The Parental Cancer Questionnaire: scale structure, reliability, and validity
Purpose This study aims to determine the principal component structure of the Parental Cancer Questionnaire (PCQ) in a sample of adult children whose parents had cancer and to illustrate the validity and reliability of subscales. Method The PCQ was administered to 311 adult children of parents with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Supportive care in cancer 2014, Vol.22 (1), p.23-32 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 32 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Supportive care in cancer |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Levesque, Janelle V. Maybery, Darryl J. |
description | Purpose
This study aims to determine the principal component structure of the Parental Cancer Questionnaire (PCQ) in a sample of adult children whose parents had cancer and to illustrate the validity and reliability of subscales.
Method
The PCQ was administered to 311 adult children of parents with cancer along with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, Carer's Assessment of Difficulties Scale, Carer's Assessment of Satisfactions Scale, Reaction to Diagnosis of Cancer Questionnaire, and the Grief Diagnostic Instrument.
Results
Exploratory Principal Components Analysis identified three dimensions of the parental cancer experience (explaining 51 % of the variance amongst scale items). The components were parental cancer benefits (e.g. ‘I became closer to my sick parent during his/her cancer.’), emotional experiences (e.g. ‘I was devastated by my parent's cancer.’), and caregiver strain (e.g. ‘I feel/felt there was nobody to assist or support me in caring for my parent.’). Convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated by meaningful correlations with other related measures (ranging from 0.14 to 0.68), and strong internal reliability was shown with Cronbach α between 0.87 and 0.91.
Conclusions
The PCQ has a clear three-component structure and demonstrates good reliability. The measure has excellent face, content, convergent, and discriminant validity, indicating a structure suitable for use in future research. The measure appears to be a useful measure of the experience of parental cancer for adult children. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00520-013-1935-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464496273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A354933845</galeid><sourcerecordid>A354933845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-161d673b02ccc59ab1d260d97dc7c8c2aec2a631bbb54f20eff205bbf91a5bb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVFLHTEQhYNU6tX2B_SlLPSlD64mmWRz0ze5VC0oWrDPIcnO2sjerE12Bf31Zrlaa2kJyZDkO8MZDiEfGD1glKrDTKnktKYMaqZB1g9bZMEEQK0A9BuyoFqwWoCUO2Q35xtKmVKSvyU7HPSSK0UX5PzqJ1aXNmEcbV-tbPSYqu8T5jEMMdqQ8EuVve2xymOa_Dgl3K8S9sG60Ifxfr-ysa3ubB_acntHtjvbZ3z_VPfIj-OvV6vT-uzi5Nvq6Kz2AvRYs4a1jQJHufdeautYyxvaatV65ZeeWyy7Aeack6LjFLtySOc6zWwpAHvk86bvbRp-zWbNOmSPfW8jDlM2TDRC6IarGf30F3ozTCkWdzPFxVICZy_UdRnVhNgNY7J-bmqOQAoNsBSyUAf_oMpqcR38ELEL5f2VgG0EPg05J-zMbQprm-4No2aO0GwiNCVCM0doHorm45Phya2x_a14zqwAfAPk8hWvMf0x0X-7PgI0IaVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1462485321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Parental Cancer Questionnaire: scale structure, reliability, and validity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Levesque, Janelle V. ; Maybery, Darryl J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Janelle V. ; Maybery, Darryl J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
This study aims to determine the principal component structure of the Parental Cancer Questionnaire (PCQ) in a sample of adult children whose parents had cancer and to illustrate the validity and reliability of subscales.
Method
The PCQ was administered to 311 adult children of parents with cancer along with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, Carer's Assessment of Difficulties Scale, Carer's Assessment of Satisfactions Scale, Reaction to Diagnosis of Cancer Questionnaire, and the Grief Diagnostic Instrument.
Results
Exploratory Principal Components Analysis identified three dimensions of the parental cancer experience (explaining 51 % of the variance amongst scale items). The components were parental cancer benefits (e.g. ‘I became closer to my sick parent during his/her cancer.’), emotional experiences (e.g. ‘I was devastated by my parent's cancer.’), and caregiver strain (e.g. ‘I feel/felt there was nobody to assist or support me in caring for my parent.’). Convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated by meaningful correlations with other related measures (ranging from 0.14 to 0.68), and strong internal reliability was shown with Cronbach α between 0.87 and 0.91.
Conclusions
The PCQ has a clear three-component structure and demonstrates good reliability. The measure has excellent face, content, convergent, and discriminant validity, indicating a structure suitable for use in future research. The measure appears to be a useful measure of the experience of parental cancer for adult children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1935-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23982770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; Aged ; Analysis ; Cancer ; Caregivers - psychology ; Children & youth ; Effects ; Female ; Grief ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Parent-Child Relations ; Parenting ; Parents & parenting ; Parents - psychology ; Principal Component Analysis ; Psychological aspects ; Psychometrics - methods ; Psychometrics - standards ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2014, Vol.22 (1), p.23-32</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-161d673b02ccc59ab1d260d97dc7c8c2aec2a631bbb54f20eff205bbf91a5bb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-161d673b02ccc59ab1d260d97dc7c8c2aec2a631bbb54f20eff205bbf91a5bb33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-013-1935-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-013-1935-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23982770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Janelle V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maybery, Darryl J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Parental Cancer Questionnaire: scale structure, reliability, and validity</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose
This study aims to determine the principal component structure of the Parental Cancer Questionnaire (PCQ) in a sample of adult children whose parents had cancer and to illustrate the validity and reliability of subscales.
