Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance
Purpose – The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Library hi tech 2013-01, Vol.31 (4), p.657-668 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 668 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 657 |
container_title | Library hi tech |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Baker, Thomas Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves Vatant, Bernard |
description | Purpose
– The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will eventually provide for the long-term preservation of vocabularies.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper builds on requirements formulated more tersely in the DCMI generic namespace policy for RDF vocabularies. The examination of requirements for linked open vocabularies focuses primarily on property-and-class vocabularies in RDFS or OWL (sometimes called metadata element sets), with some consideration of SKOS concept schemes and Dublin Core application profiles. It also discusses lessons learned through two years of development of the linked open vocabularies (LOV), of which main features and key findings are described.
Findings
– Key findings about the current practices of vocabulary managers regarding metadata, policy and versioning are presented, as well as how such practices can be improved to ensure better discoverability and usability of RDF vocabularies. The paper presents new ways to assess the links and dependencies between vocabularies. It also stresses the necessity and importance of a global governance of the ecosystem in which vocabulary managers, standard bodies, and memory institutions should engage.
Research limitations/implications
– The current paper is focused on requirements related to a single type of vocabulary but could and should be extended to other types such as thesauri, classifications, and other semantic assets.
Practical implications
– Practical technical guidelines and social good practices are proposed for promotion in the Vocabulary Ecosystem (for example, by vocabulary managers).
Originality/value
– This paper brings together the research and action of several important actors in the vocabulary management and governance field, and is intended to be the basis of a roadmap for action presented at the Dublin Core conference of September 2013 in Lisbon (DC 2013). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464571430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464571430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-28d8de64dc38b0f80de22ce8c4b12a293d5bf4e5d8b65f98927b0e10e655c1f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AURQdRsFb3LgNu3MS--cpMllLUCgVBKrgbJjMv0pJm2pmk4L83oW4UwdXbnHvhnkfINYU7SkHPlotVDjxnQHkOwNQJmTCQIqdF8X5KJqC4yrXm9JxcpLQBAMkUmxD1ivt-HXGLbZeyOsTsEJyt-sbGz2wXMWE82G4d2sy2PvsIB4ytbR1ekrPaNgmvvu-UvD0-rOaLfPny9Dy_X-aOK9XlTHvtsRDecV1BrcEjYw61ExVllpXcy6oWKL2uClmXumSqAqSAhZSO1sCn5PbYu4th32PqzHadHDaNbTH0yVAJQlBRKv0_KgohFRV8bL35hW5CPwxrRkooVRQS5EDBkXIxpBSxNru43g5iDAUzSjeDdAPcjNLNKH2IzI6RQWi0jf8r8eNN_AsGL4G0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1447766505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Baker, Thomas ; Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves ; Vatant, Bernard</creator><contributor>Greenberg, Eva Mendez Rodriguez and Gema Bueno de la Fuente, Jane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Baker, Thomas ; Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves ; Vatant, Bernard ; Greenberg, Eva Mendez Rodriguez and Gema Bueno de la Fuente, Jane</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
– The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will eventually provide for the long-term preservation of vocabularies.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper builds on requirements formulated more tersely in the DCMI generic namespace policy for RDF vocabularies. The examination of requirements for linked open vocabularies focuses primarily on property-and-class vocabularies in RDFS or OWL (sometimes called metadata element sets), with some consideration of SKOS concept schemes and Dublin Core application profiles. It also discusses lessons learned through two years of development of the linked open vocabularies (LOV), of which main features and key findings are described.
Findings
– Key findings about the current practices of vocabulary managers regarding metadata, policy and versioning are presented, as well as how such practices can be improved to ensure better discoverability and usability of RDF vocabularies. The paper presents new ways to assess the links and dependencies between vocabularies. It also stresses the necessity and importance of a global governance of the ecosystem in which vocabulary managers, standard bodies, and memory institutions should engage.
Research limitations/implications
– The current paper is focused on requirements related to a single type of vocabulary but could and should be extended to other types such as thesauri, classifications, and other semantic assets.
Practical implications
– Practical technical guidelines and social good practices are proposed for promotion in the Vocabulary Ecosystem (for example, by vocabulary managers).
Originality/value
– This paper brings together the research and action of several important actors in the vocabulary management and governance field, and is intended to be the basis of a roadmap for action presented at the Dublin Core conference of September 2013 in Lisbon (DC 2013).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-8831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-166X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Construction ; Controlled vocabulary ; Direct current ; Dublin Core Format ; Ecosystems ; Guidelines ; Librarianship/library management ; Library & information science ; Library technology ; Linked Data ; Metadata ; National libraries ; Ontology ; Open data ; Policies ; Preservation ; Resource Description Framework-RDF ; Search engines ; Semantic web ; Semantics ; Studies ; Vocabularies & taxonomies ; World Wide Web</subject><ispartof>Library hi tech, 2013-01, Vol.31 (4), p.657-668</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-28d8de64dc38b0f80de22ce8c4b12a293d5bf4e5d8b65f98927b0e10e655c1f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-28d8de64dc38b0f80de22ce8c4b12a293d5bf4e5d8b65f98927b0e10e655c1f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,968,11640,27929,27930,52691,52694</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Greenberg, Eva Mendez Rodriguez and Gema Bueno de la Fuente, Jane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Baker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatant, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance</title><title>Library hi tech</title><description>Purpose
– The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will eventually provide for the long-term preservation of vocabularies.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper builds on requirements formulated more tersely in the DCMI generic namespace policy for RDF vocabularies. The examination of requirements for linked open vocabularies focuses primarily on property-and-class vocabularies in RDFS or OWL (sometimes called metadata element sets), with some consideration of SKOS concept schemes and Dublin Core application profiles. It also discusses lessons learned through two years of development of the linked open vocabularies (LOV), of which main features and key findings are described.
Findings
– Key findings about the current practices of vocabulary managers regarding metadata, policy and versioning are presented, as well as how such practices can be improved to ensure better discoverability and usability of RDF vocabularies. The paper presents new ways to assess the links and dependencies between vocabularies. It also stresses the necessity and importance of a global governance of the ecosystem in which vocabulary managers, standard bodies, and memory institutions should engage.
Research limitations/implications
– The current paper is focused on requirements related to a single type of vocabulary but could and should be extended to other types such as thesauri, classifications, and other semantic assets.
Practical implications
– Practical technical guidelines and social good practices are proposed for promotion in the Vocabulary Ecosystem (for example, by vocabulary managers).
Originality/value
– This paper brings together the research and action of several important actors in the vocabulary management and governance field, and is intended to be the basis of a roadmap for action presented at the Dublin Core conference of September 2013 in Lisbon (DC 2013).</description><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Controlled vocabulary</subject><subject>Direct current</subject><subject>Dublin Core Format</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Librarianship/library management</subject><subject>Library & information science</subject><subject>Library technology</subject><subject>Linked Data</subject><subject>Metadata</subject><subject>National libraries</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Open data</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Resource Description Framework-RDF</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Semantic web</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vocabularies & taxonomies</subject><subject>World Wide Web</subject><issn>0737-8831</issn><issn>2054-166X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AURQdRsFb3LgNu3MS--cpMllLUCgVBKrgbJjMv0pJm2pmk4L83oW4UwdXbnHvhnkfINYU7SkHPlotVDjxnQHkOwNQJmTCQIqdF8X5KJqC4yrXm9JxcpLQBAMkUmxD1ivt-HXGLbZeyOsTsEJyt-sbGz2wXMWE82G4d2sy2PvsIB4ytbR1ekrPaNgmvvu-UvD0-rOaLfPny9Dy_X-aOK9XlTHvtsRDecV1BrcEjYw61ExVllpXcy6oWKL2uClmXumSqAqSAhZSO1sCn5PbYu4th32PqzHadHDaNbTH0yVAJQlBRKv0_KgohFRV8bL35hW5CPwxrRkooVRQS5EDBkXIxpBSxNru43g5iDAUzSjeDdAPcjNLNKH2IzI6RQWi0jf8r8eNN_AsGL4G0</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Baker, Thomas</creator><creator>Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves</creator><creator>Vatant, Bernard</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance</title><author>Baker, Thomas ; Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves ; Vatant, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-28d8de64dc38b0f80de22ce8c4b12a293d5bf4e5d8b65f98927b0e10e655c1f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Controlled vocabulary</topic><topic>Direct current</topic><topic>Dublin Core Format</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Librarianship/library management</topic><topic>Library & information science</topic><topic>Library technology</topic><topic>Linked Data</topic><topic>Metadata</topic><topic>National libraries</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Open data</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Resource Description Framework-RDF</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Semantic web</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vocabularies & taxonomies</topic><topic>World Wide Web</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatant, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Library hi tech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Thomas</au><au>Vandenbussche, Pierre-Yves</au><au>Vatant, Bernard</au><au>Greenberg, Eva Mendez Rodriguez and Gema Bueno de la Fuente, Jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance</atitle><jtitle>Library hi tech</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>657-668</pages><issn>0737-8831</issn><eissn>2054-166X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
– The paper seeks to analyze the health of the vocabulary ecosystem in terms of requirements, addressing its various stakeholders such as maintainers of linked open vocabularies, linked data providers who use those vocabularies in their data and memory institutions which, it is hoped, will eventually provide for the long-term preservation of vocabularies.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper builds on requirements formulated more tersely in the DCMI generic namespace policy for RDF vocabularies. The examination of requirements for linked open vocabularies focuses primarily on property-and-class vocabularies in RDFS or OWL (sometimes called metadata element sets), with some consideration of SKOS concept schemes and Dublin Core application profiles. It also discusses lessons learned through two years of development of the linked open vocabularies (LOV), of which main features and key findings are described.
Findings
– Key findings about the current practices of vocabulary managers regarding metadata, policy and versioning are presented, as well as how such practices can be improved to ensure better discoverability and usability of RDF vocabularies. The paper presents new ways to assess the links and dependencies between vocabularies. It also stresses the necessity and importance of a global governance of the ecosystem in which vocabulary managers, standard bodies, and memory institutions should engage.
Research limitations/implications
– The current paper is focused on requirements related to a single type of vocabulary but could and should be extended to other types such as thesauri, classifications, and other semantic assets.
Practical implications
– Practical technical guidelines and social good practices are proposed for promotion in the Vocabulary Ecosystem (for example, by vocabulary managers).
Originality/value
– This paper brings together the research and action of several important actors in the vocabulary management and governance field, and is intended to be the basis of a roadmap for action presented at the Dublin Core conference of September 2013 in Lisbon (DC 2013).</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0737-8831 |
ispartof | Library hi tech, 2013-01, Vol.31 (4), p.657-668 |
issn | 0737-8831 2054-166X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464571430 |
source | Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
subjects | Construction Controlled vocabulary Direct current Dublin Core Format Ecosystems Guidelines Librarianship/library management Library & information science Library technology Linked Data Metadata National libraries Ontology Open data Policies Preservation Resource Description Framework-RDF Search engines Semantic web Semantics Studies Vocabularies & taxonomies World Wide Web |
title | Requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T06%3A43%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Requirements%20for%20vocabulary%20preservation%20and%20governance&rft.jtitle=Library%20hi%20tech&rft.au=Baker,%20Thomas&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=657-668&rft.issn=0737-8831&rft.eissn=2054-166X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464571430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1447766505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |