Mechanisms underlying the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae
Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae regulate their virulence factors according to the local cell-population density in a regulatory system called quorum sensing. Their quorum sensing systems contain a small RNA (sRNA) circuit to regulate expression of a master transcriptional regulator via multiple q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of theoretical biology 2014-01, Vol.340, p.38-49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 49 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | Journal of theoretical biology |
container_volume | 340 |
creator | Hunter, Geoffrey A.M. Keener, James P. |
description | Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae regulate their virulence factors according to the local cell-population density in a regulatory system called quorum sensing. Their quorum sensing systems contain a small RNA (sRNA) circuit to regulate expression of a master transcriptional regulator via multiple quorum regulated RNA (Qrr) and a protein chaperon Hfq. Experiments and genetic analysis show that their respective quorum sensing networks are topologically equivalent and have homologous components, yet they respond differently to the same experimental conditions. In particular, V. harveyi Qrr are additive because all of its Qrr are required to maintain wild-type-like repression of its master transcriptional regulator. Conversely, V. cholerae Qrr are redundant because any of its Qrr is sufficient to repress its master transcriptional regulator. Given the striking similarities between their quorum sensing systems, experimentalists have been unable to identify conclusively the mechanisms behind these phenotypic differences. Nevertheless, the current hypothesis in the literature is that dosage compensation is the mechanism underlying redundancy.
In this work, we identify the mechanisms underlying Qrr redundancy using a detailed mathematical model of the V. harveyi and V. cholerae sRNA circuits. We show that there are exactly two different cases underlying Qrr redundancy and that dosage compensation is unnecessary and insufficient to explain Qrr redundancy. Although V. harveyi Qrr are additive when the perturbations in Qrr are large, we predict that V. harveyi and V. cholerae Qrr are redundant when the perturbations in Qrr are small. We argue that the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes can emerge from parametric differences in the sRNA circuit. In particular, we find that the affinity of Qrr and its expression relative to the master transcriptional regulator determine the level of redundancy in V. harveyi and V. cholerae. Furthermore, the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes reflect differences in the concentration of Hfq-Qrr in V. harveyi and V. cholerae. We use our model to test the dosage compensation hypothesis and show that decreasing the expression of qrr, rather than removing dosage compensation, abolishes Qrr redundancy in V. cholerae. Further experimentation is needed to test our results and both Qrr redundancy hypotheses.
•In general, there are two different criteria that cause Qrr redundancy.•Dosage compensation diminishes the more redundant the Qrr.• |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.08.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1461875820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022519313004086</els_id><sourcerecordid>1461875820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-534d33b39d0f01a18f73f215797c3ad21d1029fbc2634467fa62ed13f26d984e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi0EoiHwBzggH7nsMmN7vyQuVVU-pCKERHu1vPYs62jjTe1NpPx7HJL2yGlGM8-80jyMvUcoEbD-tCk3S-9LAShLaEuQ6gVbIXRV0VYKX7IVgBBFhZ28Ym9S2gBAp2T9ml0JBdgKECtGP8iOJvi0TXwfHMXp6MMfvozEjXN-8YfcBMcjubw2YeG_YuS7kcK8HHeUuA_8wffRz3w08UBH_w-_jOw4TxQNvWWvBjMlenepa3b_5fb3zbfi7ufX7zfXd4WVVb0UlVROyl52DgZAg-3QyEFg1XSNlcYJdAiiG3oraqlU3QymFuQwM7XrWkVyzT6ec3dxftxTWvTWJ0vTZALN-6RR1dg2VX49o-KM2jinFGnQu-i3Jh41gj7p1Rt90qtPejW0OuvNRx8u-ft-S-755MlnBj6fAcpfHjxFnaynYMn5SHbRbvb_y_8LZiiMHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1461875820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanisms underlying the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hunter, Geoffrey A.M. ; Keener, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Geoffrey A.M. ; Keener, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae regulate their virulence factors according to the local cell-population density in a regulatory system called quorum sensing. Their quorum sensing systems contain a small RNA (sRNA) circuit to regulate expression of a master transcriptional regulator via multiple quorum regulated RNA (Qrr) and a protein chaperon Hfq. Experiments and genetic analysis show that their respective quorum sensing networks are topologically equivalent and have homologous components, yet they respond differently to the same experimental conditions. In particular, V. harveyi Qrr are additive because all of its Qrr are required to maintain wild-type-like repression of its master transcriptional regulator. Conversely, V. cholerae Qrr are redundant because any of its Qrr is sufficient to repress its master transcriptional regulator. Given the striking similarities between their quorum sensing systems, experimentalists have been unable to identify conclusively the mechanisms behind these phenotypic differences. Nevertheless, the current hypothesis in the literature is that dosage compensation is the mechanism underlying redundancy.
