The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses
Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, poin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of product innovation management 2013-12, Vol.30 (S1), p.126-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | 126 |
container_title | The Journal of product innovation management |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Noble, Charles H. Bing, Mark N. Bogoviyeva, Elmira |
description | Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, points of differentiation (e.g., “Iron Mountain's” name and logo, intended to express its superiority in data and document safekeeping), and even brand personality. The perspective taken here is that when applied to products, metaphors also serve as a form of design innovation. This study examines the interactions and effects of various applications of brand metaphor (linguistic, visual, and symbolic) and the forms those metaphors can take (human, animal, or nonmetaphoric) in influencing important outcomes including brand vividness, brand differentiation, and consumer preference. Based on two experiments across multiple product categories with 424 subjects, we find that the consistency of brand metaphor application and the use of animal‐based metaphors in particular have significant influence on key outcomes. Implications for brand management and design innovation through the more effective use of design metaphors are considered, as are implications for theory and future research in the area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jpim.12067 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464553415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464553415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-ea636da33e9c14f839bb1f47a6c47e6db5c4d23c9d7268f4155a8ebfcb7d7f1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtOGzEUBmCrKlJT6KZPYIlNhTQwHt8m3SXhFhTaqkobdpbHc0wmJPZgT4C8PQ6hLFj0bLw4328d_Qh9JfkxSXOyaJvVMSlyIT-gHuEsz3hZ8o-ol0sqMyHL4hP6HOMiz3NSFqyHptM54DNrwXQRe4uHQbsaX0On27kPEeuITyE2tw6PnfMPumu8-44HeAqx2_qRd7dhDc5s8OWm9d0cIsQDtGf1MsKX13cf_Tk_m44us8nPi_FoMMkMK4TMQAsqak0p9A1htqT9qiKWSS0MkyDqihtWF9T0a1mI0jLCuS6hsqaStbSkpvvo2-7fNvj7dbpIrZpoYLnUDvw6KsIE45ymYKKH7-jCr4NL1yXFaMkkIf2kjnbKBB9jAKva0Kx02CiSq23Baluweik4YbLDj80SNv-R6urX-PpfJttlmtjB01tGhzuVtpKr2Y8LNSNXYnjzW6q_9BnBeYw4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443847119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Noble, Charles H. ; Bing, Mark N. ; Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creator><creatorcontrib>Noble, Charles H. ; Bing, Mark N. ; Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creatorcontrib><description>Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, points of differentiation (e.g., “Iron Mountain's” name and logo, intended to express its superiority in data and document safekeeping), and even brand personality. The perspective taken here is that when applied to products, metaphors also serve as a form of design innovation. This study examines the interactions and effects of various applications of brand metaphor (linguistic, visual, and symbolic) and the forms those metaphors can take (human, animal, or nonmetaphoric) in influencing important outcomes including brand vividness, brand differentiation, and consumer preference. Based on two experiments across multiple product categories with 424 subjects, we find that the consistency of brand metaphor application and the use of animal‐based metaphors in particular have significant influence on key outcomes. Implications for brand management and design innovation through the more effective use of design metaphors are considered, as are implications for theory and future research in the area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-6782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12067</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPIMDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Automotive engineering ; Brand differentiation ; Brand identification ; Differentiation ; Linguistics ; Logos ; Management ; Management theory ; Metaphor ; Metaphors ; Product innovation ; Studies ; Symbols</subject><ispartof>The Journal of product innovation management, 2013-12, Vol.30 (S1), p.126-141</ispartof><rights>2013 Product Development & Management Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-ea636da33e9c14f839bb1f47a6c47e6db5c4d23c9d7268f4155a8ebfcb7d7f1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-ea636da33e9c14f839bb1f47a6c47e6db5c4d23c9d7268f4155a8ebfcb7d7f1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjpim.12067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjpim.12067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noble, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bing, Mark N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses</title><title>The Journal of product innovation management</title><addtitle>J Prod Innov Manag</addtitle><description>Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, points of differentiation (e.g., “Iron Mountain's” name and logo, intended to express its superiority in data and document safekeeping), and even brand personality. The perspective taken here is that when applied to products, metaphors also serve as a form of design innovation. This study examines the interactions and effects of various applications of brand metaphor (linguistic, visual, and symbolic) and the forms those metaphors can take (human, animal, or nonmetaphoric) in influencing important outcomes including brand vividness, brand differentiation, and consumer preference. Based on two experiments across multiple product categories with 424 subjects, we find that the consistency of brand metaphor application and the use of animal‐based metaphors in particular have significant influence on key outcomes. Implications for brand management and design innovation through the more effective use of design metaphors are considered, as are implications for theory and future research in the area.