Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance

Purpose – The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Library hi tech 2013-01, Vol.31 (4), p.657-668
Hauptverfasser: Baker, Thomas, Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves, Vatant, Bernard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 668
container_issue 4
container_start_page 657
container_title Library hi tech
container_volume 31
creator Baker, Thomas
Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves
Vatant, Bernard
description Purpose – The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will eventually provide for the long-term preservation of vocabularies. Design/methodology/approach – This paper builds on requirements formulated more tersely in the DCMI generic namespace policy for RDF vocabularies. The examination of requirements for linked open vocabularies focuses primarily on property-and-class vocabularies in RDFS or OWL (sometimes called metadata element sets), with some consideration of SKOS concept schemes and Dublin Core application profiles. It also discusses lessons learned through two years of development of the linked open vocabularies (LOV), of which main features and key findings are described. Findings – Key findings about the current practices of vocabulary managers regarding metadata, policy and versioning are presented, as well as how such practices can be improved to ensure better discoverability and usability of RDF vocabularies. The paper presents new ways to assess the links and dependencies between vocabularies. It also stresses the necessity and importance of a global governance of the ecosystem in which vocabulary managers, standard bodies, and memory institutions should engage. Research limitations/implications – The current paper is focused on requirements related to a single type of vocabulary but could and should be extended to other types such as thesauri, classifications, and other semantic assets. Practical implications – Practical technical guidelines and social good practices are proposed for promotion in the Vocabulary Ecosystem (for example, by vocabulary managers). Originality/value – This paper brings together the research and action of several important actors in the vocabulary management and governance field, and is intended to be the basis of a roadmap for action presented at the Dublin Core conference of September 2013 in Lisbon (DC 2013).
doi_str_mv 10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464571430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464571430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-28d8de64dc38b0f80de22ce8c4b12a293d5bf4e5d8b65f98927b0e10e655c1f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AURQdRsFb3LgNu3MS--cpMllLUCgVBKrgbJjMv0pJm2pmk4L83oW4UwdXbnHvhnkfINYU7SkHPlotVDjxnQHkOwNQJmTCQIqdF8X5KJqC4yrXm9JxcpLQBAMkUmxD1ivt-HXGLbZeyOsTsEJyt-sbGz2wXMWE82G4d2sy2PvsIB4ytbR1ekrPaNgmvvu-UvD0-rOaLfPny9Dy_X-aOK9XlTHvtsRDecV1BrcEjYw61ExVllpXcy6oWKL2uClmXumSqAqSAhZSO1sCn5PbYu4th32PqzHadHDaNbTH0yVAJQlBRKv0_KgohFRV8bL35hW5CPwxrRkooVRQS5EDBkXIxpBSxNru43g5iDAUzSjeDdAPcjNLNKH2IzI6RQWi0jf8r8eNN_AsGL4G0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1447766505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Baker, Thomas ; Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves ; Vatant, Bernard</creator><contributor>Greenberg, Eva Mendez Rodriguez and Gema Bueno de la Fuente, Jane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Baker, Thomas ; Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves ; Vatant, Bernard ; Greenberg, Eva Mendez Rodriguez and Gema Bueno de la Fuente, Jane</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose – The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will eventually provide for the long-term preservation of vocabularies. Design/methodology/approach – This paper builds on requirements formulated more tersely in the DCMI generic namespace policy for RDF vocabularies. The examination of requirements for linked open vocabularies focuses primarily on property-and-class vocabularies in RDFS or OWL (sometimes called metadata element sets), with some consideration of SKOS concept schemes and Dublin Core application profiles. It also discusses lessons learned through two years of development of the linked open vocabularies (LOV), of which main features and key findings are described. Findings – Key findings about the current practices of vocabulary managers regarding metadata, policy and versioning are presented, as well as how such practices can be improved to ensure better discoverability and usability of RDF vocabularies. The paper presents new ways to assess the links and dependencies between vocabularies. It also stresses the necessity and importance of a global governance of the ecosystem in which vocabulary managers, standard bodies, and memory institutions should engage. Research limitations/implications – The current paper is focused on requirements related to a single type of vocabulary but could and should be extended to other types such as thesauri, classifications, and other semantic assets. Practical implications – Practical technical guidelines and social good practices are proposed for promotion in the Vocabulary Ecosystem (for example, by vocabulary managers). Originality/value – This paper brings together the research and action of several important actors in the vocabulary management and governance field, and is intended to be the basis of a roadmap for action presented at the Dublin Core conference of September 2013 in Lisbon (DC 2013).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-8831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-166X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Construction ; Controlled vocabulary ; Direct current ; Dublin Core Format ; Ecosystems ; Guidelines ; Librarianship/library management ; Library &amp; information science ; Library technology ; Linked Data ; Metadata ; National libraries ; Ontology ; Open data ; Policies ; Preservation ; Resource Description Framework-RDF ; Search engines ; Semantic web ; Semantics ; Studies ; Vocabularies &amp; taxonomies ; World Wide Web</subject><ispartof>Library hi tech, 2013-01, Vol.31 (4), p.657-668</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-28d8de64dc38b0f80de22ce8c4b12a293d5bf4e5d8b65f98927b0e10e655c1f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-28d8de64dc38b0f80de22ce8c4b12a293d5bf4e5d8b65f98927b0e10e655c1f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,968,11640,27929,27930,52691,52694</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Greenberg, Eva Mendez Rodriguez and Gema Bueno de la Fuente, Jane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Baker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatant, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance</title><title>Library hi tech</title><description>Purpose – The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will eventually provide for the long-term preservation of vocabularies. Design/methodology/approach – This paper builds on requirements formulated more tersely in the DCMI generic namespace policy for RDF vocabularies. The examination of requirements for linked open vocabularies focuses primarily on property-and-class vocabularies in RDFS or OWL (sometimes called metadata element sets), with some consideration of SKOS concept schemes and Dublin Core application profiles. It also discusses lessons learned through two years of development of the linked open vocabularies (LOV), of which main features and key findings are described. Findings – Key findings about the current practices of vocabulary managers regarding metadata, policy and versioning are presented, as well as how such practices can be improved to ensure better discoverability and usability of RDF vocabularies. The paper presents new ways to assess the links and dependencies between vocabularies. It also stresses the necessity and importance of a global governance of the ecosystem in which vocabulary managers, standard bodies, and memory institutions should engage. Research limitations/implications – The current paper is focused on requirements related to a single type of vocabulary but could and should be extended to other types such as thesauri, classifications, and other semantic assets. Practical implications – Practical technical guidelines and social good practices are proposed for promotion in the Vocabulary Ecosystem (for example, by vocabulary managers). Originality/value – This paper brings together the research and action of several important actors in the vocabulary management and governance field, and is intended to be the basis of a roadmap for action presented at the Dublin Core conference of September 2013 in Lisbon (DC 2013).</description><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Controlled vocabulary</subject><subject>Direct current</subject><subject>Dublin Core Format</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Librarianship/library management</subject><subject>Library &amp; information science</subject><subject>Library technology</subject><subject>Linked Data</subject><subject>Metadata</subject><subject>National libraries</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Open data</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Resource Description Framework-RDF</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Semantic web</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vocabularies &amp; taxonomies</subject><subject>World Wide Web</subject><issn>0737-8831</issn><issn>2054-166X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AURQdRsFb3LgNu3MS--cpMllLUCgVBKrgbJjMv0pJm2pmk4L83oW4UwdXbnHvhnkfINYU7SkHPlotVDjxnQHkOwNQJmTCQIqdF8X5KJqC4yrXm9JxcpLQBAMkUmxD1ivt-HXGLbZeyOsTsEJyt-sbGz2wXMWE82G4d2sy2PvsIB4ytbR1ekrPaNgmvvu-UvD0-rOaLfPny9Dy_X-aOK9XlTHvtsRDecV1BrcEjYw61ExVllpXcy6oWKL2uClmXumSqAqSAhZSO1sCn5PbYu4th32PqzHadHDaNbTH0yVAJQlBRKv0_KgohFRV8bL35hW5CPwxrRkooVRQS5EDBkXIxpBSxNru43g5iDAUzSjeDdAPcjNLNKH2IzI6RQWi0jf8r8eNN_AsGL4G0</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Baker, Thomas</creator><creator>Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves</creator><creator>Vatant, Bernard</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance</title><author>Baker, Thomas ; Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves ; Vatant, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-28d8de64dc38b0f80de22ce8c4b12a293d5bf4e5d8b65f98927b0e10e655c1f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Controlled vocabulary</topic><topic>Direct current</topic><topic>Dublin Core Format</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Librarianship/library management</topic><topic>Library &amp; information science</topic><topic>Library technology</topic><topic>Linked Data</topic><topic>Metadata</topic><topic>National libraries</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Open data</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Resource Description Framework-RDF</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Semantic web</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vocabularies &amp; taxonomies</topic><topic>World Wide Web</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatant, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Library hi tech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Thomas</au><au>Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves</au><au>Vatant, Bernard</au><au>Greenberg, Eva Mendez Rodriguez and Gema Bueno de la Fuente, Jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance</atitle><jtitle>Library hi tech</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>657-668</pages><issn>0737-8831</issn><eissn>2054-166X</eissn><abstract>Purpose – The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will eventually provide for the long-term preservation of vocabularies. Design/methodology/approach – This paper builds on requirements formulated more tersely in the DCMI generic namespace policy for RDF vocabularies. The examination of requirements for linked open vocabularies focuses primarily on property-and-class vocabularies in RDFS or OWL (sometimes called metadata element sets), with some consideration of SKOS concept schemes and Dublin Core application profiles. It also discusses lessons learned through two years of development of the linked open vocabularies (LOV), of which main features and key findings are described. Findings – Key findings about the current practices of vocabulary managers regarding metadata, policy and versioning are presented, as well as how such practices can be improved to ensure better discoverability and usability of RDF vocabularies. The paper presents new ways to assess the links and dependencies between vocabularies. It also stresses the necessity and importance of a global governance of the ecosystem in which vocabulary managers, standard bodies, and memory institutions should engage. Research limitations/implications – The current paper is focused on requirements related to a single type of vocabulary but could and should be extended to other types such as thesauri, classifications, and other semantic assets. Practical implications – Practical technical guidelines and social good practices are proposed for promotion in the Vocabulary Ecosystem (for example, by vocabulary managers). Originality/value – This paper brings together the research and action of several important actors in the vocabulary management and governance field, and is intended to be the basis of a roadmap for action presented at the Dublin Core conference of September 2013 in Lisbon (DC 2013).</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0737-8831
ispartof Library hi tech, 2013-01, Vol.31 (4), p.657-668
issn 0737-8831
2054-166X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464571430
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Construction
Controlled vocabulary
Direct current
Dublin Core Format
Ecosystems
Guidelines
Librarianship/library management
Library & information science
Library technology
Linked Data
Metadata
National libraries
Ontology
Open data
Policies
Preservation
Resource Description Framework-RDF
Search engines
Semantic web
Semantics
Studies
Vocabularies & taxonomies
World Wide Web
title Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T06%3A43%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Requirements%20for%20vocabulary%20preservation%20and%20governance&rft.jtitle=Library%20hi%20tech&rft.au=Baker,%20Thomas&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=657-668&rft.issn=0737-8831&rft.eissn=2054-166X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464571430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1447766505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true