Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936
In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson & Willison, 1991)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological assessment 2013-12, Vol.25 (4), p.1361-1366 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1366 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1361 |
container_title | Psychological assessment |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Dykiert, Dominika Deary, Ian J. |
description | In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson & Willison, 1991) and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Psychological Corporation, 2001) are 2 tests developed to estimate premorbid or prior ability. Due to the rarity of actual prior ability data, validation studies usually compare NART/WTAR performance with measures of current abilities in pathological and nonpathological groups. In this study, we validate the use of WTAR scores and extend the validation of the use of NART scores as estimates of prior ability, vis-à-vis the actual prior (childhood) cognitive ability. We do this in a large sample of healthy older people, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Deary, Gow, Pattie, & Starr, 2012; Deary et al., 2007). Both NART and WTAR scores were correlated with cognitive ability tested in childhood (r = .66-.68). Scores on both the NART and the WTAR had high stability over a period of 3 years in old age (r in excess of .90) and high interrater reliability. The NART accounted for more unique variance in childhood intelligence than did the WTAR. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0033623 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1467064703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3162857541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-6362a29d431c90db11560e887465b9398ed41e7aa2c67777fb4294d1a735cd4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EomVA4gmQJYTEgoBv7DjxchiVH2kEaJgCO-vGcTquMnFqO0iz4N1x6ZRKLPDGXnz3-NxzCHkK7DUwXr9BxjiXJb9HTkFxVQAXP-7nNxOs4JViJ-RRjJeMgeBN9ZCclLyBCgBOya-NTcHHyZrkflr6DQfXYXJ-pL6n37fLDcWxo5-Wmy39anywkWKkZzG5PSYf4jX1JTgf6MpfjO6PxrJ1g0sHeh7deEHTztK1TzuHI33rQtplcudDotmofEwe9DhE--R4L8j5u7Pt6kOx_vz-42q5LrBiMhUy74al6gQHo1jXAlSS2aaphazavG9jOwG2RiyNrPPpW1Eq0QHWvDKdMHxBXt7oTsFfzTYmvXfR2GHA0fo5ahCyZlLUOcUFef4PeunnMGZ3maoZawQX8F8qZ8tACSXvvjU54hhsr6eQgwsHDUxfF6dvi8vos6Pg3O5t9xe8bSoDL44ARoNDH3A0Lt5xtVJNlTNdkFc3HE6op3gwGJIzg41mDsGOSed5XVZaZKMS-G8uLqul</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1381019496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Dykiert, Dominika ; Deary, Ian J.</creator><contributor>Reynolds, Cecil R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dykiert, Dominika ; Deary, Ian J. ; Reynolds, Cecil R</creatorcontrib><description>In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson & Willison, 1991) and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Psychological Corporation, 2001) are 2 tests developed to estimate premorbid or prior ability. Due to the rarity of actual prior ability data, validation studies usually compare NART/WTAR performance with measures of current abilities in pathological and nonpathological groups. In this study, we validate the use of WTAR scores and extend the validation of the use of NART scores as estimates of prior ability, vis-à-vis the actual prior (childhood) cognitive ability. We do this in a large sample of healthy older people, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Deary, Gow, Pattie, & Starr, 2012; Deary et al., 2007). Both NART and WTAR scores were correlated with cognitive ability tested in childhood (r = .66-.68). Scores on both the NART and the WTAR had high stability over a period of 3 years in old age (r in excess of .90) and high interrater reliability. The NART accounted for more unique variance in childhood intelligence than did the WTAR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0033623</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23815111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult. Elderly ; Aged ; Aging ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis ; Alzheimer Disease - psychology ; Aptitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis ; Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology ; Cohort Studies ; Correlation analysis ; Dementia ; Developmental psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data ; Premorbidity ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data ; Reading ; Reading Measures ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scotland ; Test Validity ; Wechsler Scales - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2013-12, Vol.25 (4), p.1361-1366</ispartof><rights>2013 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>2013, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-6362a29d431c90db11560e887465b9398ed41e7aa2c67777fb4294d1a735cd4c3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6050-8223</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27998519$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23815111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Reynolds, Cecil R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dykiert, Dominika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deary, Ian J.