</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Brand differentiation</subject><subject>Brand identification</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Logos</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><subject>Metaphors</subject><subject>Product innovation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Symbols</subject><issn>0737-6782</issn><issn>1540-5885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtOGzEUBmCrKlJT6KZPYIlNhTQwHt8m3SXhFhTaqkobdpbHc0wmJPZgT4C8PQ6hLFj0bLw4328d_Qh9JfkxSXOyaJvVMSlyIT-gHuEsz3hZ8o-ol0sqMyHL4hP6HOMiz3NSFqyHptM54DNrwXQRe4uHQbsaX0On27kPEeuITyE2tw6PnfMPumu8-44HeAqx2_qRd7dhDc5s8OWm9d0cIsQDtGf1MsKX13cf_Tk_m44us8nPi_FoMMkMK4TMQAsqak0p9A1htqT9qiKWSS0MkyDqihtWF9T0a1mI0jLCuS6hsqaStbSkpvvo2-7fNvj7dbpIrZpoYLnUDvw6KsIE45ymYKKH7-jCr4NL1yXFaMkkIf2kjnbKBB9jAKva0Kx02CiSq23Baluweik4YbLDj80SNv-R6urX-PpfJttlmtjB01tGhzuVtpKr2Y8LNSNXYnjzW6q_9BnBeYw4</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Noble, Charles H.</creator><creator>Bing, Mark N.</creator><creator>Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses</title><author>Noble, Charles H. ; Bing, Mark N. ; Bogoviyeva, Elmira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-ea636da33e9c14f839bb1f47a6c47e6db5c4d23c9d7268f4155a8ebfcb7d7f1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Brand differentiation</topic><topic>Brand identification</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Logos</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><topic>Metaphors</topic><topic>Product innovation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Symbols</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noble, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bing, Mark N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogoviyeva, Elmira</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noble, Charles H.</au><au>Bing, Mark N.</au><au>Bogoviyeva, Elmira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle><addtitle>J Prod Innov Manag</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>126-141</pages><issn>0737-6782</issn><eissn>1540-5885</eissn><coden>JPIMDD</coden><abstract>Metaphors are a common tool in brand design, from the original, enticing Apple logo to the classic animalistic hood ornament of a Jaguar automobile. Metaphors are a powerful marketing tool as an efficient way to convey a great deal of meaning to consumers, including expressing product benefits, points of differentiation (e.g., “Iron Mountain's” name and logo, intended to express its superiority in data and document safekeeping), and even brand personality. The perspective taken here is that when applied to products, metaphors also serve as a form of design innovation. This study examines the interactions and effects of various applications of brand metaphor (linguistic, visual, and symbolic) and the forms those metaphors can take (human, animal, or nonmetaphoric) in influencing important outcomes including brand vividness, brand differentiation, and consumer preference. Based on two experiments across multiple product categories with 424 subjects, we find that the consistency of brand metaphor application and the use of animal‐based metaphors in particular have significant influence on key outcomes. Implications for brand management and design innovation through the more effective use of design metaphors are considered, as are implications for theory and future research in the area.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jpim.12067</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0737-6782 |
ispartof | The Journal of product innovation management, 2013-12, Vol.30 (S1), p.126-141 |
issn | 0737-6782 1540-5885 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464553415 |
source | Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Automobiles Automotive engineering Brand differentiation Brand identification Differentiation Linguistics Logos Management Management theory Metaphor Metaphors Product innovation Studies Symbols |
title | The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A53%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Brand%20Metaphors%20as%20Design%20Innovation:%20A%20Test%20of%20Congruency%20Hypotheses&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20product%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Noble,%20Charles%20H.&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=126-141&rft.issn=0737-6782&rft.eissn=1540-5885&rft.coden=JPIMDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jpim.12067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464553415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443847119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |