Operability of glioblastomas: “sins of action” versus “sins of non-action”

Despite prognosis of glioblastomas is still poor, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resections are associated with longer life expectancy. However, the surgical indications, at present, are far from uniform and the concept of operability is extremely surgeon-dependant. The resu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurological sciences 2013-12, Vol.34 (12), p.2107-2116
Hauptverfasser: Ferroli, Paolo, Schiariti, Marco, Finocchiaro, Gaetano, Salmaggi, Andrea, Castiglione, Melina, Acerbi, Francesco, Tringali, Giovanni, Farinotti, Mariangela, Broggi, Morgan, Roberto, Cordella, Maccagnano, Elio, Broggi, Giovanni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2116
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2107
container_title Neurological sciences
container_volume 34
creator Ferroli, Paolo
Schiariti, Marco
Finocchiaro, Gaetano
Salmaggi, Andrea
Castiglione, Melina
Acerbi, Francesco
Tringali, Giovanni
Farinotti, Mariangela
Broggi, Morgan
Roberto, Cordella
Maccagnano, Elio
Broggi, Giovanni
description Despite prognosis of glioblastomas is still poor, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resections are associated with longer life expectancy. However, the surgical indications, at present, are far from uniform and the concept of operability is extremely surgeon-dependant. The results of glioblastoma resection in 104 patients operated on between March 2005 and April 2011 were reviewed with the aim to shed some light on the limits between ‘sins of action’ (operating upon complex tumors causing a permanent severe deficit) and ‘sins of non-action’ (considering inoperable tumors that can be resected with good results). Fifty-five patients (54.4 %) (Group 1) presented with a ‘disputable’ surgical indication because of one or more of the following clinico-radiological aspects: involvement of motor and language areas (39.4 %), deep location (7.7 %), corpus callosum infiltration (13.4 %), or major vessels encasement (8.6 %). Forty-six (42.5 %) patients (Group 2) presented with an ‘indisputable’ surgical indication (readily accessible tumors in non-eloquent areas). Overall mortality was 2.9 %. The mean overall survival was 19.8 months and not significantly different in the two Groups (20.4 Group 2 and 19.5 months for Group 1; p  = 0.7). Patients with GTR and
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10072-013-1345-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1462188165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3137158541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e6edffe94b9ff9356d086051c280fe79331a4e28f5f23ff884129bb96efb40513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1KwzAYhoMobk4vwBMZeOJJNF-StolnMvyDwUD0OLRdMjraZiatsLNdiN7crsSUThmCJ_kC7_O9CQ9C50CugZDkxncnxQQYBsYjHB2gIUSSYMYTcbi7g0j4AJ14vySEAAd2jAY0AJIwOkQvs5V2aVaURbMeWzNelIXNytQ3tkr97Xi7-fRF7bskzZvC1tvN1_hDO9_6_ay2Nf7NT9GRSUuvz3ZzhN4e7l8nT3g6e3ye3E1xzhLaYB3ruTFa8kwaI1kUz4mISQQ5FcToRDIGKddUmMhQZowQHKjMMhlrk_HAsRG66ntXzr632jeqKnyuyzKttW29Ah5TEALiKKCXf9ClbV0dftdREDOQggQKeip31nunjVq5okrdWgFRnWrVC1dBuOqEq675YtfcZpWe_278GA4A7QEfonqh3d7T_7Z-A_jwjes</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1461631980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Operability of glioblastomas: “sins of action” versus “sins of non-action”</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ferroli, Paolo ; Schiariti, Marco ; Finocchiaro, Gaetano ; Salmaggi, Andrea ; Castiglione, Melina ; Acerbi, Francesco ; Tringali, Giovanni ; Farinotti, Mariangela ; Broggi, Morgan ; Roberto, Cordella ; Maccagnano, Elio ; Broggi, Giovanni</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferroli, Paolo ; Schiariti, Marco ; Finocchiaro, Gaetano ; Salmaggi, Andrea ; Castiglione, Melina ; Acerbi, Francesco ; Tringali, Giovanni ; Farinotti, Mariangela ; Broggi, Morgan ; Roberto, Cordella ; Maccagnano, Elio ; Broggi, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><description>Despite prognosis of glioblastomas is still poor, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resections are associated with longer life expectancy. However, the surgical indications, at present, are far from uniform and the concept of operability is extremely surgeon-dependant. The results of glioblastoma resection in 104 patients operated on between March 2005 and April 2011 were reviewed with the aim to shed some light on the limits between ‘sins of action’ (operating upon complex tumors causing a permanent severe deficit) and ‘sins of non-action’ (considering inoperable tumors that can be resected with good results). Fifty-five patients (54.4 %) (Group 1) presented with a ‘disputable’ surgical indication because of one or more of the following clinico-radiological aspects: involvement of motor and language areas (39.4 %), deep location (7.7 %), corpus callosum infiltration (13.4 %), or major vessels encasement (8.6 %). Forty-six (42.5 %) patients (Group 2) presented with an ‘indisputable’ surgical indication (readily accessible tumors in non-eloquent areas). Overall mortality was 2.9 %. The mean overall survival was 19.8 months and not significantly different in the two Groups (20.4 Group 2 and 19.5 months for Group 1; p  = 0.7). Patients with GTR and &lt;72 years had a longer survival ( p  = 0.004 and 0.03, respectively). Seventy patients (69.3 %) showed an uneventful post-operative course, without statistical significance difference between Group 1 and 2. The gross total removal of glioblastoma with many complexities (Group 1) was found to be feasible with acceptable mortality, morbidity and long-term survival rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1590-1874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1590-3478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10072-013-1345-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23479032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Aged ; Female ; Glioblastoma - diagnosis ; Glioblastoma - mortality ; Glioblastoma - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neurology ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosciences ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article ; Prognosis ; Psychiatry ; Quality of Life ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Neurological sciences, 2013-12, Vol.34 (12), p.2107-2116</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e6edffe94b9ff9356d086051c280fe79331a4e28f5f23ff884129bb96efb40513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e6edffe94b9ff9356d086051c280fe79331a4e28f5f23ff884129bb96efb40513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10072-013-1345-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10072-013-1345-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23479032$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferroli, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiariti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finocchiaro, Gaetano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmaggi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castiglione, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acerbi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tringali, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farinotti, Mariangela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broggi, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto, Cordella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccagnano, Elio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broggi, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><title>Operability of glioblastomas: “sins of action” versus “sins of non-action”</title><title>Neurological sciences</title><addtitle>Neurol Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Neurol Sci</addtitle><description>Despite prognosis of glioblastomas is still poor, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resections are associated with longer life expectancy. However, the surgical indications, at present, are far from uniform and the concept of operability is extremely surgeon-dependant. The results of glioblastoma resection in 104 patients operated on between March 2005 and April 2011 were reviewed with the aim to shed some light on the limits between ‘sins of action’ (operating upon complex tumors causing a permanent severe deficit) and ‘sins of non-action’ (considering inoperable tumors that can be resected with good results). Fifty-five patients (54.4 %) (Group 1) presented with a ‘disputable’ surgical indication because of one or more of the following clinico-radiological aspects: involvement of motor and language areas (39.4 %), deep location (7.7 %), corpus callosum infiltration (13.4 %), or major vessels encasement (8.6 %). Forty-six (42.5 %) patients (Group 2) presented with an ‘indisputable’ surgical indication (readily accessible tumors in non-eloquent areas). Overall mortality was 2.9 %. The mean overall survival was 19.8 months and not significantly different in the two Groups (20.4 Group 2 and 19.5 months for Group 1; p  = 0.7). Patients with GTR and &lt;72 years had a longer survival ( p  = 0.004 and 0.03, respectively). Seventy patients (69.3 %) showed an uneventful post-operative course, without statistical significance difference between Group 1 and 2. The gross total removal of glioblastoma with many complexities (Group 1) was found to be feasible with acceptable mortality, morbidity and long-term survival rates.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - mortality</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1590-1874</issn><issn>1590-3478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN1KwzAYhoMobk4vwBMZeOJJNF-StolnMvyDwUD0OLRdMjraZiatsLNdiN7crsSUThmCJ_kC7_O9CQ9C50CugZDkxncnxQQYBsYjHB2gIUSSYMYTcbi7g0j4AJ14vySEAAd2jAY0AJIwOkQvs5V2aVaURbMeWzNelIXNytQ3tkr97Xi7-fRF7bskzZvC1tvN1_hDO9_6_ay2Nf7NT9GRSUuvz3ZzhN4e7l8nT3g6e3ye3E1xzhLaYB3ruTFa8kwaI1kUz4mISQQ5FcToRDIGKddUmMhQZowQHKjMMhlrk_HAsRG66ntXzr632jeqKnyuyzKttW29Ah5TEALiKKCXf9ClbV0dftdREDOQggQKeip31nunjVq5okrdWgFRnWrVC1dBuOqEq675YtfcZpWe_278GA4A7QEfonqh3d7T_7Z-A_jwjes</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Ferroli, Paolo</creator><creator>Schiariti, Marco</creator><creator>Finocchiaro, Gaetano</creator><creator>Salmaggi, Andrea</creator><creator>Castiglione, Melina</creator><creator>Acerbi, Francesco</creator><creator>Tringali, Giovanni</creator><creator>Farinotti, Mariangela</creator><creator>Broggi, Morgan</creator><creator>Roberto, Cordella</creator><creator>Maccagnano, Elio</creator><creator>Broggi, Giovanni</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Operability