Influence of stirrup detailing on punching shear strength of flat slabs
► Experimental testing of RC slabs with different punching shear rebar dispositions. ► Stirrups that do not meet codes’ specifications show good punching shear strength. ► Punching shear strength decreases in slabs with interrupted longitudinal rebars. ► Comparison of experimental results with code-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering structures 2013-04, Vol.49, p.855-865 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 865 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 855 |
container_title | Engineering structures |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Pérez Caldentey, Alejandro Padilla Lavaselli, Patricio Corres Peiretti, Hugo Ariñez Fernández, Freddy |
description | ► Experimental testing of RC slabs with different punching shear rebar dispositions. ► Stirrups that do not meet codes’ specifications show good punching shear strength. ► Punching shear strength decreases in slabs with interrupted longitudinal rebars. ► Comparison of experimental results with code-type theoretical models.
Most concrete design codes agree that it is important for punching shear reinforcement stirrups in slabs to engage the tensile longitudinal reinforcement bars. However, due to the practical difficulties that this anchorage detail entails, it has been common construction practice in some countries (including Spain) to place closed stirrups without encircling the main tensile reinforcement. The Structural Concrete Research Group at the Polytechnic University of Madrid tested eight slabs with four different shear reinforcement dispositions and the results show that slabs with the shear reinforcement disposition that matches Spanish practice show punching shear strength that is quite similar to the one shown by slabs with the transverse reinforcement disposition specified in the codes. The results also show a significant reduction in punching shear strength when longitudinal reinforcement does not pass through the slab–column connection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.032 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448723721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029613000023</els_id><sourcerecordid>1448723721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5da936ee3f7674bfe9c88cd932ddd2aa7471c8db4a89968d4daa6d46924129ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_wb0IXnbNl0n2WIpWoeBFzyFNZtuU7e6aZAX_vVlaehUGZg7PzMs8CN0TXBFMxNO-gm4bUxhtqigmtMqFGb1AM6IkKyWj7BLNMOGkxLQW1-gmxj3GmCqFZ2j13jXtCJ2Fom-KmHwI41A4SMa3vtsWfVcMY2d30xx3YEJmQg5Mu4lvWpOK2JpNvEVXjWkj3J36HH29vnwu38r1x-p9uViXlkmVymdnaiYAWCOF5JsGaquUdTWjzjlqjOSSWOU23Ki6FspxZ4xwXNSUE1pbYHP0eLw7hP57hJj0wUcLbWs66MeoCedKUiYpyag8ojb0MQZo9BD8wYRfTbCe1Om9PqvTkzqdK6vLmw-nEBOtaZtgOuvjeZ1KIgTmOHOLIwf54x8PQUfrJ5fOB8g3Xe__zfoDGYiJ5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448723721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of stirrup detailing on punching shear strength of flat slabs</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Pérez Caldentey, Alejandro ; Padilla Lavaselli, Patricio ; Corres Peiretti, Hugo ; Ariñez Fernández, Freddy</creator><creatorcontrib>Pérez Caldentey, Alejandro ; Padilla Lavaselli, Patricio ; Corres Peiretti, Hugo ; Ariñez Fernández, Freddy</creatorcontrib><description>► Experimental testing of RC slabs with different punching shear rebar dispositions. ► Stirrups that do not meet codes’ specifications show good punching shear strength. ► Punching shear strength decreases in slabs with interrupted longitudinal rebars. ► Comparison of experimental results with code-type theoretical models.
Most concrete design codes agree that it is important for punching shear reinforcement stirrups in slabs to engage the tensile longitudinal reinforcement bars. However, due to the practical difficulties that this anchorage detail entails, it has been common construction practice in some countries (including Spain) to place closed stirrups without encircling the main tensile reinforcement. The Structural Concrete Research Group at the Polytechnic University of Madrid tested eight slabs with four different shear reinforcement dispositions and the results show that slabs with the shear reinforcement disposition that matches Spanish practice show punching shear strength that is quite similar to the one shown by slabs with the transverse reinforcement disposition specified in the codes. The results also show a significant reduction in punching shear strength when longitudinal reinforcement does not pass through the slab–column connection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.032</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENSTDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anchorages ; Applied sciences ; Building structure ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Construction (buildings and works) ; Current construction practice ; Design codes ; Detailing ; Exact sciences and technology ; External envelopes ; Floor. Ceiling ; Punching shear ; Reinforced concrete structure ; Reinforcement ; Reinforcing steels ; Shear ; Slabs ; Stirrups ; Strength ; Stresses. Safety ; Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2013-04, Vol.49, p.855-865</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5da936ee3f7674bfe9c88cd932ddd2aa7471c8db4a89968d4daa6d46924129ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5da936ee3f7674bfe9c88cd932ddd2aa7471c8db4a89968d4daa6d46924129ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27166040$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pérez Caldentey, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padilla Lavaselli, Patricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corres Peiretti, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariñez Fernández, Freddy</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of stirrup detailing on punching shear strength of flat slabs</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>► Experimental testing of RC slabs with different punching shear rebar dispositions. ► Stirrups that do not meet codes’ specifications show good punching shear strength. ► Punching shear strength decreases in slabs with interrupted longitudinal rebars. ► Comparison of experimental results with code-type theoretical models.
Most concrete design codes agree that it is important for punching shear reinforcement stirrups in slabs to engage the tensile longitudinal reinforcement bars. However, due to the practical difficulties that this anchorage detail entails, it has been common construction practice in some countries (including Spain) to place closed stirrups without encircling the main tensile reinforcement. The Structural Concrete Research Group at the Polytechnic University of Madrid tested eight slabs with four different shear reinforcement dispositions and the results show that slabs with the shear reinforcement disposition that matches Spanish practice show punching shear strength that is quite similar to the one shown by slabs with the transverse reinforcement disposition specified in the codes. The results also show a significant reduction in punching shear strength when longitudinal reinforcement does not pass through the slab–column connection.</description><subject>Anchorages</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building structure</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Construction (buildings and works)</subject><subject>Current construction practice</subject><subject>Design codes</subject><subject>Detailing</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External envelopes</subject><subject>Floor. Ceiling</subject><subject>Punching shear</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete structure</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Slabs</subject><subject>Stirrups</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Stresses. Safety</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_wb0IXnbNl0n2WIpWoeBFzyFNZtuU7e6aZAX_vVlaehUGZg7PzMs8CN0TXBFMxNO-gm4bUxhtqigmtMqFGb1AM6IkKyWj7BLNMOGkxLQW1-gmxj3GmCqFZ2j13jXtCJ2Fom-KmHwI41A4SMa3vtsWfVcMY2d30xx3YEJmQg5Mu4lvWpOK2JpNvEVXjWkj3J36HH29vnwu38r1x-p9uViXlkmVymdnaiYAWCOF5JsGaquUdTWjzjlqjOSSWOU23Ki6FspxZ4xwXNSUE1pbYHP0eLw7hP57hJj0wUcLbWs66MeoCedKUiYpyag8ojb0MQZo9BD8wYRfTbCe1Om9PqvTkzqdK6vLmw-nEBOtaZtgOuvjeZ1KIgTmOHOLIwf54x8PQUfrJ5fOB8g3Xe__zfoDGYiJ5g</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Pérez Caldentey, Alejandro</creator><creator>Padilla Lavaselli, Patricio</creator><creator>Corres Peiretti, Hugo</creator><creator>Ariñez Fernández, Freddy</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Influence of stirrup detailing on punching shear strength of flat slabs</title><author>Pérez Caldentey, Alejandro ; Padilla Lavaselli, Patricio ; Corres Peiretti, Hugo ; Ariñez Fernández, Freddy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5da936ee3f7674bfe9c88cd932ddd2aa7471c8db4a89968d4daa6d46924129ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anchorages</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building structure</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Construction (buildings and works)</topic><topic>Current construction practice</topic><topic>Design codes</topic><topic>Detailing</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External envelopes</topic><topic>Floor. Ceiling</topic><topic>Punching shear</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete structure</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Slabs</topic><topic>Stirrups</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Stresses. Safety</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pérez Caldentey, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padilla Lavaselli, Patricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corres Peiretti, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariñez Fernández, Freddy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pérez Caldentey, Alejandro</au><au>Padilla Lavaselli, Patricio</au><au>Corres Peiretti, Hugo</au><au>Ariñez Fernández, Freddy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of stirrup detailing on punching shear strength of flat slabs</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>49</volume><spage>855</spage><epage>865</epage><pages>855-865</pages><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><coden>ENSTDF</coden><abstract>► Experimental testing of RC slabs with different punching shear rebar dispositions. ► Stirrups that do not meet codes’ specifications show good punching shear strength. ► Punching shear strength decreases in slabs with interrupted longitudinal rebars. ► Comparison of experimental results with code-type theoretical models.
Most concrete design codes agree that it is important for punching shear reinforcement stirrups in slabs to engage the tensile longitudinal reinforcement bars. However, due to the practical difficulties that this anchorage detail entails, it has been common construction practice in some countries (including Spain) to place closed stirrups without encircling the main tensile reinforcement. The Structural Concrete Research Group at the Polytechnic University of Madrid tested eight slabs with four different shear reinforcement dispositions and the results show that slabs with the shear reinforcement disposition that matches Spanish practice show punching shear strength that is quite similar to the one shown by slabs with the transverse reinforcement disposition specified in the codes. The results also show a significant reduction in punching shear strength when longitudinal reinforcement does not pass through the slab–column connection.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.032</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-0296 |
ispartof | Engineering structures, 2013-04, Vol.49, p.855-865 |
issn | 0141-0296 1873-7323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448723721 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Anchorages Applied sciences Building structure Buildings Buildings. Public works Construction (buildings and works) Current construction practice Design codes Detailing Exact sciences and technology External envelopes Floor. Ceiling Punching shear Reinforced concrete structure Reinforcement Reinforcing steels Shear Slabs Stirrups Strength Stresses. Safety Structural analysis. Stresses |
title | Influence of stirrup detailing on punching shear strength of flat slabs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A45%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20stirrup%20detailing%20on%20punching%20shear%20strength%20of%20flat%20slabs&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=P%C3%A9rez%20Caldentey,%20Alejandro&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=49&rft.spage=855&rft.epage=865&rft.pages=855-865&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft.coden=ENSTDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1448723721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448723721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029613000023&rfr_iscdi=true |