Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936

In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson & Willison, 1991)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological assessment 2013-12, Vol.25 (4), p.1361-1366
Hauptverfasser: Dykiert, Dominika, Deary, Ian J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1366
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1361
container_title Psychological assessment
container_volume 25
creator Dykiert, Dominika
Deary, Ian J.
description In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson & Willison, 1991) and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Psychological Corporation, 2001) are 2 tests developed to estimate premorbid or prior ability. Due to the rarity of actual prior ability data, validation studies usually compare NART/WTAR performance with measures of current abilities in pathological and nonpathological groups. In this study, we validate the use of WTAR scores and extend the validation of the use of NART scores as estimates of prior ability, vis-à-vis the actual prior (childhood) cognitive ability. We do this in a large sample of healthy older people, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Deary, Gow, Pattie, & Starr, 2012; Deary et al., 2007). Both NART and WTAR scores were correlated with cognitive ability tested in childhood (r = .66-.68). Scores on both the NART and the WTAR had high stability over a period of 3 years in old age (r in excess of .90) and high interrater reliability. The NART accounted for more unique variance in childhood intelligence than did the WTAR.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0033623
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1467064703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3162857541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-6362a29d431c90db11560e887465b9398ed41e7aa2c67777fb4294d1a735cd4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EomVA4gmQJYTEgoBv7DjxchiVH2kEaJgCO-vGcTquMnFqO0iz4N1x6ZRKLPDGXnz3-NxzCHkK7DUwXr9BxjiXJb9HTkFxVQAXP-7nNxOs4JViJ-RRjJeMgeBN9ZCclLyBCgBOya-NTcHHyZrkflr6DQfXYXJ-pL6n37fLDcWxo5-Wmy39anywkWKkZzG5PSYf4jX1JTgf6MpfjO6PxrJ1g0sHeh7deEHTztK1TzuHI33rQtplcudDotmofEwe9DhE--R4L8j5u7Pt6kOx_vz-42q5LrBiMhUy74al6gQHo1jXAlSS2aaphazavG9jOwG2RiyNrPPpW1Eq0QHWvDKdMHxBXt7oTsFfzTYmvXfR2GHA0fo5ahCyZlLUOcUFef4PeunnMGZ3maoZawQX8F8qZ8tACSXvvjU54hhsr6eQgwsHDUxfF6dvi8vos6Pg3O5t9xe8bSoDL44ARoNDH3A0Lt5xtVJNlTNdkFc3HE6op3gwGJIzg41mDsGOSed5XVZaZKMS-G8uLqul</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1381019496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Dykiert, Dominika ; Deary, Ian J.</creator><contributor>Reynolds, Cecil R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dykiert, Dominika ; Deary, Ian J. ; Reynolds, Cecil R</creatorcontrib><description>In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson &amp; Willison, 1991) and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Psychological Corporation, 2001) are 2 tests developed to estimate premorbid or prior ability. Due to the rarity of actual prior ability data, validation studies usually compare NART/WTAR performance with measures of current abilities in pathological and nonpathological groups. In this study, we validate the use of WTAR scores and extend the validation of the use of NART scores as estimates of prior ability, vis-à-vis the actual prior (childhood) cognitive ability. We do this in a large sample of healthy older people, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Deary, Gow, Pattie, &amp; Starr, 2012; Deary et al., 2007). Both NART and WTAR scores were correlated with cognitive ability tested in childhood (r = .66-.68). Scores on both the NART and the WTAR had high stability over a period of 3 years in old age (r in excess of .90) and high interrater reliability. The NART accounted for more unique variance in childhood intelligence than did the WTAR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0033623</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23815111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult. Elderly ; Aged ; Aging ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis ; Alzheimer Disease - psychology ; Aptitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis ; Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology ; Cohort Studies ; Correlation analysis ; Dementia ; Developmental psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Premorbidity ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Reading ; Reading Measures ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scotland ; Test Validity ; Wechsler Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2013-12, Vol.25 (4), p.1361-1366</ispartof><rights>2013 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>2013, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-6362a29d431c90db11560e887465b9398ed41e7aa2c67777fb4294d1a735cd4c3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6050-8223</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27998519$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23815111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Reynolds, Cecil R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dykiert, Dominika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deary, Ian J.