</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson & Willison, 1991) and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Psychological Corporation, 2001) are 2 tests developed to estimate premorbid or prior ability. Due to the rarity of actual prior ability data, validation studies usually compare NART/WTAR performance with measures of current abilities in pathological and nonpathological groups. In this study, we validate the use of WTAR scores and extend the validation of the use of NART scores as estimates of prior ability, vis-à-vis the actual prior (childhood) cognitive ability. We do this in a large sample of healthy older people, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Deary, Gow, Pattie, & Starr, 2012; Deary et al., 2007). Both NART and WTAR scores were correlated with cognitive ability tested in childhood (r = .66-.68). Scores on both the NART and the WTAR had high stability over a period of 3 years in old age (r in excess of .90) and high interrater reliability. The NART accounted for more unique variance in childhood intelligence than did the WTAR.</description><subject>Adult. Elderly</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Aptitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Premorbidity</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Measures</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Wechsler Scales - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EomVA4gmQJYTEgoBv7DjxchiVH2kEaJgCO-vGcTquMnFqO0iz4N1x6ZRKLPDGXnz3-NxzCHkK7DUwXr9BxjiXJb9HTkFxVQAXP-7nNxOs4JViJ-RRjJeMgeBN9ZCclLyBCgBOya-NTcHHyZrkflr6DQfXYXJ-pL6n37fLDcWxo5-Wmy39anywkWKkZzG5PSYf4jX1JTgf6MpfjO6PxrJ1g0sHeh7deEHTztK1TzuHI33rQtplcudDotmofEwe9DhE--R4L8j5u7Pt6kOx_vz-42q5LrBiMhUy74al6gQHo1jXAlSS2aaphazavG9jOwG2RiyNrPPpW1Eq0QHWvDKdMHxBXt7oTsFfzTYmvXfR2GHA0fo5ahCyZlLUOcUFef4PeunnMGZ3maoZawQX8F8qZ8tACSXvvjU54hhsr6eQgwsHDUxfF6dvi8vos6Pg3O5t9xe8bSoDL44ARoNDH3A0Lt5xtVJNlTNdkFc3HE6op3gwGJIzg41mDsGOSed5XVZaZKMS-G8uLqul</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Dykiert, Dominika</creator><creator>Deary, Ian J.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6050-8223</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936</title><author>Dykiert, Dominika ; Deary, Ian J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-6362a29d431c90db11560e887465b9398ed41e7aa2c67777fb4294d1a735cd4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult. Elderly</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Aptitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Premorbidity</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Measures</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Wechsler Scales - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dykiert, Dominika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deary, Ian J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dykiert, Dominika</au><au>Deary, Ian J.</au><au>Reynolds, Cecil R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1361</spage><epage>1366</epage><pages>1361-1366</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson & Willison, 1991) and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Psychological Corporation, 2001) are 2 tests developed to estimate premorbid or prior ability. Due to the rarity of actual prior ability data, validation studies usually compare NART/WTAR performance with measures of current abilities in pathological and nonpathological groups. In this study, we validate the use of WTAR scores and extend the validation of the use of NART scores as estimates of prior ability, vis-à-vis the actual prior (childhood) cognitive ability. We do this in a large sample of healthy older people, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Deary, Gow, Pattie, & Starr, 2012; Deary et al., 2007). Both NART and WTAR scores were correlated with cognitive ability tested in childhood (r = .66-.68). Scores on both the NART and the WTAR had high stability over a period of 3 years in old age (r in excess of .90) and high interrater reliability. The NART accounted for more unique variance in childhood intelligence than did the WTAR.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>23815111</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0033623</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6050-8223</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-3590 |
ispartof | Psychological assessment, 2013-12, Vol.25 (4), p.1361-1366 |
issn | 1040-3590 1939-134X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1467064703 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult. Elderly Aged Aging Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis Alzheimer Disease - psychology Aptitude Biological and medical sciences Cognitive Ability Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology Cohort Studies Correlation analysis Dementia Developmental psychology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Intelligence Longitudinal Studies Male Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data Premorbidity Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data Reading Reading Measures Reproducibility of Results Scotland Test Validity Wechsler Scales - statistics & numerical data |
title | Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A01%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20Validation%20of%20WTAR%20and%20NART%20Scores%20as%20Estimators%20of%20Prior%20Cognitive%20Ability%20Using%20the%20Lothian%20Birth%20Cohort%201936&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Dykiert,%20Dominika&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1361&rft.epage=1366&rft.pages=1361-1366&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0033623&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3162857541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1381019496&rft_id=info:pmid/23815111&rfr_iscdi=true |