The Anatomy of a Regicide Attempt: Shāhrukh, the Ḥurūfīs, and the Timurid Intellectuals in 830/1426–27
This article provides a contextual analysis of the assassination attempt on the Timurid ruler Shāhrukh's life on 21 February 1427 in Herat. According to the contemporary Timurid chroniclers, Aḥmad-i Lur, a Ḥurūfī by profession, tried to kill Shāhrukh. Having survived the attack with light injur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 2013-07, Vol.23 (3), p.391-428 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 428 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 391 |
container_title | Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | BINBAS, ILKER EVRIM |
description | This article provides a contextual analysis of the assassination attempt on the Timurid ruler Shāhrukh's life on 21 February 1427 in Herat. According to the contemporary Timurid chroniclers, Aḥmad-i Lur, a Ḥurūfī by profession, tried to kill Shāhrukh. Having survived the attack with light injuries, Shāhrukh reacted harshly and executed many of those who were accused of conspiring against him. During the interrogations, many other intellectuals who professed as a method of inquiry the ‘ilm-i ḥurūf (the science of letters) were also accused of participating in the conspiracy. In this article, I treat the assassination attempt as a moment of crisis in Timurid politics, study it in relation to the transformation of the intellectual landscape towards the mid-fifteenth century, and provide an in-depth textual and contextual analysis of the historiographical sources as well as the writings of those intellectuals who left a first-hand testimony of the subsequent interrogations. After a close scrutiny of the available evidence, I demonstrate that the interrogations of those intellectuals who practiced the science of letters predated the assassination attempt, and I argue that the assassination attempt was just an episode, albeit an important one, in Shāhrukh's attempts to control and regulate the emerging public sphere in Iran and Central Asia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1356186313000278 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1462180684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1356186313000278</cupid><jstor_id>43307238</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43307238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-913a4ff1082255185e8c0478bd17bbb83313c5ef1cf86b3c9873b9758e1bf9cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUtOHDEUtFCQmEAOkAWSJRSJBR387Pans0MoECQkJJisW26PzfQw3T3Y7gU7OEOuwI4LcAByEDhJ3MwIoURZWaqqV6-eC6HPQL4CAbl_AYwLUIIBI4RQqdbQiBIOGSVCfECjgc4GfgN9DGFGCAjGyAg146nFB62OXXODO4c1PreXtaknCY3RNov4DV9Mn-6mvr-a7uGY1M-P973__eCeHsIe1u3kFRzXTe_rCT5po53PrYm9ngdct1gxsg85FS-3v6jcQusu4fbT6t1EP4--jw9_ZKdnxyeHB6eZYYzGrACmc-eAKEo5B8WtMiSXqpqArKpKsXSl4daBcUpUzBRKsqqQXFmoXGEM20S7S9-F7657G2LZ1MGkYLq1XR9KyAUFRYTKk3TnL-ms632b0pVD7IKLnEJSwVJlfBeCt65c-LrR_qYEUg4FlP8UkGa-rJx1MHruvG5NHd4GqZSMKzF4by91sxA7_8bnqR9J2eDDVrt1U6U_vrTvIv53-x_A_p5V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1426956421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Anatomy of a Regicide Attempt: Shāhrukh, the Ḥurūfīs, and the Timurid Intellectuals in 830/1426–27</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>BINBAS, ILKER EVRIM</creator><creatorcontrib>BINBAS, ILKER EVRIM</creatorcontrib><description>This article provides a contextual analysis of the assassination attempt on the Timurid ruler Shāhrukh's life on 21 February 1427 in Herat. According to the contemporary Timurid chroniclers, Aḥmad-i Lur, a Ḥurūfī by profession, tried to kill Shāhrukh. Having survived the attack with light injuries, Shāhrukh reacted harshly and executed many of those who were accused of conspiring against him. During the interrogations, many other intellectuals who professed as a method of inquiry the ‘ilm-i ḥurūf (the science of letters) were also accused of participating in the conspiracy. In this article, I treat the assassination attempt as a moment of crisis in Timurid politics, study it in relation to the transformation of the intellectual landscape towards the mid-fifteenth century, and provide an in-depth textual and contextual analysis of the historiographical sources as well as the writings of those intellectuals who left a first-hand testimony of the subsequent interrogations. After a close scrutiny of the available evidence, I demonstrate that the interrogations of those intellectuals who practiced the science of letters predated the assassination attempt, and I argue that the assassination attempt was just an episode, albeit an important one, in Shāhrukh's attempts to control and regulate the emerging public sphere in Iran and Central Asia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-2066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1356186313000278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>15th century ; Art and archaeology ; Asia ; Asian history ; Assassinations & assassination attempts ; Central Asia and Buddhic art ; Historical text analysis ; Historiography ; Intellectuals ; Politics ; Royalty</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 2013-07, Vol.23 (3), p.391-428</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2013</rights><rights>The Royal Asiatic Society 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-913a4ff1082255185e8c0478bd17bbb83313c5ef1cf86b3c9873b9758e1bf9cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-913a4ff1082255185e8c0478bd17bbb83313c5ef1cf86b3c9873b9758e1bf9cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43307238$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1356186313000278/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27735861$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BINBAS, ILKER EVRIM</creatorcontrib><title>The Anatomy of a Regicide Attempt: Shāhrukh, the Ḥurūfīs, and the Timurid Intellectuals in 830/1426–27</title><title>Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society</title><addtitle>JRAS</addtitle><description>This article provides a contextual analysis of the assassination attempt on the Timurid ruler Shāhrukh's life on 21 February 1427 in Herat. According to the contemporary Timurid chroniclers, Aḥmad-i Lur, a Ḥurūfī by profession, tried to kill Shāhrukh. Having survived the attack with light injuries, Shāhrukh reacted harshly and executed many of those who were accused of conspiring against him. During the interrogations, many other intellectuals who professed as a method of inquiry the ‘ilm-i ḥurūf (the science of letters) were also accused of participating in the conspiracy. In this article, I treat the assassination attempt as a moment of crisis in Timurid politics, study it in relation to the transformation of the intellectual landscape towards the mid-fifteenth century, and provide an in-depth textual and contextual analysis of the historiographical sources as well as the writings of those intellectuals who left a first-hand testimony of the subsequent interrogations. After a close scrutiny of the available evidence, I demonstrate that the interrogations of those intellectuals who practiced the science of letters predated the assassination attempt, and I argue that the assassination attempt was just an episode, albeit an important one, in Shāhrukh's attempts to control and regulate the emerging public sphere in Iran and Central Asia.</description><subject>15th century</subject><subject>Art and archaeology</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Asian history</subject><subject>Assassinations & assassination attempts</subject><subject>Central Asia and Buddhic art</subject><subject>Historical text analysis</subject><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Royalty</subject><issn>1356-1863</issn><issn>2051-2066</issn><issn>1474-0591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UUtOHDEUtFCQmEAOkAWSJRSJBR387Pans0MoECQkJJisW26PzfQw3T3Y7gU7OEOuwI4LcAByEDhJ3MwIoURZWaqqV6-eC6HPQL4CAbl_AYwLUIIBI4RQqdbQiBIOGSVCfECjgc4GfgN9DGFGCAjGyAg146nFB62OXXODO4c1PreXtaknCY3RNov4DV9Mn-6mvr-a7uGY1M-P973__eCeHsIe1u3kFRzXTe_rCT5po53PrYm9ngdct1gxsg85FS-3v6jcQusu4fbT6t1EP4--jw9_ZKdnxyeHB6eZYYzGrACmc-eAKEo5B8WtMiSXqpqArKpKsXSl4daBcUpUzBRKsqqQXFmoXGEM20S7S9-F7657G2LZ1MGkYLq1XR9KyAUFRYTKk3TnL-ms632b0pVD7IKLnEJSwVJlfBeCt65c-LrR_qYEUg4FlP8UkGa-rJx1MHruvG5NHd4GqZSMKzF4by91sxA7_8bnqR9J2eDDVrt1U6U_vrTvIv53-x_A_p5V</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>BINBAS, ILKER EVRIM</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>The Anatomy of a Regicide Attempt: Shāhrukh, the Ḥurūfīs, and the Timurid Intellectuals in 830/1426–27</title><author>BINBAS, ILKER EVRIM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-913a4ff1082255185e8c0478bd17bbb83313c5ef1cf86b3c9873b9758e1bf9cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>15th century</topic><topic>Art and archaeology</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Asian history</topic><topic>Assassinations & assassination attempts</topic><topic>Central Asia and Buddhic art</topic><topic>Historical text analysis</topic><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Royalty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BINBAS, ILKER EVRIM</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BINBAS, ILKER EVRIM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Anatomy of a Regicide Attempt: Shāhrukh, the Ḥurūfīs, and the Timurid Intellectuals in 830/1426–27</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society</jtitle><addtitle>JRAS</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>391-428</pages><issn>1356-1863</issn><eissn>2051-2066</eissn><eissn>1474-0591</eissn><abstract>This article provides a contextual analysis of the assassination attempt on the Timurid ruler Shāhrukh's life on 21 February 1427 in Herat. According to the contemporary Timurid chroniclers, Aḥmad-i Lur, a Ḥurūfī by profession, tried to kill Shāhrukh. Having survived the attack with light injuries, Shāhrukh reacted harshly and executed many of those who were accused of conspiring against him. During the interrogations, many other intellectuals who professed as a method of inquiry the ‘ilm-i ḥurūf (the science of letters) were also accused of participating in the conspiracy. In this article, I treat the assassination attempt as a moment of crisis in Timurid politics, study it in relation to the transformation of the intellectual landscape towards the mid-fifteenth century, and provide an in-depth textual and contextual analysis of the historiographical sources as well as the writings of those intellectuals who left a first-hand testimony of the subsequent interrogations. After a close scrutiny of the available evidence, I demonstrate that the interrogations of those intellectuals who practiced the science of letters predated the assassination attempt, and I argue that the assassination attempt was just an episode, albeit an important one, in Shāhrukh's attempts to control and regulate the emerging public sphere in Iran and Central Asia.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1356186313000278</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-1863 |
ispartof | Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 2013-07, Vol.23 (3), p.391-428 |
issn | 1356-1863 2051-2066 1474-0591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1462180684 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | 15th century Art and archaeology Asia Asian history Assassinations & assassination attempts Central Asia and Buddhic art Historical text analysis Historiography Intellectuals Politics Royalty |
title | The Anatomy of a Regicide Attempt: Shāhrukh, the Ḥurūfīs, and the Timurid Intellectuals in 830/1426–27 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T21%3A13%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Anatomy%20of%20a%20Regicide%20Attempt:%20Sh%C4%81hrukh,%20the%20%E1%B8%A4ur%C5%ABf%C4%ABs,%20and%20the%20Timurid%20Intellectuals%20in%20830/1426%E2%80%9327&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Asiatic%20Society&rft.au=BINBAS,%20ILKER%20EVRIM&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=391-428&rft.issn=1356-1863&rft.eissn=2051-2066&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1356186313000278&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43307238%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1426956421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1356186313000278&rft_jstor_id=43307238&rfr_iscdi=true |