Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City

Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above aver...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2013-08, Vol.59, p.459-469
Hauptverfasser: Gilbraith, Nathaniel, Powers, Susan E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 469
container_issue
container_start_page 459
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 59
creator Gilbraith, Nathaniel
Powers, Susan E.
description Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above average pollutant emissions and a high potential for poor air quality. The study focused on New York City (NYC) due to non-attainment with NAAQS standards, large exposed populations, and the existing goal of reducing pollutant emissions. The baseline demand response scenario simulated a 1.8% average reduction in NYC peak demand on 49 days throughout the summer. Nitrogen oxide and particulate matter less than 2.5μm in diameter emission reductions were predicted to occur (−70, −1.1metric tons (MT) annually), although, these were not likely to be sufficient for NYC to meet the NAAQS. Air pollution mediated damages were predicted to decrease by $100,000–$300,000 annually. A sensitivity analysis predicted that substantially larger pollutant emission reductions would occur if electricity demand was shifted from daytime hours to nighttime hours, or the total consumption decreased. Policies which incentivize shifting electricity consumption away from periods of high human and environmental impacts should be implemented, including policies directed toward residential consumers. •The impact of residential demand response on air emissions was modeled.•Residential demand response will decrease pollutant emissions in NYC.•Emissions reductions occur during periods with high potential for poor air quality.•Shifting demand to nighttime hours was more beneficial than to off-peak daytime hours.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448774719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421513002346</els_id><sourcerecordid>1428511893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-28bad949c38a6c2686e35a874741eea84d77d30592b25d696181679de8416e313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9BR4MiOClx6TzffAgg-4Ki4K6B08hm9RIZnuSNulW5t9b46wePMhCQQJ56qkKb9c9ZXTNKFOvdmvIUxnXA2V8TbGkutetmNG8V1rr-92Kcsp6MTD5sHvU2o5SKowVq278BC1FyHPyI4mw9zmSCm0quQFe4hKgEZ8qQf24zD7PBPaptYQAKZlM4G8IjBDmmkKaD38c0R8aSZl8gJ_ka6k3ZIOPj7sHWz82eHJ7nnVX795-2Vz0lx_P32_eXPZBajb3g7n20QobuPEqDMoo4NIbLbRgAN6IqHXkVNrhepBRWcUMU9pGMIIhyvhZ9_LknWr5vkCbHa4cYBx9hrI0x4QwGnXM3gEdjGTMWH4XVFPKhTSIPv8H3ZWlZvyzY9xYKo2wx9n8RIVaWquwdVNNe18PjlF3zNXt3O9c3TFXR7Gkwq4Xt27fgh-31eeQ2t_WQR_VVCL37MRtfXH-W0Xm6jOKFGavpBIaidcnAjCLHwmqayFBDhBTxUBdLOm_m_wC-bPBPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1389058499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gilbraith, Nathaniel ; Powers, Susan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilbraith, Nathaniel ; Powers, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above average pollutant emissions and a high potential for poor air quality. The study focused on New York City (NYC) due to non-attainment with NAAQS standards, large exposed populations, and the existing goal of reducing pollutant emissions. The baseline demand response scenario simulated a 1.8% average reduction in NYC peak demand on 49 days throughout the summer. Nitrogen oxide and particulate matter less than 2.5μm in diameter emission reductions were predicted to occur (−70, −1.1metric tons (MT) annually), although, these were not likely to be sufficient for NYC to meet the NAAQS. Air pollution mediated damages were predicted to decrease by $100,000–$300,000 annually. A sensitivity analysis predicted that substantially larger pollutant emission reductions would occur if electricity demand was shifted from daytime hours to nighttime hours, or the total consumption decreased. Policies which incentivize shifting electricity consumption away from periods of high human and environmental impacts should be implemented, including policies directed toward residential consumers. •The impact of residential demand response on air emissions was modeled.•Residential demand response will decrease pollutant emissions in NYC.•Emissions reductions occur during periods with high potential for poor air quality.•Shifting demand to nighttime hours was more beneficial than to off-peak daytime hours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; air quality ; Applied sciences ; at-risk population ; Carbon emissions ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Economic data ; Electric energy ; Electric power ; Electricity ; Emission standards ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Environment ; environmental impact ; Environmental quality ; Exact sciences and technology ; External costs ; General, economic and professional studies ; humans ; issues and policy ; Metering. Control ; National Ambient Air Quality Standards ; New York ; New York, New York ; nitrogen oxides ; Outdoor air quality ; particulates ; Pollutants ; Pollution ; Pollution control ; Pollution reduction ; Population ; Power demand ; Residential demand response ; Sensitivity analysis ; Studies ; summer ; U.S.A ; Unit commitment and economic dispatch model ; United States ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2013-08, Vol.59, p.459-469</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-28bad949c38a6c2686e35a874741eea84d77d30592b25d696181679de8416e313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-28bad949c38a6c2686e35a874741eea84d77d30592b25d696181679de8416e313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27865,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27499305$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilbraith, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><title>Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above average pollutant emissions and a high potential for poor air quality. The study focused on New York City (NYC) due to non-attainment with NAAQS standards, large exposed populations, and the existing goal of reducing pollutant emissions. The baseline demand response scenario simulated a 1.8% average reduction in NYC peak demand on 49 days throughout the summer. Nitrogen oxide and particulate matter less than 2.5μm in diameter emission reductions were predicted to occur (−70, −1.1metric tons (MT) annually), although, these were not likely to be sufficient for NYC to meet the NAAQS. Air pollution mediated damages were predicted to decrease by $100,000–$300,000 annually. A sensitivity analysis predicted that substantially larger pollutant emission reductions would occur if electricity demand was shifted from daytime hours to nighttime hours, or the total consumption decreased. Policies which incentivize shifting electricity consumption away from periods of high human and environmental impacts should be implemented, including policies directed toward residential consumers. •The impact of residential demand response on air emissions was modeled.