Rods in spinal surgery: a review of the literature
Abstract Background context Spinal instrumentation has been used for more than five decades. Since the introduction of the Harrington rod in 1962, new rod materials and concepts have been developed. Rigid rod fixation has achieved higher fusion rates than previous methods. Recently, semirigid rod fi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The spine journal 2013-10, Vol.13 (10), p.1350-1358 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1358 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1350 |
| container_title | The spine journal |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Yoshihara, Hiroyuki, MD, PhD |
| description | Abstract Background context Spinal instrumentation has been used for more than five decades. Since the introduction of the Harrington rod in 1962, new rod materials and concepts have been developed. Rigid rod fixation has achieved higher fusion rates than previous methods. Recently, semirigid rod fixation devices have been used for both dynamic stabilization and fusion fixation. Memory rods, which have an interesting ability to return to their pre-bent shape when the temperature increases, are expected to be used for scoliosis correction. Purpose To review the previous literature regarding biofunctionality and biocompatibility of rods in spinal surgery. Conclusion The properties of each type of rod need to be taken into consideration when performing spinal instrumentation surgery. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.022 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1459559532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943013004610</els_id><sourcerecordid>1459559532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-7df1d32a71c9bfc2863e44497b0bb2873f4660a77da7f4eae7e2983901aaede83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxEAMhgdRXF39ByI9emnNfGyn9SDI4hcsCH6ch-k01anddp1plf33TtnVgxchkBDevCFPCDmhkFCg6Xmd-JVtERMGlCcgEmBshxzQTGYxTTnbDfWM5XEuOEzIofc1AGSSsn0yYVxKHvoHhD12pY9sG41muon84F7RrS8iHTn8tPgVdVXUv2HU2B6d7geHR2Sv0o3H422ekpeb6-f5Xbx4uL2fXy1iIzLex7KsaMmZltTkRWVYlnIUQuSygKJgmeSVSFPQUpZaVgI1SmR5xnOgWmOJGZ-Ss43vynUfA_peLa032DS6xW7wiopZPgvBWZCKjdS4znuHlVo5u9RurSiokZaq1YaWGmkpECrQCmOn2w1DscTyd-gHTxBcbgQY7gw0nPLGYmuwtA5Nr8rO_rfhr4FpbGuNbt5xjb7uBheoh1uUZwrU0_ix8WGUA4iUAv8Gp-OQug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459559532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rods in spinal surgery: a review of the literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yoshihara, Hiroyuki, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoshihara, Hiroyuki, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background context Spinal instrumentation has been used for more than five decades. Since the introduction of the Harrington rod in 1962, new rod materials and concepts have been developed. Rigid rod fixation has achieved higher fusion rates than previous methods. Recently, semirigid rod fixation devices have been used for both dynamic stabilization and fusion fixation. Memory rods, which have an interesting ability to return to their pre-bent shape when the temperature increases, are expected to be used for scoliosis correction. Purpose To review the previous literature regarding biofunctionality and biocompatibility of rods in spinal surgery. Conclusion The properties of each type of rod need to be taken into consideration when performing spinal instrumentation surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23773430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Material ; Memory rod ; Orthopedic Fixation Devices ; Orthopedics ; Rigid rod ; Semirigid rod ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal instrumentation</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2013-10, Vol.13 (10), p.1350-1358</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-7df1d32a71c9bfc2863e44497b0bb2873f4660a77da7f4eae7e2983901aaede83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-7df1d32a71c9bfc2863e44497b0bb2873f4660a77da7f4eae7e2983901aaede83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773430$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoshihara, Hiroyuki, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Rods in spinal surgery: a review of the literature</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background context Spinal instrumentation has been used for more than five decades. Since the introduction of the Harrington rod in 1962, new rod materials and concepts have been developed. Rigid rod fixation has achieved higher fusion rates than previous methods. Recently, semirigid rod fixation devices have been used for both dynamic stabilization and fusion fixation. Memory rods, which have an interesting ability to return to their pre-bent shape when the temperature increases, are expected to be used for scoliosis correction. Purpose To review the previous literature regarding biofunctionality and biocompatibility of rods in spinal surgery. Conclusion The properties of each type of rod need to be taken into consideration when performing spinal instrumentation surgery.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Material</subject><subject>Memory rod</subject><subject>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Rigid rod</subject><subject>Semirigid rod</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal instrumentation</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxEAMhgdRXF39ByI9emnNfGyn9SDI4hcsCH6ch-k01anddp1plf33TtnVgxchkBDevCFPCDmhkFCg6Xmd-JVtERMGlCcgEmBshxzQTGYxTTnbDfWM5XEuOEzIofc1AGSSsn0yYVxKHvoHhD12pY9sG41muon84F7RrS8iHTn8tPgVdVXUv2HU2B6d7geHR2Sv0o3H422ekpeb6-f5Xbx4uL2fXy1iIzLex7KsaMmZltTkRWVYlnIUQuSygKJgmeSVSFPQUpZaVgI1SmR5xnOgWmOJGZ-Ss43vynUfA_peLa032DS6xW7wiopZPgvBWZCKjdS4znuHlVo5u9RurSiokZaq1YaWGmkpECrQCmOn2w1DscTyd-gHTxBcbgQY7gw0nPLGYmuwtA5Nr8rO_rfhr4FpbGuNbt5xjb7uBheoh1uUZwrU0_ix8WGUA4iUAv8Gp-OQug</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Yoshihara, Hiroyuki, MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Rods in spinal surgery: a review of the literature</title><author>Yoshihara, Hiroyuki, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-7df1d32a71c9bfc2863e44497b0bb2873f4660a77da7f4eae7e2983901aaede83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Material</topic><topic>Memory rod</topic><topic>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Rigid rod</topic><topic>Semirigid rod</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoshihara, Hiroyuki, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoshihara, Hiroyuki, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rods in spinal surgery: a review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1350</spage><epage>1358</epage><pages>1350-1358</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background context Spinal instrumentation has been used for more than five decades. Since the introduction of the Harrington rod in 1962, new rod materials and concepts have been developed. Rigid rod fixation has achieved higher fusion rates than previous methods. Recently, semirigid rod fixation devices have been used for both dynamic stabilization and fusion fixation. Memory rods, which have an interesting ability to return to their pre-bent shape when the temperature increases, are expected to be used for scoliosis correction. Purpose To review the previous literature regarding biofunctionality and biocompatibility of rods in spinal surgery. Conclusion The properties of each type of rod need to be taken into consideration when performing spinal instrumentation surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23773430</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1529-9430 |
| ispartof | The spine journal, 2013-10, Vol.13 (10), p.1350-1358 |
| issn | 1529-9430 1878-1632 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1459559532 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Humans Material Memory rod Orthopedic Fixation Devices Orthopedics Rigid rod Semirigid rod Spinal Fusion - instrumentation Spinal instrumentation |
| title | Rods in spinal surgery: a review of the literature |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T05%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rods%20in%20spinal%20surgery:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Yoshihara,%20Hiroyuki,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1350&rft.epage=1358&rft.pages=1350-1358&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1459559532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459559532&rft_id=info:pmid/23773430&rft_els_id=S1529943013004610&rfr_iscdi=true |