An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China
With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioresource Technology 2002-05, Vol.83 (1), p.65-70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 70 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Bioresource Technology |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Wu, C.Z Huang, H Zheng, S.P Yin, X.L |
description | With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite of the relatively high cost for controlling secondary pollution by wastewater, BGPG is economically feasible and can give a financial return owing to the low price of biomass wastes and insufficient power supply at present in some regions of China. In this work, experimental data from 1 MW-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) BGPG plants constructed recently in China were analyzed; and it was found that the unit capital cost of BGPG is only 60–70% of coal power station and its operation cost is much lower than that of conventional power plants. However, due to the relatively low efficiency of small-scale plant, the current BGPG technology will lose its economic attraction when its capacity is smaller than 160 kW or the price of biomass is higher than 200 Yuan RMB/ton. The development of medium-scale BGPG plants, with capacity ranging from 1000 to 5000 kW, is recommended; as is the demonstration of BGPG technology in suitable enterprises (e.g. rice mill and timber mill) in developing countries where large amounts of biomass wastes are available so that biomass collection and transportation can be avoided and the operation cost can be lowered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14621002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S096085240100116X</els_id><sourcerecordid>14621002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7dcc0af2b334a64617a407603f6da586c982b28e6d60708db7c6646db49655f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1PwyAYwHFiNDpfPoKmF40eqg_QAjuZZfE1SzzoYTdCgU5MCxM2jd_ezjZ69ERCfs8D-SN0jOESA2ZXzzBmkIuSFOeALwAwZvl8C42w4DQnY8620eiX7KH9lN4AgGJOdtEeJlAKQckIPU58ZnXwoXU6U141X8mlLNRZ5UKrUsoWKrnaabVywXfAZMvwaWO2sN7G_tL5bPrqvDpEO7Vqkj0azgP0cnvzMr3PZ093D9PJLNcFIaucG61B1aSitFCsYJirAjgDWjOjSsH0WJCKCMsMAw7CVFyzjpmqGLOyrOkBOuvXLmN4X9u0kq1L2jaN8jask8QFIxiAdLDsoY4hpWhruYyuVfFLYpCbhvKnodwEkoDlT0M57-ZOhgfWVWvN39QQrQOnA1BJq6aOymuX_hzlglHOOnfdO9vV-HA2yqSd9doaF61eSRPcP1_5BjyFjTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14621002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Wu, C.Z ; Huang, H ; Zheng, S.P ; Yin, X.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.Z ; Huang, H ; Zheng, S.P ; Yin, X.L</creatorcontrib><description>With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite of the relatively high cost for controlling secondary pollution by wastewater, BGPG is economically feasible and can give a financial return owing to the low price of biomass wastes and insufficient power supply at present in some regions of China. In this work, experimental data from 1 MW-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) BGPG plants constructed recently in China were analyzed; and it was found that the unit capital cost of BGPG is only 60–70% of coal power station and its operation cost is much lower than that of conventional power plants. However, due to the relatively low efficiency of small-scale plant, the current BGPG technology will lose its economic attraction when its capacity is smaller than 160 kW or the price of biomass is higher than 200 Yuan RMB/ton. The development of medium-scale BGPG plants, with capacity ranging from 1000 to 5000 kW, is recommended; as is the demonstration of BGPG technology in suitable enterprises (e.g. rice mill and timber mill) in developing countries where large amounts of biomass wastes are available so that biomass collection and transportation can be avoided and the operation cost can be lowered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12058832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biomass ; Biomass waste ; Biotechnology - economics ; Biotechnology - methods ; Biotransformation ; China ; Circulating fluidized bed ; Commercialization ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Demonstration project ; Economics ; Electric power generation ; Electric Power Supplies - economics ; Electricity ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gasifier ; Natural energy ; Refuse Disposal ; Scale-up ; System design</subject><ispartof>Bioresource Technology, 2002-05, Vol.83 (1), p.65-70</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7dcc0af2b334a64617a407603f6da586c982b28e6d60708db7c6646db49655f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7dcc0af2b334a64617a407603f6da586c982b28e6d60708db7c6646db49655f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,3550,27922,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13786376$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12058832$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, S.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, X.L</creatorcontrib><title>An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China</title><title>Bioresource Technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite of the relatively high cost for controlling secondary pollution by wastewater, BGPG is economically feasible and can give a financial return owing to the low price of biomass wastes and insufficient power supply at present in some regions of China. In this work, experimental data from 1 MW-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) BGPG plants constructed recently in China were analyzed; and it was found that the unit capital cost of BGPG is only 60–70% of coal power station and its operation cost is much lower than that of conventional power plants. However, due to the relatively low efficiency of small-scale plant, the current BGPG technology will lose its economic attraction when its capacity is smaller than 160 kW or the price of biomass is higher than 200 Yuan RMB/ton. The development of medium-scale BGPG plants, with capacity ranging from 1000 to 5000 kW, is recommended; as is the demonstration of BGPG technology in suitable enterprises (e.g. rice mill and timber mill) in developing countries where large amounts of biomass wastes are available so that biomass collection and transportation can be avoided and the operation cost can be lowered.