An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China

With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource Technology 2002-05, Vol.83 (1), p.65-70
Hauptverfasser: Wu, C.Z, Huang, H, Zheng, S.P, Yin, X.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Bioresource Technology
container_volume 83
creator Wu, C.Z
Huang, H
Zheng, S.P
Yin, X.L
description With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite of the relatively high cost for controlling secondary pollution by wastewater, BGPG is economically feasible and can give a financial return owing to the low price of biomass wastes and insufficient power supply at present in some regions of China. In this work, experimental data from 1 MW-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) BGPG plants constructed recently in China were analyzed; and it was found that the unit capital cost of BGPG is only 60–70% of coal power station and its operation cost is much lower than that of conventional power plants. However, due to the relatively low efficiency of small-scale plant, the current BGPG technology will lose its economic attraction when its capacity is smaller than 160 kW or the price of biomass is higher than 200 Yuan RMB/ton. The development of medium-scale BGPG plants, with capacity ranging from 1000 to 5000 kW, is recommended; as is the demonstration of BGPG technology in suitable enterprises (e.g. rice mill and timber mill) in developing countries where large amounts of biomass wastes are available so that biomass collection and transportation can be avoided and the operation cost can be lowered.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14621002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S096085240100116X</els_id><sourcerecordid>14621002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7dcc0af2b334a64617a407603f6da586c982b28e6d60708db7c6646db49655f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1PwyAYwHFiNDpfPoKmF40eqg_QAjuZZfE1SzzoYTdCgU5MCxM2jd_ezjZ69ERCfs8D-SN0jOESA2ZXzzBmkIuSFOeALwAwZvl8C42w4DQnY8620eiX7KH9lN4AgGJOdtEeJlAKQckIPU58ZnXwoXU6U141X8mlLNRZ5UKrUsoWKrnaabVywXfAZMvwaWO2sN7G_tL5bPrqvDpEO7Vqkj0azgP0cnvzMr3PZ093D9PJLNcFIaucG61B1aSitFCsYJirAjgDWjOjSsH0WJCKCMsMAw7CVFyzjpmqGLOyrOkBOuvXLmN4X9u0kq1L2jaN8jask8QFIxiAdLDsoY4hpWhruYyuVfFLYpCbhvKnodwEkoDlT0M57-ZOhgfWVWvN39QQrQOnA1BJq6aOymuX_hzlglHOOnfdO9vV-HA2yqSd9doaF61eSRPcP1_5BjyFjTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14621002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Wu, C.Z ; Huang, H ; Zheng, S.P ; Yin, X.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.Z ; Huang, H ; Zheng, S.P ; Yin, X.L</creatorcontrib><description>With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite of the relatively high cost for controlling secondary pollution by wastewater, BGPG is economically feasible and can give a financial return owing to the low price of biomass wastes and insufficient power supply at present in some regions of China. In this work, experimental data from 1 MW-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) BGPG plants constructed recently in China were analyzed; and it was found that the unit capital cost of BGPG is only 60–70% of coal power station and its operation cost is much lower than that of conventional power plants. However, due to the relatively low efficiency of small-scale plant, the current BGPG technology will lose its economic attraction when its capacity is smaller than 160 kW or the price of biomass is higher than 200 Yuan RMB/ton. The development of medium-scale BGPG plants, with capacity ranging from 1000 to 5000 kW, is recommended; as is the demonstration of BGPG technology in suitable enterprises (e.g. rice mill and timber mill) in developing countries where large amounts of biomass wastes are available so that biomass collection and transportation can be avoided and the operation cost can be lowered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12058832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biomass ; Biomass waste ; Biotechnology - economics ; Biotechnology - methods ; Biotransformation ; China ; Circulating fluidized bed ; Commercialization ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Demonstration project ; Economics ; Electric power generation ; Electric Power Supplies - economics ; Electricity ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gasifier ; Natural energy ; Refuse Disposal ; Scale-up ; System design</subject><ispartof>Bioresource Technology, 2002-05, Vol.83 (1), p.65-70</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7dcc0af2b334a64617a407603f6da586c982b28e6d60708db7c6646db49655f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7dcc0af2b334a64617a407603f6da586c982b28e6d60708db7c6646db49655f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,3550,27922,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13786376$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12058832$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, S.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, X.L</creatorcontrib><title>An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China</title><title>Bioresource Technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite of the relatively high cost for controlling secondary pollution by wastewater, BGPG is economically feasible and can give a financial return owing to the low price of biomass wastes and insufficient power supply at present in some regions of China. In this work, experimental data from 1 MW-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) BGPG plants constructed recently in China were analyzed; and it was found that the unit capital cost of BGPG is only 60–70% of coal power station and its operation cost is much lower than that of conventional power plants. However, due to the relatively low efficiency of small-scale plant, the current BGPG technology will lose its economic attraction when its capacity is smaller than 160 kW or the price of biomass is higher than 200 Yuan RMB/ton. The development of medium-scale BGPG plants, with capacity ranging from 1000 to 5000 kW, is recommended; as is the demonstration of BGPG technology in suitable enterprises (e.g. rice mill and timber mill) in developing countries where large amounts of biomass wastes are available so that biomass collection and transportation can be avoided and the operation cost can be lowered.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass waste</subject><subject>Biotechnology - economics</subject><subject>Biotechnology - methods</subject><subject>Biotransformation</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Circulating fluidized bed</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Demonstration project</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electric Power Supplies - economics</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gasifier</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal</subject><subject>Scale-up</subject><subject>System design</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1PwyAYwHFiNDpfPoKmF40eqg_QAjuZZfE1SzzoYTdCgU5MCxM2jd_ezjZ69ERCfs8D-SN0jOESA2ZXzzBmkIuSFOeALwAwZvl8C42w4DQnY8620eiX7KH9lN4AgGJOdtEeJlAKQckIPU58ZnXwoXU6U141X8mlLNRZ5UKrUsoWKrnaabVywXfAZMvwaWO2sN7G_tL5bPrqvDpEO7Vqkj0azgP0cnvzMr3PZ093D9PJLNcFIaucG61B1aSitFCsYJirAjgDWjOjSsH0WJCKCMsMAw7CVFyzjpmqGLOyrOkBOuvXLmN4X9u0kq1L2jaN8jask8QFIxiAdLDsoY4hpWhruYyuVfFLYpCbhvKnodwEkoDlT0M57-ZOhgfWVWvN39QQrQOnA1BJq6aOymuX_hzlglHOOnfdO9vV-HA2yqSd9doaF61eSRPcP1_5BjyFjTM</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>Wu, C.Z</creator><creator>Huang, H</creator><creator>Zheng, S.P</creator><creator>Yin, X.L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China</title><author>Wu, C.Z ; Huang, H ; Zheng, S.P ; Yin, X.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7dcc0af2b334a64617a407603f6da586c982b28e6d60708db7c6646db49655f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass waste</topic><topic>Biotechnology - economics</topic><topic>Biotechnology - methods</topic><topic>Biotransformation</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Circulating fluidized bed</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Demonstration project</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electric Power Supplies - economics</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gasifier</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal</topic><topic>Scale-up</topic><topic>System design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, S.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, X.L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioresource Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, C.Z</au><au>Huang, H</au><au>Zheng, S.P</au><au>Yin, X.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource Technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>65-70</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite of the relatively high cost for controlling secondary pollution by wastewater, BGPG is economically feasible and can give a financial return owing to the low price of biomass wastes and insufficient power supply at present in some regions of China. In this work, experimental data from 1 MW-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) BGPG plants constructed recently in China were analyzed; and it was found that the unit capital cost of BGPG is only 60–70% of coal power station and its operation cost is much lower than that of conventional power plants. However, due to the relatively low efficiency of small-scale plant, the current BGPG technology will lose its economic attraction when its capacity is smaller than 160 kW or the price of biomass is higher than 200 Yuan RMB/ton. The development of medium-scale BGPG plants, with capacity ranging from 1000 to 5000 kW, is recommended; as is the demonstration of BGPG technology in suitable enterprises (e.g. rice mill and timber mill) in developing countries where large amounts of biomass wastes are available so that biomass collection and transportation can be avoided and the operation cost can be lowered.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12058832</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8524
ispartof Bioresource Technology, 2002-05, Vol.83 (1), p.65-70
issn 0960-8524
1873-2976
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14621002
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Applied sciences
Biodegradation, Environmental
Biomass
Biomass waste
Biotechnology - economics
Biotechnology - methods
Biotransformation
China
Circulating fluidized bed
Commercialization
Conservation of Natural Resources - economics
Conservation of Natural Resources - methods
Demonstration project
Economics
Electric power generation
Electric Power Supplies - economics
Electricity
Energy
Exact sciences and technology
Gasifier
Natural energy
Refuse Disposal
Scale-up
System design
title An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A14%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20economic%20analysis%20of%20biomass%20gasification%20and%20power%20generation%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20Technology&rft.au=Wu,%20C.Z&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=65-70&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14621002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14621002&rft_id=info:pmid/12058832&rft_els_id=S096085240100116X&rfr_iscdi=true