias field correction.
Conclusions:
The investigated CLIC method significantly increased the precision and accuracy of breast density quantification using breast MRI images by effectively correcting the bias field. It is expected that a fully automated computerized algorithm for breast density quantification may have great potential in clinical MRI applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.4831967 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1467068051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1467068051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-8f4c07f46e0a834f0b9d12f04f86f06cdc3dba0223743bc128b7ebcc1f0e31783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModq1e-Ack4E0rTD35mI_1QqjFj0KLInodMpmT3chMsk0yLfvvnXXWpSJ6Fch58uQ9vIQ8Z3DGGGteszPZCLas6gdkwWUtCslh-ZAsAJay4BLKI_IkpR8AUIkSHpMjLgWHUlQLkt5F1CnTDn1yeUtvRu2zs87o7IKnY3J-RQe98pidoRFT8NobpG66241Orr9entI7l9e0dTpR67DvqAkxotkZ3tBzugkpDyFmHGjKY7d9Sh5Z3Sd8tj-PyfcP779dfCquPn-8vDi_KkzJWF00VhqorawQdCOkhXbZMW5B2qayUJnOiK7VwLmopWgN401bY2sMs4CC1Y04Jm9n72ZsB-wM-hx1rzZxCh-3Kmin_px4t1arcKtEU_EKYBK8nAXTAk4l4zKatQneT7spznnJ6qWcqJP9NzHcjJiyGlwy2PfaYxiTYrKqoWqgZBN6OqMmhpQi2kMYBmpXpWJqX-XEvrif_kD-7m4Cihm4cz1u_21S11_2wlczv1vkV72HN7ch3uM3nf0f_HfUn-d0xHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1467068051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: A postmortem study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ding, Huanjun ; Johnson, Travis ; Lin, Muqing ; Le, Huy Q. ; Ducote, Justin L. ; Su, Min-Ying ; Molloi, Sabee</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Huanjun ; Johnson, Travis ; Lin, Muqing ; Le, Huy Q. ; Ducote, Justin L. ; Su, Min-Ying ; Molloi, Sabee</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
Quantification of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI may provide useful information for the early detection of breast cancer. However, the field inhomogeneity can severely challenge the computerized image segmentation process. In this work, the effect of the bias field in breast density quantification has been investigated with a postmortem study.
Methods:
T1-weighted images of 20 pairs of postmortem breasts were acquired on a 1.5 T breast MRI scanner. Two computer-assisted algorithms were used to quantify the volumetric breast density. First, standard fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering was used on raw images with the bias field present. Then, the coherent local intensity clustering (CLIC) method estimated and corrected the bias field during the iterative tissue segmentation process. Finally, FCM clustering was performed on the bias-field-corrected images produced by CLIC method. The left–right correlation for breasts in the same pair was studied for both segmentation algorithms to evaluate the precision of the tissue classification. Finally, the breast densities measured with the three methods were compared to the gold standard tissue compositions obtained from chemical analysis. The linear correlation coefficient, Pearson'sr, was used to evaluate the two image segmentation algorithms and the effect of bias field.
Results:
The CLIC method successfully corrected the intensity inhomogeneity induced by the bias field. In left–right comparisons, the CLIC method significantly improved the slope and the correlation coefficient of the linear fitting for the glandular volume estimation. The left–right breast density correlation was also increased from 0.93 to 0.98. When compared with the percent fibroglandular volume (%FGV) from chemical analysis, results after bias field correction from both the CLIC the FCM algorithms showed improved linear correlation. As a result, the Pearson'sr increased from 0.86 to 0.92 with the bias field correction.
Conclusions:
The investigated CLIC method significantly increased the precision and accuracy of breast density quantification using breast MRI images by effectively correcting the bias field. It is expected that a fully automated computerized algorithm for breast density quantification may have great potential in clinical MRI applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4831967</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24320536</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ACCURACY ; ALGORITHMS ; ANIMAL TISSUES ; Autopsy ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; biological tissues ; biomedical MRI ; Breast - pathology ; breast density ; breast imaging ; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS ; Cluster analysis ; CORRECTIONS ; CORRELATIONS ; density measurement ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; Female ; fuzzy c‐means clustering ; FUZZY LOGIC ; Humans ; image classification ; Image data processing or generation, in general ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; image segmentation ; Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity ; Involving electronic [emr] or nuclear [nmr] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging ; ITERATIVE METHODS ; Lipids ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Physics ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; Mammography ; Mass and density ; medical image processing ; Medical image segmentation ; MRI ; NEOPLASMS ; NMR IMAGING ; Organ Size ; Proteins ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Segmentation ; statistical analysis ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2013-12, Vol.40 (12), p.122305-n/a</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-8f4c07f46e0a834f0b9d12f04f86f06cdc3dba0223743bc128b7ebcc1f0e31783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-8f4c07f46e0a834f0b9d12f04f86f06cdc3dba0223743bc128b7ebcc1f0e31783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4831967$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4831967$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24320536$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22251794$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Huanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Muqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Huy Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducote, Justin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Min-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molloi, Sabee</creatorcontrib><title>Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: A postmortem study</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose:
Quantification of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI may provide useful information for the early detection of breast cancer. However, the field inhomogeneity can severely challenge the computerized image segmentation process. In this work, the effect of the bias field in breast density quantification has been investigated with a postmortem study.
