Left atrial appendage closure followed by 6 weeks of antithrombotic therapy: A prospective single-center experience

Background Currently, 2 different left atrial appendage (LAA) closure systems are available for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation but comparative data are lacking. Objectives To prospectively compare procedural data and patient outcome for 2 contemporary LAA closure systems and to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2013-12, Vol.10 (12), p.1792-1799
Hauptverfasser: Chun, KR Julian, MD, Bordignon, Stefano, MD, Urban, Verena, MD, Perrotta, Laura, MD, Dugo, Daniela, MD, Fürnkranz, Alexander, MD, Nowak, Bernd, MD, Schmidt, Boris, MD, FHRS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1799
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1792
container_title Heart rhythm
container_volume 10
creator Chun, KR Julian, MD
Bordignon, Stefano, MD
Urban, Verena, MD
Perrotta, Laura, MD
Dugo, Daniela, MD
Fürnkranz, Alexander, MD
Nowak, Bernd, MD
Schmidt, Boris, MD, FHRS
description Background Currently, 2 different left atrial appendage (LAA) closure systems are available for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation but comparative data are lacking. Objectives To prospectively compare procedural data and patient outcome for 2 contemporary LAA closure systems and to investigate an alternative antithrombotic treatment regimen in high-risk patients. Methods Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, with high risk for stroke, and who either had contraindication or were not willing to accept oral anticoagulation were prospectively enrolled. Watchman (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA; group A) or Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (St Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN; group B) devices were implanted. All patients received antithrombotic therapy for 6 weeks. After repeat transesophageal echocardiography, patients were switched to aspirin. Results Eighty patients were enrolled. There was no statistical difference in patient characteristics in groups A and B: CHA2 DS2 VASC score: 4.1 ± 1.5 versus 4.5 ± 1.8; HASBLED score: 3.1 ± 1.1 versus 3.1 ± 1.1, respectively. LAA closure was achieved in 78 of 80 patients (98%) (group A: 38 of 40 [95%] vs group B: 40 of 40 [100%]). There was no difference in procedure time (group A: 48 ± 16 minutes vs group B: 47 ± 15 minutes; P = .69) and fluoroscopy time (group A: 6.0 ± 4.7 minutes vs group B: 7.3 ± 4.4 minutes; P = .25). Major complications included 1 air embolism and delayed tamponade in each group. After 6 weeks, 1 device dislodgment and 4 device-related thrombi were detected. Ninety-four percent of the patients (73 of 77) were switched to aspirin after 6 weeks. During a median follow-up of 364 days (Q1–Q3: 283–539 days), no systemic embolism occurred, but 3 patients died (heart failure: n = 2; bleeding: n = 1). Conclusions Implantation of both LAA closure devices can be performed with high success rates in high-risk patients. Postprocedural 6 weeks antithrombotic therapy followed by aspirin therapy needs to be confirmed in a larger study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464892672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1547527113009004</els_id><sourcerecordid>1464892672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d5716fa3c6feb1780919a30251a8788a6355f566e782f4adcd4f4868e7f476f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wC5CQj1wS_JHYDhJIVUWh0kocgLPldcZdb5042E7L_nucbuHQC6eZw_vOvPNMVb0huCGY8Pf7ZhfzbmwoJqzBssG0e1adkq7jNZOCPF_7VtQdFeSkOktpjzHtOWYvqxPKesH6jp5WaQM2I52j0x7peYZp0DeAjA9piYBs8D7cw4C2B8TRPcBtQsEiPWWXdzGM25CdQXkHUc-HD-gCzTGkGUx2d4CSm2481AamDBHB7xmig8nAq-qF1T7B68d6Xv28-vzj8mu9-fbl-vJiU5tW4lwPnSDcama4hS0REvek16xcSbQUUmrOus52nIOQ1LZ6MENrW8klCNsKbjE7r94d55ZQvxZIWY0uGfBeTxCWpEjLW9lTLmiRsqPUlPwpglVzdKOOB0WwWmmrvXqgrVbaCktVchTX28cFy3aE4Z_nL94i-HgUQDnzzkFUyTwgGFwskNQQ3H8WfHriN95Nzmh_CwdI-7DEqRBURCWqsPq-Pnz9N2EY9xi37A8Yy6fS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464892672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Left atrial appendage closure followed by 6 weeks of antithrombotic therapy: A prospective single-center experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chun, KR Julian, MD ; Bordignon, Stefano, MD ; Urban, Verena, MD ; Perrotta, Laura, MD ; Dugo, Daniela, MD ; Fürnkranz, Alexander, MD ; Nowak, Bernd, MD ; Schmidt, Boris, MD, FHRS</creator><creatorcontrib>Chun, KR Julian, MD ; Bordignon, Stefano, MD ; Urban, Verena, MD ; Perrotta, Laura, MD ; Dugo, Daniela, MD ; Fürnkranz, Alexander, MD ; Nowak, Bernd, MD ; Schmidt, Boris, MD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><description>Background Currently, 2 different left atrial appendage (LAA) closure systems are available for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation but comparative data are lacking. Objectives To prospectively compare procedural data and patient outcome for 2 contemporary LAA closure systems and to investigate an alternative antithrombotic treatment regimen in high-risk patients. Methods Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, with high risk for stroke, and who either had contraindication or were not willing to accept oral anticoagulation were prospectively enrolled. Watchman (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA; group A) or Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (St Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN; group B) devices were implanted. All patients received antithrombotic therapy for 6 weeks. After repeat transesophageal echocardiography, patients were switched to aspirin. Results Eighty patients were enrolled. There was no statistical difference in patient characteristics in groups A and B: CHA2 DS2 VASC score: 4.1 ± 1.5 versus 4.5 ± 1.8; HASBLED score: 3.1 ± 1.1 versus 3.1 ± 1.1, respectively. LAA closure was achieved in 78 of 80 patients (98%) (group A: 38 of 40 [95%] vs group B: 40 of 40 [100%]). There was no difference in procedure time (group A: 48 ± 16 minutes vs group B: 47 ± 15 minutes; P = .69) and fluoroscopy time (group A: 6.0 ± 4.7 minutes vs group B: 7.3 ± 4.4 minutes; P = .25). Major complications included 1 air embolism and delayed tamponade in each group. After 6 weeks, 1 device dislodgment and 4 device-related thrombi were detected. Ninety-four percent of the patients (73 of 77) were switched to aspirin after 6 weeks. During a median follow-up of 364 days (Q1–Q3: 283–539 days), no systemic embolism occurred, but 3 patients died (heart failure: n = 2; bleeding: n = 1). Conclusions Implantation of both LAA closure devices can be performed with high success rates in high-risk patients. Postprocedural 6 weeks antithrombotic therapy followed by aspirin therapy needs to be confirmed in a larger study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23973952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Atrial Appendage - diagnostic imaging ; Atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - complications ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Atrial Fibrillation - therapy ; Cardiovascular ; Echocardiography, Transesophageal ; Female ; Fibrinolytic Agents - therapeutic use ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Left atrial appendage closure ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Stroke ; Stroke - etiology ; Stroke - prevention &amp; control ; Thrombosis - complications ; Thrombosis - drug therapy ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2013-12, Vol.10 (12), p.1792-1799</ispartof><rights>Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>2013 Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d5716fa3c6feb1780919a30251a8788a6355f566e782f4adcd4f4868e7f476f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d5716fa3c6feb1780919a30251a8788a6355f566e782f4adcd4f4868e7f476f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527113009004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23973952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chun, KR Julian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordignon, Stefano, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban, Verena, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotta, Laura, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugo, Daniela, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fürnkranz, Alexander, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Bernd, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Boris, MD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><title>Left atrial appendage closure followed by 6 weeks of antithrombotic therapy: A prospective single-center experience</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><description>Background Currently, 2 different left atrial appendage (LAA) closure systems are available for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation but comparative data are lacking. Objectives To prospectively compare procedural data and patient outcome for 2 contemporary LAA closure