Evaluation of two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods for the analysis of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
•A LC–MS/MS method was firstly developed for baclofen and gabapentin in feeds.•Two QuEChERS sample preparation methods had been developed and compared.•Selectivity, linearity, trueness, precision, LOD and LOQ had been validated.•The whole method was fast, reliable, convenient and sensitive. This pap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 2014-01, Vol.88, p.53-59 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 59 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Hou, Xiao-Lin Wu, Yin-Liang Chen, Ruo-Xia Zhu, Yong Lv, Yan Xu, Xiu-Qin |
description | •A LC–MS/MS method was firstly developed for baclofen and gabapentin in feeds.•Two QuEChERS sample preparation methods had been developed and compared.•Selectivity, linearity, trueness, precision, LOD and LOQ had been validated.•The whole method was fast, reliable, convenient and sensitive.
This paper presents a new analytical method for the simultaneous determination of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds based on two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). For the two modified QuEChERS methods, samples were first extracted with acidified acetonitrile (5.0% acetic acid, v/v) without using acetonitrile salting-out extraction. Then, the first modified QuEChERS method was established according to the original QuEChERS cleanup procedure. For the second modified QuEChERS method, the extract was evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in acetonitrile. Subsequently, the analytes in the reconstituted solution were retained by primary secondary amine (PSA) and released from PSA with 1.0% formic acid in methanol. Finally, the eluate was evaporated and dissolved in 0.1% formic acid solution/methanol (v/v, 80:20). All of the samples were analyzed by LC–MS/MS on a Waters Acquity BEH C18 column with 0.1% formic acid in water/methanol as the mobile phase with gradient elution. The matrix effect, recovery, and repeatability, within laboratory reproducibility, and the LODs and LOQs of the two modified QuEChERS sample preparation methods were investigated and compared. Comparative results showed that the second method was obviously superior to the first method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.08.026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1462186590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0731708513003816</els_id><sourcerecordid>1462186590</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a0d171797c81987bc1c4bd70d0c7caeed392e4144b023a012e2f79b8b157783d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV2r1DAQLaJ416t_wAfJ4xW2a5J2mxZ8kWX9gAviF_gWpslkm7VtepN0pX_U32PWvfooBMIw55w5MyfLnjO6YZRVr46b49TChlNWbGi9obx6kK1YLYqcV-X3h9mKioLlgtbbq-xJCEdK6ZY15ePsipe0qIqKr7Jf-xP0M0TrRuIMiT8dGZy2xqImd7NVP9YEISxrojqEKRXGoIr2hGvi58MhoWDUJIBBcvNp3u-6_ecvL1M9TD2SyeME_iI-YOycDsQ4T2KHiQb9Emw4T21B9c7g-EfrAC1MOEY7kvQMYiK1C-ltsqOTDe8GiO7gYeoWEhMDBzJACCRMyVnqYvTL0-yRgT7gs_v_Ovv2dv919z6__fjuw-7Nba6KbRVzoJoJJhqhatbUolVMla0WVFMlFKTRRcOxZGXZUl4AZRy5EU1bt2wrRF3o4jq7uehO3t3NGKIcbFDY9zCim4NkZcVZXW0bmqD8AlXeheDRyMnbAfwiGZXnPOVRnvOU5zwlrWXKM5Fe3OvP7YD6H-VvgAnw-gLAtOXJopdBWRwVauvTOaR29n_6vwEBe7V7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1462186590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods for the analysis of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hou, Xiao-Lin ; Wu, Yin-Liang ; Chen, Ruo-Xia ; Zhu, Yong ; Lv, Yan ; Xu, Xiu-Qin</creator><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xiao-Lin ; Wu, Yin-Liang ; Chen, Ruo-Xia ; Zhu, Yong ; Lv, Yan ; Xu, Xiu-Qin</creatorcontrib><description>•A LC–MS/MS method was firstly developed for baclofen and gabapentin in feeds.•Two QuEChERS sample preparation methods had been developed and compared.•Selectivity, linearity, trueness, precision, LOD and LOQ had been validated.•The whole method was fast, reliable, convenient and sensitive.
