Encouraging distributed generation of power that improves air quality: can we have our cake and eat it too?
The goal of electric power deregulation in the United States is to lower electricity costs through market competition and greater consumer choice. This goal raises important questions: exactly what kinds of distributed generation (DG) should energy and environmental policy favor? What level of gover...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2002-07, Vol.30 (9), p.737-752 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 752 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 737 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Allison, Juliann Emmons Lents, Jim |
description | The goal of electric power deregulation in the United States is to lower electricity costs through market competition and greater consumer choice. This goal raises important questions: exactly what kinds of distributed generation (DG) should energy and environmental policy favor? What level of government is best-suited and/or most capable of governing DG? And what is the range of regulations that would most easily facilitate the competitive success of DG? In response, this article provides a comparative analysis of the electricity generation process with heat recovery created to assess the level of polluting emissions associated with a range of technologies and fuel types. Given the results of this analysis, we evaluate the governance structure responsible for regulating energy and environmental policy in the United States, and outline a regulatory approach that would ensure the use of the DG technologies and fuel sources that would be most beneficial to the environment and public health. Our analysis suggests that only the lowest emitting DG with significant waste heat recovery is even marginally competitive with combined cycle power production when air pollution issues are considered. Thus, we advocate technology-forcing in the specific form of manufacturer-based regulation, which would require, over time, the reduction of emissions from DG units at the point of manufacture as a means of ensuring greater air quality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00135-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14634420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421501001355</els_id><sourcerecordid>169758541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-a83b672d533710547bf4fdd87bbf46d76cf59181409eb546694479c7436973313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUF1rFDEUHUTBtfoThCAo-jCaTL52fClS2qoUfFCfQyZzZzftbDJNMlv233unWyr4YuDkJnDO4dxTVa8Z_cgoU59-Uk5ZLRom31P2gVLGZS2fVCu21rxWWuun1eqR8rx6kfM1pVSsW7Gqbs6Di3OyGx82pPe5JN_NBXqygQDJFh8DiQOZ4h0kUra2EL-bUtxDJtYncjvb0ZfDZ-JsIHdAtnYPBP3wfwPEhp7AIimkxHj6sno22DHDq4d5Uv2-OP919rW--nH57ezLVe0kU6W2a94p3fSSc82oFLobxND3a93hQ_VauUG2bM0EbaGTQqlWCN06LbhqNeeMn1Tvjr4Y9HaGXMzOZwfjaAPEORsmFBeioUh88w_xGrMHzGYaKjljjC8keSS5FHNOMJgp-Z1NB8OoWfo39_2bpVyD875_I1H3_ahLMIF7FAGeAFMczd5wyyleB0RDaYPDI1rEhNBcGy0bsy07NHv7kNRmZ8ch2eB8_psEV1-WQt7pkQfY795DMtl5CA56n8AV00f_n9h_AGmJsS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205311130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Encouraging distributed generation of power that improves air quality: can we have our cake and eat it too?</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Allison, Juliann Emmons ; Lents, Jim</creator><creatorcontrib>Allison, Juliann Emmons ; Lents, Jim</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of electric power deregulation in the United States is to lower electricity costs through market competition and greater consumer choice. This goal raises important questions: exactly what kinds of distributed generation (DG) should energy and environmental policy favor? What level of government is best-suited and/or most capable of governing DG? And what is the range of regulations that would most easily facilitate the competitive success of DG? In response, this article provides a comparative analysis of the electricity generation process with heat recovery created to assess the level of polluting emissions associated with a range of technologies and fuel types. Given the results of this analysis, we evaluate the governance structure responsible for regulating energy and environmental policy in the United States, and outline a regulatory approach that would ensure the use of the DG technologies and fuel sources that would be most beneficial to the environment and public health. Our analysis suggests that only the lowest emitting DG with significant waste heat recovery is even marginally competitive with combined cycle power production when air pollution issues are considered. Thus, we advocate technology-forcing in the specific form of manufacturer-based regulation, which would require, over time, the reduction of emissions from DG units at the point of manufacture as a means of ensuring greater air quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00135-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Combustion and energy production ; Comparative analysis ; Deregulation ; Economic data ; Electric energy ; Electricity distribution ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Environmental policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Mathematical models ; Outdoor air quality ; Pollution ; Pollution control ; Pollution sources. Measurement results ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2002-07, Vol.30 (9), p.737-752</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-a83b672d533710547bf4fdd87bbf46d76cf59181409eb546694479c7436973313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-a83b672d533710547bf4fdd87bbf46d76cf59181409eb546694479c7436973313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421501001355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13694634$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a30_3ay_3a2002_3ai_3a9_3ap_3a737-752.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allison, Juliann Emmons</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lents, Jim</creatorcontrib><title>Encouraging distributed generation of power that improves air quality: can we have our cake and eat it too?