Validation of the Volumetric Measurement of a Simulated Maxillary Alveolar Bone Defect Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Objective To determine the accuracy of volumetric measurement of a simulated alveolar bone defect using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Design Laboratory-based observational study. Setting University dental teaching hospital. Methods Scans of a dried skull with an artificially created ma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2013-11, Vol.50 (6), p.115-120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 120 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Kasaven, C.P. Ivekovic, S. McIntyre, G.T. Gillgrass, T. Thomson, D.A. Menhinick, A. Mossey, P.A. |
description | Objective
To determine the accuracy of volumetric measurement of a simulated alveolar bone defect using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
Design
Laboratory-based observational study.
Setting
University dental teaching hospital.
Methods
Scans of a dried skull with an artificially created maxillary bone defect.
Main Outcome Measures
The skull was scanned using an i-CAT CBCT scanner (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) at 0.2 mm resolution. The superior and inferior aspects of the void were identified, and the volume was calculated by three-dimensional (3D) computational analysis of the CBCT scan using an algorithm created with MATLAB software (The Mathworks Inc., R2009a, Natick, MA). The skull was then scanned using micro computed tomography (micro-CT) at 0.0934 mm resolution, and the volume of the defect was determined using the Studio Max 2.2 program (Volume Graphics, 2012, Heidelberg, Germany). The process was repeated two additional times, and the volumes were compared using a two-sample t test (P < .05). To determine the interobserver reproducibility of the identification of the superior and inferior aspects of the defect, the slices chosen to represent these extremities were selected by four separate observers and the data assessed using an F-test (P < .05).
Results
The interobserver reproducibility of the identification of the superior and inferior boundaries of the defect was good (P = .18). The volumes computed from the i-CAT CBCT images were 4.11% lower than those computed from the micro-CT images; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .71).
Conclusions
3D volumetric measurement of simulated alveolar bone defects using i-CAT CBCT scans is similar to the volumes determined using micro-CT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1597/12-161 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1458513192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1597_12-161</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1458513192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-d14a5b5f4ac6ae778a1c1d7c2ab6dc50c0cbfc3d3f9caa59f4e2493fe52b295e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1v1TAMhiMEYmPAT0CRkCZuOuqkbk4vt8PHJm3igm23lZs6Z52a5pC0iPHrydEGA678yn782rKFeA3lEWBj3oMqoIYnYh-wwgKwbp5mXSIWdY31nniR0m1ZKgS1ei72lAY0aMy--HlN49DTPIRJBifnG5bXYVw8z3Gw8oIpLZE9T_OuSvLr4JeRZu7lBf0YxpHinTwev3PISp6EieUHdmxneZWGaSPXOVOcMPms_HbZ9V0GHzaRtjd3L8UzR2PiVw_xQFx9-ni5Pi3Ov3w-Wx-fF1ZrnIseKsIOXUW2JjZmRWChN1ZRV_cWS1vazlnda9dYImxcxapqtGNUnWqQ9YF4d--7jeHbwmlu_ZAs5-UnDktqocIVgoZGZfTtf-htWOKUt8tUbVBrA02mDu8pG0NKkV27jYPPp2ihbHffaEG1-RsZfPNgt3Se-z_Y7_M_zku04b9m_WvzC53ckEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1467533719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Volumetric Measurement of a Simulated Maxillary Alveolar Bone Defect Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kasaven, C.P. ; Ivekovic, S. ; McIntyre, G.T. ; Gillgrass, T. ; Thomson, D.A. ; Menhinick, A. ; Mossey, P.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kasaven, C.P. ; Ivekovic, S. ; McIntyre, G.T. ; Gillgrass, T. ; Thomson, D.A. ; Menhinick, A. ; Mossey, P.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To determine the accuracy of volumetric measurement of a simulated alveolar bone defect using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
Design
Laboratory-based observational study.
Setting
University dental teaching hospital.
Methods
Scans of a dried skull with an artificially created maxillary bone defect.
Main Outcome Measures
The skull was scanned using an i-CAT CBCT scanner (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) at 0.2 mm resolution. The superior and inferior aspects of the void were identified, and the volume was calculated by three-dimensional (3D) computational analysis of the CBCT scan using an algorithm created with MATLAB software (The Mathworks Inc., R2009a, Natick, MA). The skull was then scanned using micro computed tomography (micro-CT) at 0.0934 mm resolution, and the volume of the defect was determined using the Studio Max 2.2 program (Volume Graphics, 2012, Heidelberg, Germany). The process was repeated two additional times, and the volumes were compared using a two-sample t test (P < .05). To determine the interobserver reproducibility of the identification of the superior and inferior aspects of the defect, the slices chosen to represent these extremities were selected by four separate observers and the data assessed using an F-test (P < .05).
Results
The interobserver reproducibility of the identification of the superior and inferior boundaries of the defect was good (P = .18). The volumes computed from the i-CAT CBCT images were 4.11% lower than those computed from the micro-CT images; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .71).
Conclusions
3D volumetric measurement of simulated alveolar bone defects using i-CAT CBCT scans is similar to the volumes determined using micro-CT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-6656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1597/12-161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23157577</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPJOEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bones ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Deformities ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Measurement ; Reproducibility of Results ; Three dimensional imaging ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2013-11, Vol.50 (6), p.115-120</ispartof><rights>2013 American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. All rights reserved</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-d14a5b5f4ac6ae778a1c1d7c2ab6dc50c0cbfc3d3f9caa59f4e2493fe52b295e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-d14a5b5f4ac6ae778a1c1d7c2ab6dc50c0cbfc3d3f9caa59f4e2493fe52b295e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1597/12-161$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1597/12-161$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23157577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kasaven, C.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivekovic, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, G.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillgrass, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menhinick, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossey, P.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Volumetric Measurement of a Simulated Maxillary Alveolar Bone Defect Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</title><title>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</title><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><description>Objective
To determine the accuracy of volumetric measurement of a simulated alveolar bone defect using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
Design
Laboratory-based observational study.
Setting
University dental teaching hospital.
Methods
Scans of a dried skull with an artificially created maxillary bone defect.
Main Outcome Measures
The skull was scanned using an i-CAT CBCT scanner (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) at 0.2 mm resolution. The superior and inferior aspects of the void were identified, and the volume was calculated by three-dimensional (3D) computational analysis of the CBCT scan using an algorithm created with MATLAB software (The Mathworks Inc., R2009a, Natick, MA). The skull was then scanned using micro computed tomography (micro-CT) at 0.0934 mm resolution, and the volume of the defect was determined using the Studio Max 2.2 program (Volume Graphics, 2012, Heidelberg, Germany). The process was repeated two additional times, and the volumes were compared using a two-sample t test (P < .05). To determine the interobserver reproducibility of the identification of the superior and inferior aspects of the defect, the slices chosen to represent these extremities were selected by four separate observers and the data assessed using an F-test (P < .05).
Results
The interobserver reproducibility of the identification of the superior and inferior boundaries of the defect was good (P = .18). The volumes computed from the i-CAT CBCT images were 4.11% lower than those computed from the micro-CT images; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .71).