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass waste</subject><subject>Biotechnology - economics</subject><subject>Biotechnology - methods</subject><subject>Biotransformation</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Circulating fluidized bed</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Demonstration project</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electric Power Supplies - economics</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gasifier</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal</subject><subject>Scale-up</subject><subject>System design</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1PwyAYwHFiNDpfPoKmF40eqg_QAjuZZfE1SzzoYTdCgU5MCxM2jd_ezjZ69ERCfs8D-SN0jOESA2ZXzzBmkIuSFOeALwAwZvl8C42w4DQnY8620eiX7KH9lN4AgGJOdtEeJlAKQckIPU58ZnXwoXU6U141X8mlLNRZ5UKrUsoWKrnaabVywXfAZMvwaWO2sN7G_tL5bPrqvDpEO7Vqkj0azgP0cnvzMr3PZ093D9PJLNcFIaucG61B1aSitFCsYJirAjgDWjOjSsH0WJCKCMsMAw7CVFyzjpmqGLOyrOkBOuvXLmN4X9u0kq1L2jaN8jask8QFIxiAdLDsoY4hpWhruYyuVfFLYpCbhvKnodwEkoDlT0M57-ZOhgfWVWvN39QQrQOnA1BJq6aOymuX_hzlglHOOnfdO9vV-HA2yqSd9doaF61eSRPcP1_5BjyFjTM</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>Wu, C.Z</creator><creator>Huang, H</creator><creator>Zheng, S.P</creator><creator>Yin, X.L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China</title><author>Wu, C.Z ; Huang, H ; Zheng, S.P ; Yin, X.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7dcc0af2b334a64617a407603f6da586c982b28e6d60708db7c6646db49655f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass waste</topic><topic>Biotechnology - economics</topic><topic>Biotechnology - methods</topic><topic>Biotransformation</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Circulating fluidized bed</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Demonstration project</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electric Power Supplies - economics</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gasifier</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal</topic><topic>Scale-up</topic><topic>System design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, S.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, X.L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioresource Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, C.Z</au><au>Huang, H</au><au>Zheng, S.P</au><au>Yin, X.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource Technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>65-70</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>With vast territory and abundant biomass resources China appears to have suitable conditions to develop biomass utilization technologies. As an important decentralized power technology, biomass gasification and power generation (BGPG) has a potential market in making use of biomass wastes. In spite of the relatively high cost for controlling secondary pollution by wastewater, BGPG is economically feasible and can give a financial return owing to the low price of biomass wastes and insufficient power supply at present in some regions of China. In this work, experimental data from 1 MW-scale circulating fluidized bed (CFB) BGPG plants constructed recently in China were analyzed; and it was found that the unit capital cost of BGPG is only 60–70% of coal power station and its operation cost is much lower than that of conventional power plants. However, due to the relatively low efficiency of small-scale plant, the current BGPG technology will lose its economic attraction when its capacity is smaller than 160 kW or the price of biomass is higher than 200 Yuan RMB/ton. The development of medium-scale BGPG plants, with capacity ranging from 1000 to 5000 kW, is recommended; as is the demonstration of BGPG technology in suitable enterprises (e.g. rice mill and timber mill) in developing countries where large amounts of biomass wastes are available so that biomass collection and transportation can be avoided and the operation cost can be lowered.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12058832</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8524 |
ispartof | Bioresource Technology, 2002-05, Vol.83 (1), p.65-70 |
issn | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14621002 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences Biodegradation, Environmental Biomass Biomass waste Biotechnology - economics Biotechnology - methods Biotransformation China Circulating fluidized bed Commercialization Conservation of Natural Resources - economics Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Demonstration project Economics Electric power generation Electric Power Supplies - economics Electricity Energy Exact sciences and technology Gasifier Natural energy Refuse Disposal Scale-up System design |
title | An economic analysis of biomass gasification and power generation in China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A14%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20economic%20analysis%20of%20biomass%20gasification%20and%20power%20generation%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20Technology&rft.au=Wu,%20C.Z&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=65-70&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00116-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14621002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14621002&rft_id=info:pmid/12058832&rft_els_id=S096085240100116X&rfr_iscdi=true |