REN AS A COMMUNAL PROPERTY IN THE ANALECTS

This essay presents an interpretation of ren 仁 in the Analects that takes it to be a moral property primarily of communities, one that individuals can possess derivatively. Other interpretations of ren, li 禮, and moral agency in the Analects fail to account for the centrality of community in an adeq...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophy east & west 2012-10, Vol.62 (4), p.505-528
1. Verfasser: McLeod, Alexus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 528
container_issue 4
container_start_page 505
container_title Philosophy east & west
container_volume 62
creator McLeod, Alexus
description This essay presents an interpretation of ren 仁 in the Analects that takes it to be a moral property primarily of communities, one that individuals can possess derivatively. Other interpretations of ren, li 禮, and moral agency in the Analects fail to account for the centrality of community in an adequate way, making it peripheral to the main theory, and thus struggling to make sense of the concentration on community in sections of the Analects such as book 4, and key passages such as Analects 4.1, 4.7, and 4.25, in which Confucius discusses the connection of ren to the particular community in which one lives, the groups one is a member of, and one's neighbors, respectively. First, a conception is outlined of shared communal disposition that helps us to understand ren in the Analects. Then, a textual argument centered in book 4 of the Analects is presented that ren is best understood as a communal property. Finally, an explanation is offered of communal disposition in general, and of how ren as a communal property is connected to the relevant communal dispositions.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/pew.2012.0055
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448372952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A305839062</galeid><jstor_id>41684477</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A305839062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-4f8af2deea59cafafef2eb7b75c10acfbb41200c13b867014ab4a89504f622053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk2P0zAQhi0EEmXhyBERiQsgpYy_YucYorBbqduu2u6Bk-V47SpV2hQ7EfDvcShaKKp8sDR63pnR6EHoNYYpppx-OtrvUwKYTAE4f4ImmJM8xTKXT9EEgOJUEoKfoxch7ACAZCAm6OOqWiTFOimScnl7e78o5sndanlXrTZfk9ki2dxUSRGLVblZv0TPnG6DffXnv0L3X6pNeZPOl9ezspinhhPZp8xJ7ciDtZrnRjvtrCO2FrXgBoM2rq4ZJgAG01pmAjDTNdMy58BcRghweoXen_oeffdtsKFX-yYY27b6YLshKMyYpILknET03X_orhv8IW6nMMacS85EFqm3J2qrW6tab7Z6CEEVFLikOWT_9PlNNAfX9V6bcew5Nb1Axfdg943pDtY1sX4W-HAWiExvf_Sn8bPP1-dseok1XdvarVXxwuXyIm98F4K3Th19s9f-p8KgRh1U1EGNOqhRh8izx1PtrOn3Q7B_r8WklESo9ajMaAwmbFQkj7E3p9gu9J1_nMFwJhkTgv4Cj762fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115585476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>REN AS A COMMUNAL PROPERTY IN THE ANALECTS</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>McLeod, Alexus</creator><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Alexus</creatorcontrib><description>This essay presents an interpretation of ren 仁 in the Analects that takes it to be a moral property primarily of communities, one that individuals can possess derivatively. Other interpretations of ren, li 禮, and moral agency in the Analects fail to account for the centrality of community in an adequate way, making it peripheral to the main theory, and thus struggling to make sense of the concentration on community in sections of the Analects such as book 4, and key passages such as Analects 4.1, 4.7, and 4.25, in which Confucius discusses the connection of ren to the particular community in which one lives, the groups one is a member of, and one's neighbors, respectively. First, a conception is outlined of shared communal disposition that helps us to understand ren in the Analects. Then, a textual argument centered in book 4 of the Analects is presented that ren is best understood as a communal property. Finally, an explanation is offered of communal disposition in general, and of how ren as a communal property is connected to the relevant communal dispositions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8221</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-1898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-1898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/pew.2012.0055</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHEWAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Attitudes ; Behavior ; Communalism ; Communities ; Community ; Community property ; Confucianism ; Confucius (551-479 BC) ; Confucius (Chinese philosopher) ; Desire ; Eastern philosophy ; Engagement ; Group performance ; Morality ; Musical performances ; Personality ; Philosophers ; Philosophy ; Psychological attitudes ; Ren ; Rituals ; Theater ; Virtue ; Virtue ethics ; Works</subject><ispartof>Philosophy east &amp; west, 2012-10, Vol.62 (4), p.505-528</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I PRESS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 University of Hawai'i Press.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 University of Hawaii Press</rights><rights>Copyright University of Hawaii Press Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-4f8af2deea59cafafef2eb7b75c10acfbb41200c13b867014ab4a89504f622053</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41684477$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41684477$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Alexus</creatorcontrib><title>REN AS A COMMUNAL PROPERTY IN THE ANALECTS</title><title>Philosophy east &amp; west</title><addtitle>Philosophy East and West</addtitle><description>This essay presents an interpretation of ren 仁 in the Analects that takes it to be a moral property primarily of communities, one that individuals can possess derivatively. Other interpretations of ren, li 禮, and moral agency in the Analects fail to account for the centrality of community in an adequate way, making it peripheral to the main theory, and thus struggling to make sense of the concentration on community in sections of the Analects such as