Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background context Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common degenerative spine diseases. Surgical options are largely divided into decompression only and decompression with arthrodesis. Recent randomized trials showed that surgery was more effective than nonoperative treatment for c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2013-10, Vol.13 (10), p.1230-1237
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD, Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD, Park, Choon Seon, PhD, Choi, Boram, PhD, Hahn, Seokyung, PhD, Kim, Min Jung, MS, Lee, Kun Sei, MD, MPH, PhD, Park, Byung Joo, MD, MPH, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1237
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1230
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 13
creator Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD
Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD
Park, Choon Seon, PhD
Choi, Boram, PhD
Hahn, Seokyung, PhD
Kim, Min Jung, MS
Lee, Kun Sei, MD, MPH, PhD
Park, Byung Joo, MD, MPH, PhD
description Abstract Background context Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common degenerative spine diseases. Surgical options are largely divided into decompression only and decompression with arthrodesis. Recent randomized trials showed that surgery was more effective than nonoperative treatment for carefully selected patients with lumbar stenosis. However, some patients require reoperation because of complications, failure of bony fusion, persistent pain, or progressive degenerative changes, such as adjacent segment disease. In a previous population-based study, the 10-year reoperation rate was 17%, and fusion surgery was performed in 10% of patients. Recently, the lumbar fusion surgery rate has doubled, and a substantial portion of the reoperations are associated with a fusion procedure. With the change in surgical trends, the longitudinal surgical outcomes of these trends need to be reevaluated. Purpose To provide the longitudinal reoperation rate after surgery for spinal stenosis and to compare the reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. Study design/setting Retrospective cohort study using national health insurance data. Patient sample A cohort of patients who underwent initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003. Outcome measures The primary end point was any type of second lumbar surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to compare the adjusted reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. Methods A national health insurance database was used to identify a cohort of patients who underwent an initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003; a total of 11,027 patients were selected. Individual patients were followed for at least 5 years through their encrypted unique resident registration number. After adjusting for confounding factors, the reoperation rates for decompression and fusion surgery were compared. Results Fusion surgery was performed in 20% of patients. The cumulative reoperation rate was 4.7% at 3 months, 7.2% at 1 year, 9.4% at 2 years, 11.2% at 3 years, 12.5% at 4 years, and 14.2% at 5 years. The adjusted reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries (p=.82). The calculated reoperation rate was expected to be 22.9% at 10 years. Conclusions The reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries. With current surgical trends, the reoperation rate appeared to be higher than in t
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1459561354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943013007729</els_id><sourcerecordid>1459561354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-cd9588d160014c422daf425de76dc3a813afdce87054f405ca106674ce86b63f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQDaK46-o_EMnRS4-Vj053PAiy-AULgh_nkEmqnYyZzpikXfrfm3FWD16Eggovr96jXhHylMGGAVMv9ptyDDPihgMTG1Ct9D1yycZh7JgS_H5791x3Wgq4II9K2QPAODD-kFxwCWzQvb4k8ydMR8y2hjTT1pDaqWKmZcnfMK90SpnG5bC1DWp2NtJScU4lFHob6i4tteFp9mtMMZS6w_bzklo6_1a8DR6pS7uUG60ufn1MHkw2Fnxy16_I17dvvly_724-vvtw_fqmc3IUtXNe9-PomQJg0knOvZ0k7z0OyjthRybs5B2OA_RyktA7y0CpQTZIbZWYxBV5ftY95vRjwVLNIRSHMdoZ01IMk73uFRO9bFR5prqcSsk4mWMOB5tXw8CckjZ7c07anJI2oFrpNvbszmHZHtD_HfoTbSO8OhOw7fkzYDbFBZwd-pDRVeNT-J_DvwIuhjk4G7_jimWfltzu0XYxhRswn0_XPh2bCYBh4Fr8AkyWqPE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459561354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD ; Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD ; Park, Choon Seon, PhD ; Choi, Boram, PhD ; Hahn, Seokyung, PhD ; Kim, Min Jung, MS ; Lee, Kun Sei, MD, MPH, PhD ; Park, Byung Joo, MD, MPH, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD ; Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD ; Park, Choon Seon, PhD ; Choi, Boram, PhD ; Hahn, Seokyung, PhD ; Kim, Min Jung, MS ; Lee, Kun Sei, MD, MPH, PhD ; Park, Byung Joo, MD, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background context Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common degenerative spine diseases. Surgical options are largely divided into decompression only and decompression with arthrodesis. Recent randomized trials showed that surgery was more effective than nonoperative treatment for carefully selected patients with lumbar stenosis. However, some patients require reoperation because of complications, failure of bony fusion, persistent pain, or progressive degenerative changes, such as adjacent segment disease. In a previous population-based study, the 10-year reoperation rate was 17%, and fusion surgery was performed in 10% of patients. Recently, the lumbar fusion surgery rate has doubled, and a substantial portion of the reoperations are associated with a fusion procedure. With the change in surgical trends, the longitudinal