</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson &amp; Willison, 1991) and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Psychological Corporation, 2001) are 2 tests developed to estimate premorbid or prior ability. Due to the rarity of actual prior ability data, validation studies usually compare NART/WTAR performance with measures of current abilities in pathological and nonpathological groups. In this study, we validate the use of WTAR scores and extend the validation of the use of NART scores as estimates of prior ability, vis-à-vis the actual prior (childhood) cognitive ability. We do this in a large sample of healthy older people, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Deary, Gow, Pattie, &amp; Starr, 2012; Deary et al., 2007). Both NART and WTAR scores were correlated with cognitive ability tested in childhood (r = .66-.68). Scores on both the NART and the WTAR had high stability over a period of 3 years in old age (r in excess of .90) and high interrater reliability. The NART accounted for more unique variance in childhood intelligence than did the WTAR.</description><subject>Adult. Elderly</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Aptitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Premorbidity</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Measures</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Wechsler Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EomVA4gmQJYTEgoBv7DjxchiVH2kEaJgCO-vGcTquMnFqO0iz4N1x6ZRKLPDGXnz3-NxzCHkK7DUwXr9BxjiXJb9HTkFxVQAXP-7nNxOs4JViJ-RRjJeMgeBN9ZCclLyBCgBOya-NTcHHyZrkflr6DQfXYXJ-pL6n37fLDcWxo5-Wmy39anywkWKkZzG5PSYf4jX1JTgf6MpfjO6PxrJ1g0sHeh7deEHTztK1TzuHI33rQtplcudDotmofEwe9DhE--R4L8j5u7Pt6kOx_vz-42q5LrBiMhUy74al6gQHo1jXAlSS2aaphazavG9jOwG2RiyNrPPpW1Eq0QHWvDKdMHxBXt7oTsFfzTYmvXfR2GHA0fo5ahCyZlLUOcUFef4PeunnMGZ3maoZawQX8F8qZ8tACSXvvjU54hhsr6eQgwsHDUxfF6dvi8vos6Pg3O5t9xe8bSoDL44ARoNDH3A0Lt5xtVJNlTNdkFc3HE6op3gwGJIzg41mDsGOSed5XVZaZKMS-G8uLqul</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Dykiert, Dominika</creator><creator>Deary, Ian J.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6050-8223</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936</title><author>Dykiert, Dominika ; Deary, Ian J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-6362a29d431c90db11560e887465b9398ed41e7aa2c67777fb4294d1a735cd4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult. Elderly</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Aptitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Premorbidity</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Measures</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Wechsler Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dykiert, Dominika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deary, Ian J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dykiert, Dominika</au><au>Deary, Ian J.</au><au>Reynolds, Cecil R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1361</spage><epage>1366</epage><pages>1361-1366</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>In order to assess the degree of cognitive decline resulting from a pathological state, such as dementia, or from a normal aging process, it is necessary to know or to have a valid estimate of premorbid (or prior) cognitive ability. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson &amp; Willison, 1991) and the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR; Psychological Corporation, 2001) are 2 tests developed to estimate premorbid or prior ability. Due to the rarity of actual prior ability data, validation studies usually compare NART/WTAR performance with measures of current abilities in pathological and nonpathological groups. In this study, we validate the use of WTAR scores and extend the validation of the use of NART scores as estimates of prior ability, vis-à-vis the actual prior (childhood) cognitive ability. We do this in a large sample of healthy older people, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (Deary, Gow, Pattie, &amp; Starr, 2012; Deary et al., 2007). Both NART and WTAR scores were correlated with cognitive ability tested in childhood (r = .66-.68). Scores on both the NART and the WTAR had high stability over a period of 3 years in old age (r in excess of .90) and high interrater reliability. The NART accounted for more unique variance in childhood intelligence than did the WTAR.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>23815111</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0033623</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6050-8223</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-3590
ispartof Psychological assessment, 2013-12, Vol.25 (4), p.1361-1366
issn 1040-3590
1939-134X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1467064703
source APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE
subjects Adult. Elderly
Aged
Aging
Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis
Alzheimer Disease - psychology
Aptitude
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive Ability
Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis
Cognitive Dysfunction - psychology
Cohort Studies
Correlation analysis
Dementia
Developmental psychology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Intelligence
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data
Premorbidity
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
Reading
Reading Measures
Reproducibility of Results
Scotland
Test Validity
Wechsler Scales - statistics & numerical data
title Retrospective Validation of WTAR and NART Scores as Estimators of Prior Cognitive Ability Using the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A01%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20Validation%20of%20WTAR%20and%20NART%20Scores%20as%20Estimators%20of%20Prior%20Cognitive%20Ability%20Using%20the%20Lothian%20Birth%20Cohort%201936&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Dykiert,%20Dominika&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1361&rft.epage=1366&rft.pages=1361-1366&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0033623&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3162857541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1381019496&rft_id=info:pmid/23815111&rfr_iscdi=true