•Residential demand response will decrease pollutant emissions in NYC.•Emissions reductions occur during periods with high potential for poor air quality.•Shifting demand to nighttime hours was more beneficial than to off-peak daytime hours.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>air quality</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>at-risk population</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External costs</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Metering. Control</subject><subject>National Ambient Air Quality Standards</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>New York, New York</subject><subject>nitrogen oxides</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>particulates</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Pollution reduction</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Power demand</subject><subject>Residential demand response</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Unit commitment and economic dispatch model</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9BR4MiOClx6TzffAgg-4Ki4K6B08hm9RIZnuSNulW5t9b46wePMhCQQJ56qkKb9c9ZXTNKFOvdmvIUxnXA2V8TbGkutetmNG8V1rr-92Kcsp6MTD5sHvU2o5SKowVq278BC1FyHPyI4mw9zmSCm0quQFe4hKgEZ8qQf24zD7PBPaptYQAKZlM4G8IjBDmmkKaD38c0R8aSZl8gJ_ka6k3ZIOPj7sHWz82eHJ7nnVX795-2Vz0lx_P32_eXPZBajb3g7n20QobuPEqDMoo4NIbLbRgAN6IqHXkVNrhepBRWcUMU9pGMIIhyvhZ9_LknWr5vkCbHa4cYBx9hrI0x4QwGnXM3gEdjGTMWH4XVFPKhTSIPv8H3ZWlZvyzY9xYKo2wx9n8RIVaWquwdVNNe18PjlF3zNXt3O9c3TFXR7Gkwq4Xt27fgh-31eeQ2t_WQR_VVCL37MRtfXH-W0Xm6jOKFGavpBIaidcnAjCLHwmqayFBDhBTxUBdLOm_m_wC-bPBPg</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Gilbraith, Nathaniel</creator><creator>Powers, Susan E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City</title><author>Gilbraith, Nathaniel ; Powers, Susan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-28bad949c38a6c2686e35a874741eea84d77d30592b25d696181679de8416e313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>air quality</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>at-risk population</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External costs</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Metering. Control</topic><topic>National Ambient Air Quality Standards</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>New York, New York</topic><topic>nitrogen oxides</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>particulates</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Pollution reduction</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Power demand</topic><topic>Residential demand response</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Unit commitment and economic dispatch model</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilbraith, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilbraith, Nathaniel</au><au>Powers, Susan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>459</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>459-469</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above average pollutant emissions and a high potential for poor air quality. The study focused on New York City (NYC) due to non-attainment with NAAQS standards, large exposed populations, and the existing goal of reducing pollutant emissions. The baseline demand response scenario simulated a 1.8% average reduction in NYC peak demand on 49 days throughout the summer. Nitrogen oxide and particulate matter less than 2.5μm in diameter emission reductions were predicted to occur (−70, −1.1metric tons (MT) annually), although, these were not likely to be sufficient for NYC to meet the NAAQS. Air pollution mediated damages were predicted to decrease by $100,000–$300,000 annually. A sensitivity analysis predicted that substantially larger pollutant emission reductions would occur if electricity demand was shifted from daytime hours to nighttime hours, or the total consumption decreased. Policies which incentivize shifting electricity consumption away from periods of high human and environmental impacts should be implemented, including policies directed toward residential consumers. •The impact of residential demand response on air emissions was modeled.•Residential demand response will decrease pollutant emissions in NYC.•Emissions reductions occur during periods with high potential for poor air quality.•Shifting demand to nighttime hours was more beneficial than to off-peak daytime hours.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2013-08, Vol.59, p.459-469
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448774719
source PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Air pollution
Air pollution caused by fuel industries
air quality
Applied sciences
at-risk population
Carbon emissions
Consumers
Consumption
Economic data
Electric energy
Electric power
Electricity
Emission standards
Emissions
Emissions control
Energy
Energy consumption
Energy economics
Energy policy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Environment
environmental impact
Environmental quality
Exact sciences and technology
External costs
General, economic and professional studies
humans
issues and policy
Metering. Control
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
New York
New York, New York
nitrogen oxides
Outdoor air quality
particulates
Pollutants
Pollution
Pollution control
Pollution reduction
Population
Power demand
Residential demand response
Sensitivity analysis
Studies
summer
U.S.A
Unit commitment and economic dispatch model
United States
Urban areas
title Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residential%20demand%20response%20reduces%20air%20pollutant%20emissions%20on%20peak%20electricity%20demand%20days%20in%20New%20York%20City&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Gilbraith,%20Nathaniel&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=459-469&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1428511893%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1389058499&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421513002346&rfr_iscdi=true