The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications

The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nurse education today 2013-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1153-1159
Hauptverfasser: Hollins Martin, Caroline J., Forrest, Eleanor, Wylie, Linda, Martin, Colin R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1159
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1153
container_title Nurse education today
container_volume 33
creator Hollins Martin, Caroline J.
Forrest, Eleanor
Wylie, Linda
Martin, Colin R.
description The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the purpose of improving delivery of bereavement education to student midwives. An instrument called the Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) was designed to measure effectiveness of the workbook at equipping students with essential knowledge. To assess validity and reliability of the UBET at measuring midwives' self-perceptions of knowledge surrounding delivery of bereavement care to childbearing women, partners and families who have experienced childbirth related bereavement. An evaluative audit using the UBET was undertaken to explore student midwives' (n=179) self perceived knowledge levels before and after the workbook intervention. Validity tests have shown that the UBET, (6-item version), could be considered a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing students' knowledge gain. PCA identified that the UBET comprised two sub-scales (theoretical knowledge base — Q 1, 2 & 3 and psychosocial elements of care delivery — Q 4, 5 & 6). Data has shown that the easy to administer and short 6-item UBET is a valid and reliable tool for educators to measure success at delivering education using the “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” work book.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1466092234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0260691712003929</els_id><sourcerecordid>3080230671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-e34228fdf967636bf4b38666825d399d5a5c77e82f3fb021903316a4050e90663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc-L1DAUgIMo7rj6D3iQgJf10JofbdrIXtxlVoUFLzPnkEle3QxtMiZpxf_elFk9eBBPgcf3Psj7EHpNSU0JFe-PtQeba0YoqymtCZVP0Ia2nFWsk_wp2hAmSCUk7S7Qi5SOhJC-Y_w5umCcSdJRvkHL7gHw3luIKWtvnf-GbyCCXmACn_F20eOsswse70IY8dX-Zrt7h4cQ8eTsD7dA-oDvtMllkHKcTZ4j4CLCZnTeGT3iCAl0NA9Yn05jmayy9BI9G_SY4NXje4n2d9vd7efq_uunL7cf7yvTCJor4A1j_WAHKTrBxWFoDrwXQvSstVxK2-rWdB30bODDgTAqCedU6Ia0BCQRgl-iq7P3FMP3GVJWk0sGxlF7CHNStBGCSMZ48x8o50yU-63Wt3-hxzBHXz6yUq3gPWl5odiZMjGkFGFQp-gmHX8qStQaUB3VGlCtARWlqgQsS28e1fNhAvtn5XexAlyfAShnWxxElYwDb8C6CCYrG9y__L8AOGWqqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1435638053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hollins Martin, Caroline J. ; Forrest, Eleanor ; Wylie, Linda ; Martin, Colin R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hollins Martin, Caroline J. ; Forrest, Eleanor ; Wylie, Linda ; Martin, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><description>The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the purpose of improving delivery of bereavement education to student midwives. An instrument called the Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) was designed to measure effectiveness of the workbook at equipping students with essential knowledge. To assess validity and reliability of the UBET at measuring midwives' self-perceptions of knowledge surrounding delivery of bereavement care to childbearing women, partners and families who have experienced childbirth related bereavement. An evaluative audit using the UBET was undertaken to explore student midwives' (n=179) self perceived knowledge levels before and after the workbook intervention. Validity tests have shown that the UBET, (6-item version), could be considered a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing students' knowledge gain. PCA identified that the UBET comprised two sub-scales (theoretical knowledge base — Q 1, 2 &amp; 3 and psychosocial elements of care delivery — Q 4, 5 &amp; 6). Data has shown that the easy to administer and short 6-item UBET is a valid and reliable tool for educators to measure success at delivering education using the “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” work book.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-6917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23290713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bereavement ; Education ; Educational evaluation ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Evaluation ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Grief ; Humans ; Knowledge Level ; Loss ; Midwifery ; Miscarriage ; Nurse Midwives - education ; Nurse-Patient Relations ; Nursing ; Nursing skills ; Pilot Projects ; Pregnancy ; Psychiatric-mental health nursing ; Psychometrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scotland ; Stillbirth ; Student Evaluation ; Teaching ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Workbooks</subject><ispartof>Nurse education today, 2013-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1153-1159</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-e34228fdf967636bf4b38666825d399d5a5c77e82f3fb021903316a4050e90663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-e34228fdf967636bf4b38666825d399d5a5c77e82f3fb021903316a4050e90663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691712003929$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23290713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hollins Martin, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications</title><title>Nurse education today</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><description>The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the purpose of improving delivery of bereavement education to student midwives. An instrument called the Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) was designed to measure effectiveness of the workbook at equipping students with essential knowledge. To assess validity and reliability of the UBET at measuring midwives' self-perceptions of knowledge surrounding delivery of bereavement care to childbearing women, partners and families who have experienced childbirth related bereavement. An evaluative audit using the UBET was undertaken to explore student midwives' (n=179) self perceived knowledge levels before and after the workbook intervention. Validity tests have shown that the UBET, (6-item version), could be considered a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing students' knowledge gain. PCA identified that the UBET comprised two sub-scales (theoretical knowledge base — Q 1, 2 &amp; 3 and psychosocial elements of care delivery — Q 4, 5 &amp; 6). Data has shown that the easy to administer and short 6-item UBET is a valid and reliable tool for educators to measure success at delivering education using the “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” work book.