The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications
The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nurse education today 2013-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1153-1159 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1159 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1153 |
container_title | Nurse education today |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Hollins Martin, Caroline J. Forrest, Eleanor Wylie, Linda Martin, Colin R. |
description | The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the purpose of improving delivery of bereavement education to student midwives. An instrument called the Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) was designed to measure effectiveness of the workbook at equipping students with essential knowledge.
To assess validity and reliability of the UBET at measuring midwives' self-perceptions of knowledge surrounding delivery of bereavement care to childbearing women, partners and families who have experienced childbirth related bereavement.
An evaluative audit using the UBET was undertaken to explore student midwives' (n=179) self perceived knowledge levels before and after the workbook intervention. Validity tests have shown that the UBET, (6-item version), could be considered a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing students' knowledge gain. PCA identified that the UBET comprised two sub-scales (theoretical knowledge base — Q 1, 2 & 3 and psychosocial elements of care delivery — Q 4, 5 & 6).
Data has shown that the easy to administer and short 6-item UBET is a valid and reliable tool for educators to measure success at delivering education using the “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” work book. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1466092234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0260691712003929</els_id><sourcerecordid>3080230671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-e34228fdf967636bf4b38666825d399d5a5c77e82f3fb021903316a4050e90663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc-L1DAUgIMo7rj6D3iQgJf10JofbdrIXtxlVoUFLzPnkEle3QxtMiZpxf_elFk9eBBPgcf3Psj7EHpNSU0JFe-PtQeba0YoqymtCZVP0Ia2nFWsk_wp2hAmSCUk7S7Qi5SOhJC-Y_w5umCcSdJRvkHL7gHw3luIKWtvnf-GbyCCXmACn_F20eOsswse70IY8dX-Zrt7h4cQ8eTsD7dA-oDvtMllkHKcTZ4j4CLCZnTeGT3iCAl0NA9Yn05jmayy9BI9G_SY4NXje4n2d9vd7efq_uunL7cf7yvTCJor4A1j_WAHKTrBxWFoDrwXQvSstVxK2-rWdB30bODDgTAqCedU6Ia0BCQRgl-iq7P3FMP3GVJWk0sGxlF7CHNStBGCSMZ48x8o50yU-63Wt3-hxzBHXz6yUq3gPWl5odiZMjGkFGFQp-gmHX8qStQaUB3VGlCtARWlqgQsS28e1fNhAvtn5XexAlyfAShnWxxElYwDb8C6CCYrG9y__L8AOGWqqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1435638053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hollins Martin, Caroline J. ; Forrest, Eleanor ; Wylie, Linda ; Martin, Colin R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hollins Martin, Caroline J. ; Forrest, Eleanor ; Wylie, Linda ; Martin, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><description>The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the purpose of improving delivery of bereavement education to student midwives. An instrument called the Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) was designed to measure effectiveness of the workbook at equipping students with essential knowledge.
To assess validity and reliability of the UBET at measuring midwives' self-perceptions of knowledge surrounding delivery of bereavement care to childbearing women, partners and families who have experienced childbirth related bereavement.
An evaluative audit using the UBET was undertaken to explore student midwives' (n=179) self perceived knowledge levels before and after the workbook intervention. Validity tests have shown that the UBET, (6-item version), could be considered a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing students' knowledge gain. PCA identified that the UBET comprised two sub-scales (theoretical knowledge base — Q 1, 2 & 3 and psychosocial elements of care delivery — Q 4, 5 & 6).
Data has shown that the easy to administer and short 6-item UBET is a valid and reliable tool for educators to measure success at delivering education using the “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” work book.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-6917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23290713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bereavement ; Education ; Educational evaluation ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Evaluation ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Grief ; Humans ; Knowledge Level ; Loss ; Midwifery ; Miscarriage ; Nurse Midwives - education ; Nurse-Patient Relations ; Nursing ; Nursing skills ; Pilot Projects ; Pregnancy ; Psychiatric-mental health nursing ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scotland ; Stillbirth ; Student Evaluation ; Teaching ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Workbooks</subject><ispartof>Nurse education today, 2013-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1153-1159</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-e34228fdf967636bf4b38666825d399d5a5c77e82f3fb021903316a4050e90663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-e34228fdf967636bf4b38666825d399d5a5c77e82f3fb021903316a4050e90663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691712003929$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23290713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hollins Martin, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications</title><title>Nurse education today</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><description>The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the purpose of improving delivery of bereavement education to student midwives. An instrument called the Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) was designed to measure effectiveness of the workbook at equipping students with essential knowledge.
To assess validity and reliability of the UBET at measuring midwives' self-perceptions of knowledge surrounding delivery of bereavement care to childbearing women, partners and families who have experienced childbirth related bereavement.
An evaluative audit using the UBET was undertaken to explore student midwives' (n=179) self perceived knowledge levels before and after the workbook intervention. Validity tests have shown that the UBET, (6-item version), could be considered a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing students' knowledge gain. PCA identified that the UBET comprised two sub-scales (theoretical knowledge base — Q 1, 2 & 3 and psychosocial elements of care delivery — Q 4, 5 & 6).
Data has shown that the easy to administer and short 6-item UBET is a valid and reliable tool for educators to measure success at delivering education using the “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” work book.</description><subject>Bereavement</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grief</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Loss</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Nurse Midwives - education</subject><subject>Nurse-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing skills</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Stillbirth</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Workbooks</subject><issn>0260-6917</issn><issn>1532-2793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc-L1DAUgIMo7rj6D3iQgJf10JofbdrIXtxlVoUFLzPnkEle3QxtMiZpxf_elFk9eBBPgcf3Psj7EHpNSU0JFe-PtQeba0YoqymtCZVP0Ia2nFWsk_wp2hAmSCUk7S7Qi5SOhJC-Y_w5umCcSdJRvkHL7gHw3luIKWtvnf-GbyCCXmACn_F20eOsswse70IY8dX-Zrt7h4cQ8eTsD7dA-oDvtMllkHKcTZ4j4CLCZnTeGT3iCAl0NA9Yn05jmayy9BI9G_SY4NXje4n2d9vd7efq_uunL7cf7yvTCJor4A1j_WAHKTrBxWFoDrwXQvSstVxK2-rWdB30bODDgTAqCedU6Ia0BCQRgl-iq7P3FMP3GVJWk0sGxlF7CHNStBGCSMZ48x8o50yU-63Wt3-hxzBHXz6yUq3gPWl5odiZMjGkFGFQp-gmHX8qStQaUB3VGlCtARWlqgQsS28e1fNhAvtn5XexAlyfAShnWxxElYwDb8C6CCYrG9y__L8AOGWqqQ</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Hollins Martin, Caroline J.</creator><creator>Forrest, Eleanor</creator><creator>Wylie, Linda</creator><creator>Martin, Colin R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications</title><author>Hollins Martin, Caroline J. ; Forrest, Eleanor ; Wylie, Linda ; Martin, Colin R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-e34228fdf967636bf4b38666825d399d5a5c77e82f3fb021903316a4050e90663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bereavement</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grief</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Loss</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Nurse Midwives - education</topic><topic>Nurse-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing skills</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Stillbirth</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Workbooks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hollins Martin, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hollins Martin, Caroline J.</au><au>Forrest, Eleanor</au><au>Wylie, Linda</au><au>Martin, Colin R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1153</spage><epage>1159</epage><pages>1153-1159</pages><issn>0260-6917</issn><eissn>1532-2793</eissn><abstract>The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the purpose of improving delivery of bereavement education to student midwives. An instrument called the Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) was designed to measure effectiveness of the workbook at equipping students with essential knowledge.
To assess validity and reliability of the UBET at measuring midwives' self-perceptions of knowledge surrounding delivery of bereavement care to childbearing women, partners and families who have experienced childbirth related bereavement.
An evaluative audit using the UBET was undertaken to explore student midwives' (n=179) self perceived knowledge levels before and after the workbook intervention. Validity tests have shown that the UBET, (6-item version), could be considered a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing students' knowledge gain. PCA identified that the UBET comprised two sub-scales (theoretical knowledge base — Q 1, 2 & 3 and psychosocial elements of care delivery — Q 4, 5 & 6).
Data has shown that the easy to administer and short 6-item UBET is a valid and reliable tool for educators to measure success at delivering education using the “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” work book.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23290713</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.019</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0260-6917 |
ispartof | Nurse education today, 2013-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1153-1159 |
issn | 0260-6917 1532-2793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1466092234 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Bereavement Education Educational evaluation Educational Measurement - methods Evaluation Factor Analysis, Statistical Factor Structure Female Grief Humans Knowledge Level Loss Midwifery Miscarriage Nurse Midwives - education Nurse-Patient Relations Nursing Nursing skills Pilot Projects Pregnancy Psychiatric-mental health nursing Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Scotland Stillbirth Student Evaluation Teaching Validation studies Validity Workbooks |
title | The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A20%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Understanding%20Bereavement%20Evaluation%20Tool%20(UBET)%20for%20midwives:%20Factor%20structure%20and%20clinical%20research%20applications&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20today&rft.au=Hollins%20Martin,%20Caroline%20J.&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1153&rft.epage=1159&rft.pages=1153-1159&rft.issn=0260-6917&rft.eissn=1532-2793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3080230671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1435638053&rft_id=info:pmid/23290713&rft_els_id=S0260691712003929&rfr_iscdi=true |