Ultrastructure of enamel and dentine in extant dolphins (Cetacea: Delphinoidea and Inioidea)

Longitudinal and cross sections of teeth from 17 species of the Recent dolphins (Delphinoidea and Inioidea) were examined under scanning electron microscope to study the arrangement and ultrastructure of dental tissues with reference to phylogenetic and functional constraints. For most species, enam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zoomorphology 2013-06, Vol.132 (2), p.215-225
Hauptverfasser: Loch, Carolina, Duncan, Warwick, Simões-Lopes, Paulo C., Kieser, Jules A., Fordyce, R. Ewan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 2
container_start_page 215
container_title Zoomorphology
container_volume 132
creator Loch, Carolina
Duncan, Warwick
Simões-Lopes, Paulo C.
Kieser, Jules A.
Fordyce, R. Ewan
description Longitudinal and cross sections of teeth from 17 species of the Recent dolphins (Delphinoidea and Inioidea) were examined under scanning electron microscope to study the arrangement and ultrastructure of dental tissues with reference to phylogenetic and functional constraints. For most species, enamel had a simple bi-layered structure of radial enamel and an outer layer of prismless enamel. The outer prismless layer varied from 5 to 30 % of enamel thickness. The enamel of Burmeister’s porpoise ( Phocoena spinipinnis ) was entirely prismless. The prisms had an open sheath; tubules and tuft-like structures were common at the enamel-dentine junction. Cetacean dentine was characterized by irregularly distributed dentinal tubules in a relatively homogenous dentinal matrix. Radial enamel was observed in all Delphinoidea and in the franciscana ( Pontoporia blainvillei ), whereas the Amazon river dolphin ( Inia geoffrensis ) had prisms organized in Hunter–Schreger bands. HSB in enamel are regarded as a device for resisting propagation of cracks. These may occur due to increased functional demands, possibly related to the hardness of the species diet. Simplification in tooth shape and reduced biomechanical demands plausibly explain the primitive radial organization among delphinoids and Pontoporia . The HSB structure in the Amazon river dolphin, similar to those of extinct archaeocetes, seems to have secondary functional implications. However, the distribution of HSB in more-basal odontocetes is too poorly known to judge whether the HSB of Inia are a retained plesiomorphic feature or convergence.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00435-012-0180-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1458545426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1458545426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-15ea403ccd6804651fe9c468fc554ebfe62525a4668107353dcad5da7d9742953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8BL3qoZvLV1pusn7DgRcGDEGIy1Uo3XZMU9N_b3RUEwcMQJjzvy_AQcgjsFBgrzxJjUqiCAR-nYgVskQlIwQsu5NM2mbCSs4KDeNoleym9MwZSSzEhz49djjblOLg8RKR9QzHYBXbUBk89htwGpG2g-JltyNT33fKtDYkezzBbh_acXuL6q2892nXqLrTr5WSf7DS2S3jw807J4_XVw-y2mN_f3M0u5oUTss4FKLSSCee8rpjUChqsndRV45SS-NKg5oorK7WugJVCCe-sV96Wvi4lr5WYkuNN7zL2HwOmbBZtcth1NmA_JANSVUoqyfWIHv1B3_shhvE6w7kGBVWlVoWwoVzsU4rYmGVsFzZ-GWBm5dtsfJvRt1n5NjBm-CaTRja8Yvxt_j_0DeppgZ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261518855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrastructure of enamel and dentine in extant dolphins (Cetacea: Delphinoidea and Inioidea)</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Loch, Carolina ; Duncan, Warwick ; Simões-Lopes, Paulo C. ; Kieser, Jules A. ; Fordyce, R. Ewan</creator><creatorcontrib>Loch, Carolina ; Duncan, Warwick ; Simões-Lopes, Paulo C. ; Kieser, Jules A. ; Fordyce, R. Ewan</creatorcontrib><description>Longitudinal and cross sections of teeth from 17 species of the Recent dolphins (Delphinoidea and Inioidea) were examined under scanning electron microscope to study the arrangement and ultrastructure of dental tissues with reference to phylogenetic and functional constraints. For most species, enamel had a simple bi-layered structure of radial enamel and an outer layer of prismless enamel. The outer prismless layer varied from 5 to 30 % of enamel thickness. The enamel of Burmeister’s porpoise ( Phocoena spinipinnis ) was entirely prismless. The prisms had an open sheath; tubules and tuft-like structures were common at the enamel-dentine junction. Cetacean dentine was characterized by irregularly distributed dentinal tubules in a relatively homogenous dentinal matrix. Radial enamel was observed in all Delphinoidea and in the franciscana ( Pontoporia blainvillei ), whereas the Amazon river dolphin ( Inia geoffrensis ) had prisms organized in Hunter–Schreger bands. HSB in enamel are regarded as a device for resisting propagation of cracks. These may occur due to increased functional demands, possibly related to the hardness of the species diet. Simplification in tooth shape and reduced biomechanical demands plausibly explain the primitive radial organization among delphinoids and Pontoporia . The HSB structure in the Amazon river dolphin, similar to those of extinct archaeocetes, seems to have secondary functional implications. However, the distribution of HSB in more-basal odontocetes is too poorly known to judge whether the HSB of Inia are a retained plesiomorphic feature or convergence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-213X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-234X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00435-012-0180-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Aquatic mammals ; Archaeocetes ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cetacea ; Delphinoidea ; Dental enamel ; Developmental Biology ; Enamel ; Evolutionary Biology ; Freshwater mammals ; Histology ; Inia ; Inia geoffrensis ; Life Sciences ; Marine ; Marine mammals ; Morphology ; Odontoceti ; Organizations ; Original Paper ; Phocoena spinipinnis ; Phylogeny ; Pontoporia ; Pontoporia blainvillei ; Rivers ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Species ; Teeth ; Tissue ; Tubules ; Ultrastructure ; Water hardness</subject><ispartof>Zoomorphology, 2013-06, Vol.132 (2), p.215-225</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><rights>Zoomorphology is a copyright of Springer, (2012). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-15ea403ccd6804651fe9c468fc554ebfe62525a4668107353dcad5da7d9742953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-15ea403ccd6804651fe9c468fc554ebfe62525a4668107353dcad5da7d9742953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00435-012-0180-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00435-012-0180-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loch, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Warwick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões-Lopes, Paulo C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieser, Jules A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fordyce, R. Ewan</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrastructure of enamel and dentine in extant dolphins (Cetacea: Delphinoidea and Inioidea)</title><title>Zoomorphology</title><addtitle>Zoomorphology</addtitle><description>Longitudinal and cross sections of teeth from 17 species of the Recent dolphins (Delphinoidea and Inioidea) were examined under scanning electron microscope to study the arrangement and ultrastructure of dental tissues with reference to phylogenetic and functional constraints. For most species, enamel had a simple bi-layered structure of radial enamel and an outer layer of prismless enamel. The outer prismless layer varied from 5 to 30 % of enamel thickness. The enamel of Burmeister’s porpoise ( Phocoena spinipinnis ) was entirely prismless. The prisms had an open sheath; tubules and tuft-like structures were common at the enamel-dentine junction. Cetacean dentine was characterized by irregularly distributed dentinal tubules in a relatively homogenous dentinal matrix. Radial enamel was observed in all Delphinoidea and in the franciscana ( Pontoporia blainvillei ), whereas the Amazon river dolphin ( Inia geoffrensis ) had prisms organized in Hunter–Schreger bands. HSB in enamel are regarded as a device for resisting propagation of cracks. These may occur due to increased functional demands, possibly related to the hardness of the species diet. Simplification in tooth shape and reduced biomechanical demands plausibly explain the primitive radial organization among delphinoids and Pontoporia . The HSB structure in the Amazon river dolphin, similar to those of extinct archaeocetes, seems to have secondary functional implications. However, the distribution of HSB in more-basal odontocetes is too poorly known to judge whether the HSB of Inia are a retained plesiomorphic feature or convergence.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Archaeocetes</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cetacea</subject><subject>Delphinoidea</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Freshwater mammals</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Inia</subject><subject>Inia geoffrensis</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Odontoceti</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phocoena spinipinnis</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Pontoporia</subject><subject>Pontoporia blainvillei</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Tissue</subject><subject>Tubules</subject><subject>Ultrastructure</subject><subject>Water hardness</subject><issn>0720-213X</issn><issn>1432-234X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8BL3qoZvLV1pusn7DgRcGDEGIy1Uo3XZMU9N_b3RUEwcMQJjzvy_AQcgjsFBgrzxJjUqiCAR-nYgVskQlIwQsu5NM2mbCSs4KDeNoleym9MwZSSzEhz49djjblOLg8RKR9QzHYBXbUBk89htwGpG2g-JltyNT33fKtDYkezzBbh_acXuL6q2892nXqLrTr5WSf7DS2S3jw807J4_XVw-y2mN_f3M0u5oUTss4FKLSSCee8rpjUChqsndRV45SS-NKg5oorK7WugJVCCe-sV96Wvi4lr5WYkuNN7zL2HwOmbBZtcth1NmA_JANSVUoqyfWIHv1B3_shhvE6w7kGBVWlVoWwoVzsU4rYmGVsFzZ-GWBm5dtsfJvRt1n5NjBm-CaTRja8Yvxt_j_0DeppgZ8</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Loch, Carolina</creator><creator>Duncan, Warwick</creator><creator>Simões-Lopes, Paulo C.</creator><creator>Kieser, Jules A.