The Density Conundrum: Does Legislation Help or Hurt?
Breast density and breast density legislation are controversial and potentially emotional issues in breast screening. Informing individual patients of their breast density status is an extremely important and highly personal conversation that must focus on patients' specific situations. The una...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Radiology 2013-12, Vol.10 (12), p.909-912 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 912 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 909 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Radiology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Smith, Mary Lou, JD, MBA |
description | Breast density and breast density legislation are controversial and potentially emotional issues in breast screening. Informing individual patients of their breast density status is an extremely important and highly personal conversation that must focus on patients' specific situations. The unanswered questions about converting population risk make it difficult to provide an individual woman with an explanation of what breast density means to her individual risk for developing breast cancer now or in the future. There are no standards or guidelines for what doctors should tell patients about their risk with dense breasts, and legislating the conversation may not improve it or a woman's response to the information. It is necessary to learn more about breast density, understand its meaning, and communicate clearly and compassionately with patients about what we know and what we do not know about breast cancer risk. Precipitous legislation can, in fact, undermine both the patient-physician relationship and the need for more evidence that would expand our understanding of the risk associated with breast density. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464890537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1546144013005814</els_id><sourcerecordid>1464890537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d7fe0239bf82a82bea91df32e3d229113fe010415edd2129403e4a44ca94def83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQha0KVCjtH-gB5cgl6Yzt7MYVokILdJFW4gCVerO89qQ4ZOOtnSDtv2-ihR44cJqR5r0nzfcY-4pQIODsW1M0xsaCA4oCVAHIP7BjLMsqF1L9Pph2OctRSjhin1JqAPh8XlUf2RGXXJVKqGNWPjxSdkVd8v0uW4Ru6FwcNt-zq0ApW9Efn1rT-9BlS2q3WYjZcoj9j8_ssDZtoi8v84T9url-WCzz1d3P28XlKrcSsc_dvCbgQq3ripuKr8kodLXgJBznClGMZwSJJTnHkSsJgqSR0holHdWVOGFn-9xtDH8HSr3e-GSpbU1HYUga5UxWCkoxH6V8L7UxpBSp1tvoNybuNIKecOlGT7j0hEuD0iOu0XT6kj-sN-T-W175jILzvYDGL589RZ2sp86S85Fsr13w7-dfvLHb1nfemvaJdpSaMMRu5KdRJ65B30-FTX2hACgrlOIfyPqOoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464890537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Density Conundrum: Does Legislation Help or Hurt?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Smith, Mary Lou, JD, MBA</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mary Lou, JD, MBA</creatorcontrib><description>Breast density and breast density legislation are controversial and potentially emotional issues in breast screening. Informing individual patients of their breast density status is an extremely important and highly personal conversation that must focus on patients' specific situations. The unanswered questions about converting population risk make it difficult to provide an individual woman with an explanation of what breast density means to her individual risk for developing breast cancer now or in the future. There are no standards or guidelines for what doctors should tell patients about their risk with dense breasts, and legislating the conversation may not improve it or a woman's response to the information. It is necessary to learn more about breast density, understand its meaning, and communicate clearly and compassionately with patients about what we know and what we do not know about breast cancer risk. Precipitous legislation can, in fact, undermine both the patient-physician relationship and the need for more evidence that would expand our understanding of the risk associated with breast density.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-1440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-349X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24295939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Dense breasts ; Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Humans ; legislation ; Mammography ; Mass Screening - legislation & jurisprudence ; Patient Access to Records - legislation & jurisprudence ; patient-physician communication ; Physician's Role ; Radiology ; Radiology - standards ; screening ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2013-12, Vol.10 (12), p.909-912</ispartof><rights>American College of Radiology</rights><rights>2013 American College of Radiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d7fe0239bf82a82bea91df32e3d229113fe010415edd2129403e4a44ca94def83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d7fe0239bf82a82bea91df32e3d229113fe010415edd2129403e4a44ca94def83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24295939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mary Lou, JD, MBA</creatorcontrib><title>The Density Conundrum: Does Legislation Help or Hurt?