The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses

Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, poin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of product innovation management 2013-12, Vol.30 (S1), p.126-141
Hauptverfasser: Noble, Charles H., Bing, Mark N., Bogoviyeva, Elmira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue S1
container_start_page 126
container_title The Journal of product innovation management
container_volume 30
creator Noble, Charles H.
Bing, Mark N.
Bogoviyeva, Elmira
description Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, points of differentiation (e.g., “Iron Mountain's” name and logo, intended to express its superiority in data and document safekeeping), and even brand personality. The perspective taken here is that when applied to products, metaphors also serve as a form of design innovation. This study examines the interactions and effects of various applications of brand metaphor (linguistic, visual, and symbolic) and the forms those metaphors can take (human, animal, or nonmetaphoric) in influencing important outcomes including brand vividness, brand differentiation, and consumer preference. Based on two experiments across multiple product categories with 424 subjects, we find that the consistency of brand metaphor application and the use of animal‐based metaphors in particular have significant influence on key outcomes. Implications for brand management and design innovation through the more effective use of design metaphors are considered, as are implications for theory and future research in the area.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jpim.12067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464553415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464553415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-ea636da33e9c14f839bb1f47a6c47e6db5c4d23c9d7268f4155a8ebfcb7d7f1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtOGzEUBmCrKlJT6KZPYIlNhTQwHt8m3SXhFhTaqkobdpbHc0wmJPZgT4C8PQ6hLFj0bLw4328d_Qh9JfkxSXOyaJvVMSlyIT-gHuEsz3hZ8o-ol0sqMyHL4hP6HOMiz3NSFqyHptM54DNrwXQRe4uHQbsaX0On27kPEeuITyE2tw6PnfMPumu8-44HeAqx2_qRd7dhDc5s8OWm9d0cIsQDtGf1MsKX13cf_Tk_m44us8nPi_FoMMkMK4TMQAsqak0p9A1htqT9qiKWSS0MkyDqihtWF9T0a1mI0jLCuS6hsqaStbSkpvvo2-7fNvj7dbpIrZpoYLnUDvw6KsIE45ymYKKH7-jCr4NL1yXFaMkkIf2kjnbKBB9jAKva0Kx02CiSq23Baluweik4YbLDj80SNv-R6urX-PpfJttlmtjB01tGhzuVtpKr2Y8LNSNXYnjzW6q_9BnBeYw4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443847119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Noble, Charles H. ; Bing, Mark N. ; Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creator><creatorcontrib>Noble, Charles H. ; Bing, Mark N. ; Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creatorcontrib><description>Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, points of differentiation (e.g., “Iron Mountain's” name and logo, intended to express its superiority in data and document safekeeping), and even brand personality. The perspective taken here is that when applied to products, metaphors also serve as a form of design innovation. This study examines the interactions and effects of various applications of brand metaphor (linguistic, visual, and symbolic) and the forms those metaphors can take (human, animal, or nonmetaphoric) in influencing important outcomes including brand vividness, brand differentiation, and consumer preference. Based on two experiments across multiple product categories with 424 subjects, we find that the consistency of brand metaphor application and the use of animal‐based metaphors in particular have significant influence on key outcomes. Implications for brand management and design innovation through the more effective use of design metaphors are considered, as are implications for theory and future research in the area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-6782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12067</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPIMDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Automotive engineering ; Brand differentiation ; Brand identification ; Differentiation ; Linguistics ; Logos ; Management ; Management theory ; Metaphor ; Metaphors ; Product innovation ; Studies ; Symbols</subject><ispartof>The Journal of product innovation management, 2013-12, Vol.30 (S1), p.126-141</ispartof><rights>2013 Product Development &amp; Management Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-ea636da33e9c14f839bb1f47a6c47e6db5c4d23c9d7268f4155a8ebfcb7d7f1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-ea636da33e9c14f839bb1f47a6c47e6db5c4d23c9d7268f4155a8ebfcb7d7f1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjpim.12067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjpim.12067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noble, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bing, Mark N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses</title><title>The Journal of product innovation management</title><addtitle>J Prod Innov Manag</addtitle><description>Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, points of differentiation (e.g., “Iron Mountain's” name and logo, intended to express its superiority in data and document safekeeping), and even brand personality. The perspective taken here is that when applied to products, metaphors also serve as a form of design innovation. This study examines the interactions and effects of various applications of brand metaphor (linguistic, visual, and symbolic) and the forms those metaphors can take (human, animal, or nonmetaphoric) in influencing important outcomes including brand vividness, brand differentiation, and consumer preference. Based on two experiments across multiple product categories with 424 subjects, we find that the consistency of brand metaphor application and the use of animal‐based metaphors in particular have significant influence on key outcomes. Implications for brand management and design innovation through the more effective use of design metaphors are considered, as are implications for theory and future research in the area.</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Brand differentiation</subject><subject>Brand identification</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Logos</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><subject>Metaphors</subject><subject>Product innovation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Symbols</subject><issn>0737-6782</issn><issn>1540-5885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtOGzEUBmCrKlJT6KZPYIlNhTQwHt8m3SXhFhTaqkobdpbHc0wmJPZgT4C8PQ6hLFj0bLw4328d_Qh9JfkxSXOyaJvVMSlyIT-gHuEsz3hZ8o-ol0sqMyHL4hP6HOMiz3NSFqyHptM54DNrwXQRe4uHQbsaX0On27kPEeuITyE2tw6PnfMPumu8-44HeAqx2_qRd7dhDc5s8OWm9d0cIsQDtGf1MsKX13cf_Tk_m44us8nPi_FoMMkMK4TMQAsqak0p9A1htqT9qiKWSS0MkyDqihtWF9T0a1mI0jLCuS6hsqaStbSkpvvo2-7fNvj7dbpIrZpoYLnUDvw6KsIE45ymYKKH7-jCr4NL1yXFaMkkIf2kjnbKBB9jAKva0Kx02CiSq23Baluweik4YbLDj80SNv-R6urX-PpfJttlmtjB01tGhzuVtpKr2Y8LNSNXYnjzW6q_9BnBeYw4</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Noble, Charles H.</creator><creator>Bing, Mark N.</creator><creator>Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses</title><author>Noble, Charles H. ; Bing, Mark N. ; Bogoviyeva, Elmira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-ea636da33e9c14f839bb1f47a6c47e6db5c4d23c9d7268f4155a8ebfcb7d7f1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Brand differentiation</topic><topic>Brand identification</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Logos</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><topic>Metaphors</topic><topic>Product innovation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Symbols</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noble, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bing, Mark N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noble, Charles H.</au><au>Bing, Mark N.</au><au>Bogoviyeva, Elmira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle><addtitle>J Prod Innov Manag</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>126-141</pages><issn>0737-6782</issn><eissn>1540-5885</eissn><coden>JPIMDD</coden><abstract>Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, points of differentiation (e.g., “Iron Mountain's” name and logo, intended to express its superiority in data and document safekeeping), and even brand personality. The perspective taken here is that when applied to products, metaphors also serve as a form of design innovation. This study examines the interactions and effects of various applications of brand metaphor (linguistic, visual, and symbolic) and the forms those metaphors can take (human, animal, or nonmetaphoric) in influencing important outcomes including brand vividness, brand differentiation, and consumer preference. Based on two experiments across multiple product categories with 424 subjects, we find that the consistency of brand metaphor application and the use of animal‐based metaphors in particular have significant influence on key outcomes. Implications for brand management and design innovation through the more effective use of design metaphors are considered, as are implications for theory and future research in the area.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jpim.12067</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0737-6782
ispartof The Journal of product innovation management, 2013-12, Vol.30 (S1), p.126-141
issn 0737-6782
1540-5885
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464553415
source Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Automobiles
Automotive engineering
Brand differentiation
Brand identification
Differentiation
Linguistics
Logos
Management
Management theory
Metaphor
Metaphors
Product innovation
Studies
Symbols
title The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A53%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Brand%20Metaphors%20as%20Design%20Innovation:%20A%20Test%20of%20Congruency%20Hypotheses&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20product%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Noble,%20Charles%20H.&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=126-141&rft.issn=0737-6782&rft.eissn=1540-5885&rft.coden=JPIMDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jpim.12067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464553415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443847119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true