systems and to investigate an alternative antithrombotic treatment regimen in high-risk patients. Methods Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, with high risk for stroke, and who either had contraindication or were not willing to accept oral anticoagulation were prospectively enrolled. Watchman (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA; group A) or Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (St Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN; group B) devices were implanted. All patients received antithrombotic therapy for 6 weeks. After repeat transesophageal echocardiography, patients were switched to aspirin. Results Eighty patients were enrolled. There was no statistical difference in patient characteristics in groups A and B: CHA2 DS2 VASC score: 4.1 ± 1.5 versus 4.5 ± 1.8; HASBLED score: 3.1 ± 1.1 versus 3.1 ± 1.1, respectively. LAA closure was achieved in 78 of 80 patients (98%) (group A: 38 of 40 [95%] vs group B: 40 of 40 [100%]). There was no difference in procedure time (group A: 48 ± 16 minutes vs group B: 47 ± 15 minutes; P = .69) and fluoroscopy time (group A: 6.0 ± 4.7 minutes vs group B: 7.3 ± 4.4 minutes; P = .25). Major complications included 1 air embolism and delayed tamponade in each group. After 6 weeks, 1 device dislodgment and 4 device-related thrombi were detected. Ninety-four percent of the patients (73 of 77) were switched to aspirin after 6 weeks. During a median follow-up of 364 days (Q1–Q3: 283–539 days), no systemic embolism occurred, but 3 patients died (heart failure: n = 2; bleeding: n = 1). Conclusions Implantation of both LAA closure devices can be performed with high success rates in high-risk patients. Postprocedural 6 weeks antithrombotic therapy followed by aspirin therapy needs to be confirmed in a larger study.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Atrial Appendage - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Transesophageal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibrinolytic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Left atrial appendage closure</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - etiology</subject><subject>Stroke - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Thrombosis - complications</subject><subject>Thrombosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wC5CQj1wS_JHYDhJIVUWh0kocgLPldcZdb5042E7L_nucbuHQC6eZw_vOvPNMVb0huCGY8Pf7ZhfzbmwoJqzBssG0e1adkq7jNZOCPF_7VtQdFeSkOktpjzHtOWYvqxPKesH6jp5WaQM2I52j0x7peYZp0DeAjA9piYBs8D7cw4C2B8TRPcBtQsEiPWWXdzGM25CdQXkHUc-HD-gCzTGkGUx2d4CSm2481AamDBHB7xmig8nAq-qF1T7B68d6Xv28-vzj8mu9-fbl-vJiU5tW4lwPnSDcama4hS0REvek16xcSbQUUmrOus52nIOQ1LZ6MENrW8klCNsKbjE7r94d55ZQvxZIWY0uGfBeTxCWpEjLW9lTLmiRsqPUlPwpglVzdKOOB0WwWmmrvXqgrVbaCktVchTX28cFy3aE4Z_nL94i-HgUQDnzzkFUyTwgGFwskNQQ3H8WfHriN95Nzmh_CwdI-7DEqRBURCWqsPq-Pnz9N2EY9xi37A8Yy6fS</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Chun, KR Julian, MD</creator><creator>Bordignon, Stefano, MD</creator><creator>Urban, Verena, MD</creator><creator>Perrotta, Laura, MD</creator><creator>Dugo, Daniela, MD</creator><creator>Fürnkranz, Alexander, MD</creator><creator>Nowak, Bernd, MD</creator><creator>Schmidt, Boris, MD, FHRS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Left atrial appendage closure followed by 6 weeks of antithrombotic therapy: A prospective single-center experience</title><author>Chun, KR Julian, MD ; Bordignon, Stefano, MD ; Urban, Verena, MD ; Perrotta, Laura, MD ; Dugo, Daniela, MD ; Fürnkranz, Alexander, MD ; Nowak, Bernd, MD ; Schmidt, Boris, MD, FHRS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d5716fa3c6feb1780919a30251a8788a6355f566e782f4adcd4f4868e7f476f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Atrial Appendage - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Transesophageal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibrinolytic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Left atrial appendage closure</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - etiology</topic><topic>Stroke - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Thrombosis - complications</topic><topic>Thrombosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chun, KR Julian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordignon, Stefano, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban, Verena, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrotta, Laura, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugo, Daniela, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fürnkranz, Alexander, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Bernd, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Boris, MD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chun, KR