The end of International Relations theory?
With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of ‘The end of International Relations theory?’ It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that h...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of international relations 2013-09, Vol.19 (3), p.405-425 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 425 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 405 |
| container_title | European journal of international relations |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Dunne, Tim Hansen, Lene Wight, Colin |
| description | With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of ‘The end of International Relations theory?’ It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1354066113495485 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448996979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1354066113495485</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3076409011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-757691d7789edfb9e360e50d662c6e811dbb1e6c1d1bfe2bf13b644858492d3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHgNeRIjuZDe72ZNIqVooCFLPIZud2JQ0W3eTQ_-9m8aDFARPM_C-eTPzCLkGeg8g5QOwlFMhABhXKc_SEzIBLmjMJLDT0Ac5HvRzcuH9hlKaAagJuVutMcLWRLaKFm2Hri262rZFE71jc2h91K3Ruv3jJTmrisbj1U-dko_n-Wr2Gi_fXhazp2Vccsm7WKZSKDBSZgpNpRUyQTGlRoikFBi2Gq0BRQkGdIWJroBpwcPFGVeJYZpNye3ou3P2q0ff5dval9g0RYu29zkEWCmhpPoHyqRKg7UI6M0RurF9-LY5UExRyvlgSEeqdNZ7h1W-c_W2cPscaD7knB_nHEbiccQXn_jL9C_-G7A2eaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433900449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The end of International Relations theory?</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Dunne, Tim ; Hansen, Lene ; Wight, Colin</creator><contributor>Dunne, Tim ; Hansen, Lene ; Wight, Colin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Tim ; Hansen, Lene ; Wight, Colin ; Dunne, Tim ; Hansen, Lene ; Wight, Colin</creatorcontrib><description>With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of ‘The end of International Relations theory?’ It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-0661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1354066113495485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Competition ; Discourse ; International Relations ; International relations theory ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Paradigms ; Pluralism ; Political theory ; Social forces ; Studies ; Theories</subject><ispartof>European journal of international relations, 2013-09, Vol.19 (3), p.405-425</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-757691d7789edfb9e360e50d662c6e811dbb1e6c1d1bfe2bf13b644858492d3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-757691d7789edfb9e360e50d662c6e811dbb1e6c1d1bfe2bf13b644858492d3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066113495485$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354066113495485$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Dunne, Tim</contributor><contributor>Hansen, Lene</contributor><contributor>Wight, Colin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wight, Colin</creatorcontrib><title>The end of International Relations theory?</title><title>European journal of international relations</title><description>With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of ‘The end of International Relations theory?’ It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>International relations theory</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Pluralism</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Social forces</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theories</subject><issn>1354-0661</issn><issn>1460-3713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHgNeRIjuZDe72ZNIqVooCFLPIZud2JQ0W3eTQ_-9m8aDFARPM_C-eTPzCLkGeg8g5QOwlFMhABhXKc_SEzIBLmjMJLDT0Ac5HvRzcuH9hlKaAagJuVutMcLWRLaKFm2Hri262rZFE71jc2h91K3Ruv3jJTmrisbj1U-dko_n-Wr2Gi_fXhazp2Vccsm7WKZSKDBSZgpNpRUyQTGlRoikFBi2Gq0BRQkGdIWJroBpwcPFGVeJYZpNye3ou3P2q0ff5dval9g0RYu29zkEWCmhpPoHyqRKg7UI6M0RurF9-LY5UExRyvlgSEeqdNZ7h1W-c_W2cPscaD7knB_nHEbiccQXn_jL9C_-G7A2eaA</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Dunne, Tim</creator><creator>Hansen, Lene</creator><creator>Wight, Colin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>The end of International Relations theory?</title><author>Dunne, Tim ; Hansen, Lene ; Wight, Colin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-757691d7789edfb9e360e50d662c6e811dbb1e6c1d1bfe2bf13b644858492d3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>International relations theory</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Pluralism</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Social forces</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Lene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wight, Colin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European journal of international relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunne, Tim</au><au>Hansen, Lene</au><au>Wight, Colin</au><au>Dunne, Tim</au><au>Hansen, Lene</au><au>Wight, Colin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The end of International Relations theory?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of international relations</jtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>405-425</pages><issn>1354-0661</issn><eissn>1460-3713</eissn><abstract>With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of ‘The end of International Relations theory?’ It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1354066113495485</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1354-0661 |
| ispartof | European journal of international relations, 2013-09, Vol.19 (3), p.405-425 |
| issn | 1354-0661 1460-3713 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448996979 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| subjects | Competition Discourse International Relations International relations theory Multiculturalism & pluralism Paradigms Pluralism Political theory Social forces Studies Theories |
| title | The end of International Relations theory? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A35%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20end%20of%20International%20Relations%20theory?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20international%20relations&rft.au=Dunne,%20Tim&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=405-425&rft.issn=1354-0661&rft.eissn=1460-3713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1354066113495485&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3076409011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433900449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1354066113495485&rfr_iscdi=true |