Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City
Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above aver...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2013-08, Vol.59, p.459-469 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 469 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 459 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Gilbraith, Nathaniel Powers, Susan E. |
description | Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above average pollutant emissions and a high potential for poor air quality. The study focused on New York City (NYC) due to non-attainment with NAAQS standards, large exposed populations, and the existing goal of reducing pollutant emissions. The baseline demand response scenario simulated a 1.8% average reduction in NYC peak demand on 49 days throughout the summer. Nitrogen oxide and particulate matter less than 2.5μm in diameter emission reductions were predicted to occur (−70, −1.1metric tons (MT) annually), although, these were not likely to be sufficient for NYC to meet the NAAQS. Air pollution mediated damages were predicted to decrease by $100,000–$300,000 annually. A sensitivity analysis predicted that substantially larger pollutant emission reductions would occur if electricity demand was shifted from daytime hours to nighttime hours, or the total consumption decreased. Policies which incentivize shifting electricity consumption away from periods of high human and environmental impacts should be implemented, including policies directed toward residential consumers.
•The impact of residential demand response on air emissions was modeled.•Residential demand response will decrease pollutant emissions in NYC.•Emissions reductions occur during periods with high potential for poor air quality.•Shifting demand to nighttime hours was more beneficial than to off-peak daytime hours. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448774719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421513002346</els_id><sourcerecordid>1428511893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-28bad949c38a6c2686e35a874741eea84d77d30592b25d696181679de8416e313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9BR4MiOClx6TzffAgg-4Ki4K6B08hm9RIZnuSNulW5t9b46wePMhCQQJ56qkKb9c9ZXTNKFOvdmvIUxnXA2V8TbGkutetmNG8V1rr-92Kcsp6MTD5sHvU2o5SKowVq278BC1FyHPyI4mw9zmSCm0quQFe4hKgEZ8qQf24zD7PBPaptYQAKZlM4G8IjBDmmkKaD38c0R8aSZl8gJ_ka6k3ZIOPj7sHWz82eHJ7nnVX795-2Vz0lx_P32_eXPZBajb3g7n20QobuPEqDMoo4NIbLbRgAN6IqHXkVNrhepBRWcUMU9pGMIIhyvhZ9_LknWr5vkCbHa4cYBx9hrI0x4QwGnXM3gEdjGTMWH4XVFPKhTSIPv8H3ZWlZvyzY9xYKo2wx9n8RIVaWquwdVNNe18PjlF3zNXt3O9c3TFXR7Gkwq4Xt27fgh-31eeQ2t_WQR_VVCL37MRtfXH-W0Xm6jOKFGavpBIaidcnAjCLHwmqayFBDhBTxUBdLOm_m_wC-bPBPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1389058499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gilbraith, Nathaniel ; Powers, Susan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilbraith, Nathaniel ; Powers, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above average pollutant emissions and a high potential for poor air quality. The study focused on New York City (NYC) due to non-attainment with NAAQS standards, large exposed populations, and the existing goal of reducing pollutant emissions. The baseline demand response scenario simulated a 1.8% average reduction in NYC peak demand on 49 days throughout the summer. Nitrogen oxide and particulate matter less than 2.5μm in diameter emission reductions were predicted to occur (−70, −1.1metric tons (MT) annually), although, these were not likely to be sufficient for NYC to meet the NAAQS. Air pollution mediated damages were predicted to decrease by $100,000–$300,000 annually. A sensitivity analysis predicted that substantially larger pollutant emission reductions would occur if electricity demand was shifted from daytime hours to nighttime hours, or the total consumption decreased. Policies which incentivize shifting electricity consumption away from periods of high human and environmental impacts should be implemented, including policies directed toward residential consumers.
•The impact of residential demand response on air emissions was modeled.•Residential demand response will decrease pollutant emissions in NYC.•Emissions reductions occur during periods with high potential for poor air quality.•Shifting demand to nighttime hours was more beneficial than to off-peak daytime hours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; air quality ; Applied sciences ; at-risk population ; Carbon emissions ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Economic data ; Electric energy ; Electric power ; Electricity ; Emission standards ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Environment ; environmental impact ; Environmental quality ; Exact sciences and technology ; External costs ; General, economic and professional studies ; humans ; issues and policy ; Metering. Control ; National Ambient Air Quality Standards ; New York ; New York, New York ; nitrogen oxides ; Outdoor air quality ; particulates ; Pollutants ; Pollution ; Pollution control ; Pollution reduction ; Population ; Power demand ; Residential demand response ; Sensitivity analysis ; Studies ; summer ; U.S.A ; Unit commitment and economic dispatch model ; United States ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2013-08, Vol.59, p.459-469</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-28bad949c38a6c2686e35a874741eea84d77d30592b25d696181679de8416e313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-28bad949c38a6c2686e35a874741eea84d77d30592b25d696181679de8416e313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27865,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27499305$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilbraith, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><title>Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above average pollutant emissions and a high potential for poor air quality. The study focused on New York City (NYC) due to non-attainment with NAAQS standards, large exposed populations, and the existing goal of reducing pollutant emissions. The baseline demand response scenario simulated a 1.8% average reduction in NYC peak demand on 49 days throughout the summer. Nitrogen oxide and particulate matter less than 2.5μm in diameter emission reductions were predicted to occur (−70, −1.1metric tons (MT) annually), although, these were not likely to be sufficient for NYC to meet the NAAQS. Air pollution mediated damages were predicted to decrease by $100,000–$300,000 annually. A sensitivity analysis predicted that substantially larger pollutant emission reductions would occur if electricity demand was shifted from daytime hours to nighttime hours, or the total consumption decreased. Policies which incentivize shifting electricity consumption away from periods of high human and environmental impacts should be implemented, including policies directed toward residential consumers.
•The impact of residential demand response on air emissions was modeled.•Residential demand response will decrease pollutant emissions in NYC.•Emissions reductions occur during periods with high potential for poor air quality.•Shifting demand to nighttime hours was more beneficial than to off-peak daytime hours.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>air quality</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>at-risk population</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External costs</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Metering. Control</subject><subject>National Ambient Air Quality Standards</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>New York, New York</subject><subject>nitrogen oxides</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>particulates</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Pollution reduction</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Power demand</subject><subject>Residential demand response</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Unit commitment and economic dispatch model</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9BR4MiOClx6TzffAgg-4Ki4K6B08hm9RIZnuSNulW5t9b46wePMhCQQJ56qkKb9c9ZXTNKFOvdmvIUxnXA2V8TbGkutetmNG8V1rr-92Kcsp6MTD5sHvU2o5SKowVq278BC1FyHPyI4mw9zmSCm0quQFe4hKgEZ8qQf24zD7PBPaptYQAKZlM4G8IjBDmmkKaD38c0R8aSZl8gJ_ka6k3ZIOPj7sHWz82eHJ7nnVX795-2Vz0lx_P32_eXPZBajb3g7n20QobuPEqDMoo4NIbLbRgAN6IqHXkVNrhepBRWcUMU9pGMIIhyvhZ9_LknWr5vkCbHa4cYBx9hrI0x4QwGnXM3gEdjGTMWH4XVFPKhTSIPv8H3ZWlZvyzY9xYKo2wx9n8RIVaWquwdVNNe18PjlF3zNXt3O9c3TFXR7Gkwq4Xt27fgh-31eeQ2t_WQR_VVCL37MRtfXH-W0Xm6jOKFGavpBIaidcnAjCLHwmqayFBDhBTxUBdLOm_m_wC-bPBPg</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Gilbraith, Nathaniel</creator><creator>Powers, Susan E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City</title><author>Gilbraith, Nathaniel ; Powers, Susan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-28bad949c38a6c2686e35a874741eea84d77d30592b25d696181679de8416e313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>air quality</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>at-risk population</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External costs</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Metering. Control</topic><topic>National Ambient Air Quality Standards</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>New York, New York</topic><topic>nitrogen oxides</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>particulates</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Pollution reduction</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Power demand</topic><topic>Residential demand response</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Unit commitment and economic dispatch model</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilbraith, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powers, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilbraith, Nathaniel</au><au>Powers, Susan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>459</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>459-469</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>Many urban areas in the United States have experienced difficulty meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), partially due to pollution from electricity generating units. We evaluated the potential for residential demand response to reduce pollutant emissions on days with above average pollutant emissions and a high potential for poor air quality. The study focused on New York City (NYC) due to non-attainment with NAAQS standards, large exposed populations, and the existing goal of reducing pollutant emissions. The baseline demand response scenario simulated a 1.8% average reduction in NYC peak demand on 49 days throughout the summer. Nitrogen oxide and particulate matter less than 2.5μm in diameter emission reductions were predicted to occur (−70, −1.1metric tons (MT) annually), although, these were not likely to be sufficient for NYC to meet the NAAQS. Air pollution mediated damages were predicted to decrease by $100,000–$300,000 annually. A sensitivity analysis predicted that substantially larger pollutant emission reductions would occur if electricity demand was shifted from daytime hours to nighttime hours, or the total consumption decreased. Policies which incentivize shifting electricity consumption away from periods of high human and environmental impacts should be implemented, including policies directed toward residential consumers.
•The impact of residential demand response on air emissions was modeled.•Residential demand response will decrease pollutant emissions in NYC.•Emissions reductions occur during periods with high potential for poor air quality.•Shifting demand to nighttime hours was more beneficial than to off-peak daytime hours.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2013-08, Vol.59, p.459-469 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448774719 |
source | PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Air pollution Air pollution caused by fuel industries air quality Applied sciences at-risk population Carbon emissions Consumers Consumption Economic data Electric energy Electric power Electricity Emission standards Emissions Emissions control Energy Energy consumption Energy economics Energy policy Energy. Thermal use of fuels Environment environmental impact Environmental quality Exact sciences and technology External costs General, economic and professional studies humans issues and policy Metering. Control National Ambient Air Quality Standards New York New York, New York nitrogen oxides Outdoor air quality particulates Pollutants Pollution Pollution control Pollution reduction Population Power demand Residential demand response Sensitivity analysis Studies summer U.S.A Unit commitment and economic dispatch model United States Urban areas |
title | Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residential%20demand%20response%20reduces%20air%20pollutant%20emissions%20on%20peak%20electricity%20demand%20days%20in%20New%20York%20City&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Gilbraith,%20Nathaniel&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=459-469&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1428511893%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1389058499&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421513002346&rfr_iscdi=true |