surgical outcomes of these trends need to be reevaluated. Purpose To provide the longitudinal reoperation rate after surgery for spinal stenosis and to compare the reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. Study design/setting Retrospective cohort study using national health insurance data. Patient sample A cohort of patients who underwent initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003. Outcome measures The primary end point was any type of second lumbar surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to compare the adjusted reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. Methods A national health insurance database was used to identify a cohort of patients who underwent an initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003; a total of 11,027 patients were selected. Individual patients were followed for at least 5 years through their encrypted unique resident registration number. After adjusting for confounding factors, the reoperation rates for decompression and fusion surgery were compared. Results Fusion surgery was performed in 20% of patients. The cumulative reoperation rate was 4.7% at 3 months, 7.2% at 1 year, 9.4% at 2 years, 11.2% at 3 years, 12.5% at 4 years, and 14.2% at 5 years. The adjusted reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries (p=.82). The calculated reoperation rate was expected to be 22.9% at 10 years. Conclusions The reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries. With current surgical trends, the reoperation rate appeared to be higher than in the past, and consideration of this problem is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24017959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Decompression ; Decompression, Surgical ; Female ; Fusion ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Lumbar spine ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Reoperation rate ; Spinal Fusion ; Spinal Stenosis - surgery ; Spondylolisthesis ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2013-10, Vol.13 (10), p.1230-1237</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-cd9588d160014c422daf425de76dc3a813afdce87054f405ca106674ce86b63f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-cd9588d160014c422daf425de76dc3a813afdce87054f405ca106674ce86b63f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943013007729$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24017959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Choon Seon, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Boram, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Seokyung, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Jung, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kun Sei, MD, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Byung Joo, MD, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background context Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common degenerative spine diseases. Surgical options are largely divided into decompression only and decompression with arthrodesis. Recent randomized trials showed that surgery was more effective than nonoperative treatment for carefully selected patients with lumbar stenosis. However, some patients require reoperation because of complications, failure of bony fusion, persistent pain, or progressive degenerative changes, such as adjacent segment disease. In a previous population-based study, the 10-year reoperation rate was 17%, and fusion surgery was performed in 10% of patients. Recently, the lumbar fusion surgery rate has doubled, and a substantial portion of the reoperations are associated with a fusion procedure. With the change in surgical trends, the longitudinal surgical outcomes of these trends need to be reevaluated. Purpose To provide the longitudinal reoperation rate after surgery for spinal stenosis and to compare the reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. Study design/setting Retrospective cohort study using national health insurance data. Patient sample A cohort of patients who underwent initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003. Outcome measures The primary end point was any type of second lumbar surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to compare the adjusted reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. Methods A national health insurance database was used to identify a cohort of patients who underwent an initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003; a total of 11,027 patients were selected. Individual patients were followed for at least 5 years through their encrypted unique resident registration number. After adjusting for confounding factors, the reoperation rates for decompression and fusion surgery were compared. Results Fusion surgery was performed in 20% of patients. The cumulative reoperation rate was 4.7% at 3 months, 7.2% at 1 year, 9.4% at 2 years, 11.2% at 3 years, 12.5% at 4 years, and 14.2% at 5 years. The adjusted reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries (p=.82). The calculated reoperation rate was expected to be 22.9% at 10 years. Conclusions The reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries. With current surgical trends, the reoperation rate appeared to be higher than in the past, and consideration of this problem is required.