Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial
Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatrics (Evanston) 2013-11, Vol.132 (5), p.e1247-e1256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1256 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e1247 |
container_title | Pediatrics (Evanston) |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Field, David Juszczak, Ed Linsell, Louise Azzopardi, Denis Cowan, Frances Marlow, Neil Edwards, David |
description | Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized that therapeutic hypothermia during ECMO would reduce the proportion of infants with brain injury, and thus later impairment.
We conducted a randomized trial in the United Kingdom to compare ECMO with cooling (34°C for the first 48 to 72 hours) with standard ECMO (37°C). The primary outcome was the cognitive composite score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, at 2 years. Prespecified secondary outcomes included death, neonatal morbidity, and other neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 2 years.
A total of 111 infants were entered into the study, 14 died before 2 years of age (16% who received ECMO with cooling vs 9% who received ECMO alone). Two infants were lost to follow-up, and 8 were unable to complete the full range of tests. For 45 evaluated infants who received ECMO with cooling, mean cognitive scores at 2 years were 88.0 (SD: 16.2) compared with 90.6 (SD: 13.1) for 48 infants receiving ECMO only (difference in means: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -8.7 to 3.4). The various secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, but most favored ECMO without cooling.
In newborn infants treated by ECMO, the use of mild hypothermia for the first 48 to 72 hours did not result in improved outcomes up to 2 years of age. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1542/peds.2013-1754 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1449266765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A355096924</galeid><sourcerecordid>A355096924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-db197c55da111828698a3634b33e6e525d2494432c6ac45f96f6badf135d5f103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkT1PwzAURS0EglJYGVEkFhhS_J2aDVWFIgEdgNly45cqKImL7UiUX4-jAgPTe8Oxde87CJ0RPCGC0-sN2DChmLCcFILvoRHBappzWoh9NMKYkZxjLI7QcQjvGGMuCnqIjignnBeYjdDiGVxnommy-expmYXY223mqixCuwFvYu8hu3yev7xe3WQm86azrq2_wGal66J3TZPW6GvTnKCDyjQBTn_mGL3dzV9ni_xxef8wu33MSyZJzO2KqKIUwhpCyJROpZoaJhlfMQYSBBWWcsU5o6U0JReVkpVcGVsRJqyoCGZjdLn7d-PdRw8h6rYOJTSN6cD1QadiikpZSJHQi3_ou-t9l9IlSqSzqIKTROU7am0a0HU3FIPPWA7d1qBT-NlS3zIhsJKK8sRPdnzpXQgeKr3xdWv8VhOsByd6cKIHJ3pwkh6c_8ToVy3YP_xXAvsGWFmD2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1450059741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Field, David ; Juszczak, Ed ; Linsell, Louise ; Azzopardi, Denis ; Cowan, Frances ; Marlow, Neil ; Edwards, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Field, David ; Juszczak, Ed ; Linsell, Louise ; Azzopardi, Denis ; Cowan, Frances ; Marlow, Neil ; Edwards, David ; NEST Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><description>Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized that therapeutic hypothermia during ECMO would reduce the proportion of infants with brain injury, and thus later impairment.
We conducted a randomized trial in the United Kingdom to compare ECMO with cooling (34°C for the first 48 to 72 hours) with standard ECMO (37°C). The primary outcome was the cognitive composite score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, at 2 years. Prespecified secondary outcomes included death, neonatal morbidity, and other neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 2 years.
A total of 111 infants were entered into the study, 14 died before 2 years of age (16% who received ECMO with cooling vs 9% who received ECMO alone). Two infants were lost to follow-up, and 8 were unable to complete the full range of tests. For 45 evaluated infants who received ECMO with cooling, mean cognitive scores at 2 years were 88.0 (SD: 16.2) compared with 90.6 (SD: 13.1) for 48 infants receiving ECMO only (difference in means: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -8.7 to 3.4). The various secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, but most favored ECMO without cooling.
In newborn infants treated by ECMO, the use of mild hypothermia for the first 48 to 72 hours did not result in improved outcomes up to 2 years of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-1754</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24144703</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Babies ; Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal ; Body Temperature - physiology ; Brain damage ; Brain Injuries - metabolism ; Brain Injuries - prevention & control ; Care and treatment ; Cognition & reasoning ; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Hypothermia ; Hypothermia, Induced - methods ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants (Newborn) ; Male ; Newborn infants ; Pediatrics ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2013-11, Vol.132 (5), p.e1247-e1256</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-db197c55da111828698a3634b33e6e525d2494432c6ac45f96f6badf135d5f103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-db197c55da111828698a3634b33e6e525d2494432c6ac45f96f6badf135d5f103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24144703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Field, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juszczak, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linsell, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzopardi, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlow, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEST Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><title>Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized that therapeutic hypothermia during ECMO would reduce the proportion of infants with brain injury, and thus later impairment.
We conducted a randomized trial in the United Kingdom to compare ECMO with cooling (34°C for the first 48 to 72 hours) with standard ECMO (37°C). The primary outcome was the cognitive composite score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, at 2 years. Prespecified secondary outcomes included death, neonatal morbidity, and other neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 2 years.
A total of 111 infants were entered into the study, 14 died before 2 years of age (16% who received ECMO with cooling vs 9% who received ECMO alone). Two infants were lost to follow-up, and 8 were unable to complete the full range of tests. For 45 evaluated infants who received ECMO with cooling, mean cognitive scores at 2 years were 88.0 (SD: 16.2) compared with 90.6 (SD: 13.1) for 48 infants receiving ECMO only (difference in means: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -8.7 to 3.4). The various secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, but most favored ECMO without cooling.
In newborn infants treated by ECMO, the use of mild hypothermia for the first 48 to 72 hours did not result in improved outcomes up to 2 years of age.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal</subject><subject>Body Temperature - physiology</subject><subject>Brain damage</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - metabolism</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - prevention & control</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypothermia</subject><subject>Hypothermia, Induced - methods</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants (Newborn)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Newborn infants</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkT1PwzAURS0EglJYGVEkFhhS_J2aDVWFIgEdgNly45cqKImL7UiUX4-jAgPTe8Oxde87CJ0RPCGC0-sN2DChmLCcFILvoRHBappzWoh9NMKYkZxjLI7QcQjvGGMuCnqIjignnBeYjdDiGVxnommy-expmYXY223mqixCuwFvYu8hu3yev7xe3WQm86azrq2_wGal66J3TZPW6GvTnKCDyjQBTn_mGL3dzV9ni_xxef8wu33MSyZJzO2KqKIUwhpCyJROpZoaJhlfMQYSBBWWcsU5o6U0JReVkpVcGVsRJqyoCGZjdLn7d-PdRw8h6rYOJTSN6cD1QadiikpZSJHQi3_ou-t9l9IlSqSzqIKTROU7am0a0HU3FIPPWA7d1qBT-NlS3zIhsJKK8sRPdnzpXQgeKr3xdWv8VhOsByd6cKIHJ3pwkh6c_8ToVy3YP_xXAvsGWFmD2A</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Field, David</creator><creator>Juszczak, Ed</creator><creator>Linsell, Louise</creator><creator>Azzopardi, Denis</creator><creator>Cowan, Frances</creator><creator>Marlow, Neil</creator><creator>Edwards, David</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Field, David ; Juszczak, Ed ; Linsell, Louise ; Azzopardi, Denis ; Cowan, Frances ; Marlow, Neil ; Edwards, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-db197c55da111828698a3634b33e6e525d2494432c6ac45f96f6badf135d5f103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal</topic><topic>Body Temperature - physiology</topic><topic>Brain damage</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - metabolism</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - prevention & control</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypothermia</topic><topic>Hypothermia, Induced - methods</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants (Newborn)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Newborn infants</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Field, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juszczak, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linsell, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzopardi, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlow, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEST Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Field, David</au><au>Juszczak, Ed</au><au>Linsell, Louise</au><au>Azzopardi, Denis</au><au>Cowan, Frances</au><au>Marlow, Neil</au><au>Edwards, David</au><aucorp>NEST Study Collaborative Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e1247</spage><epage>e1256</epage><pages>e1247-e1256</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized that therapeutic hypothermia during ECMO would reduce the proportion of infants with brain injury, and thus later impairment.
We conducted a randomized trial in the United Kingdom to compare ECMO with cooling (34°C for the first 48 to 72 hours) with standard ECMO (37°C). The primary outcome was the cognitive composite score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, at 2 years. Prespecified secondary outcomes included death, neonatal morbidity, and other neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 2 years.
A total of 111 infants were entered into the study, 14 died before 2 years of age (16% who received ECMO with cooling vs 9% who received ECMO alone). Two infants were lost to follow-up, and 8 were unable to complete the full range of tests. For 45 evaluated infants who received ECMO with cooling, mean cognitive scores at 2 years were 88.0 (SD: 16.2) compared with 90.6 (SD: 13.1) for 48 infants receiving ECMO only (difference in means: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -8.7 to 3.4). The various secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, but most favored ECMO without cooling.
In newborn infants treated by ECMO, the use of mild hypothermia for the first 48 to 72 hours did not result in improved outcomes up to 2 years of age.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>24144703</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.2013-1754</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-4005 |
ispartof | Pediatrics (Evanston), 2013-11, Vol.132 (5), p.e1247-e1256 |
issn | 0031-4005 1098-4275 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1449266765 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Babies Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal Body Temperature - physiology Brain damage Brain Injuries - metabolism Brain Injuries - prevention & control Care and treatment Cognition & reasoning Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Health aspects Humans Hypothermia Hypothermia, Induced - methods Infant Infant, Newborn Infants (Newborn) Male Newborn infants Pediatrics Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A53%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neonatal%20ECMO%20study%20of%20temperature%20(NEST):%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Field,%20David&rft.aucorp=NEST%20Study%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e1247&rft.epage=e1256&rft.pages=e1247-e1256&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.2013-1754&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA355096924%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1450059741&rft_id=info:pmid/24144703&rft_galeid=A355096924&rfr_iscdi=true |