</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>The goal of electric power deregulation in the United States is to lower electricity costs through market competition and greater consumer choice. This goal raises important questions: exactly what kinds of distributed generation (DG) should energy and environmental policy favor? What level of government is best-suited and/or most capable of governing DG? And what is the range of regulations that would most easily facilitate the competitive success of DG? In response, this article provides a comparative analysis of the electricity generation process with heat recovery created to assess the level of polluting emissions associated with a range of technologies and fuel types. Given the results of this analysis, we evaluate the governance structure responsible for regulating energy and environmental policy in the United States, and outline a regulatory approach that would ensure the use of the DG technologies and fuel sources that would be most beneficial to the environment and public health. Our analysis suggests that only the lowest emitting DG with significant waste heat recovery is even marginally competitive with combined cycle power production when air pollution issues are considered. Thus, we advocate technology-forcing in the specific form of manufacturer-based regulation, which would require, over time, the reduction of emissions from DG units at the point of manufacture as a means of ensuring greater air quality.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Combustion and energy production</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Deregulation</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Pollution sources. Measurement results</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUF1rFDEUHUTBtfoThCAo-jCaTL52fClS2qoUfFCfQyZzZzftbDJNMlv233unWyr4YuDkJnDO4dxTVa8Z_cgoU59-Uk5ZLRom31P2gVLGZS2fVCu21rxWWuun1eqR8rx6kfM1pVSsW7Gqbs6Di3OyGx82pPe5JN_NBXqygQDJFh8DiQOZ4h0kUra2EL-bUtxDJtYncjvb0ZfDZ-JsIHdAtnYPBP3wfwPEhp7AIimkxHj6sno22DHDq4d5Uv2-OP919rW--nH57ezLVe0kU6W2a94p3fSSc82oFLobxND3a93hQ_VauUG2bM0EbaGTQqlWCN06LbhqNeeMn1Tvjr4Y9HaGXMzOZwfjaAPEORsmFBeioUh88w_xGrMHzGYaKjljjC8keSS5FHNOMJgp-Z1NB8OoWfo39_2bpVyD875_I1H3_ahLMIF7FAGeAFMczd5wyyleB0RDaYPDI1rEhNBcGy0bsy07NHv7kNRmZ8ch2eB8_psEV1-WQt7pkQfY795DMtl5CA56n8AV00f_n9h_AGmJsS8</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>Allison, Juliann Emmons</creator><creator>Lents, Jim</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>Encouraging distributed generation of power that improves air quality: can we have our cake and eat it too?</title><author>Allison, Juliann Emmons ; Lents, Jim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-a83b672d533710547bf4fdd87bbf46d76cf59181409eb546694479c7436973313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Combustion and energy production</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Deregulation</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Pollution sources. Measurement results</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allison, Juliann Emmons</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lents, Jim</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allison, Juliann Emmons</au><au>Lents, Jim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Encouraging distributed generation of power that improves air quality: can we have our cake and eat it too?</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>737</spage><epage>752</epage><pages>737-752</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>The goal of electric power deregulation in the United States is to lower electricity costs through market competition and greater consumer choice. This goal raises important questions: exactly what kinds of distributed generation (DG) should energy and environmental policy favor? What level of government is best-suited and/or most capable of governing DG? And what is the range of regulations that would most easily facilitate the competitive success of DG? In response, this article provides a comparative analysis of the electricity generation process with heat recovery created to assess the level of polluting emissions associated with a range of technologies and fuel types. Given the results of this analysis, we evaluate the governance structure responsible for regulating energy and environmental policy in the United States, and outline a regulatory approach that would ensure the use of the DG technologies and fuel sources that would be most beneficial to the environment and public health. Our analysis suggests that only the lowest emitting DG with significant waste heat recovery is even marginally competitive with combined cycle power production when air pollution issues are considered. Thus, we advocate technology-forcing in the specific form of manufacturer-based regulation, which would require, over time, the reduction of emissions from DG units at the point of manufacture as a means of ensuring greater air quality.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00135-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2002-07, Vol.30 (9), p.737-752 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14634420 |
source | RePEc; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Atmospheric pollution Combustion and energy production Comparative analysis Deregulation Economic data Electric energy Electricity distribution Energy Energy economics Energy policy Environmental policy Exact sciences and technology General, economic and professional studies Mathematical models Outdoor air quality Pollution Pollution control Pollution sources. Measurement results Studies |
title | Encouraging distributed generation of power that improves air quality: can we have our cake and eat it too? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T11%3A11%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Encouraging%20distributed%20generation%20of%20power%20that%20improves%20air%20quality:%20can%20we%20have%20our%20cake%20and%20eat%20it%20too?&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Allison,%20Juliann%20Emmons&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=737&rft.epage=752&rft.pages=737-752&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00135-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E169758541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205311130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421501001355&rfr_iscdi=true |