Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of industrial ecology 2013-10, Vol.17 (5), p.777-788
Hauptverfasser: SAUNDERS, Christi L, LANDIS, Amy E, MECCA, Laurel P, JONES, Alex K, SCHAEFER, Laura A, BILEC, Melissa M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 788
container_issue 5
container_start_page 777
container_title Journal of industrial ecology
container_volume 17
creator SAUNDERS, Christi L
LANDIS, Amy E
MECCA, Laurel P
JONES, Alex K
SCHAEFER, Laura A
BILEC, Melissa M
description Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole‐building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole‐building LCA. In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self‐identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was “provides information about environmental impacts.” The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building‐related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jiec.12028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448372000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1448372000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c183t-c3fa0ef296c14bcdfedb0a062ce8a7fad021ac9e2494def72a4c5eb2ed35be073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4Qu8QUJIKWM7bWJ2paKAVAQSsI6cyRhcuUmxk0X5etKHmM2dxbl3cRi7FDAS_d0uHeFISJD5ERuIsYJESw3H_Q95ngidwyk7i3EJINREwoC9TGvjN7-u_uLtN_G3YLB1SLyxfOEs8dkGPfFpjBTjiur2js8b7CJv6h1_3zlfbcvvhG0TztmJNT7SxSGH7HP-8DF7Shavj8-z6SJBkas2QWUNkJV6giItsbJUlWBgIpFyk1lTgRQGNclUpxXZTJoUx1RKqtS4JMjUkF3vd9eh-ekotsXKRSTvTU1NFwuRprnKJAD06M0exdDEGMgW6-BWJmwKAcXWWbF1Vuyc9fDVYddENN4GU6OL_w2ZaaW0UOoPCl1s3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448372000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>SAUNDERS, Christi L ; LANDIS, Amy E ; MECCA, Laurel P ; JONES, Alex K ; SCHAEFER, Laura A ; BILEC, Melissa M</creator><creatorcontrib>SAUNDERS, Christi L ; LANDIS, Amy E ; MECCA, Laurel P ; JONES, Alex K ; SCHAEFER, Laura A ; BILEC, Melissa M</creatorcontrib><description>Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole‐building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole‐building LCA. In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self‐identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was “provides information about environmental impacts.” The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building‐related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-1980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Construction industry ; Environment and sustainable development ; Environmental impact studies ; Focus groups ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industrial economics ; Industrial production ; Quantitative analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of industrial ecology, 2013-10, Vol.17 (5), p.777-788</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c183t-c3fa0ef296c14bcdfedb0a062ce8a7fad021ac9e2494def72a4c5eb2ed35be073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27933913$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SAUNDERS, Christi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDIS, Amy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MECCA, Laurel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, Alex K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHAEFER, Laura A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILEC, Melissa M</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector</title><title>Journal of industrial ecology</title><description>Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole‐building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole‐building LCA. In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self‐identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was “provides information about environmental impacts.” The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building‐related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Environment and sustainable development</subject><subject>Environmental impact studies</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial economics</subject><subject>Industrial production</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><issn>1088-1980</issn><issn>1530-9290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4Qu8QUJIKWM7bWJ2paKAVAQSsI6cyRhcuUmxk0X5etKHmM2dxbl3cRi7FDAS_d0uHeFISJD5ERuIsYJESw3H_Q95ngidwyk7i3EJINREwoC9TGvjN7-u_uLtN_G3YLB1SLyxfOEs8dkGPfFpjBTjiur2js8b7CJv6h1_3zlfbcvvhG0TztmJNT7SxSGH7HP-8DF7Shavj8-z6SJBkas2QWUNkJV6giItsbJUlWBgIpFyk1lTgRQGNclUpxXZTJoUx1RKqtS4JMjUkF3vd9eh-ekotsXKRSTvTU1NFwuRprnKJAD06M0exdDEGMgW6-BWJmwKAcXWWbF1Vuyc9fDVYddENN4GU6OL_w2ZaaW0UOoPCl1s3g</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>SAUNDERS, Christi L</creator><creator>LANDIS, Amy E</creator><creator>MECCA, Laurel P</creator><creator>JONES, Alex K</creator><creator>SCHAEFER, Laura A</creator><creator>BILEC, Melissa M</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector</title><author>SAUNDERS, Christi L ; LANDIS, Amy E ; MECCA, Laurel P ; JONES, Alex K ; SCHAEFER, Laura A ; BILEC, Melissa M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c183t-c3fa0ef296c14bcdfedb0a062ce8a7fad021ac9e2494def72a4c5eb2ed35be073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Environment and sustainable development</topic><topic>Environmental impact studies</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial economics</topic><topic>Industrial production</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SAUNDERS, Christi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDIS, Amy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MECCA, Laurel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, Alex K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHAEFER, Laura A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILEC, Melissa M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of industrial ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SAUNDERS, Christi L</au><au>LANDIS, Amy E</au><au>MECCA, Laurel P</au><au>JONES, Alex K</au><au>SCHAEFER, Laura A</au><au>BILEC, Melissa M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector</atitle><jtitle>Journal of industrial ecology</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>777</spage><epage>788</epage><pages>777-788</pages><issn>1088-1980</issn><eissn>1530-9290</eissn><abstract>Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole‐building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole‐building LCA. In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self‐identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was “provides information about environmental impacts.” The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building‐related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/jiec.12028</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-1980
ispartof Journal of industrial ecology, 2013-10, Vol.17 (5), p.777-788
issn 1088-1980
1530-9290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448372000
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Construction industry
Environment and sustainable development
Environmental impact studies
Focus groups
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Industrial economics
Industrial production
Quantitative analysis
title Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A12%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20the%20Practice%20of%20Life%20Cycle%20Assessment:%20Focus%20on%20the%20Building%20Sector&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20industrial%20ecology&rft.au=SAUNDERS,%20Christi%20L&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=777&rft.epage=788&rft.pages=777-788&rft.issn=1088-1980&rft.eissn=1530-9290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jiec.12028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1448372000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448372000&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true