</creator><creator>Fordyce, R. Ewan</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Ultrastructure of enamel and dentine in extant dolphins (Cetacea: Delphinoidea and Inioidea)</title><author>Loch, Carolina ; Duncan, Warwick ; Simões-Lopes, Paulo C. ; Kieser, Jules A. ; Fordyce, R. Ewan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-15ea403ccd6804651fe9c468fc554ebfe62525a4668107353dcad5da7d9742953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Archaeocetes</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cetacea</topic><topic>Delphinoidea</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Freshwater mammals</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Inia</topic><topic>Inia geoffrensis</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Odontoceti</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phocoena spinipinnis</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Pontoporia</topic><topic>Pontoporia blainvillei</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Tissue</topic><topic>Tubules</topic><topic>Ultrastructure</topic><topic>Water hardness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loch, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Warwick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões-Lopes, Paulo C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieser, Jules A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fordyce, R. Ewan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loch, Carolina</au><au>Duncan, Warwick</au><au>Simões-Lopes, Paulo C.</au><au>Kieser, Jules A.</au><au>Fordyce, R. Ewan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrastructure of enamel and dentine in extant dolphins (Cetacea: Delphinoidea and Inioidea)</atitle><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle><stitle>Zoomorphology</stitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>215-225</pages><issn>0720-213X</issn><eissn>1432-234X</eissn><abstract>Longitudinal and cross sections of teeth from 17 species of the Recent dolphins (Delphinoidea and Inioidea) were examined under scanning electron microscope to study the arrangement and ultrastructure of dental tissues with reference to phylogenetic and functional constraints. For most species, enamel had a simple bi-layered structure of radial enamel and an outer layer of prismless enamel. The outer prismless layer varied from 5 to 30 % of enamel thickness. The enamel of Burmeister’s porpoise ( Phocoena spinipinnis ) was entirely prismless. The prisms had an open sheath; tubules and tuft-like structures were common at the enamel-dentine junction. Cetacean dentine was characterized by irregularly distributed dentinal tubules in a relatively homogenous dentinal matrix. Radial enamel was observed in all Delphinoidea and in the franciscana ( Pontoporia blainvillei ), whereas the Amazon river dolphin ( Inia geoffrensis ) had prisms organized in Hunter–Schreger bands. HSB in enamel are regarded as a device for resisting propagation of cracks. These may occur due to increased functional demands, possibly related to the hardness of the species diet. Simplification in tooth shape and reduced biomechanical demands plausibly explain the primitive radial organization among delphinoids and Pontoporia . The HSB structure in the Amazon river dolphin, similar to those of extinct archaeocetes, seems to have secondary functional implications. However, the distribution of HSB in more-basal odontocetes is too poorly known to judge whether the HSB of Inia are a retained plesiomorphic feature or convergence.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00435-012-0180-1</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-213X
ispartof Zoomorphology, 2013-06, Vol.132 (2), p.215-225
issn 0720-213X
1432-234X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1458545426
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animal Anatomy
Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
Aquatic mammals
Archaeocetes
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cetacea
Delphinoidea
Dental enamel
Developmental Biology
Enamel
Evolutionary Biology
Freshwater mammals
Histology
Inia
Inia geoffrensis
Life Sciences
Marine
Marine mammals
Morphology
Odontoceti
Organizations
Original Paper
Phocoena spinipinnis
Phylogeny
Pontoporia
Pontoporia blainvillei
Rivers
Scanning electron microscopy
Species
Teeth
Tissue
Tubules
Ultrastructure
Water hardness
title Ultrastructure of enamel and dentine in extant dolphins (Cetacea: Delphinoidea and Inioidea)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A38%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrastructure%20of%20enamel%20and%20dentine%20in%20extant%20dolphins%20(Cetacea:%20Delphinoidea%20and%20Inioidea)&rft.jtitle=Zoomorphology&rft.au=Loch,%20Carolina&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=215-225&rft.issn=0720-213X&rft.eissn=1432-234X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00435-012-0180-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1458545426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261518855&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true