In this work, we identify the mechanisms underlying Qrr redundancy using a detailed mathematical model of the V. harveyi and V. cholerae sRNA circuits. We show that there are exactly two different cases underlying Qrr redundancy and that dosage compensation is unnecessary and insufficient to explain Qrr redundancy. Although V. harveyi Qrr are additive when the perturbations in Qrr are large, we predict that V. harveyi and V. cholerae Qrr are redundant when the perturbations in Qrr are small. We argue that the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes can emerge from parametric differences in the sRNA circuit. In particular, we find that the affinity of Qrr and its expression relative to the master transcriptional regulator determine the level of redundancy in V. harveyi and V. cholerae. Furthermore, the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes reflect differences in the concentration of Hfq-Qrr in V. harveyi and V. cholerae. We use our model to test the dosage compensation hypothesis and show that decreasing the expression of qrr, rather than removing dosage compensation, abolishes Qrr redundancy in V. cholerae. Further experimentation is needed to test our results and both Qrr redundancy hypotheses.
•In general, there are two different criteria that cause Qrr redundancy.•Dosage compensation diminishes the more redundant the Qrr.•V. harveyi Qrr are redundant when Qrr perturbations are small.•Identical mechanisms underlie redundancy in V. harveyi and V. cholerae.•Additive and redundant phenotypes are caused by different levels of Hfq-Qrr.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.08.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24018202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacterial Proteins - genetics ; Dosage compensation ; Dosage Compensation, Genetic ; Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial ; Genes, Bacterial ; Host Factor 1 Protein - genetics ; Mathematical model ; Models, Theoretical ; Phenotype ; Quorum Sensing ; RNA, Bacterial - genetics ; Small RNA ; Vibrio - genetics ; Vibrio cholerae - genetics</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical biology, 2014-01, Vol.340, p.38-49</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-534d33b39d0f01a18f73f215797c3ad21d1029fbc2634467fa62ed13f26d984e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-534d33b39d0f01a18f73f215797c3ad21d1029fbc2634467fa62ed13f26d984e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.08.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24018202$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Geoffrey A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keener, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanisms underlying the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae</title><title>Journal of theoretical biology</title><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><description>Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae regulate their virulence factors according to the local cell-population density in a regulatory system called quorum sensing. Their quorum sensing systems contain a small RNA (sRNA) circuit to regulate expression of a master transcriptional regulator via multiple quorum regulated RNA (Qrr) and a protein chaperon Hfq. Experiments and genetic analysis show that their respective quorum sensing networks are topologically equivalent and have homologous components, yet they respond differently to the same experimental conditions. In particular, V. harveyi Qrr are additive because all of its Qrr are required to maintain wild-type-like repression of its master transcriptional regulator. Conversely, V. cholerae Qrr are redundant because any of its Qrr is sufficient to repress its master transcriptional regulator. Given the striking similarities between their quorum sensing systems, experimentalists have been unable to identify conclusively the mechanisms behind these phenotypic differences. Nevertheless, the current hypothesis in the literature is that dosage compensation is the mechanism underlying redundancy.
In this work, we identify the mechanisms underlying Qrr redundancy using a detailed mathematical model of the V. harveyi and V. cholerae sRNA circuits. We show that there are exactly two different cases underlying Qrr redundancy and that dosage compensation is unnecessary and insufficient to explain Qrr redundancy. Although V. harveyi Qrr are additive when the perturbations in Qrr are large, we predict that V. harveyi and V. cholerae Qrr are redundant when the perturbations in Qrr are small. We argue that the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes can emerge from parametric differences in the sRNA circuit. In particular, we find that the affinity of Qrr and its expression relative to the master transcriptional regulator determine the level of redundancy in V. harveyi and V. cholerae. Furthermore, the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes reflect differences in the concentration of Hfq-Qrr in V. harveyi and V. cholerae. We use our model to test the dosage compensation hypothesis and show that decreasing the expression of qrr, rather than removing dosage compensation, abolishes Qrr redundancy in V. cholerae. Further experimentation is needed to test our results and both Qrr redundancy hypotheses.