</title><title>Journal of the American College of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><description>Breast density and breast density legislation are controversial and potentially emotional issues in breast screening. Informing individual patients of their breast density status is an extremely important and highly personal conversation that must focus on patients' specific situations. The unanswered questions about converting population risk make it difficult to provide an individual woman with an explanation of what breast density means to her individual risk for developing breast cancer now or in the future. There are no standards or guidelines for what doctors should tell patients about their risk with dense breasts, and legislating the conversation may not improve it or a woman's response to the information. It is necessary to learn more about breast density, understand its meaning, and communicate clearly and compassionately with patients about what we know and what we do not know about breast cancer risk. Precipitous legislation can, in fact, undermine both the patient-physician relationship and the need for more evidence that would expand our understanding of the risk associated with breast density.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dense breasts</subject><subject>Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>legislation</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mass Screening - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Patient Access to Records - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>patient-physician communication</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiology - standards</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1546-1440</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQha0KVCjtH-gB5cgl6Yzt7MYVokILdJFW4gCVerO89qQ4ZOOtnSDtv2-ihR44cJqR5r0nzfcY-4pQIODsW1M0xsaCA4oCVAHIP7BjLMsqF1L9Pph2OctRSjhin1JqAPh8XlUf2RGXXJVKqGNWPjxSdkVd8v0uW4Ru6FwcNt-zq0ApW9Efn1rT-9BlS2q3WYjZcoj9j8_ssDZtoi8v84T9url-WCzz1d3P28XlKrcSsc_dvCbgQq3ripuKr8kodLXgJBznClGMZwSJJTnHkSsJgqSR0holHdWVOGFn-9xtDH8HSr3e-GSpbU1HYUga5UxWCkoxH6V8L7UxpBSp1tvoNybuNIKecOlGT7j0hEuD0iOu0XT6kj-sN-T-W175jILzvYDGL589RZ2sp86S85Fsr13w7-dfvLHb1nfemvaJdpSaMMRu5KdRJ65B30-FTX2hACgrlOIfyPqOoQ</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Smith, Mary Lou, JD, MBA</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>The Density Conundrum: Does Legislation Help or Hurt?</title><author>Smith, Mary Lou, JD, MBA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d7fe0239bf82a82bea91df32e3d229113fe010415edd2129403e4a44ca94def83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dense breasts</topic><topic>Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>legislation</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mass Screening - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Patient Access to Records - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>patient-physician communication</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiology - standards</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mary Lou, JD, MBA</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Mary Lou, JD, MBA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Density Conundrum: Does Legislation Help or Hurt?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>909</spage><epage>912</epage><pages>909-912</pages><issn>1546-1440</issn><eissn>1558-349X</eissn><abstract>Breast density and breast density legislation are controversial and potentially emotional issues in breast screening. Informing individual patients of their breast density status is an extremely important and highly personal conversation that must focus on patients' specific situations. The unanswered questions about converting population risk make it difficult to provide an individual woman with an explanation of what breast density means to her individual risk for developing breast cancer now or in the future. There are no standards or guidelines for what doctors should tell patients about their risk with dense breasts, and legislating the conversation may not improve it or a woman's response to the information. It is necessary to learn more about breast density, understand its meaning, and communicate clearly and compassionately with patients about what we know and what we do not know about breast cancer risk. Precipitous legislation can, in fact, undermine both the patient-physician relationship and the need for more evidence that would expand our understanding of the risk associated with breast density.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24295939</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.012</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1546-1440 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2013-12, Vol.10 (12), p.909-912 |
issn | 1546-1440 1558-349X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464890537 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control Dense breasts Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence Early Detection of Cancer Female Humans legislation Mammography Mass Screening - legislation & jurisprudence Patient Access to Records - legislation & jurisprudence patient-physician communication Physician's Role Radiology Radiology - standards screening United States |
title | The Density Conundrum: Does Legislation Help or Hurt? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A33%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Density%20Conundrum:%20Does%20Legislation%20Help%20or%20Hurt?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Smith,%20Mary%20Lou,%20JD,%20MBA&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=909&rft.epage=912&rft.pages=909-912&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.eissn=1558-349X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464890537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464890537&rft_id=info:pmid/24295939&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1546144013005814&rfr_iscdi=true |