Conclusions
3D volumetric measurement of simulated alveolar bone defects using i-CAT CBCT scans is similar to the volumes determined using micro-CT.</description><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Deformities</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Three dimensional imaging</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>1055-6656</issn><issn>1545-1569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1v1TAMhiMEYmPAT0CRkCZuOuqkbk4vt8PHJm3igm23lZs6Z52a5pC0iPHrydEGA678yn782rKFeA3lEWBj3oMqoIYnYh-wwgKwbp5mXSIWdY31nniR0m1ZKgS1ei72lAY0aMy--HlN49DTPIRJBifnG5bXYVw8z3Gw8oIpLZE9T_OuSvLr4JeRZu7lBf0YxpHinTwev3PISp6EieUHdmxneZWGaSPXOVOcMPms_HbZ9V0GHzaRtjd3L8UzR2PiVw_xQFx9-ni5Pi3Ov3w-Wx-fF1ZrnIseKsIOXUW2JjZmRWChN1ZRV_cWS1vazlnda9dYImxcxapqtGNUnWqQ9YF4d--7jeHbwmlu_ZAs5-UnDktqocIVgoZGZfTtf-htWOKUt8tUbVBrA02mDu8pG0NKkV27jYPPp2ihbHffaEG1-RsZfPNgt3Se-z_Y7_M_zku04b9m_WvzC53ckEo</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Kasaven, C.P.</creator><creator>Ivekovic, S.</creator><creator>McIntyre, G.T.</creator><creator>Gillgrass, T.</creator><creator>Thomson, D.A.</creator><creator>Menhinick, A.</creator><creator>Mossey, P.A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Validation of the Volumetric Measurement of a Simulated Maxillary Alveolar Bone Defect Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</title><author>Kasaven, C.P. ; Ivekovic, S. ; McIntyre, G.T. ; Gillgrass, T. ; Thomson, D.A. ; Menhinick, A. ; Mossey, P.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-d14a5b5f4ac6ae778a1c1d7c2ab6dc50c0cbfc3d3f9caa59f4e2493fe52b295e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Deformities</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Three dimensional imaging</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kasaven, C.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivekovic, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, G.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillgrass, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menhinick, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossey, P.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kasaven, C.P.</au><au>Ivekovic, S.</au><au>McIntyre, G.T.</au><au>Gillgrass, T.</au><au>Thomson, D.A.</au><au>Menhinick, A.</au><au>Mossey, P.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Volumetric Measurement of a Simulated Maxillary Alveolar Bone Defect Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</atitle><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>115-120</pages><issn>1055-6656</issn><eissn>1545-1569</eissn><coden>CPJOEG</coden><abstract>Objective
To determine the accuracy of volumetric measurement of a simulated alveolar bone defect using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
Design
Laboratory-based observational study.
Setting
University dental teaching hospital.
Methods
Scans of a dried skull with an artificially created maxillary bone defect.
Main Outcome Measures
The skull was scanned using an i-CAT CBCT scanner (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) at 0.2 mm resolution. The superior and inferior aspects of the void were identified, and the volume was calculated by three-dimensional (3D) computational analysis of the CBCT scan using an algorithm created with MATLAB software (The Mathworks Inc., R2009a, Natick, MA). The skull was then scanned using micro computed tomography (micro-CT) at 0.0934 mm resolution, and the volume of the defect was determined using the Studio Max 2.2 program (Volume Graphics, 2012, Heidelberg, Germany). The process was repeated two additional times, and the volumes were compared using a two-sample t test (P < .05). To determine the interobserver reproducibility of the identification of the superior and inferior aspects of the defect, the slices chosen to represent these extremities were selected by four separate observers and the data assessed using an F-test (P < .05).
Results
The interobserver reproducibility of the identification of the superior and inferior boundaries of the defect was good (P = .18). The volumes computed from the i-CAT CBCT images were 4.11% lower than those computed from the micro-CT images; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .71).
Conclusions
3D volumetric measurement of simulated alveolar bone defects using i-CAT CBCT scans is similar to the volumes determined using micro-CT.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23157577</pmid><doi>10.1597/12-161</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-6656 |
ispartof | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2013-11, Vol.50 (6), p.115-120 |
issn | 1055-6656 1545-1569 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1458513192 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Bones Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Deformities Dentistry Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Imaging, Three-Dimensional Maxilla - diagnostic imaging Measurement Reproducibility of Results Three dimensional imaging X-Ray Microtomography |
title | Validation of the Volumetric Measurement of a Simulated Maxillary Alveolar Bone Defect Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T15%3A03%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Volumetric%20Measurement%20of%20a%20Simulated%20Maxillary%20Alveolar%20Bone%20Defect%20Using%20Cone-Beam%20Computed%20Tomography&rft.jtitle=The%20Cleft%20palate-craniofacial%20journal&rft.au=Kasaven,%20C.P.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=115-120&rft.issn=1055-6656&rft.eissn=1545-1569&rft.coden=CPJOEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1597/12-161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1458513192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1467533719&rft_id=info:pmid/23157577&rft_sage_id=10.1597_12-161&rfr_iscdi=true |