This paper presents a new analytical method for the simultaneous determination of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds based on two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). For the two modified QuEChERS methods, samples were first extracted with acidified acetonitrile (5.0% acetic acid, v/v) without using acetonitrile salting-out extraction. Then, the first modified QuEChERS method was established according to the original QuEChERS cleanup procedure. For the second modified QuEChERS method, the extract was evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in acetonitrile. Subsequently, the analytes in the reconstituted solution were retained by primary secondary amine (PSA) and released from PSA with 1.0% formic acid in methanol. Finally, the eluate was evaporated and dissolved in 0.1% formic acid solution/methanol (v/v, 80:20). All of the samples were analyzed by LC–MS/MS on a Waters Acquity BEH C18 column with 0.1% formic acid in water/methanol as the mobile phase with gradient elution. The matrix effect, recovery, and repeatability, within laboratory reproducibility, and the LODs and LOQs of the two modified QuEChERS sample preparation methods were investigated and compared. Comparative results showed that the second method was obviously superior to the first method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-7085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-264X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.08.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24036362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acetonitriles - chemistry ; Amines - analysis ; Amines - chemistry ; Animal Feed ; Baclofen ; Baclofen - analysis ; Chemistry Techniques, Analytical ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods ; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - standards ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids - analysis ; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists - analysis ; Feed ; Formates - chemistry ; GABA-B Receptor Agonists - analysis ; Gabapentin ; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid - analysis ; LC–MS/MS ; Mass Spectrometry ; Methanol - chemistry ; QuEChERS ; Reproducibility of Results ; Time Factors ; Water - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2014-01, Vol.88, p.53-59</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a0d171797c81987bc1c4bd70d0c7caeed392e4144b023a012e2f79b8b157783d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a0d171797c81987bc1c4bd70d0c7caeed392e4144b023a012e2f79b8b157783d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0731708513003816$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xiao-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yin-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ruo-Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiu-Qin</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods for the analysis of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry</title><title>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</title><addtitle>J Pharm Biomed Anal</addtitle><description>•A LC–MS/MS method was firstly developed for baclofen and gabapentin in feeds.•Two QuEChERS sample preparation methods had been developed and compared.•Selectivity, linearity, trueness, precision, LOD and LOQ had been validated.•The whole method was fast, reliable, convenient and sensitive.
This paper presents a new analytical method for the simultaneous determination of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds based on two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). For the two modified QuEChERS methods, samples were first extracted with acidified acetonitrile (5.0% acetic acid, v/v) without using acetonitrile salting-out extraction. Then, the first modified QuEChERS method was established according to the original QuEChERS cleanup procedure. For the second modified QuEChERS method, the extract was evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in acetonitrile. Subsequently, the analytes in the reconstituted solution were retained by primary secondary amine (PSA) and released from PSA with 1.0% formic acid in methanol. Finally, the eluate was evaporated and dissolved in 0.1% formic acid solution/methanol (v/v, 80:20). All of the samples were analyzed by LC–MS/MS on a Waters Acquity BEH C18 column with 0.1% formic acid in water/methanol as the mobile phase with gradient elution. The matrix effect, recovery, and repeatability, within laboratory reproducibility, and the LODs and LOQs of the two modified QuEChERS sample preparation methods were investigated and compared. Comparative results showed that the second method was obviously superior to the first method.</description><subject>Acetonitriles - chemistry</subject><subject>Amines - analysis</subject><subject>Amines - chemistry</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Baclofen</subject><subject>Baclofen - analysis</subject><subject>Chemistry Techniques, Analytical</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods</subject><subject>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - standards</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid</subject><subject>Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids - analysis</subject><subject>Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists - analysis</subject><subject>Feed</subject><subject>Formates - chemistry</subject><subject>GABA-B Receptor Agonists - analysis</subject><subject>Gabapentin</subject><subject>gamma-Aminobutyric Acid - analysis</subject><subject>LC–MS/MS</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Methanol - chemistry</subject><subject>QuEChERS</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><issn>0731-7085</issn><issn>1873-264X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV2r1DAQLaJ416t_wAfJ4xW2a5J2mxZ8kWX9gAviF_gWpslkm7VtepN0pX_U32PWvfooBMIw55w5MyfLnjO6YZRVr46b49TChlNWbGi9obx6kK1YLYqcV-X3h9mKioLlgtbbq-xJCEdK6ZY15ePsipe0qIqKr7Jf-xP0M0TrRuIMiT8dGZy2xqImd7NVP9YEISxrojqEKRXGoIr2hGvi58MhoWDUJIBBcvNp3u-6_ecvL1M9TD2SyeME_iI-YOycDsQ4T2KHiQb9Emw4T21B9c7g-EfrAC1MOEY7kvQMYiK1C-ltsqOTDe8GiO7gYeoWEhMDBzJACCRMyVnqYvTL0-yRgT7gs_v_Ovv2dv919z6__fjuw-7Nba6KbRVzoJoJJhqhatbUolVMla0WVFMlFKTRRcOxZGXZUl4AZRy5EU1bt2wrRF3o4jq7uehO3t3NGKIcbFDY9zCim4NkZcVZXW0bmqD8AlXeheDRyMnbAfwiGZXnPOVRnvOU5zwlrWXKM5Fe3OvP7YD6H-VvgAnw-gLAtOXJopdBWRwVauvTOaR29n_6vwEBe7V7</recordid><startdate>20140125</startdate><enddate>20140125</enddate><creator>Hou, Xiao-Lin</creator><creator>Wu, Yin-Liang</creator><creator>Chen, Ruo-Xia</creator><creator>Zhu, Yong</creator><creator>Lv, Yan</creator><creator>Xu, Xiu-Qin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140125</creationdate><title>Evaluation of two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods for the analysis of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry</title><author>Hou, Xiao-Lin ; Wu, Yin-Liang ; Chen, Ruo-Xia ; Zhu, Yong ; Lv, Yan ; Xu, Xiu-Qin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a0d171797c81987bc1c4bd70d0c7caeed392e4144b023a012e2f79b8b157783d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acetonitriles - chemistry</topic><topic>Amines - analysis</topic><topic>Amines - chemistry</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Baclofen</topic><topic>Baclofen - analysis</topic><topic>Chemistry Techniques, Analytical</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods</topic><topic>Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - standards</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid</topic><topic>Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids - analysis</topic><topic>Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists - analysis</topic><topic>Feed</topic><topic>Formates - chemistry</topic><topic>GABA-B Receptor Agonists - analysis</topic><topic>Gabapentin</topic><topic>gamma-Aminobutyric Acid - analysis</topic><topic>LC–MS/MS</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Methanol - chemistry</topic><topic>QuEChERS</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xiao-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yin-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ruo-Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiu-Qin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hou, Xiao-Lin</au><au>Wu, Yin-Liang</au><au>Chen, Ruo-Xia</au><au>Zhu, Yong</au><au>Lv, Yan</au><au>Xu, Xiu-Qin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods for the analysis of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharm Biomed Anal</addtitle><date>2014-01-25</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>88</volume><spage>53</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>53-59</pages><issn>0731-7085</issn><eissn>1873-264X</eissn><abstract>•A LC–MS/MS method was firstly developed for baclofen and gabapentin in feeds.•Two QuEChERS sample preparation methods had been developed and compared.•Selectivity, linearity, trueness, precision, LOD and LOQ had been validated.•The whole method was fast, reliable, convenient and sensitive.
This paper presents a new analytical method for the simultaneous determination of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds based on two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). For the two modified QuEChERS methods, samples were first extracted with acidified acetonitrile (5.0% acetic acid, v/v) without using acetonitrile salting-out extraction. Then, the first modified QuEChERS method was established according to the original QuEChERS cleanup procedure. For the second modified QuEChERS method, the extract was evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in acetonitrile. Subsequently, the analytes in the reconstituted solution were retained by primary secondary amine (PSA) and released from PSA with 1.0% formic acid in methanol. Finally, the eluate was evaporated and dissolved in 0.1% formic acid solution/methanol (v/v, 80:20). All of the samples were analyzed by LC–MS/MS on a Waters Acquity BEH C18 column with 0.1% formic acid in water/methanol as the mobile phase with gradient elution. The matrix effect, recovery, and repeatability, within laboratory reproducibility, and the LODs and LOQs of the two modified QuEChERS sample preparation methods were investigated and compared. Comparative results showed that the second method was obviously superior to the first method.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24036362</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpba.2013.08.026</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0731-7085 |
ispartof | Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2014-01, Vol.88, p.53-59 |
issn | 0731-7085 1873-264X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1462186590 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acetonitriles - chemistry Amines - analysis Amines - chemistry Animal Feed Baclofen Baclofen - analysis Chemistry Techniques, Analytical Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - methods Chemistry, Pharmaceutical - standards Chromatography, Liquid Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids - analysis Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists - analysis Feed Formates - chemistry GABA-B Receptor Agonists - analysis Gabapentin gamma-Aminobutyric Acid - analysis LC–MS/MS Mass Spectrometry Methanol - chemistry QuEChERS Reproducibility of Results Time Factors Water - chemistry |
title | Evaluation of two modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation methods for the analysis of baclofen and gabapentin in feeds by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20two%20modified%20quick,%20easy,%20cheap,%20effective,%20rugged%20and%20safe%20(QuEChERS)%20sample%20preparation%20methods%20for%20the%20analysis%20of%20baclofen%20and%20gabapentin%20in%20feeds%20by%20liquid%20chromatography%20tandem%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20and%20biomedical%20analysis&rft.au=Hou,%20Xiao-Lin&rft.date=2014-01-25&rft.volume=88&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=53-59&rft.issn=0731-7085&rft.eissn=1873-264X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.08.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1462186590%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1462186590&rft_id=info:pmid/24036362&rft_els_id=S0731708513003816&rfr_iscdi=true |