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Decompression</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fusion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Lumbar spine</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Reoperation rate</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Spondylolisthesis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQDaK46-o_EMnRS4-Vj053PAiy-AULgh_nkEmqnYyZzpikXfrfm3FWD16Eggovr96jXhHylMGGAVMv9ptyDDPihgMTG1Ct9D1yycZh7JgS_H5791x3Wgq4II9K2QPAODD-kFxwCWzQvb4k8ydMR8y2hjTT1pDaqWKmZcnfMK90SpnG5bC1DWp2NtJScU4lFHob6i4tteFp9mtMMZS6w_bzklo6_1a8DR6pS7uUG60ufn1MHkw2Fnxy16_I17dvvly_724-vvtw_fqmc3IUtXNe9-PomQJg0knOvZ0k7z0OyjthRybs5B2OA_RyktA7y0CpQTZIbZWYxBV5ftY95vRjwVLNIRSHMdoZ01IMk73uFRO9bFR5prqcSsk4mWMOB5tXw8CckjZ7c07anJI2oFrpNvbszmHZHtD_HfoTbSO8OhOw7fkzYDbFBZwd-pDRVeNT-J_DvwIuhjk4G7_jimWfltzu0XYxhRswn0_XPh2bCYBh4Fr8AkyWqPE</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Park, Choon Seon, PhD</creator><creator>Choi, Boram, PhD</creator><creator>Hahn, Seokyung, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Min Jung, MS</creator><creator>Lee, Kun Sei, MD, MPH, PhD</creator><creator>Park, Byung Joo, MD, MPH, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study</title><author>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD ; Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD ; Park, Choon Seon, PhD ; Choi, Boram, PhD ; Hahn, Seokyung, PhD ; Kim, Min Jung, MS ; Lee, Kun Sei, MD, MPH, PhD ; Park, Byung Joo, MD, MPH, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-cd9588d160014c422daf425de76dc3a813afdce87054f405ca106674ce86b63f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Decompression</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fusion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Lumbar spine</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Reoperation rate</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Spondylolisthesis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Choon Seon, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Boram, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Seokyung, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Jung, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kun Sei, MD, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Byung Joo, MD, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Chi Heon, MD, PhD</au><au>Chung, Chun Kee, MD, PhD</au><au>Park, Choon Seon, PhD</au><au>Choi, Boram, PhD</au><au>Hahn, Seokyung, PhD</au><au>Kim, Min Jung, MS</au><au>Lee, Kun Sei, MD, MPH, PhD</au><au>Park, Byung Joo, MD, MPH, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1230</spage><epage>1237</epage><pages>1230-1237</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background context Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common degenerative spine diseases. Surgical options are largely divided into decompression only and decompression with arthrodesis. Recent randomized trials showed that surgery was more effective than nonoperative treatment for carefully selected patients with lumbar stenosis. However, some patients require reoperation because of complications, failure of bony fusion, persistent pain, or progressive degenerative changes, such as adjacent segment disease. In a previous population-based study, the 10-year reoperation rate was 17%, and fusion surgery was performed in 10% of patients. Recently, the lumbar fusion surgery rate has doubled, and a substantial portion of the reoperations are associated with a fusion procedure. With the change in surgical trends, the longitudinal surgical outcomes of these trends need to be reevaluated. Purpose To provide the longitudinal reoperation rate after surgery for spinal stenosis and to compare the reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. Study design/setting Retrospective cohort study using national health insurance data. Patient sample A cohort of patients who underwent initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003. Outcome measures The primary end point was any type of second lumbar surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to compare the adjusted reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. Methods A national health insurance database was used to identify a cohort of patients who underwent an initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003; a total of 11,027 patients were selected. Individual patients were followed for at least 5 years through their encrypted unique resident registration number. After adjusting for confounding factors, the reoperation rates for decompression and fusion surgery were compared. Results Fusion surgery was performed in 20% of patients. The cumulative reoperation rate was 4.7% at 3 months, 7.2% at 1 year, 9.4% at 2 years, 11.2% at 3 years, 12.5% at 4 years, and 14.2% at 5 years. The adjusted reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries (p=.82). The calculated reoperation rate was expected to be 22.9% at 10 years. Conclusions The reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries. With current surgical trends, the reoperation rate appeared to be higher than in the past, and consideration of this problem is required.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24017959</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2013-10, Vol.13 (10), p.1230-1237
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1459561354
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Cohort Studies
Decompression
Decompression, Surgical
Female
Fusion
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Lumbar spine
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Reoperation rate
Spinal Fusion
Spinal Stenosis - surgery
Spondylolisthesis
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A20%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reoperation%20rate%20after%20surgery%20for%20lumbar%20spinal%20stenosis%20without%20spondylolisthesis:%20a%20nationwide%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Kim,%20Chi%20Heon,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1230&rft.epage=1237&rft.pages=1230-1237&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1459561354%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459561354&rft_id=info:pmid/24017959&rft_els_id=S1529943013007729&rfr_iscdi=true