Polyamide interfacial composite membranes prepared from m-phenylene diamine, trimesoyl chloride and a new disulfonated diamine
[Display omitted] ► Polyamide TFCs were prepared from m-phenylenediamine and trimesoyl chloride. ► TFC membranes have 0.4±0.1% NaCl passage and permeate flux of 42±3L/(m2h). ► Post-polymerization thermal treatment did not improve rejection or permeate flux. ► TFC membranes were synthesized from S-BA...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of membrane science 2012-06, Vol.403-404, p.152-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 152 |
container_title | Journal of membrane science |
container_volume | 403-404 |
creator | Xie, Wei Geise, Geoffrey M. Freeman, Benny D. Lee, Hae-Seung Byun, Gwangsu McGrath, James E. |
description | [Display omitted]
► Polyamide TFCs were prepared from m-phenylenediamine and trimesoyl chloride. ► TFC membranes have 0.4±0.1% NaCl passage and permeate flux of 42±3L/(m2h). ► Post-polymerization thermal treatment did not improve rejection or permeate flux. ► TFC membranes were synthesized from S-BAPS, a disulfonated sulfone diamine and TMC. ► S-BAPS based membranes have higher permeate flux and lower rejection than MPD based ones.
The influence of synthesis conditions (e.g., monomer concentration and membrane preparation protocol) on transport properties of polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) membranes prepared using m-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) via interfacial polymerization is reported. For example, at 25°C, NaCl rejection and permeate flux combinations of 99.6±0.1% and 42±3L/(m2h), respectively, were achieved in crossflow filtration using a 2000ppm aqueous solution of NaCl and a transmembrane pressure difference of 225psi (15.5bar). Additionally, a sulfone diamine, disulfonated bis[4-(3-aminophenoxy)phenyl]sulfone (S-BAPS), was used in place of MPD to prepare TFC membranes. The resulting membranes had low NaCl rejection but somewhat higher permeate flux than MPD/TMC membranes. These membranes had reduced chlorine tolerance compared to those prepared using MPD as the diamine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464498452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376738812001445</els_id><sourcerecordid>1464498452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-eb820b9f113861c75091ae1bc273ed7aea7e5594bf83eaef4bbd79bc635d1653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM2KFDEURoMo2I6-gWA2ggurTSqpSrIRZPAPBhQc1yGV3DhpUkmZVI_0xmc3bTUuhQvZnO_c3A-h55TsKaHjm8N-hrnasO8J7fekDZMP0I5KwTpGe_YQ7QgTYyeYlI_Rk1oPhFBBpNqh319zPJk5OMAhrVC8scFEbPO85BpWwM08FZOg4qXAYgo47Eue8dwtd5BOERJgF5ohwWu8ljBDzacmuIu5nK0mOWxwgl-NqsfoczJrc1wiT9Ejb2KFZ5f3Ct1-eH97_am7-fLx8_W7m84yxdYOJtmTSXlKmRypFQNR1ACdbC8YOGHACBgGxScvGRjwfJqcUJMd2eDoOLAr9GrTLiX_PEJd9RyqhRjbYflYNeUj50ryoW8o31Bbcq0FvF7aUaacNCX63LY-6K1tfW5bkzZMttjLywZTrYm-VWZD_ZftByEV-6t_sXHeZG1-lMZ8_9ZEIyFEcspVI95uBLQ-7gMU3XZBsuBCAbtql8P_v_IHGMmj3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464498452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polyamide interfacial composite membranes prepared from m-phenylene diamine, trimesoyl chloride and a new disulfonated diamine</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Xie, Wei ; Geise, Geoffrey M. ; Freeman, Benny D. ; Lee, Hae-Seung ; Byun, Gwangsu ; McGrath, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Wei ; Geise, Geoffrey M. ; Freeman, Benny D. ; Lee, Hae-Seung ; Byun, Gwangsu ; McGrath, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
► Polyamide TFCs were prepared from m-phenylenediamine and trimesoyl chloride. ► TFC membranes have 0.4±0.1% NaCl passage and permeate flux of 42±3L/(m2h). ► Post-polymerization thermal treatment did not improve rejection or permeate flux. ► TFC membranes were synthesized from S-BAPS, a disulfonated sulfone diamine and TMC. ► S-BAPS based membranes have higher permeate flux and lower rejection than MPD based ones.