book 4, and key passages such as Analects 4.1, 4.7, and 4.25, in which Confucius discusses the connection of ren to the particular community in which one lives, the groups one is a member of, and one's neighbors, respectively. First, a conception is outlined of shared communal disposition that helps us to understand ren in the Analects. Then, a textual argument centered in book 4 of the Analects is presented that ren is best understood as a communal property. Finally, an explanation is offered of communal disposition in general, and of how ren as a communal property is connected to the relevant communal dispositions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Communalism</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community property</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Confucius (551-479 BC)</subject><subject>Confucius (Chinese philosopher)</subject><subject>Desire</subject><subject>Eastern philosophy</subject><subject>Engagement</subject><subject>Group performance</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Musical performances</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Psychological attitudes</subject><subject>Ren</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Theater</subject><subject>Virtue</subject><subject>Virtue ethics</subject><subject>Works</subject><issn>0031-8221</issn><issn>1529-1898</issn><issn>1529-1898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk2P0zAQhi0EEmXhyBERiQsgpYy_YucYorBbqduu2u6Bk-V47SpV2hQ7EfDvcShaKKp8sDR63pnR6EHoNYYpppx-OtrvUwKYTAE4f4ImmJM8xTKXT9EEgOJUEoKfoxch7ACAZCAm6OOqWiTFOimScnl7e78o5sndanlXrTZfk9ki2dxUSRGLVblZv0TPnG6DffXnv0L3X6pNeZPOl9ezspinhhPZp8xJ7ciDtZrnRjvtrCO2FrXgBoM2rq4ZJgAG01pmAjDTNdMy58BcRghweoXen_oeffdtsKFX-yYY27b6YLshKMyYpILknET03X_orhv8IW6nMMacS85EFqm3J2qrW6tab7Z6CEEVFLikOWT_9PlNNAfX9V6bcew5Nb1Axfdg943pDtY1sX4W-HAWiExvf_Sn8bPP1-dseok1XdvarVXxwuXyIm98F4K3Th19s9f-p8KgRh1U1EGNOqhRh8izx1PtrOn3Q7B_r8WklESo9ajMaAwmbFQkj7E3p9gu9J1_nMFwJhkTgv4Cj762fg</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>McLeod, Alexus</creator><general>University of Hawaii Press</general><general>University of Hawai'i Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>REN AS A COMMUNAL PROPERTY IN THE ANALECTS</title><author>McLeod, Alexus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-4f8af2deea59cafafef2eb7b75c10acfbb41200c13b867014ab4a89504f622053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Communalism</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community property</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Confucius (551-479 BC)</topic><topic>Confucius (Chinese philosopher)</topic><topic>Desire</topic><topic>Eastern philosophy</topic><topic>Engagement</topic><topic>Group performance</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Musical performances</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Psychological attitudes</topic><topic>Ren</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Theater</topic><topic>Virtue</topic><topic>Virtue ethics</topic><topic>Works</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Alexus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Philosophy east &amp; west</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLeod, Alexus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>REN AS A COMMUNAL PROPERTY IN THE ANALECTS</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy east &amp; west</jtitle><addtitle>Philosophy East and West</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>505-528</pages><issn>0031-8221</issn><issn>1529-1898</issn><eissn>1529-1898</eissn><coden>PHEWAU</coden><abstract>This essay presents an interpretation of ren 仁 in the Analects that takes it to be a moral property primarily of communities, one that individuals can possess derivatively. Other interpretations of ren, li 禮, and moral agency in the Analects fail to account for the centrality of community in an adequate way, making it peripheral to the main theory, and thus struggling to make sense of the concentration on community in sections of the Analects such as book 4, and key passages such as Analects 4.1, 4.7, and 4.25, in which Confucius discusses the connection of ren to the particular community in which one lives, the groups one is a member of, and one's neighbors, respectively. First, a conception is outlined of shared communal disposition that helps us to understand ren in the Analects. Then, a textual argument centered in book 4 of the Analects is presented that ren is best understood as a communal property. Finally, an explanation is offered of communal disposition in general, and of how ren as a communal property is connected to the relevant communal dispositions.</abstract><cop>Honolulu</cop><pub>University of Hawaii Press</pub><doi>10.1353/pew.2012.0055</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8221
ispartof Philosophy east & west, 2012-10, Vol.62 (4), p.505-528
issn 0031-8221
1529-1898
1529-1898
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448372952
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Analysis
Attitudes
Behavior
Communalism
Communities
Community
Community property
Confucianism
Confucius (551-479 BC)
Confucius (Chinese philosopher)
Desire
Eastern philosophy
Engagement
Group performance
Morality
Musical performances
Personality
Philosophers
Philosophy
Psychological attitudes
Ren
Rituals
Theater
Virtue
Virtue ethics
Works
title REN AS A COMMUNAL PROPERTY IN THE ANALECTS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T04%3A44%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=REN%20AS%20A%20COMMUNAL%20PROPERTY%20IN%20THE%20ANALECTS&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20east%20&%20west&rft.au=McLeod,%20Alexus&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=505-528&rft.issn=0031-8221&rft.eissn=1529-1898&rft.coden=PHEWAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/pew.2012.0055&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA305839062%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115585476&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A305839062&rft_jstor_id=41684477&rfr_iscdi=true