•In general, there are two different criteria that cause Qrr redundancy.•Dosage compensation diminishes the more redundant the Qrr.•V. harveyi Qrr are redundant when Qrr perturbations are small.•Identical mechanisms underlie redundancy in V. harveyi and V. cholerae.•Additive and redundant phenotypes are caused by different levels of Hfq-Qrr.</description><subject>Bacterial Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Dosage compensation</subject><subject>Dosage Compensation, Genetic</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial</subject><subject>Genes, Bacterial</subject><subject>Host Factor 1 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Quorum Sensing</subject><subject>RNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Small RNA</subject><subject>Vibrio - genetics</subject><subject>Vibrio cholerae - genetics</subject><issn>0022-5193</issn><issn>1095-8541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi0EoiHwBzggH7nsMmN7vyQuVVU-pCKERHu1vPYs62jjTe1NpPx7HJL2yGlGM8-80jyMvUcoEbD-tCk3S-9LAShLaEuQ6gVbIXRV0VYKX7IVgBBFhZ28Ym9S2gBAp2T9ml0JBdgKECtGP8iOJvi0TXwfHMXp6MMfvozEjXN-8YfcBMcjubw2YeG_YuS7kcK8HHeUuA_8wffRz3w08UBH_w-_jOw4TxQNvWWvBjMlenepa3b_5fb3zbfi7ufX7zfXd4WVVb0UlVROyl52DgZAg-3QyEFg1XSNlcYJdAiiG3oraqlU3QymFuQwM7XrWkVyzT6ec3dxftxTWvTWJ0vTZALN-6RR1dg2VX49o-KM2jinFGnQu-i3Jh41gj7p1Rt90qtPejW0OuvNRx8u-ft-S-755MlnBj6fAcpfHjxFnaynYMn5SHbRbvb_y_8LZiiMHg</recordid><startdate>20140107</startdate><enddate>20140107</enddate><creator>Hunter, Geoffrey A.M.</creator><creator>Keener, James P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140107</creationdate><title>Mechanisms underlying the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae</title><author>Hunter, Geoffrey A.M. ; Keener, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-534d33b39d0f01a18f73f215797c3ad21d1029fbc2634467fa62ed13f26d984e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Dosage compensation</topic><topic>Dosage Compensation, Genetic</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial</topic><topic>Genes, Bacterial</topic><topic>Host Factor 1 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Quorum Sensing</topic><topic>RNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Small RNA</topic><topic>Vibrio - genetics</topic><topic>Vibrio cholerae - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Geoffrey A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keener, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunter, Geoffrey A.M.</au><au>Keener, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanisms underlying the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><date>2014-01-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>340</volume><spage>38</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>38-49</pages><issn>0022-5193</issn><eissn>1095-8541</eissn><abstract>Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae regulate their virulence factors according to the local cell-population density in a regulatory system called quorum sensing. Their quorum sensing systems contain a small RNA (sRNA) circuit to regulate expression of a master transcriptional regulator via multiple quorum regulated RNA (Qrr) and a protein chaperon Hfq. Experiments and genetic analysis show that their respective quorum sensing networks are topologically equivalent and have homologous components, yet they respond differently to the same experimental conditions. In particular, V. harveyi Qrr are additive because all of its Qrr are required to maintain wild-type-like repression of its master transcriptional regulator. Conversely, V. cholerae Qrr are redundant because any of its Qrr is sufficient to repress its master transcriptional regulator. Given the striking similarities between their quorum sensing systems, experimentalists have been unable to identify conclusively the mechanisms behind these phenotypic differences. Nevertheless, the current hypothesis in the literature is that dosage compensation is the mechanism underlying redundancy.
In this work, we identify the mechanisms underlying Qrr redundancy using a detailed mathematical model of the V. harveyi and V. cholerae sRNA circuits. We show that there are exactly two different cases underlying Qrr redundancy and that dosage compensation is unnecessary and insufficient to explain Qrr redundancy. Although V. harveyi Qrr are additive when the perturbations in Qrr are large, we predict that V. harveyi and V. cholerae Qrr are redundant when the perturbations in Qrr are small. We argue that the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes can emerge from parametric differences in the sRNA circuit. In particular, we find that the affinity of Qrr and its expression relative to the master transcriptional regulator determine the level of redundancy in V. harveyi and V. cholerae. Furthermore, the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes reflect differences in the concentration of Hfq-Qrr in V. harveyi and V. cholerae. We use our model to test the dosage compensation hypothesis and show that decreasing the expression of qrr, rather than removing dosage compensation, abolishes Qrr redundancy in V. cholerae. Further experimentation is needed to test our results and both Qrr redundancy hypotheses.
•In general, there are two different criteria that cause Qrr redundancy.•Dosage compensation diminishes the more redundant the Qrr.•V. harveyi Qrr are redundant when Qrr perturbations are small.•Identical mechanisms underlie redundancy in V. harveyi and V. cholerae.•Additive and redundant phenotypes are caused by different levels of Hfq-Qrr.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24018202</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.08.034</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5193 |
ispartof | Journal of theoretical biology, 2014-01, Vol.340, p.38-49 |
issn | 0022-5193 1095-8541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1461875820 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Bacterial Proteins - genetics Dosage compensation Dosage Compensation, Genetic Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial Genes, Bacterial Host Factor 1 Protein - genetics Mathematical model Models, Theoretical Phenotype Quorum Sensing RNA, Bacterial - genetics Small RNA Vibrio - genetics Vibrio cholerae - genetics |
title | Mechanisms underlying the additive and redundant Qrr phenotypes in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A59%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanisms%20underlying%20the%20additive%20and%20redundant%20Qrr%20phenotypes%20in%20Vibrio%20harveyi%20and%20Vibrio%20cholerae&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20biology&rft.au=Hunter,%20Geoffrey%20A.M.&rft.date=2014-01-07&rft.volume=340&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=38-49&rft.issn=0022-5193&rft.eissn=1095-8541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.08.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1461875820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1461875820&rft_id=info:pmid/24018202&rft_els_id=S0022519313004086&rfr_iscdi=true |