The influence of synthesis conditions (e.g., monomer concentration and membrane preparation protocol) on transport properties of polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) membranes prepared using m-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) via interfacial polymerization is reported. For example, at 25°C, NaCl rejection and permeate flux combinations of 99.6±0.1% and 42±3L/(m2h), respectively, were achieved in crossflow filtration using a 2000ppm aqueous solution of NaCl and a transmembrane pressure difference of 225psi (15.5bar). Additionally, a sulfone diamine, disulfonated bis[4-(3-aminophenoxy)phenyl]sulfone (S-BAPS), was used in place of MPD to prepare TFC membranes. The resulting membranes had low NaCl rejection but somewhat higher permeate flux than MPD/TMC membranes. These membranes had reduced chlorine tolerance compared to those prepared using MPD as the diamine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-7388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.038</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMESDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>aqueous solutions ; Aromatic polyamide thin-film composite ; artificial membranes ; Chemistry ; chlorine ; Chlorine tolerance ; Colloidal state and disperse state ; Exact sciences and technology ; filtration ; General and physical chemistry ; Interfacial polymerization ; Membranes ; polyamides ; polymerization ; Post-polymerization thermal treatment ; sodium chloride ; Sulfone diamine ; Surface physical chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of membrane science, 2012-06, Vol.403-404, p.152-161</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-eb820b9f113861c75091ae1bc273ed7aea7e5594bf83eaef4bbd79bc635d1653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-eb820b9f113861c75091ae1bc273ed7aea7e5594bf83eaef4bbd79bc635d1653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25789352$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geise, Geoffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Benny D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hae-Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Gwangsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrath, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Polyamide interfacial composite membranes prepared from m-phenylene diamine, trimesoyl chloride and a new disulfonated diamine</title><title>Journal of membrane science</title><description>[Display omitted]
► Polyamide TFCs were prepared from m-phenylenediamine and trimesoyl chloride. ► TFC membranes have 0.4±0.1% NaCl passage and permeate flux of 42±3L/(m2h). ► Post-polymerization thermal treatment did not improve rejection or permeate flux. ► TFC membranes were synthesized from S-BAPS, a disulfonated sulfone diamine and TMC. ► S-BAPS based membranes have higher permeate flux and lower rejection than MPD based ones.
The influence of synthesis conditions (e.g., monomer concentration and membrane preparation protocol) on transport properties of polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) membranes prepared using m-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) via interfacial polymerization is reported. For example, at 25°C, NaCl rejection and permeate flux combinations of 99.6±0.1% and 42±3L/(m2h), respectively, were achieved in crossflow filtration using a 2000ppm aqueous solution of NaCl and a transmembrane pressure difference of 225psi (15.5bar). Additionally, a sulfone diamine, disulfonated bis[4-(3-aminophenoxy)phenyl]sulfone (S-BAPS), was used in place of MPD to prepare TFC membranes. The resulting membranes had low NaCl rejection but somewhat higher permeate flux than MPD/TMC membranes. These membranes had reduced chlorine tolerance compared to those prepared using MPD as the diamine.</description><subject>aqueous solutions</subject><subject>Aromatic polyamide thin-film composite</subject><subject>artificial membranes</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>chlorine</subject><subject>Chlorine tolerance</subject><subject>Colloidal state and disperse state</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>filtration</subject><subject>General and physical chemistry</subject><subject>Interfacial polymerization</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>polyamides</subject><subject>polymerization</subject><subject>Post-polymerization thermal treatment</subject><subject>sodium chloride</subject><subject>Sulfone diamine</subject><subject>Surface physical chemistry</subject><issn>0376-7388</issn><issn>1873-3123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM2KFDEURoMo2I6-gWA2ggurTSqpSrIRZPAPBhQc1yGV3DhpUkmZVI_0xmc3bTUuhQvZnO_c3A-h55TsKaHjm8N-hrnasO8J7fekDZMP0I5KwTpGe_YQ7QgTYyeYlI_Rk1oPhFBBpNqh319zPJk5OMAhrVC8scFEbPO85BpWwM08FZOg4qXAYgo47Eue8dwtd5BOERJgF5ohwWu8ljBDzacmuIu5nK0mOWxwgl-NqsfoczJrc1wiT9Ejb2KFZ5f3Ct1-eH97_am7-fLx8_W7m84yxdYOJtmTSXlKmRypFQNR1ACdbC8YOGHACBgGxScvGRjwfJqcUJMd2eDoOLAr9GrTLiX_PEJd9RyqhRjbYflYNeUj50ryoW8o31Bbcq0FvF7aUaacNCX63LY-6K1tfW5bkzZMttjLywZTrYm-VWZD_ZftByEV-6t_sXHeZG1-lMZ8_9ZEIyFEcspVI95uBLQ-7gMU3XZBsuBCAbtql8P_v_IHGMmj3Q</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Xie, Wei</creator><creator>Geise, Geoffrey M.