Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial

Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2013-11, Vol.132 (5), p.e1247-e1256
Hauptverfasser: Field, David, Juszczak, Ed, Linsell, Louise, Azzopardi, Denis, Cowan, Frances, Marlow, Neil, Edwards, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e1256
container_issue 5
container_start_page e1247
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 132
creator Field, David
Juszczak, Ed
Linsell, Louise
Azzopardi, Denis
Cowan, Frances
Marlow, Neil
Edwards, David
description Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized that therapeutic hypothermia during ECMO would reduce the proportion of infants with brain injury, and thus later impairment. We conducted a randomized trial in the United Kingdom to compare ECMO with cooling (34°C for the first 48 to 72 hours) with standard ECMO (37°C). The primary outcome was the cognitive composite score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, at 2 years. Prespecified secondary outcomes included death, neonatal morbidity, and other neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 2 years. A total of 111 infants were entered into the study, 14 died before 2 years of age (16% who received ECMO with cooling vs 9% who received ECMO alone). Two infants were lost to follow-up, and 8 were unable to complete the full range of tests. For 45 evaluated infants who received ECMO with cooling, mean cognitive scores at 2 years were 88.0 (SD: 16.2) compared with 90.6 (SD: 13.1) for 48 infants receiving ECMO only (difference in means: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -8.7 to 3.4). The various secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, but most favored ECMO without cooling. In newborn infants treated by ECMO, the use of mild hypothermia for the first 48 to 72 hours did not result in improved outcomes up to 2 years of age.
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.2013-1754
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1449266765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A355096924</galeid><sourcerecordid>A355096924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-db197c55da111828698a3634b33e6e525d2494432c6ac45f96f6badf135d5f103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkT1PwzAURS0EglJYGVEkFhhS_J2aDVWFIgEdgNly45cqKImL7UiUX4-jAgPTe8Oxde87CJ0RPCGC0-sN2DChmLCcFILvoRHBappzWoh9NMKYkZxjLI7QcQjvGGMuCnqIjignnBeYjdDiGVxnommy-expmYXY223mqixCuwFvYu8hu3yev7xe3WQm86azrq2_wGal66J3TZPW6GvTnKCDyjQBTn_mGL3dzV9ni_xxef8wu33MSyZJzO2KqKIUwhpCyJROpZoaJhlfMQYSBBWWcsU5o6U0JReVkpVcGVsRJqyoCGZjdLn7d-PdRw8h6rYOJTSN6cD1QadiikpZSJHQi3_ou-t9l9IlSqSzqIKTROU7am0a0HU3FIPPWA7d1qBT-NlS3zIhsJKK8sRPdnzpXQgeKr3xdWv8VhOsByd6cKIHJ3pwkh6c_8ToVy3YP_xXAvsGWFmD2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1450059741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Field, David ; Juszczak, Ed ; Linsell, Louise ; Azzopardi, Denis ; Cowan, Frances ; Marlow, Neil ; Edwards, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Field, David ; Juszczak, Ed ; Linsell, Louise ; Azzopardi, Denis ; Cowan, Frances ; Marlow, Neil ; Edwards, David ; NEST Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><description>Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized that therapeutic hypothermia during ECMO would reduce the proportion of infants with brain injury, and thus later impairment. We conducted a randomized trial in the United Kingdom to compare ECMO with cooling (34°C for the first 48 to 72 hours) with standard ECMO (37°C). The primary outcome was the cognitive composite score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, at 2 years. Prespecified secondary outcomes included death, neonatal morbidity, and other neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 2 years. A total of 111 infants were entered into the study, 14 died before 2 years of age (16% who received ECMO with cooling vs 9% who received ECMO alone). Two infants were lost to follow-up, and 8 were unable to complete the full range of tests. For 45 evaluated infants who received ECMO with cooling, mean cognitive scores at 2 years were 88.0 (SD: 16.2) compared with 90.6 (SD: 13.1) for 48 infants receiving ECMO only (difference in means: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -8.7 to 3.4). The various secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, but most favored ECMO without cooling. In newborn infants treated by ECMO, the use of mild hypothermia for the first 48 to 72 hours did not result in improved outcomes up to 2 years of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-1754</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24144703</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Babies ; Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal ; Body Temperature - physiology ; Brain damage ; Brain Injuries - metabolism ; Brain Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Care and treatment ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Hypothermia ; Hypothermia, Induced - methods ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants (Newborn) ; Male ; Newborn infants ; Pediatrics ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2013-11, Vol.132 (5), p.e1247-e1256</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-db197c55da111828698a3634b33e6e525d2494432c6ac45f96f6badf135d5f103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-db197c55da111828698a3634b33e6e525d2494432c6ac45f96f6badf135d5f103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24144703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Field, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juszczak, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linsell, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzopardi, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlow, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEST Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><title>Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized that therapeutic hypothermia during ECMO would reduce the proportion of infants with brain injury, and thus later impairment. We conducted a randomized trial in the United Kingdom to compare ECMO with cooling (34°C for the first 48 to 72 hours) with standard ECMO (37°C). The primary outcome was the cognitive composite score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, at 2 years. Prespecified secondary outcomes included death, neonatal morbidity, and other neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 2 years. A total of 111 infants were entered into the study, 14 died before 2 years of age (16% who received ECMO with cooling vs 9% who received ECMO alone). Two infants were lost to follow-up, and 8 were unable to complete the full range of tests. For 45 evaluated infants who received ECMO with cooling, mean cognitive scores at 2 years were 88.0 (SD: 16.2) compared with 90.6 (SD: 13.1) for 48 infants receiving ECMO only (difference in means: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -8.7 to 3.4). The various secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, but most favored ECMO without cooling. In newborn infants treated by ECMO, the use of mild hypothermia for the first 48 to 72 hours did not result in improved outcomes up to 2 years of age.</description><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal</subject><subject>Body Temperature - physiology</subject><subject>Brain damage</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - metabolism</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypothermia</subject><subject>Hypothermia, Induced - methods</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants (Newborn)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Newborn infants</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkT1PwzAURS0EglJYGVEkFhhS_J2aDVWFIgEdgNly45cqKImL7UiUX4-jAgPTe8Oxde87CJ0RPCGC0-sN2DChmLCcFILvoRHBappzWoh9NMKYkZxjLI7QcQjvGGMuCnqIjignnBeYjdDiGVxnommy-expmYXY223mqixCuwFvYu8hu3yev7xe3WQm86azrq2_wGal66J3TZPW6GvTnKCDyjQBTn_mGL3dzV9ni_xxef8wu33MSyZJzO2KqKIUwhpCyJROpZoaJhlfMQYSBBWWcsU5o6U0JReVkpVcGVsRJqyoCGZjdLn7d-PdRw8h6rYOJTSN6cD1QadiikpZSJHQi3_ou-t9l9IlSqSzqIKTROU7am0a0HU3FIPPWA7d1qBT-NlS3zIhsJKK8sRPdnzpXQgeKr3xdWv8VhOsByd6cKIHJ3pwkh6c_8ToVy3YP_xXAvsGWFmD2A</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Field, David</creator><creator>Juszczak, Ed</creator><creator>Linsell, Louise</creator><creator>Azzopardi, Denis</creator><creator>Cowan, Frances</creator><creator>Marlow, Neil</creator><creator>Edwards, David</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Field, David ; Juszczak, Ed ; Linsell, Louise ; Azzopardi, Denis ; Cowan, Frances ; Marlow, Neil ; Edwards, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-db197c55da111828698a3634b33e6e525d2494432c6ac45f96f6badf135d5f103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal</topic><topic>Body Temperature - physiology</topic><topic>Brain damage</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - metabolism</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypothermia</topic><topic>Hypothermia, Induced - methods</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants (Newborn)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Newborn infants</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Field, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juszczak, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linsell, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzopardi, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlow, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEST Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Field, David</au><au>Juszczak, Ed</au><au>Linsell, Louise</au><au>Azzopardi, Denis</au><au>Cowan, Frances</au><au>Marlow, Neil</au><au>Edwards, David</au><aucorp>NEST Study Collaborative Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e1247</spage><epage>e1256</epage><pages>e1247-e1256</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>Despite evidence to support the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in defined groups of newborn infants, rates of impairment among survivors remain high. Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to provide neuroprotection in mature infants exposed to perinatal asphyxia. We hypothesized that therapeutic hypothermia during ECMO would reduce the proportion of infants with brain injury, and thus later impairment. We conducted a randomized trial in the United Kingdom to compare ECMO with cooling (34°C for the first 48 to 72 hours) with standard ECMO (37°C). The primary outcome was the cognitive composite score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, at 2 years. Prespecified secondary outcomes included death, neonatal morbidity, and other neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 2 years. A total of 111 infants were entered into the study, 14 died before 2 years of age (16% who received ECMO with cooling vs 9% who received ECMO alone). Two infants were lost to follow-up, and 8 were unable to complete the full range of tests. For 45 evaluated infants who received ECMO with cooling, mean cognitive scores at 2 years were 88.0 (SD: 16.2) compared with 90.6 (SD: 13.1) for 48 infants receiving ECMO only (difference in means: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -8.7 to 3.4). The various secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, but most favored ECMO without cooling. In newborn infants treated by ECMO, the use of mild hypothermia for the first 48 to 72 hours did not result in improved outcomes up to 2 years of age.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>24144703</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.2013-1754</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 2013-11, Vol.132 (5), p.e1247-e1256
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1449266765
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Babies
Blood oxygenation, Extracorporeal
Body Temperature - physiology
Brain damage
Brain Injuries - metabolism
Brain Injuries - prevention & control
Care and treatment
Cognition & reasoning
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health aspects
Humans
Hypothermia
Hypothermia, Induced - methods
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infants (Newborn)
Male
Newborn infants
Pediatrics
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Neonatal ECMO study of temperature (NEST): a randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A53%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neonatal%20ECMO%20study%20of%20temperature%20(NEST):%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Field,%20David&rft.aucorp=NEST%20Study%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e1247&rft.epage=e1256&rft.pages=e1247-e1256&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.2013-1754&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA355096924%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1450059741&rft_id=info:pmid/24144703&rft_galeid=A355096924&rfr_iscdi=true