Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access

Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2013-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1646-1652
Hauptverfasser: Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD, Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD, da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD, Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD, Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1652
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1646
container_title Heart rhythm
container_volume 10
creator Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD
Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD
da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD
Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD
Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS
description Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access. Methods Between June 2006 and November 2011, 15 patients underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation. Procedures were performed through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and pericardial window with subsequent fluoroscopy-assisted lead placement. Mean patient age was 46.4 ± 15.3 years (9 male [(60.0%], 6 female [40.0%]). The new surgical approach was used in patients determined to have limited venous access due to multiple abandoned leads in 5 (33.3%), venous occlusion in 3 (20.0%), intravascular retention of lead fragments from prior extraction in 3 (20.0%), tricuspid valve vegetation currently under treatment in 2 (13.3%), and unrepaired intracardiac defects in 2 (13.3%). Results All procedures were successful with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time for isolated pacemaker implantation was 231.7 ± 33.5 minutes. Lead placement on the superior aspect of right atrium, through the transverse sinus, was possible in 12 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, the atrial lead was implanted on the left atrium through the oblique sinus, the postcaval recess, or the left pulmonary vein recess. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 36.8 ± 25.1 months. Conclusion Epicardial pacemaker implantation through pericardial reflections is an effective alternative therapy for those patients requiring physiologic pacing in whom venous access is limited.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1450177320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1547527113008400</els_id><sourcerecordid>1450177320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6f1f4e59e3686e7748e74e8ead9d4d8407e1388127a2757b071e9f0b9e4efb083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTlv3DAQhYkgQXwkvyBAwDKN5OEhkSoSIDB8AUZS2G7SEFxqhOVal0nuGv73prKOCzephsC8x5n5HiFfGJQMWH2yKdchrYeSAxMl6BKAvyOHrKrqQmjF3i9vqYqKK3ZAjmLcZEFTg_hIDrhoOIBSh-TPr2mHPbXzHCbr1jRNFGfvbGi97elsHQ72HgP1w9zbMdnkp5H6MXeSxzFF-ujTmvZ-8AlbusNx2kZqncMYP5EPne0jfn6px-Tu_Oz29LK4_n1xdfrzunCSyVTUHeskVg2KWteolNSoJGq0bdPKVktQyITWjCvLVaVWoBg2HawalNitQItj8m3_bz7hYYsxmcFHh33eF_M2hskKmFKCQ5aKvdSFKcaAnZmDH2x4MgzMAtVszF-oZoFqQJvMLLu-vgzYrgZsXz3_KGbB970A85k7j8FEl-k4bH1Al0w7-f8M-PHG73o_5hT6e3zCuJm2YcwEDTORGzA3S65LrEwAZEAgngE4k57U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1450177320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD ; Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD ; da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD ; Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD ; Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creator><creatorcontrib>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD ; Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD ; da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD ; Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD ; Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><description>Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access. Methods Between June 2006 and November 2011, 15 patients underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation. Procedures were performed through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and pericardial window with subsequent fluoroscopy-assisted lead placement. Mean patient age was 46.4 ± 15.3 years (9 male [(60.0%], 6 female [40.0%]). The new surgical approach was used in patients determined to have limited venous access due to multiple abandoned leads in 5 (33.3%), venous occlusion in 3 (20.0%), intravascular retention of lead fragments from prior extraction in 3 (20.0%), tricuspid valve vegetation currently under treatment in 2 (13.3%), and unrepaired intracardiac defects in 2 (13.3%). Results All procedures were successful with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time for isolated pacemaker implantation was 231.7 ± 33.5 minutes. Lead placement on the superior aspect of right atrium, through the transverse sinus, was possible in 12 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, the atrial lead was implanted on the left atrium through the oblique sinus, the postcaval recess, or the left pulmonary vein recess. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 36.8 ± 25.1 months. Conclusion Epicardial pacemaker implantation through pericardial reflections is an effective alternative therapy for those patients requiring physiologic pacing in whom venous access is limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23920077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Artificial pacemaker ; Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis ; Atrioventricular Block - physiopathology ; Atrioventricular Block - therapy ; Cardiovascular ; Central venous occlusion ; Echocardiography ; Electrocardiography ; Endocarditis ; Epicardial lead ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Implanted electrodes ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Pericardial reflections ; Pericardium ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke Volume ; Subxiphoid ; Surgical procedures ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2013-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1646-1652</ispartof><rights>Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>2013 Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>2013 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6f1f4e59e3686e7748e74e8ead9d4d8407e1388127a2757b071e9f0b9e4efb083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6f1f4e59e3686e7748e74e8ead9d4d8407e1388127a2757b071e9f0b9e4efb083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23920077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><title>Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><description>Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access. Methods Between June 2006 and November 2011, 15 patients underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation. Procedures were performed through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and pericardial window with subsequent fluoroscopy-assisted lead placement. Mean patient age was 46.4 ± 15.3 years (9 male [(60.0%], 6 female [40.0%]). The new surgical approach was used in patients determined to have limited venous access due to multiple abandoned leads in 5 (33.3%), venous occlusion in 3 (20.0%), intravascular retention of lead fragments from prior extraction in 3 (20.0%), tricuspid valve vegetation currently under treatment in 2 (13.3%), and unrepaired intracardiac defects in 2 (13.3%). Results All procedures were successful with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time for isolated pacemaker implantation was 231.7 ± 33.5 minutes. Lead placement on the superior aspect of right atrium, through the transverse sinus, was possible in 12 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, the atrial lead was implanted on the left atrium through the oblique sinus, the postcaval recess, or the left pulmonary vein recess. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 36.8 ± 25.1 months. Conclusion Epicardial pacemaker implantation through pericardial reflections is an effective alternative therapy for those patients requiring physiologic pacing in whom venous access is limited.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Artificial pacemaker</subject><subject>Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrioventricular Block - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrioventricular Block - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Central venous occlusion</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Endocarditis</subject><subject>Epicardial lead</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implanted electrodes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Pericardial reflections</subject><subject>Pericardium</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Subxiphoid</subject><subject>Surgical procedures</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTlv3DAQhYkgQXwkvyBAwDKN5OEhkSoSIDB8AUZS2G7SEFxqhOVal0nuGv73prKOCzephsC8x5n5HiFfGJQMWH2yKdchrYeSAxMl6BKAvyOHrKrqQmjF3i9vqYqKK3ZAjmLcZEFTg_hIDrhoOIBSh-TPr2mHPbXzHCbr1jRNFGfvbGi97elsHQ72HgP1w9zbMdnkp5H6MXeSxzFF-ujTmvZ-8AlbusNx2kZqncMYP5EPne0jfn6px-Tu_Oz29LK4_n1xdfrzunCSyVTUHeskVg2KWteolNSoJGq0bdPKVktQyITWjCvLVaVWoBg2HawalNitQItj8m3_bz7hYYsxmcFHh33eF_M2hskKmFKCQ5aKvdSFKcaAnZmDH2x4MgzMAtVszF-oZoFqQJvMLLu-vgzYrgZsXz3_KGbB970A85k7j8FEl-k4bH1Al0w7-f8M-PHG73o_5hT6e3zCuJm2YcwEDTORGzA3S65LrEwAZEAgngE4k57U</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD</creator><creator>da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD</creator><creator>Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access</title><author>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD ; Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD ; da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD ; Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD ; Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6f1f4e59e3686e7748e74e8ead9d4d8407e1388127a2757b071e9f0b9e4efb083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Artificial pacemaker</topic><topic>Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrioventricular Block - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrioventricular Block - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Central venous occlusion</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Endocarditis</topic><topic>Epicardial lead</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implanted electrodes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Pericardial reflections</topic><topic>Pericardium</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Subxiphoid</topic><topic>Surgical procedures</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD</au><au>Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD</au><au>da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD</au><au>Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD</au><au>Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1646</spage><epage>1652</epage><pages>1646-1652</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access. Methods Between June 2006 and November 2011, 15 patients underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation. Procedures were performed through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and pericardial window with subsequent fluoroscopy-assisted lead placement. Mean patient age was 46.4 ± 15.3 years (9 male [(60.0%], 6 female [40.0%]). The new surgical approach was used in patients determined to have limited venous access due to multiple abandoned leads in 5 (33.3%), venous occlusion in 3 (20.0%), intravascular retention of lead fragments from prior extraction in 3 (20.0%), tricuspid valve vegetation currently under treatment in 2 (13.3%), and unrepaired intracardiac defects in 2 (13.3%). Results All procedures were successful with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time for isolated pacemaker implantation was 231.7 ± 33.5 minutes. Lead placement on the superior aspect of right atrium, through the transverse sinus, was possible in 12 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, the atrial lead was implanted on the left atrium through the oblique sinus, the postcaval recess, or the left pulmonary vein recess. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 36.8 ± 25.1 months. Conclusion Epicardial pacemaker implantation through pericardial reflections is an effective alternative therapy for those patients requiring physiologic pacing in whom venous access is limited.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23920077</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1547-5271
ispartof Heart rhythm, 2013-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1646-1652
issn 1547-5271
1556-3871
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1450177320
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Artificial pacemaker
Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis
Atrioventricular Block - physiopathology
Atrioventricular Block - therapy
Cardiovascular
Central venous occlusion
Echocardiography
Electrocardiography
Endocarditis
Epicardial lead
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Implanted electrodes
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Pacemaker, Artificial
Pericardial reflections
Pericardium
Retrospective Studies
Stroke Volume
Subxiphoid
Surgical procedures
Treatment Outcome
title Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20approach%20to%20epicardial%20pacemaker%20implantation%20in%20patients%20with%20limited%20venous%20access&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Costa,%20Roberto,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1646&rft.epage=1652&rft.pages=1646-1652&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1450177320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1450177320&rft_id=info:pmid/23920077&rft_els_id=S1547527113008400&rfr_iscdi=true