Methods:
T1-weighted images of 20 pairs of postmortem breasts were acquired on a 1.5 T breast MRI scanner. Two computer-assisted algorithms were used to quantify the volumetric breast density. First, standard fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering was used on raw images with the bias field present. Then, the coherent local intensity clustering (CLIC) method estimated and corrected the bias field during the iterative tissue segmentation process. Finally, FCM clustering was performed on the bias-field-corrected images produced by CLIC method. The left–right correlation for breasts in the same pair was studied for both segmentation algorithms to evaluate the precision of the tissue classification. Finally, the breast densities measured with the three methods were compared to the gold standard tissue compositions obtained from chemical analysis. The linear correlation coefficient, Pearson'sr, was used to evaluate the two image segmentation algorithms and the effect of bias field.
Results:
The CLIC method successfully corrected the intensity inhomogeneity induced by the bias field. In left–right comparisons, the CLIC method significantly improved the slope and the correlation coefficient of the linear fitting for the glandular volume estimation. The left–right breast density correlation was also increased from 0.93 to 0.98. When compared with the percent fibroglandular volume (%FGV) from chemical analysis, results after bias field correction from both the CLIC the FCM algorithms showed improved linear correlation. As a result, the Pearson'sr increased from 0.86 to 0.92 with the bias field correction.
Conclusions:
The investigated CLIC method significantly increased the precision and accuracy of breast density quantification using breast MRI images by effectively correcting the bias field. It is expected that a fully automated computerized algorithm for breast density quantification may have great potential in clinical MRI applications.</description><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>ANIMAL TISSUES</subject><subject>Autopsy</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>biological tissues</subject><subject>biomedical MRI</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>breast density</subject><subject>breast imaging</subject><subject>CHEMICAL ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>CORRECTIONS</subject><subject>CORRELATIONS</subject><subject>density measurement</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fuzzy c‐means clustering</subject><subject>FUZZY LOGIC</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>image classification</subject><subject>Image data processing or generation, in general</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>image segmentation</subject><subject>Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity</subject><subject>Involving electronic [emr] or nuclear [nmr] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>ITERATIVE METHODS</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Physics</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mass and density</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image segmentation</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>NMR IMAGING</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><issn>0094-2405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModq1e-Ack4E0rTD35mI_1QqjFj0KLInodMpmT3chMsk0yLfvvnXXWpSJ6Fch58uQ9vIQ8Z3DGGGteszPZCLas6gdkwWUtCslh-ZAsAJay4BLKI_IkpR8AUIkSHpMjLgWHUlQLkt5F1CnTDn1yeUtvRu2zs87o7IKnY3J-RQe98pidoRFT8NobpG66241Orr9entI7l9e0dTpR67DvqAkxotkZ3tBzugkpDyFmHGjKY7d9Sh5Z3Sd8tj-PyfcP779dfCquPn-8vDi_KkzJWF00VhqorawQdCOkhXbZMW5B2qayUJnOiK7VwLmopWgN401bY2sMs4CC1Y04Jm9n72ZsB-wM-hx1rzZxCh-3Kmin_px4t1arcKtEU_EKYBK8nAXTAk4l4zKatQneT7spznnJ6qWcqJP9NzHcjJiyGlwy2PfaYxiTYrKqoWqgZBN6OqMmhpQi2kMYBmpXpWJqX-XEvrif_kD-7m4Cihm4cz1u_21S11_2wlczv1vkV72HN7ch3uM3nf0f_HfUn-d0xHc</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Ding, Huanjun</creator><creator>Johnson, Travis</creator><creator>Lin, Muqing</creator><creator>Le, Huy Q.</creator><creator>Ducote, Justin L.</creator><creator>Su, Min-Ying</creator><creator>Molloi, Sabee</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: A postmortem study</title><author>Ding, Huanjun ; Johnson, Travis ; Lin, Muqing ; Le, Huy Q. ; Ducote, Justin L. ; Su, Min-Ying ; Molloi, Sabee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5117-8f4c07f46e0a834f0b9d12f04f86f06cdc3dba0223743bc128b7ebcc1f0e31783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>ANIMAL TISSUES</topic><topic>Autopsy</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>biological tissues</topic><topic>biomedical MRI</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>breast density</topic><topic>breast imaging</topic><topic>CHEMICAL ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>CORRECTIONS</topic><topic>CORRELATIONS</topic><topic>density measurement</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fuzzy c‐means clustering</topic><topic>FUZZY LOGIC</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>image classification</topic><topic>Image data processing or generation, in general</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>image segmentation</topic><topic>Investigating density or specific gravity of materials; Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity</topic><topic>Involving electronic [emr] or nuclear [nmr] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>ITERATIVE METHODS</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Physics</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mass and density</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image segmentation</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>NMR IMAGING</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Huanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Muqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Huy Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducote, Justin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Min-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molloi, Sabee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Huanjun</au><au>Johnson, Travis</au><au>Lin, Muqing</au><au>Le, Huy Q.</au><au>Ducote, Justin L.</au><au>Su, Min-Ying</au><au>Molloi, Sabee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: A postmortem study</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>122305</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>122305-n/a</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><eissn>0094-2405</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose:
Quantification of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI may provide useful information for the early detection of breast cancer. However, the field inhomogeneity can severely challenge the computerized image segmentation process. In this work, the effect of the bias field in breast density quantification has been investigated with a postmortem study.
Methods:
T1-weighted images of 20 pairs of postmortem breasts were acquired on a 1.5 T breast MRI scanner. Two computer-assisted algorithms were used to quantify the volumetric breast density. First, standard fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering was used on raw images with the bias field present. Then, the coherent local intensity clustering (CLIC) method estimated and corrected the bias field during the iterative tissue segmentation process. Finally, FCM clustering was performed on the bias-field-corrected images produced by CLIC method. The left–right correlation for breasts in the same pair was studied for both segmentation algorithms to evaluate the precision of the tissue classification. Finally, the breast densities measured with the three methods were compared to the gold standard tissue compositions obtained from chemical analysis. The linear correlation coefficient, Pearson'sr, was used to evaluate the two image segmentation algorithms and the effect of bias field.
Results:
The CLIC method successfully corrected the intensity inhomogeneity induced by the bias field. In left–right comparisons, the CLIC method significantly improved the slope and the correlation coefficient of the linear fitting for the glandular volume estimation. The left–right breast density correlation was also increased from 0.93 to 0.98. When compared with the percent fibroglandular volume (%FGV) from chemical analysis, results after bias field correction from both the CLIC the FCM algorithms showed improved linear correlation. As a result, the Pearson'sr increased from 0.86 to 0.92 with the bias field correction.
Conclusions:
The investigated CLIC method significantly increased the precision and accuracy of breast density quantification using breast MRI images by effectively correcting the bias field. It is expected that a fully automated computerized algorithm for breast density quantification may have great potential in clinical MRI applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>24320536</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4831967</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2013-12, Vol.40 (12), p.122305-n/a |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 0094-2405 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1467068051 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | ACCURACY ALGORITHMS ANIMAL TISSUES Autopsy Biological material, e.g. blood, urine Haemocytometers biological tissues biomedical MRI Breast - pathology breast density breast imaging CHEMICAL ANALYSIS Cluster analysis CORRECTIONS CORRELATIONS density measurement Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications Female fuzzy c‐means clustering FUZZY LOGIC Humans image classification Image data processing or generation, in general Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods image segmentation Investigating density or specific gravity of materials Analysing materials by determining density or specific gravity Involving electronic [emr] or nuclear [nmr] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging ITERATIVE METHODS Lipids Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Magnetic Resonance Physics MAMMARY GLANDS Mammography Mass and density medical image processing Medical image segmentation MRI NEOPLASMS NMR IMAGING Organ Size Proteins RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE Segmentation statistical analysis Tissues |
title | Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: A postmortem study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T16%3A15%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20density%20quantification%20using%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20(MRI)%20with%20bias%20field%20correction:%20A%20postmortem%20study&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Ding,%20Huanjun&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=122305&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=122305-n/a&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4831967&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1467068051%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1467068051&rft_id=info:pmid/24320536&rfr_iscdi=true |