Effects of minute misregistrations of prefabricated markers for image-guided dental implant surgery: an analytical evaluation

Objectives The goal of the present study was to develop a theoretical analysis of errors in implant position, which can occur owing to minute registration errors of a reference marker in a cone beam computed tomography volume when inserting an implant with a surgical stent. Material and methods A vi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2013-12, Vol.24 (12), p.1339-1346
Hauptverfasser: Rußig, Lorenz L., Schulze, Ralf K. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1346
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1339
container_title Clinical oral implants research
container_volume 24
creator Rußig, Lorenz L.
Schulze, Ralf K. W.
description Objectives The goal of the present study was to develop a theoretical analysis of errors in implant position, which can occur owing to minute registration errors of a reference marker in a cone beam computed tomography volume when inserting an implant with a surgical stent. Material and methods A virtual dental‐arch model was created using anatomic data derived from the literature. Basic trigonometry was used to compute effects of defined minute registration errors of only voxel size. The errors occurring at the implant's neck and apex both in horizontal as in vertical direction were computed for mean ±95%‐confidence intervals of jaw width and length and typical implant lengths (8, 10 and 12 mm). Results Largest errors occur in vertical direction for larger voxel sizes and for greater arch dimensions. For a 10 mm implant in the frontal region, these can amount to a mean of 0.716 mm (range: 0.201–1.533 mm). Horizontal errors at the neck are negligible, with a mean overall deviation of 0.009 mm (range: 0.001–0.034 mm). Errors increase with distance to the registration marker and voxel size and are affected by implant length. Conclusion Our study shows that minute and realistic errors occurring in the automated registration of a reference object have an impact on the implant's position and angulation. These errors occur in the fundamental initial step in the long planning chain; thus, they are critical and should be made aware to users of these systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/clr.12005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464516713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1447109263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3965-862714a1f14687ff9fc641ffb998b3dafc4cdca0d499699808a4541b573e845f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCgT-AcoRD2nHiT25oVQpoBSofgpvlOONVwJtsbQe6B_477m7bGxKWJUszjx_Z8xLyjMIpLevMhXhKGwD-gCyoAKiBA31IFqCB15IKekSOU_oBAEIr_ZgcNY1umJJ8Qf6ce48up2ry1WYY54zlSBHXQ8rR5mEa961tRG-7ODibsa82Nv7EmCo_xWrY2DXW63noS6PHMdtQattgx1ylOa4x7l5Vdizbhl0uglDhLxvmvfsJeeRtSPj09jwhX9-cf1m-rVcfL94tX69q12rBayUaSZmlnjKhpPfaO8Go953Wqmt76x1zvbPQM61FqYGyjDPacdmiYty3J-TFwbuN09WMKZvySYehvBKnOZniZZwKSdv_QJmkoBtxg748oC5OqczMm20s44g7Q8HcBGNKMGYfTGGf32rnboP9PXmXRAHODsDvIeDu3yazXH26U9aHGyUqvL6_UbIxQraSm28fLszl5XtQ7LMy39u_0POoTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1447109263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of minute misregistrations of prefabricated markers for image-guided dental implant surgery: an analytical evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rußig, Lorenz L. ; Schulze, Ralf K. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rußig, Lorenz L. ; Schulze, Ralf K. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The goal of the present study was to develop a theoretical analysis of errors in implant position, which can occur owing to minute registration errors of a reference marker in a cone beam computed tomography volume when inserting an implant with a surgical stent. Material and methods A virtual dental‐arch model was created using anatomic data derived from the literature. Basic trigonometry was used to compute effects of defined minute registration errors of only voxel size. The errors occurring at the implant's neck and apex both in horizontal as in vertical direction were computed for mean ±95%‐confidence intervals of jaw width and length and typical implant lengths (8, 10 and 12 mm). Results Largest errors occur in vertical direction for larger voxel sizes and for greater arch dimensions. For a 10 mm implant in the frontal region, these can amount to a mean of 0.716 mm (range: 0.201–1.533 mm). Horizontal errors at the neck are negligible, with a mean overall deviation of 0.009 mm (range: 0.001–0.034 mm). Errors increase with distance to the registration marker and voxel size and are affected by implant length. Conclusion Our study shows that minute and realistic errors occurring in the automated registration of a reference object have an impact on the implant's position and angulation. These errors occur in the fundamental initial step in the long planning chain; thus, they are critical and should be made aware to users of these systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.12005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22924875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>accuracy ; Computed tomography ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dental Implants ; Dental Models ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dentistry ; Humans ; image-guided implantation ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Patient Care Planning ; registration errors ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2013-12, Vol.24 (12), p.1339-1346</ispartof><rights>2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><rights>2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3965-862714a1f14687ff9fc641ffb998b3dafc4cdca0d499699808a4541b573e845f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3965-862714a1f14687ff9fc641ffb998b3dafc4cdca0d499699808a4541b573e845f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.12005$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.12005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22924875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rußig, Lorenz L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Ralf K. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of minute misregistrations of prefabricated markers for image-guided dental implant surgery: an analytical evaluation</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</addtitle><description>Objectives The goal of the present study was to develop a theoretical analysis of errors in implant position, which can occur owing to minute registration errors of a reference marker in a cone beam computed tomography volume when inserting an implant with a surgical stent. Material and methods A virtual dental‐arch model was created using anatomic data derived from the literature. Basic trigonometry was used to compute effects of defined minute registration errors of only voxel size. The errors occurring at the implant's neck and apex both in horizontal as in vertical direction were computed for mean ±95%‐confidence intervals of jaw width and length and typical implant lengths (8, 10 and 12 mm). Results Largest errors occur in vertical direction for larger voxel sizes and for greater arch dimensions. For a 10 mm implant in the frontal region, these can amount to a mean of 0.716 mm (range: 0.201–1.533 mm). Horizontal errors at the neck are negligible, with a mean overall deviation of 0.009 mm (range: 0.001–0.034 mm). Errors increase with distance to the registration marker and voxel size and are affected by implant length. Conclusion Our study shows that minute and realistic errors occurring in the automated registration of a reference object have an impact on the implant's position and angulation. These errors occur in the fundamental initial step in the long planning chain; thus, they are critical and should be made aware to users of these systems.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Models</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>image-guided implantation</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>registration errors</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCgT-AcoRD2nHiT25oVQpoBSofgpvlOONVwJtsbQe6B_477m7bGxKWJUszjx_Z8xLyjMIpLevMhXhKGwD-gCyoAKiBA31IFqCB15IKekSOU_oBAEIr_ZgcNY1umJJ8Qf6ce48up2ry1WYY54zlSBHXQ8rR5mEa961tRG-7ODibsa82Nv7EmCo_xWrY2DXW63noS6PHMdtQattgx1ylOa4x7l5Vdizbhl0uglDhLxvmvfsJeeRtSPj09jwhX9-cf1m-rVcfL94tX69q12rBayUaSZmlnjKhpPfaO8Go953Wqmt76x1zvbPQM61FqYGyjDPacdmiYty3J-TFwbuN09WMKZvySYehvBKnOZniZZwKSdv_QJmkoBtxg748oC5OqczMm20s44g7Q8HcBGNKMGYfTGGf32rnboP9PXmXRAHODsDvIeDu3yazXH26U9aHGyUqvL6_UbIxQraSm28fLszl5XtQ7LMy39u_0POoTw</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Rußig, Lorenz L.</creator><creator>Schulze, Ralf K. W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Effects of minute misregistrations of prefabricated markers for image-guided dental implant surgery: an analytical evaluation</title><author>Rußig, Lorenz L. ; Schulze, Ralf K. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3965-862714a1f14687ff9fc641ffb998b3dafc4cdca0d499699808a4541b573e845f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Models</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>image-guided implantation</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>registration errors</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rußig, Lorenz L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Ralf K. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rußig, Lorenz L.</au><au>Schulze, Ralf K. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of minute misregistrations of prefabricated markers for image-guided dental implant surgery: an analytical evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1339</spage><epage>1346</epage><pages>1339-1346</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives The goal of the present study was to develop a theoretical analysis of errors in implant position, which can occur owing to minute registration errors of a reference marker in a cone beam computed tomography volume when inserting an implant with a surgical stent. Material and methods A virtual dental‐arch model was created using anatomic data derived from the literature. Basic trigonometry was used to compute effects of defined minute registration errors of only voxel size. The errors occurring at the implant's neck and apex both in horizontal as in vertical direction were computed for mean ±95%‐confidence intervals of jaw width and length and typical implant lengths (8, 10 and 12 mm). Results Largest errors occur in vertical direction for larger voxel sizes and for greater arch dimensions. For a 10 mm implant in the frontal region, these can amount to a mean of 0.716 mm (range: 0.201–1.533 mm). Horizontal errors at the neck are negligible, with a mean overall deviation of 0.009 mm (range: 0.001–0.034 mm). Errors increase with distance to the registration marker and voxel size and are affected by implant length. Conclusion Our study shows that minute and realistic errors occurring in the automated registration of a reference object have an impact on the implant's position and angulation. These errors occur in the fundamental initial step in the long planning chain; thus, they are critical and should be made aware to users of these systems.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22924875</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.12005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7161
ispartof Clinical oral implants research, 2013-12, Vol.24 (12), p.1339-1346
issn 0905-7161
1600-0501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464516713
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects accuracy
Computed tomography
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
Dental Implants
Dental Models
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dentistry
Humans
image-guided implantation
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Patient Care Planning
registration errors
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
title Effects of minute misregistrations of prefabricated markers for image-guided dental implant surgery: an analytical evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A40%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20minute%20misregistrations%20of%20prefabricated%20markers%20for%20image-guided%20dental%20implant%20surgery:%20an%20analytical%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Ru%C3%9Fig,%20Lorenz%20L.&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1339&rft.epage=1346&rft.pages=1339-1346&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.12005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1447109263%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1447109263&rft_id=info:pmid/22924875&rfr_iscdi=true