Docking and pharmacophore-based alignment comparative molecular field analysis three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors by linear and nonlinear calibration methods
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) studies have been carried out on 2,4‐diamino‐5‐(2_‐arylpropargyl)pyrimidine derivatives such as dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) anticancer inhibitors. Because of the interoperable results of CoMFA models, they are noteworthy tools in rational drug designs....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemometrics 2013-10, Vol.27 (10), p.287-296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 287 |
container_title | Journal of chemometrics |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Ghasemi, Jahan B. Meftahi, Nastaran Pirhadi, Somayeh Tavakoli, Hossein |
description | Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) studies have been carried out on 2,4‐diamino‐5‐(2_‐arylpropargyl)pyrimidine derivatives such as dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) anticancer inhibitors. Because of the interoperable results of CoMFA models, they are noteworthy tools in rational drug designs. However, the huge amount of fields generated by this method contributes to its poor predictive ability. In this study, we applied a CoMFA region focusing (CoMFA‐ReF) approach to weight and enhance or attenuate the contribution of lattice points on standard CoMFA interactions. In addition, the genetic algorithm (GA) is used to select interactions that are responsible for the inhibitory activities of these compounds. The selected fields were introduced to multiple linear regression, partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) regression methods. Among the constructed models and in terms of root mean square predictions (RMSEP), the predictive power of the (CoMFA‐ReF)‐PLS (RMSEP = 0.252) was better than that of the others. The performances of the GA‐RF regression model (RMSEP = 0.383) and GA‐SVM (RMSEP = 0.387) were comparable. The pharmacophore‐based alignment has been used as an intelligent alignment algorithm in the construction of a CoMFA standard model to improve the accuracies according to the (DHFR) protein environment. Docking studies clarified the role of these compounds in the inhibitory and anticancer activities of DHFR. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) studies have been carried out on some dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. The huge amount of fields generated by CoMFA contributes to its poor predictive ability. In this study, we applied a CoMFA region focusing approach. In addition, the genetic algorithm is used to select interactions that are responsible for the inhibitory activities of these compounds. The selected fields were introduced to multiple linear regression, partial least squares, support vector machines, and random forest regression methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cem.2515 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464571206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464571206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3645-2fef4c484c63edb28de8f573092dc12c2050a7b567e5147c01d2b45eba560ec73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEEkNB4hEssWGT4t8ks4RSBqQBNqAiNpZj3zRuHTu1HSBvzGPgYSoqkFhZvue7x0c-VfWU4FOCMX2hYTqlgoh71Ybg7bYmtPtyv9rgrmvqLevYw-pRSlcYF43xTfXzddDX1l8i5Q2aRxUnpcM8hgh1rxIYpJy99BP4jHSYZhVVtt8ATcGBXpyKaLDgCuWVW5NNKI8RoDa2bCQbyhTdLMpnm497KcdF56W4K10GNq8ogita8Gm0851PGJCx42piGELRoWCmbJZIyPrR9jaHmFC_Imc9lBiH-D7425suqfv42xZNkMdg0uPqwaBcgie350n1-c35p7O39f7j7t3Zy32tWcNFTQcYuOYd1w0D09POQDeIluEtNZpQTbHAqu1F04IgvNWYGNpzAb0SDQbdspPq-dF3juFmgZTlZJMG55SHsCRJeHmmJRQ3BX32D3oVllh-4EDxpiWMdvzOUMeQUoRBztFOKq6SYHmoXJbK5aHygtZH9Lt1sP6Xk2fn7__mbcrw4w-v4rVsWtYKefFhJ3dfL8Qr3uwlY78AUVjEwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1446713284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Docking and pharmacophore-based alignment comparative molecular field analysis three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors by linear and nonlinear calibration methods</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Ghasemi, Jahan B. ; Meftahi, Nastaran ; Pirhadi, Somayeh ; Tavakoli, Hossein</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Jahan B. ; Meftahi, Nastaran ; Pirhadi, Somayeh ; Tavakoli, Hossein</creatorcontrib><description>Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) studies have been carried out on 2,4‐diamino‐5‐(2_‐arylpropargyl)pyrimidine derivatives such as dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) anticancer inhibitors. Because of the interoperable results of CoMFA models, they are noteworthy tools in rational drug designs. However, the huge amount of fields generated by this method contributes to its poor predictive ability. In this study, we applied a CoMFA region focusing (CoMFA‐ReF) approach to weight and enhance or attenuate the contribution of lattice points on standard CoMFA interactions. In addition, the genetic algorithm (GA) is used to select interactions that are responsible for the inhibitory activities of these compounds. The selected fields were introduced to multiple linear regression, partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) regression methods. Among the constructed models and in terms of root mean square predictions (RMSEP), the predictive power of the (CoMFA‐ReF)‐PLS (RMSEP = 0.252) was better than that of the others. The performances of the GA‐RF regression model (RMSEP = 0.383) and GA‐SVM (RMSEP = 0.387) were comparable. The pharmacophore‐based alignment has been used as an intelligent alignment algorithm in the construction of a CoMFA standard model to improve the accuracies according to the (DHFR) protein environment. Docking studies clarified the role of these compounds in the inhibitory and anticancer activities of DHFR. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) studies have been carried out on some dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. The huge amount of fields generated by CoMFA contributes to its poor predictive ability. In this study, we applied a CoMFA region focusing approach. In addition, the genetic algorithm is used to select interactions that are responsible for the inhibitory activities of these compounds. The selected fields were introduced to multiple linear regression, partial least squares, support vector machines, and random forest regression methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-9383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-128X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cem.2515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alignment ; Analytical chemistry ; Chemical compounds ; CoMFA ; Comparative analysis ; DHFR ; Docking ; Genetic algorithms ; Inhibitors ; molecular modeling ; Molecules ; pharmacophore ; random forest ; Reductases ; Regression ; Regression analysis ; Support vector machines ; SVM ; Three dimensional</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemometrics, 2013-10, Vol.27 (10), p.287-296</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Oct 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3645-2fef4c484c63edb28de8f573092dc12c2050a7b567e5147c01d2b45eba560ec73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3645-2fef4c484c63edb28de8f573092dc12c2050a7b567e5147c01d2b45eba560ec73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcem.2515$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcem.2515$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Jahan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meftahi, Nastaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirhadi, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Hossein</creatorcontrib><title>Docking and pharmacophore-based alignment comparative molecular field analysis three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors by linear and nonlinear calibration methods</title><title>Journal of chemometrics</title><addtitle>J. Chemometrics</addtitle><description>Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) studies have been carried out on 2,4‐diamino‐5‐(2_‐arylpropargyl)pyrimidine derivatives such as dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) anticancer inhibitors. Because of the interoperable results of CoMFA models, they are noteworthy tools in rational drug designs. However, the huge amount of fields generated by this method contributes to its poor predictive ability. In this study, we applied a CoMFA region focusing (CoMFA‐ReF) approach to weight and enhance or attenuate the contribution of lattice points on standard CoMFA interactions. In addition, the genetic algorithm (GA) is used to select interactions that are responsible for the inhibitory activities of these compounds. The selected fields were introduced to multiple linear regression, partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) regression methods. Among the constructed models and in terms of root mean square predictions (RMSEP), the predictive power of the (CoMFA‐ReF)‐PLS (RMSEP = 0.252) was better than that of the others. The performances of the GA‐RF regression model (RMSEP = 0.383) and GA‐SVM (RMSEP = 0.387) were comparable. The pharmacophore‐based alignment has been used as an intelligent alignment algorithm in the construction of a CoMFA standard model to improve the accuracies according to the (DHFR) protein environment. Docking studies clarified the role of these compounds in the inhibitory and anticancer activities of DHFR. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) studies have been carried out on some dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. The huge amount of fields generated by CoMFA contributes to its poor predictive ability. In this study, we applied a CoMFA region focusing approach. In addition, the genetic algorithm is used to select interactions that are responsible for the inhibitory activities of these compounds. The selected fields were introduced to multiple linear regression, partial least squares, support vector machines, and random forest regression methods.</description><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>CoMFA</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>DHFR</subject><subject>Docking</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>molecular modeling</subject><subject>Molecules</subject><subject>pharmacophore</subject><subject>random forest</subject><subject>Reductases</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>SVM</subject><subject>Three dimensional</subject><issn>0886-9383</issn><issn>1099-128X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEEkNB4hEssWGT4t8ks4RSBqQBNqAiNpZj3zRuHTu1HSBvzGPgYSoqkFhZvue7x0c-VfWU4FOCMX2hYTqlgoh71Ybg7bYmtPtyv9rgrmvqLevYw-pRSlcYF43xTfXzddDX1l8i5Q2aRxUnpcM8hgh1rxIYpJy99BP4jHSYZhVVtt8ATcGBXpyKaLDgCuWVW5NNKI8RoDa2bCQbyhTdLMpnm497KcdF56W4K10GNq8ogita8Gm0851PGJCx42piGELRoWCmbJZIyPrR9jaHmFC_Imc9lBiH-D7425suqfv42xZNkMdg0uPqwaBcgie350n1-c35p7O39f7j7t3Zy32tWcNFTQcYuOYd1w0D09POQDeIluEtNZpQTbHAqu1F04IgvNWYGNpzAb0SDQbdspPq-dF3juFmgZTlZJMG55SHsCRJeHmmJRQ3BX32D3oVllh-4EDxpiWMdvzOUMeQUoRBztFOKq6SYHmoXJbK5aHygtZH9Lt1sP6Xk2fn7__mbcrw4w-v4rVsWtYKefFhJ3dfL8Qr3uwlY78AUVjEwg</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Ghasemi, Jahan B.</creator><creator>Meftahi, Nastaran</creator><creator>Pirhadi, Somayeh</creator><creator>Tavakoli, Hossein</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>Docking and pharmacophore-based alignment comparative molecular field analysis three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors by linear and nonlinear calibration methods</title><author>Ghasemi, Jahan B. ; Meftahi, Nastaran ; Pirhadi, Somayeh ; Tavakoli, Hossein</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3645-2fef4c484c63edb28de8f573092dc12c2050a7b567e5147c01d2b45eba560ec73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>CoMFA</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>DHFR</topic><topic>Docking</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>molecular modeling</topic><topic>Molecules</topic><topic>pharmacophore</topic><topic>random forest</topic><topic>Reductases</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>SVM</topic><topic>Three dimensional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Jahan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meftahi, Nastaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirhadi, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Hossein</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghasemi, Jahan B.</au><au>Meftahi, Nastaran</au><au>Pirhadi, Somayeh</au><au>Tavakoli, Hossein</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Docking and pharmacophore-based alignment comparative molecular field analysis three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors by linear and nonlinear calibration methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemometrics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chemometrics</addtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>287-296</pages><issn>0886-9383</issn><eissn>1099-128X</eissn><abstract>Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) studies have been carried out on 2,4‐diamino‐5‐(2_‐arylpropargyl)pyrimidine derivatives such as dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) anticancer inhibitors. Because of the interoperable results of CoMFA models, they are noteworthy tools in rational drug designs. However, the huge amount of fields generated by this method contributes to its poor predictive ability. In this study, we applied a CoMFA region focusing (CoMFA‐ReF) approach to weight and enhance or attenuate the contribution of lattice points on standard CoMFA interactions. In addition, the genetic algorithm (GA) is used to select interactions that are responsible for the inhibitory activities of these compounds. The selected fields were introduced to multiple linear regression, partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) regression methods. Among the constructed models and in terms of root mean square predictions (RMSEP), the predictive power of the (CoMFA‐ReF)‐PLS (RMSEP = 0.252) was better than that of the others. The performances of the GA‐RF regression model (RMSEP = 0.383) and GA‐SVM (RMSEP = 0.387) were comparable. The pharmacophore‐based alignment has been used as an intelligent alignment algorithm in the construction of a CoMFA standard model to improve the accuracies according to the (DHFR) protein environment. Docking studies clarified the role of these compounds in the inhibitory and anticancer activities of DHFR. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) studies have been carried out on some dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. The huge amount of fields generated by CoMFA contributes to its poor predictive ability. In this study, we applied a CoMFA region focusing approach. In addition, the genetic algorithm is used to select interactions that are responsible for the inhibitory activities of these compounds. The selected fields were introduced to multiple linear regression, partial least squares, support vector machines, and random forest regression methods.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/cem.2515</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-9383 |
ispartof | Journal of chemometrics, 2013-10, Vol.27 (10), p.287-296 |
issn | 0886-9383 1099-128X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464571206 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Alignment Analytical chemistry Chemical compounds CoMFA Comparative analysis DHFR Docking Genetic algorithms Inhibitors molecular modeling Molecules pharmacophore random forest Reductases Regression Regression analysis Support vector machines SVM Three dimensional |
title | Docking and pharmacophore-based alignment comparative molecular field analysis three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors by linear and nonlinear calibration methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A37%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Docking%20and%20pharmacophore-based%20alignment%20comparative%20molecular%20field%20analysis%20three-dimensional%20quantitative%20structure-activity%20relationship%20analysis%20of%20dihydrofolate%20reductase%20inhibitors%20by%20linear%20and%20nonlinear%20calibration%20methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemometrics&rft.au=Ghasemi,%20Jahan%20B.&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=287-296&rft.issn=0886-9383&rft.eissn=1099-128X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cem.2515&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464571206%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1446713284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |