Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms
This paper looks to broaden understanding about the networks of firms located in Business Incubators (BIs). To achieve this objective, a framework for understanding the networks of incubator firms was constructed. We argue that networks at incubators can be seen in two dimensions. In the first dimen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of technology transfer 2013-08, Vol.38 (4), p.432-453 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 453 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 432 |
container_title | The Journal of technology transfer |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Soetanto, Danny P Jack, Sarah L |
description | This paper looks to broaden understanding about the networks of firms located in Business Incubators (BIs). To achieve this objective, a framework for understanding the networks of incubator firms was constructed. We argue that networks at incubators can be seen in two dimensions. In the first dimension, we define incubator firm networking activities in terms of resource type, i.e. tangible and intangible resources. In the second dimension, we define networks of incubator firms as external and internal. Internal networks refer to the relationship among tenants while external networks refer to the firm’s relationship with other institutions such as a university and/or research centre. Networks of firms located at the Daresbury Science and Innovation Campus in the United Kingdom were investigated using a tenant survey. Findings show that incubator firms develop more networks to access intangible resources than tangible resources. The analysis explored and compared types of networks for highly innovative firms and medium to low innovative firms and found differences in their networking activity. With regards to policy recommendations, this study shows network support for incubator firms can be improved. It also shows that those concerned with developing BI policy need to recognize and appreciate that not all incubator firms have the same needs. This should be taken into account when developing network support. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10961-011-9237-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448774808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3020016901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f4174355311f99ba448d9f24e0b59d481fb1bf2a5026a3bd310433bd8ace30a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhiMEEqXwA5iIxMISOH8l8YIEFV8SEgN0tpzEblNau_gSof57XMJQMSCmu-F5X909SXJK4JIAFFdIQOYkA0IySVmR8b1kBKWkmZSE7u_sh8kR4gIAONBilFzf9tg6g5i2ru4r3fmAqXZN2s1N6kz36cM7pt6mnannzi_9bJNVGk2T2jas8Dg5sHqJ5uRnjpPp_d3b5DF7fnl4mtw8ZzUvoMssJwVnQjBCrJSV5rxspKXcQCVkw0tiK1JZqgXQXLOqYQQ4i7PUtWGgczZOLobedfAfvcFOrVqszXKpnfE9KhIbi4KXUP4DpbIUIpc8oue_0IXvg4uPRCoqklEtRIoMVB08YjBWrUO70mGjCKitfDXIV1G-2spX22Y6ZDCybmbCTvMfobMhZLVXehZaVNNXCt-nCMFzyr4AdgWOMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1400091000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Soetanto, Danny P ; Jack, Sarah L</creator><creatorcontrib>Soetanto, Danny P ; Jack, Sarah L</creatorcontrib><description>This paper looks to broaden understanding about the networks of firms located in Business Incubators (BIs). To achieve this objective, a framework for understanding the networks of incubator firms was constructed. We argue that networks at incubators can be seen in two dimensions. In the first dimension, we define incubator firm networking activities in terms of resource type, i.e. tangible and intangible resources. In the second dimension, we define networks of incubator firms as external and internal. Internal networks refer to the relationship among tenants while external networks refer to the firm’s relationship with other institutions such as a university and/or research centre. Networks of firms located at the Daresbury Science and Innovation Campus in the United Kingdom were investigated using a tenant survey. Findings show that incubator firms develop more networks to access intangible resources than tangible resources. The analysis explored and compared types of networks for highly innovative firms and medium to low innovative firms and found differences in their networking activity. With regards to policy recommendations, this study shows network support for incubator firms can be improved. It also shows that those concerned with developing BI policy need to recognize and appreciate that not all incubator firms have the same needs. This should be taken into account when developing network support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-9912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0892-9912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7047</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10961-011-9237-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Business ; Business and Management ; business development ; Business incubators ; Business networking ; Colleges and universities ; Commercial Law ; Construction ; Economic Growth ; Industrial Organization ; Innovation/Technology Management ; Innovations ; issues and policy ; Management ; Networks ; Organization theory ; Policies ; R&D ; Recognition ; Research & development ; Science ; Studies ; Surveys ; Technology transfer ; Two dimensional ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>The Journal of technology transfer, 2013-08, Vol.38 (4), p.432-453</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f4174355311f99ba448d9f24e0b59d481fb1bf2a5026a3bd310433bd8ace30a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f4174355311f99ba448d9f24e0b59d481fb1bf2a5026a3bd310433bd8ace30a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10961-011-9237-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10961-011-9237-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27842,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soetanto, Danny P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Sarah L</creatorcontrib><title>Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms</title><title>The Journal of technology transfer</title><addtitle>J Technol Transf</addtitle><description>This paper looks to broaden understanding about the networks of firms located in Business Incubators (BIs). To achieve this objective, a framework for understanding the networks of incubator firms was constructed. We argue that networks at incubators can be seen in two dimensions. In the first dimension, we define incubator firm networking activities in terms of resource type, i.e. tangible and intangible resources. In the second dimension, we define networks of incubator firms as external and internal. Internal networks refer to the relationship among tenants while external networks refer to the firm’s relationship with other institutions such as a university and/or research centre. Networks of firms located at the Daresbury Science and Innovation Campus in the United Kingdom were investigated using a tenant survey. Findings show that incubator firms develop more networks to access intangible resources than tangible resources. The analysis explored and compared types of networks for highly innovative firms and medium to low innovative firms and found differences in their networking activity. With regards to policy recommendations, this study shows network support for incubator firms can be improved. It also shows that those concerned with developing BI policy need to recognize and appreciate that not all incubator firms have the same needs. This should be taken into account when developing network support.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>business development</subject><subject>Business incubators</subject><subject>Business networking</subject><subject>Colleges and universities</subject><subject>Commercial Law</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Innovation/Technology Management</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><subject>Two dimensional</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0892-9912</issn><issn>0892-9912</issn><issn>1573-7047</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhiMEEqXwA5iIxMISOH8l8YIEFV8SEgN0tpzEblNau_gSof57XMJQMSCmu-F5X909SXJK4JIAFFdIQOYkA0IySVmR8b1kBKWkmZSE7u_sh8kR4gIAONBilFzf9tg6g5i2ru4r3fmAqXZN2s1N6kz36cM7pt6mnannzi_9bJNVGk2T2jas8Dg5sHqJ5uRnjpPp_d3b5DF7fnl4mtw8ZzUvoMssJwVnQjBCrJSV5rxspKXcQCVkw0tiK1JZqgXQXLOqYQQ4i7PUtWGgczZOLobedfAfvcFOrVqszXKpnfE9KhIbi4KXUP4DpbIUIpc8oue_0IXvg4uPRCoqklEtRIoMVB08YjBWrUO70mGjCKitfDXIV1G-2spX22Y6ZDCybmbCTvMfobMhZLVXehZaVNNXCt-nCMFzyr4AdgWOMA</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Soetanto, Danny P</creator><creator>Jack, Sarah L</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms</title><author>Soetanto, Danny P ; Jack, Sarah L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f4174355311f99ba448d9f24e0b59d481fb1bf2a5026a3bd310433bd8ace30a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>business development</topic><topic>Business incubators</topic><topic>Business networking</topic><topic>Colleges and universities</topic><topic>Commercial Law</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Innovation/Technology Management</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><topic>Two dimensional</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soetanto, Danny P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Sarah L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of technology transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soetanto, Danny P</au><au>Jack, Sarah L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of technology transfer</jtitle><stitle>J Technol Transf</stitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>432</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>432-453</pages><issn>0892-9912</issn><eissn>0892-9912</eissn><eissn>1573-7047</eissn><abstract>This paper looks to broaden understanding about the networks of firms located in Business Incubators (BIs). To achieve this objective, a framework for understanding the networks of incubator firms was constructed. We argue that networks at incubators can be seen in two dimensions. In the first dimension, we define incubator firm networking activities in terms of resource type, i.e. tangible and intangible resources. In the second dimension, we define networks of incubator firms as external and internal. Internal networks refer to the relationship among tenants while external networks refer to the firm’s relationship with other institutions such as a university and/or research centre. Networks of firms located at the Daresbury Science and Innovation Campus in the United Kingdom were investigated using a tenant survey. Findings show that incubator firms develop more networks to access intangible resources than tangible resources. The analysis explored and compared types of networks for highly innovative firms and medium to low innovative firms and found differences in their networking activity. With regards to policy recommendations, this study shows network support for incubator firms can be improved. It also shows that those concerned with developing BI policy need to recognize and appreciate that not all incubator firms have the same needs. This should be taken into account when developing network support.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10961-011-9237-4</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0892-9912 |
ispartof | The Journal of technology transfer, 2013-08, Vol.38 (4), p.432-453 |
issn | 0892-9912 0892-9912 1573-7047 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448774808 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PAIS Index |
subjects | Business Business and Management business development Business incubators Business networking Colleges and universities Commercial Law Construction Economic Growth Industrial Organization Innovation/Technology Management Innovations issues and policy Management Networks Organization theory Policies R&D Recognition Research & development Science Studies Surveys Technology transfer Two dimensional United Kingdom |
title | Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T23%3A57%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Business%20incubators%20and%20the%20networks%20of%20technology-based%20firms&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20technology%20transfer&rft.au=Soetanto,%20Danny%20P&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=432&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=432-453&rft.issn=0892-9912&rft.eissn=0892-9912&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10961-011-9237-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3020016901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1400091000&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |