Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice

How do consumers reconcile conflicting motives for social group identification and individual uniqueness? Four studies demonstrate that consumers simultaneously pursue assimilation and differentiation goals on different dimensions of a single choice: they assimilate to their group on one dimension (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of consumer research 2012-10, Vol.39 (3), p.561-573
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Cindy, Berger, Jonah, Van Boven, Leaf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 573
container_issue 3
container_start_page 561
container_title The Journal of consumer research
container_volume 39
creator Chan, Cindy
Berger, Jonah
Van Boven, Leaf
description How do consumers reconcile conflicting motives for social group identification and individual uniqueness? Four studies demonstrate that consumers simultaneously pursue assimilation and differentiation goals on different dimensions of a single choice: they assimilate to their group on one dimension (by conforming on identity-signaling attributes such as brand) while differentiating on another dimension (distinguishing themselves on uniqueness attributes such as color). Desires to communicate social identity lead consumers to conform on choice dimensions that are strongly associated with their group, particularly in identity-relevant consumer categories such as clothing. Higher needs for uniqueness lead consumers to differentiate within groups by choosing less popular options among those that are associated with their group. By examining both between- and within-group levels of comparison and using multidimensional decisions, this research provides insight into how multiple identity motives jointly influence consumer choice.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/664804
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1463014800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/664804</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/664804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4dcb3502e4fd1449efd3516ce3dd25dd05eb8b1f6eb5c345cec53991c1af0b453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOI76GwKCuKkmzaONOxl8wagLnY2b0iS3mqGTjE0qzL-30gFBEFcX7v043HMOQseUnFNSygspeUn4DppQwYpM5EWxiyaEKJYJRug-OohxSQihhNIJer234JNrXK1bwLpP-DEkPC5N3V7iWVhp551_w8_BuLrd3tIG197ihXcfPXiIET-E5D4hYufx7D04A4dor6nbCEfbOUWLm-uX2V02f7q9n13NM8NZnjJujWaC5MAbSzlX0FgmqDTArM2FtUSALjVtJGhhGBcGjGBKUUPrhmgu2BSdjbrrLgzPxFStXDTQtrWH0MeKcjn4HjIh_6NMcqmUyMsBPfmFLkPf-cFIRYlUea4KxgfqdKRMF2LsoKnWnVvV3WaAqu82qrGNH7llTKH7i_oCO0GFvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1069229734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Chan, Cindy ; Berger, Jonah ; Van Boven, Leaf</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Cindy ; Berger, Jonah ; Van Boven, Leaf</creatorcontrib><description>How do consumers reconcile conflicting motives for social group identification and individual uniqueness? Four studies demonstrate that consumers simultaneously pursue assimilation and differentiation goals on different dimensions of a single choice: they assimilate to their group on one dimension (by conforming on identity-signaling attributes such as brand) while differentiating on another dimension (distinguishing themselves on uniqueness attributes such as color). Desires to communicate social identity lead consumers to conform on choice dimensions that are strongly associated with their group, particularly in identity-relevant consumer categories such as clothing. Higher needs for uniqueness lead consumers to differentiate within groups by choosing less popular options among those that are associated with their group. By examining both between- and within-group levels of comparison and using multidimensional decisions, this research provides insight into how multiple identity motives jointly influence consumer choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-5301</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/664804</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCSRBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Assimilation ; Automobiles ; Brands ; Choices ; Consumer behavior ; Consumer motivation ; Consumer research ; Consumers ; Decision Making ; Desire ; Group identity ; Identity ; Motivation ; Preferences ; Product choice ; Social Identity ; Studies ; Uniqueness</subject><ispartof>The Journal of consumer research, 2012-10, Vol.39 (3), p.561-573</ispartof><rights>2012 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4dcb3502e4fd1449efd3516ce3dd25dd05eb8b1f6eb5c345cec53991c1af0b453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Jonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Boven, Leaf</creatorcontrib><title>Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice</title><title>The Journal of consumer research</title><description>How do consumers reconcile conflicting motives for social group identification and individual uniqueness? Four studies demonstrate that consumers simultaneously pursue assimilation and differentiation goals on different dimensions of a single choice: they assimilate to their group on one dimension (by conforming on identity-signaling attributes such as brand) while differentiating on another dimension (distinguishing themselves on uniqueness attributes such as color). Desires to communicate social identity lead consumers to conform on choice dimensions that are strongly associated with their group, particularly in identity-relevant consumer categories such as clothing. Higher needs for uniqueness lead consumers to differentiate within groups by choosing less popular options among those that are associated with their group. By examining both between- and within-group levels of comparison and using multidimensional decisions, this research provides insight into how multiple identity motives jointly influence consumer choice.</description><subject>Assimilation</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer motivation</subject><subject>Consumer research</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Desire</subject><subject>Group identity</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Product choice</subject><subject>Social Identity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Uniqueness</subject><issn>0093-5301</issn><issn>1537-5277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOI76GwKCuKkmzaONOxl8wagLnY2b0iS3mqGTjE0qzL-30gFBEFcX7v043HMOQseUnFNSygspeUn4DppQwYpM5EWxiyaEKJYJRug-OohxSQihhNIJer234JNrXK1bwLpP-DEkPC5N3V7iWVhp551_w8_BuLrd3tIG197ihXcfPXiIET-E5D4hYufx7D04A4dor6nbCEfbOUWLm-uX2V02f7q9n13NM8NZnjJujWaC5MAbSzlX0FgmqDTArM2FtUSALjVtJGhhGBcGjGBKUUPrhmgu2BSdjbrrLgzPxFStXDTQtrWH0MeKcjn4HjIh_6NMcqmUyMsBPfmFLkPf-cFIRYlUea4KxgfqdKRMF2LsoKnWnVvV3WaAqu82qrGNH7llTKH7i_oCO0GFvg</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Chan, Cindy</creator><creator>Berger, Jonah</creator><creator>Van Boven, Leaf</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice</title><author>Chan, Cindy ; Berger, Jonah ; Van Boven, Leaf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-4dcb3502e4fd1449efd3516ce3dd25dd05eb8b1f6eb5c345cec53991c1af0b453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Assimilation</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer motivation</topic><topic>Consumer research</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Desire</topic><topic>Group identity</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Product choice</topic><topic>Social Identity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Uniqueness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Jonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Boven, Leaf</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of consumer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Cindy</au><au>Berger, Jonah</au><au>Van Boven, Leaf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of consumer research</jtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>561</spage><epage>573</epage><pages>561-573</pages><issn>0093-5301</issn><eissn>1537-5277</eissn><coden>JCSRBJ</coden><abstract>How do consumers reconcile conflicting motives for social group identification and individual uniqueness? Four studies demonstrate that consumers simultaneously pursue assimilation and differentiation goals on different dimensions of a single choice: they assimilate to their group on one dimension (by conforming on identity-signaling attributes such as brand) while differentiating on another dimension (distinguishing themselves on uniqueness attributes such as color). Desires to communicate social identity lead consumers to conform on choice dimensions that are strongly associated with their group, particularly in identity-relevant consumer categories such as clothing. Higher needs for uniqueness lead consumers to differentiate within groups by choosing less popular options among those that are associated with their group. By examining both between- and within-group levels of comparison and using multidimensional decisions, this research provides insight into how multiple identity motives jointly influence consumer choice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/664804</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-5301
ispartof The Journal of consumer research, 2012-10, Vol.39 (3), p.561-573
issn 0093-5301
1537-5277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1463014800
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Assimilation
Automobiles
Brands
Choices
Consumer behavior
Consumer motivation
Consumer research
Consumers
Decision Making
Desire
Group identity
Identity
Motivation
Preferences
Product choice
Social Identity
Studies
Uniqueness
title Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A31%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifiable%20but%20Not%20Identical:%20Combining%20Social%20Identity%20and%20Uniqueness%20Motives%20in%20Choice&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20consumer%20research&rft.au=Chan,%20Cindy&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=561&rft.epage=573&rft.pages=561-573&rft.issn=0093-5301&rft.eissn=1537-5277&rft.coden=JCSRBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/664804&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/664804%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1069229734&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/664804&rfr_iscdi=true