Method
The PCQ was administered to 311 adult children of parents with cancer along with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, Carer's Assessment of Difficulties Scale, Carer's Assessment of Satisfactions Scale, Reaction to Diagnosis of Cancer Questionnaire, and the Grief Diagnostic Instrument.
Results
Exploratory Principal Components Analysis identified three dimensions of the parental cancer experience (explaining 51 % of the variance amongst scale items). The components were parental cancer benefits (e.g. ‘I became closer to my sick parent during his/her cancer.’), emotional experiences (e.g. ‘I was devastated by my parent's cancer.’), and caregiver strain (e.g. ‘I feel/felt there was nobody to assist or support me in caring for my parent.’). Convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated by meaningful correlations with other related measures (ranging from 0.14 to 0.68), and strong internal reliability was shown with Cronbach α between 0.87 and 0.91.
Conclusions
The PCQ has a clear three-component structure and demonstrates good reliability. The measure has excellent face, content, convergent, and discriminant validity, indicating a structure suitable for use in future research. The measure appears to be a useful measure of the experience of parental cancer for adult children.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grief</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Parent-Child Relations</subject><subject>Parenting</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVFLHTEQhYNU6tX2B_SlLPSlD64mmWRz0ze5VC0oWrDPIcnO2sjerE12Bf31Zrlaa2kJyZDkO8MZDiEfGD1glKrDTKnktKYMaqZB1g9bZMEEQK0A9BuyoFqwWoCUO2Q35xtKmVKSvyU7HPSSK0UX5PzqJ1aXNmEcbV-tbPSYqu8T5jEMMdqQ8EuVve2xymOa_Dgl3K8S9sG60Ifxfr-ysa3ubB_acntHtjvbZ3z_VPfIj-OvV6vT-uzi5Nvq6Kz2AvRYs4a1jQJHufdeautYyxvaatV65ZeeWyy7Aeack6LjFLtySOc6zWwpAHvk86bvbRp-zWbNOmSPfW8jDlM2TDRC6IarGf30F3ozTCkWdzPFxVICZy_UdRnVhNgNY7J-bmqOQAoNsBSyUAf_oMpqcR38ELEL5f2VgG0EPg05J-zMbQprm-4No2aO0GwiNCVCM0doHorm45Phya2x_a14zqwAfAPk8hWvMf0x0X-7PgI0IaVc</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Levesque, Janelle V.</creator><creator>Maybery, Darryl J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>The Parental Cancer Questionnaire: scale structure, reliability, and validity</title><author>Levesque, Janelle V. ; Maybery, Darryl J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-161d673b02ccc59ab1d260d97dc7c8c2aec2a631bbb54f20eff205bbf91a5bb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grief</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Parent-Child Relations</topic><topic>Parenting</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Janelle V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maybery, Darryl J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levesque, Janelle V.</au><au>Maybery, Darryl J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Parental Cancer Questionnaire: scale structure, reliability, and validity</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>23-32</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose
This study aims to determine the principal component structure of the Parental Cancer Questionnaire (PCQ) in a sample of adult children whose parents had cancer and to illustrate the validity and reliability of subscales.
Method
The PCQ was administered to 311 adult children of parents with cancer along with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, Carer's Assessment of Difficulties Scale, Carer's Assessment of Satisfactions Scale, Reaction to Diagnosis of Cancer Questionnaire, and the Grief Diagnostic Instrument.
Results
Exploratory Principal Components Analysis identified three dimensions of the parental cancer experience (explaining 51 % of the variance amongst scale items). The components were parental cancer benefits (e.g. ‘I became closer to my sick parent during his/her cancer.’), emotional experiences (e.g. ‘I was devastated by my parent's cancer.’), and caregiver strain (e.g. ‘I feel/felt there was nobody to assist or support me in caring for my parent.’). Convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated by meaningful correlations with other related measures (ranging from 0.14 to 0.68), and strong internal reliability was shown with Cronbach α between 0.87 and 0.91.
Conclusions
The PCQ has a clear three-component structure and demonstrates good reliability. The measure has excellent face, content, convergent, and discriminant validity, indicating a structure suitable for use in future research. The measure appears to be a useful measure of the experience of parental cancer for adult children.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>23982770</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-013-1935-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-4355 |
ispartof | Supportive care in cancer, 2014, Vol.22 (1), p.23-32 |
issn | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1464496273 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Adults Aged Analysis Cancer Caregivers - psychology Children & youth Effects Female Grief Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoplasms - psychology Nursing Nursing Research Oncology Original Article Pain Medicine Parent-Child Relations Parenting Parents & parenting Parents - psychology Principal Component Analysis Psychological aspects Psychometrics - methods Psychometrics - standards Questionnaires Rehabilitation Medicine Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Young Adult |
title | The Parental Cancer Questionnaire: scale structure, reliability, and validity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A39%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Parental%20Cancer%20Questionnaire:%20scale%20structure,%20reliability,%20and%20validity&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Levesque,%20Janelle%20V.&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=23-32&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-013-1935-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA354933845%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1462485321&rft_id=info:pmid/23982770&rft_galeid=A354933845&rfr_iscdi=true |