Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access
Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart rhythm 2013-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1646-1652 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1652 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1646 |
container_title | Heart rhythm |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS |
description | Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access. Methods Between June 2006 and November 2011, 15 patients underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation. Procedures were performed through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and pericardial window with subsequent fluoroscopy-assisted lead placement. Mean patient age was 46.4 ± 15.3 years (9 male [(60.0%], 6 female [40.0%]). The new surgical approach was used in patients determined to have limited venous access due to multiple abandoned leads in 5 (33.3%), venous occlusion in 3 (20.0%), intravascular retention of lead fragments from prior extraction in 3 (20.0%), tricuspid valve vegetation currently under treatment in 2 (13.3%), and unrepaired intracardiac defects in 2 (13.3%). Results All procedures were successful with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time for isolated pacemaker implantation was 231.7 ± 33.5 minutes. Lead placement on the superior aspect of right atrium, through the transverse sinus, was possible in 12 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, the atrial lead was implanted on the left atrium through the oblique sinus, the postcaval recess, or the left pulmonary vein recess. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 36.8 ± 25.1 months. Conclusion Epicardial pacemaker implantation through pericardial reflections is an effective alternative therapy for those patients requiring physiologic pacing in whom venous access is limited. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1450177320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1547527113008400</els_id><sourcerecordid>1450177320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6f1f4e59e3686e7748e74e8ead9d4d8407e1388127a2757b071e9f0b9e4efb083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTlv3DAQhYkgQXwkvyBAwDKN5OEhkSoSIDB8AUZS2G7SEFxqhOVal0nuGv73prKOCzephsC8x5n5HiFfGJQMWH2yKdchrYeSAxMl6BKAvyOHrKrqQmjF3i9vqYqKK3ZAjmLcZEFTg_hIDrhoOIBSh-TPr2mHPbXzHCbr1jRNFGfvbGi97elsHQ72HgP1w9zbMdnkp5H6MXeSxzFF-ujTmvZ-8AlbusNx2kZqncMYP5EPne0jfn6px-Tu_Oz29LK4_n1xdfrzunCSyVTUHeskVg2KWteolNSoJGq0bdPKVktQyITWjCvLVaVWoBg2HawalNitQItj8m3_bz7hYYsxmcFHh33eF_M2hskKmFKCQ5aKvdSFKcaAnZmDH2x4MgzMAtVszF-oZoFqQJvMLLu-vgzYrgZsXz3_KGbB970A85k7j8FEl-k4bH1Al0w7-f8M-PHG73o_5hT6e3zCuJm2YcwEDTORGzA3S65LrEwAZEAgngE4k57U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1450177320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD ; Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD ; da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD ; Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD ; Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creator><creatorcontrib>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD ; Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD ; da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD ; Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD ; Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><description>Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access. Methods Between June 2006 and November 2011, 15 patients underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation. Procedures were performed through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and pericardial window with subsequent fluoroscopy-assisted lead placement. Mean patient age was 46.4 ± 15.3 years (9 male [(60.0%], 6 female [40.0%]). The new surgical approach was used in patients determined to have limited venous access due to multiple abandoned leads in 5 (33.3%), venous occlusion in 3 (20.0%), intravascular retention of lead fragments from prior extraction in 3 (20.0%), tricuspid valve vegetation currently under treatment in 2 (13.3%), and unrepaired intracardiac defects in 2 (13.3%). Results All procedures were successful with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time for isolated pacemaker implantation was 231.7 ± 33.5 minutes. Lead placement on the superior aspect of right atrium, through the transverse sinus, was possible in 12 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, the atrial lead was implanted on the left atrium through the oblique sinus, the postcaval recess, or the left pulmonary vein recess. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 36.8 ± 25.1 months. Conclusion Epicardial pacemaker implantation through pericardial reflections is an effective alternative therapy for those patients requiring physiologic pacing in whom venous access is limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23920077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Artificial pacemaker ; Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis ; Atrioventricular Block - physiopathology ; Atrioventricular Block - therapy ; Cardiovascular ; Central venous occlusion ; Echocardiography ; Electrocardiography ; Endocarditis ; Epicardial lead ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Implanted electrodes ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Pericardial reflections ; Pericardium ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke Volume ; Subxiphoid ; Surgical procedures ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2013-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1646-1652</ispartof><rights>Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>2013 Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>2013 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6f1f4e59e3686e7748e74e8ead9d4d8407e1388127a2757b071e9f0b9e4efb083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6f1f4e59e3686e7748e74e8ead9d4d8407e1388127a2757b071e9f0b9e4efb083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23920077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><title>Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><description>Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access. Methods Between June 2006 and November 2011, 15 patients underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation. Procedures were performed through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and pericardial window with subsequent fluoroscopy-assisted lead placement. Mean patient age was 46.4 ± 15.3 years (9 male [(60.0%], 6 female [40.0%]). The new surgical approach was used in patients determined to have limited venous access due to multiple abandoned leads in 5 (33.3%), venous occlusion in 3 (20.0%), intravascular retention of lead fragments from prior extraction in 3 (20.0%), tricuspid valve vegetation currently under treatment in 2 (13.3%), and unrepaired intracardiac defects in 2 (13.3%). Results All procedures were successful with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time for isolated pacemaker implantation was 231.7 ± 33.5 minutes. Lead placement on the superior aspect of right atrium, through the transverse sinus, was possible in 12 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, the atrial lead was implanted on the left atrium through the oblique sinus, the postcaval recess, or the left pulmonary vein recess. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 36.8 ± 25.1 months. Conclusion Epicardial pacemaker implantation through pericardial reflections is an effective alternative therapy for those patients requiring physiologic pacing in whom venous access is limited.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Artificial pacemaker</subject><subject>Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrioventricular Block - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrioventricular Block - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Central venous occlusion</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Endocarditis</subject><subject>Epicardial lead</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implanted electrodes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Pericardial reflections</subject><subject>Pericardium</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Subxiphoid</subject><subject>Surgical procedures</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTlv3DAQhYkgQXwkvyBAwDKN5OEhkSoSIDB8AUZS2G7SEFxqhOVal0nuGv73prKOCzephsC8x5n5HiFfGJQMWH2yKdchrYeSAxMl6BKAvyOHrKrqQmjF3i9vqYqKK3ZAjmLcZEFTg_hIDrhoOIBSh-TPr2mHPbXzHCbr1jRNFGfvbGi97elsHQ72HgP1w9zbMdnkp5H6MXeSxzFF-ujTmvZ-8AlbusNx2kZqncMYP5EPne0jfn6px-Tu_Oz29LK4_n1xdfrzunCSyVTUHeskVg2KWteolNSoJGq0bdPKVktQyITWjCvLVaVWoBg2HawalNitQItj8m3_bz7hYYsxmcFHh33eF_M2hskKmFKCQ5aKvdSFKcaAnZmDH2x4MgzMAtVszF-oZoFqQJvMLLu-vgzYrgZsXz3_KGbB970A85k7j8FEl-k4bH1Al0w7-f8M-PHG73o_5hT6e3zCuJm2YcwEDTORGzA3S65LrEwAZEAgngE4k57U</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD</creator><creator>da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD</creator><creator>Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access</title><author>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD ; Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD ; da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD ; Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD ; Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-6f1f4e59e3686e7748e74e8ead9d4d8407e1388127a2757b071e9f0b9e4efb083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Artificial pacemaker</topic><topic>Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrioventricular Block - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrioventricular Block - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Central venous occlusion</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Endocarditis</topic><topic>Epicardial lead</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implanted electrodes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Pericardial reflections</topic><topic>Pericardium</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Subxiphoid</topic><topic>Surgical procedures</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costa, Roberto, MD, PhD</au><au>Scanavacca, Mauricio, MD, PhD</au><au>da Silva, Kátia Regina, RN, PhD</au><au>Martinelli Filho, Martino, MD, PhD</au><au>Carrillo, Roger, MD, FHRS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1646</spage><epage>1652</epage><pages>1646-1652</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Background Limited venous access in certain patients increases the procedural risk and complexity of conventional transvenous pacemaker implantation. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine a minimally invasive epicardial approach using pericardial reflections for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access. Methods Between June 2006 and November 2011, 15 patients underwent epicardial pacemaker implantation. Procedures were performed through a minimally invasive subxiphoid approach and pericardial window with subsequent fluoroscopy-assisted lead placement. Mean patient age was 46.4 ± 15.3 years (9 male [(60.0%], 6 female [40.0%]). The new surgical approach was used in patients determined to have limited venous access due to multiple abandoned leads in 5 (33.3%), venous occlusion in 3 (20.0%), intravascular retention of lead fragments from prior extraction in 3 (20.0%), tricuspid valve vegetation currently under treatment in 2 (13.3%), and unrepaired intracardiac defects in 2 (13.3%). Results All procedures were successful with no perioperative complications or early deaths. Mean operating time for isolated pacemaker implantation was 231.7 ± 33.5 minutes. Lead placement on the superior aspect of right atrium, through the transverse sinus, was possible in 12 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, the atrial lead was implanted on the left atrium through the oblique sinus, the postcaval recess, or the left pulmonary vein recess. None of the patients displayed pacing or sensing dysfunction, and all parameters remained stable throughout the follow-up period of 36.8 ± 25.1 months. Conclusion Epicardial pacemaker implantation through pericardial reflections is an effective alternative therapy for those patients requiring physiologic pacing in whom venous access is limited.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23920077</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1547-5271 |
ispartof | Heart rhythm, 2013-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1646-1652 |
issn | 1547-5271 1556-3871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1450177320 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Aged Artificial pacemaker Atrioventricular Block - diagnosis Atrioventricular Block - physiopathology Atrioventricular Block - therapy Cardiovascular Central venous occlusion Echocardiography Electrocardiography Endocarditis Epicardial lead Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Implanted electrodes Male Middle Aged Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods Pacemaker, Artificial Pericardial reflections Pericardium Retrospective Studies Stroke Volume Subxiphoid Surgical procedures Treatment Outcome |
title | Novel approach to epicardial pacemaker implantation in patients with limited venous access |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20approach%20to%20epicardial%20pacemaker%20implantation%20in%20patients%20with%20limited%20venous%20access&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Costa,%20Roberto,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1646&rft.epage=1652&rft.pages=1646-1652&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1450177320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1450177320&rft_id=info:pmid/23920077&rft_els_id=S1547527113008400&rfr_iscdi=true |