of glioblastomas: “sins of action” versus “sins of non-action”</title><author>Ferroli, Paolo ; Schiariti, Marco ; Finocchiaro, Gaetano ; Salmaggi, Andrea ; Castiglione, Melina ; Acerbi, Francesco ; Tringali, Giovanni ; Farinotti, Mariangela ; Broggi, Morgan ; Roberto, Cordella ; Maccagnano, Elio ; Broggi, Giovanni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e6edffe94b9ff9356d086051c280fe79331a4e28f5f23ff884129bb96efb40513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - mortality</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferroli, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiariti, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finocchiaro, Gaetano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmaggi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castiglione, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acerbi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tringali, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farinotti, Mariangela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broggi, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberto, Cordella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccagnano, Elio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broggi, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferroli, Paolo</au><au>Schiariti, Marco</au><au>Finocchiaro, Gaetano</au><au>Salmaggi, Andrea</au><au>Castiglione, Melina</au><au>Acerbi, Francesco</au><au>Tringali, Giovanni</au><au>Farinotti, Mariangela</au><au>Broggi, Morgan</au><au>Roberto, Cordella</au><au>Maccagnano, Elio</au><au>Broggi, Giovanni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Operability of glioblastomas: “sins of action” versus “sins of non-action”</atitle><jtitle>Neurological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Neurol Sci</stitle><addtitle>Neurol Sci</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2107</spage><epage>2116</epage><pages>2107-2116</pages><issn>1590-1874</issn><eissn>1590-3478</eissn><abstract>Despite prognosis of glioblastomas is still poor, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resections are associated with longer life expectancy. However, the surgical indications, at present, are far from uniform and the concept of operability is extremely surgeon-dependant. The results of glioblastoma resection in 104 patients operated on between March 2005 and April 2011 were reviewed with the aim to shed some light on the limits between ‘sins of action’ (operating upon complex tumors causing a permanent severe deficit) and ‘sins of non-action’ (considering inoperable tumors that can be resected with good results). Fifty-five patients (54.4 %) (Group 1) presented with a ‘disputable’ surgical indication because of one or more of the following clinico-radiological aspects: involvement of motor and language areas (39.4 %), deep location (7.7 %), corpus callosum infiltration (13.4 %), or major vessels encasement (8.6 %). Forty-six (42.5 %) patients (Group 2) presented with an ‘indisputable’ surgical indication (readily accessible tumors in non-eloquent areas). Overall mortality was 2.9 %. The mean overall survival was 19.8 months and not significantly different in the two Groups (20.4 Group 2 and 19.5 months for Group 1; p  = 0.7). Patients with GTR and &lt;72 years had a longer survival ( p  = 0.004 and 0.03, respectively). Seventy patients (69.3 %) showed an uneventful post-operative course, without statistical significance difference between Group 1 and 2. The gross total removal of glioblastoma with many complexities (Group 1) was found to be feasible with acceptable mortality, morbidity and long-term survival rates.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><pmid>23479032</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10072-013-1345-5</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1590-1874
ispartof Neurological sciences, 2013-12, Vol.34 (12), p.2107-2116
issn 1590-1874
1590-3478
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1462188165
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Female
Glioblastoma - diagnosis
Glioblastoma - mortality
Glioblastoma - surgery
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neurology
Neuroradiology
Neurosciences
Neurosurgery
Original Article
Prognosis
Psychiatry
Quality of Life
Treatment Outcome
title Operability of glioblastomas: “sins of action” versus “sins of non-action”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A27%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Operability%20of%20glioblastomas:%20%E2%80%9Csins%20of%20action%E2%80%9D%20versus%20%E2%80%9Csins%20of%20non-action%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Neurological%20sciences&rft.au=Ferroli,%20Paolo&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2107&rft.epage=2116&rft.pages=2107-2116&rft.issn=1590-1874&rft.eissn=1590-3478&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10072-013-1345-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3137158541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1461631980&rft_id=info:pmid/23479032&rfr_iscdi=true