</description><subject>Bereavement</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grief</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Loss</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Nurse Midwives - education</subject><subject>Nurse-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing skills</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Stillbirth</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Workbooks</subject><issn>0260-6917</issn><issn>1532-2793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc-L1DAUgIMo7rj6D3iQgJf10JofbdrIXtxlVoUFLzPnkEle3QxtMiZpxf_elFk9eBBPgcf3Psj7EHpNSU0JFe-PtQeba0YoqymtCZVP0Ia2nFWsk_wp2hAmSCUk7S7Qi5SOhJC-Y_w5umCcSdJRvkHL7gHw3luIKWtvnf-GbyCCXmACn_F20eOsswse70IY8dX-Zrt7h4cQ8eTsD7dA-oDvtMllkHKcTZ4j4CLCZnTeGT3iCAl0NA9Yn05jmayy9BI9G_SY4NXje4n2d9vd7efq_uunL7cf7yvTCJor4A1j_WAHKTrBxWFoDrwXQvSstVxK2-rWdB30bODDgTAqCedU6Ia0BCQRgl-iq7P3FMP3GVJWk0sGxlF7CHNStBGCSMZ48x8o50yU-63Wt3-hxzBHXz6yUq3gPWl5odiZMjGkFGFQp-gmHX8qStQaUB3VGlCtARWlqgQsS28e1fNhAvtn5XexAlyfAShnWxxElYwDb8C6CCYrG9y__L8AOGWqqQ</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Hollins Martin, Caroline J.</creator><creator>Forrest, Eleanor</creator><creator>Wylie, Linda</creator><creator>Martin, Colin R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications</title><author>Hollins Martin, Caroline J. ; Forrest, Eleanor ; Wylie, Linda ; Martin, Colin R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-e34228fdf967636bf4b38666825d399d5a5c77e82f3fb021903316a4050e90663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bereavement</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grief</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Loss</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Nurse Midwives - education</topic><topic>Nurse-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing skills</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Stillbirth</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Workbooks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hollins Martin, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hollins Martin, Caroline J.</au><au>Forrest, Eleanor</au><au>Wylie, Linda</au><au>Martin, Colin R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1153</spage><epage>1159</epage><pages>1153-1159</pages><issn>0260-6917</issn><eissn>1532-2793</eissn><abstract>The NMSF (2009) survey reported that bereavement midwife care was inadequate in a number of UK NHS Trusts. Using a small grant from the Scottish government, 3 experienced midwifery lecturers designed an interactive workbook called “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” for the purpose of improving delivery of bereavement education to student midwives. An instrument called the Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) was designed to measure effectiveness of the workbook at equipping students with essential knowledge. To assess validity and reliability of the UBET at measuring midwives' self-perceptions of knowledge surrounding delivery of bereavement care to childbearing women, partners and families who have experienced childbirth related bereavement. An evaluative audit using the UBET was undertaken to explore student midwives' (n=179) self perceived knowledge levels before and after the workbook intervention. Validity tests have shown that the UBET, (6-item version), could be considered a psychometrically robust instrument for assessing students' knowledge gain. PCA identified that the UBET comprised two sub-scales (theoretical knowledge base — Q 1, 2 &amp; 3 and psychosocial elements of care delivery — Q 4, 5 &amp; 6). Data has shown that the easy to administer and short 6-item UBET is a valid and reliable tool for educators to measure success at delivering education using the “Shaping bereavement care for midwives in clinical practice” work book.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23290713</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.019</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0260-6917
ispartof Nurse education today, 2013-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1153-1159
issn 0260-6917
1532-2793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1466092234
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bereavement
Education
Educational evaluation
Educational Measurement - methods
Evaluation
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Factor Structure
Female
Grief
Humans
Knowledge Level
Loss
Midwifery
Miscarriage
Nurse Midwives - education
Nurse-Patient Relations
Nursing
Nursing skills
Pilot Projects
Pregnancy
Psychiatric-mental health nursing
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Scotland
Stillbirth
Student Evaluation
Teaching
Validation studies
Validity
Workbooks
title The Understanding Bereavement Evaluation Tool (UBET) for midwives: Factor structure and clinical research applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A20%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Understanding%20Bereavement%20Evaluation%20Tool%20(UBET)%20for%20midwives:%20Factor%20structure%20and%20clinical%20research%20applications&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20today&rft.au=Hollins%20Martin,%20Caroline%20J.&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1153&rft.epage=1159&rft.pages=1153-1159&rft.issn=0260-6917&rft.eissn=1532-2793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3080230671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1435638053&rft_id=info:pmid/23290713&rft_els_id=S0260691712003929&rfr_iscdi=true