Julian, MD</au><au>Bordignon, Stefano, MD</au><au>Urban, Verena, MD</au><au>Perrotta, Laura, MD</au><au>Dugo, Daniela, MD</au><au>Fürnkranz, Alexander, MD</au><au>Nowak, Bernd, MD</au><au>Schmidt, Boris, MD, FHRS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Left atrial appendage closure followed by 6 weeks of antithrombotic therapy: A prospective single-center experience</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1792</spage><epage>1799</epage><pages>1792-1799</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Background Currently, 2 different left atrial appendage (LAA) closure systems are available for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation but comparative data are lacking. Objectives To prospectively compare procedural data and patient outcome for 2 contemporary LAA closure systems and to investigate an alternative antithrombotic treatment regimen in high-risk patients. Methods Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, with high risk for stroke, and who either had contraindication or were not willing to accept oral anticoagulation were prospectively enrolled. Watchman (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA; group A) or Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (St Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN; group B) devices were implanted. All patients received antithrombotic therapy for 6 weeks. After repeat transesophageal echocardiography, patients were switched to aspirin. Results Eighty patients were enrolled. There was no statistical difference in patient characteristics in groups A and B: CHA2 DS2 VASC score: 4.1 ± 1.5 versus 4.5 ± 1.8; HASBLED score: 3.1 ± 1.1 versus 3.1 ± 1.1, respectively. LAA closure was achieved in 78 of 80 patients (98%) (group A: 38 of 40 [95%] vs group B: 40 of 40 [100%]). There was no difference in procedure time (group A: 48 ± 16 minutes vs group B: 47 ± 15 minutes; P = .69) and fluoroscopy time (group A: 6.0 ± 4.7 minutes vs group B: 7.3 ± 4.4 minutes; P = .25). Major complications included 1 air embolism and delayed tamponade in each group. After 6 weeks, 1 device dislodgment and 4 device-related thrombi were detected. Ninety-four percent of the patients (73 of 77) were switched to aspirin after 6 weeks. During a median follow-up of 364 days (Q1–Q3: 283–539 days), no systemic embolism occurred, but 3 patients died (heart failure: n = 2; bleeding: n = 1). Conclusions Implantation of both LAA closure devices can be performed with high success rates in high-risk patients. Postprocedural 6 weeks antithrombotic therapy followed by aspirin therapy needs to be confirmed in a larger study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23973952</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.025</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1547-5271
ispartof Heart rhythm, 2013-12, Vol.10 (12), p.1792-1799
issn 1547-5271
1556-3871
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464892672
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Atrial Appendage - diagnostic imaging
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation - complications
Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology
Atrial Fibrillation - therapy
Cardiovascular
Echocardiography, Transesophageal
Female
Fibrinolytic Agents - therapeutic use
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Left atrial appendage closure
Male
Prospective Studies
Stroke
Stroke - etiology
Stroke - prevention & control
Thrombosis - complications
Thrombosis - drug therapy
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Left atrial appendage closure followed by 6 weeks of antithrombotic therapy: A prospective single-center experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T17%3A38%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Left%20atrial%20appendage%20closure%20followed%20by%206%20weeks%20of%20antithrombotic%20therapy:%20A%20prospective%20single-center%20experience&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Chun,%20KR%20Julian,%20MD&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1792&rft.epage=1799&rft.pages=1792-1799&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464892672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464892672&rft_id=info:pmid/23973952&rft_els_id=S1547527113009004&rfr_iscdi=true