</creator><creator>Freeman, Benny D.</creator><creator>Lee, Hae-Seung</creator><creator>Byun, Gwangsu</creator><creator>McGrath, James E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Polyamide interfacial composite membranes prepared from m-phenylene diamine, trimesoyl chloride and a new disulfonated diamine</title><author>Xie, Wei ; Geise, Geoffrey M. ; Freeman, Benny D. ; Lee, Hae-Seung ; Byun, Gwangsu ; McGrath, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-eb820b9f113861c75091ae1bc273ed7aea7e5594bf83eaef4bbd79bc635d1653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>aqueous solutions</topic><topic>Aromatic polyamide thin-film composite</topic><topic>artificial membranes</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>chlorine</topic><topic>Chlorine tolerance</topic><topic>Colloidal state and disperse state</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>filtration</topic><topic>General and physical chemistry</topic><topic>Interfacial polymerization</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>polyamides</topic><topic>polymerization</topic><topic>Post-polymerization thermal treatment</topic><topic>sodium chloride</topic><topic>Sulfone diamine</topic><topic>Surface physical chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geise, Geoffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Benny D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hae-Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Gwangsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrath, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of membrane science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Wei</au><au>Geise, Geoffrey M.</au><au>Freeman, Benny D.</au><au>Lee, Hae-Seung</au><au>Byun, Gwangsu</au><au>McGrath, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Polyamide interfacial composite membranes prepared from m-phenylene diamine, trimesoyl chloride and a new disulfonated diamine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of membrane science</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>403-404</volume><spage>152</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>152-161</pages><issn>0376-7388</issn><eissn>1873-3123</eissn><coden>JMESDO</coden><abstract>[Display omitted]
► Polyamide TFCs were prepared from m-phenylenediamine and trimesoyl chloride. ► TFC membranes have 0.4±0.1% NaCl passage and permeate flux of 42±3L/(m2h). ► Post-polymerization thermal treatment did not improve rejection or permeate flux. ► TFC membranes were synthesized from S-BAPS, a disulfonated sulfone diamine and TMC. ► S-BAPS based membranes have higher permeate flux and lower rejection than MPD based ones.
The influence of synthesis conditions (e.g., monomer concentration and membrane preparation protocol) on transport properties of polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) membranes prepared using m-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) via interfacial polymerization is reported. For example, at 25°C, NaCl rejection and permeate flux combinations of 99.6±0.1% and 42±3L/(m2h), respectively, were achieved in crossflow filtration using a 2000ppm aqueous solution of NaCl and a transmembrane pressure difference of 225psi (15.5bar). Additionally, a sulfone diamine, disulfonated bis[4-(3-aminophenoxy)phenyl]sulfone (S-BAPS), was used in place of MPD to prepare TFC membranes. The resulting membranes had low NaCl rejection but somewhat higher permeate flux than MPD/TMC membranes. These membranes had reduced chlorine tolerance compared to those prepared using MPD as the diamine.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.038</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-7388 |
ispartof | Journal of membrane science, 2012-06, Vol.403-404, p.152-161 |
issn | 0376-7388 1873-3123 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464498452 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | aqueous solutions Aromatic polyamide thin-film composite artificial membranes Chemistry chlorine Chlorine tolerance Colloidal state and disperse state Exact sciences and technology filtration General and physical chemistry Interfacial polymerization Membranes polyamides polymerization Post-polymerization thermal treatment sodium chloride Sulfone diamine Surface physical chemistry |
title | Polyamide interfacial composite membranes prepared from m-phenylene diamine, trimesoyl chloride and a new disulfonated diamine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A41%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polyamide%20interfacial%20composite%20membranes%20prepared%20from%20m-phenylene%20diamine,%20trimesoyl%20chloride%20and%20a%20new%20disulfonated%20diamine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20membrane%20science&rft.au=Xie,%20Wei&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=403-404&rft.spage=152&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=152-161&rft.issn=0376-7388&rft.eissn=1873-3123&rft.coden=JMESDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1464498452%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464498452&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0376738812001445&rfr_iscdi=true |