Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of industrial ecology 2013-10, Vol.17 (5), p.777-788 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 788 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 777 |
container_title | Journal of industrial ecology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | SAUNDERS, Christi L LANDIS, Amy E MECCA, Laurel P JONES, Alex K SCHAEFER, Laura A BILEC, Melissa M |
description | Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole‐building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole‐building LCA.
In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self‐identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was “provides information about environmental impacts.” The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building‐related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jiec.12028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448372000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1448372000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c183t-c3fa0ef296c14bcdfedb0a062ce8a7fad021ac9e2494def72a4c5eb2ed35be073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4Qu8QUJIKWM7bWJ2paKAVAQSsI6cyRhcuUmxk0X5etKHmM2dxbl3cRi7FDAS_d0uHeFISJD5ERuIsYJESw3H_Q95ngidwyk7i3EJINREwoC9TGvjN7-u_uLtN_G3YLB1SLyxfOEs8dkGPfFpjBTjiur2js8b7CJv6h1_3zlfbcvvhG0TztmJNT7SxSGH7HP-8DF7Shavj8-z6SJBkas2QWUNkJV6giItsbJUlWBgIpFyk1lTgRQGNclUpxXZTJoUx1RKqtS4JMjUkF3vd9eh-ekotsXKRSTvTU1NFwuRprnKJAD06M0exdDEGMgW6-BWJmwKAcXWWbF1Vuyc9fDVYddENN4GU6OL_w2ZaaW0UOoPCl1s3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448372000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>SAUNDERS, Christi L ; LANDIS, Amy E ; MECCA, Laurel P ; JONES, Alex K ; SCHAEFER, Laura A ; BILEC, Melissa M</creator><creatorcontrib>SAUNDERS, Christi L ; LANDIS, Amy E ; MECCA, Laurel P ; JONES, Alex K ; SCHAEFER, Laura A ; BILEC, Melissa M</creatorcontrib><description>Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole‐building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole‐building LCA.
In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self‐identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was “provides information about environmental impacts.” The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building‐related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-1980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Construction industry ; Environment and sustainable development ; Environmental impact studies ; Focus groups ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industrial economics ; Industrial production ; Quantitative analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of industrial ecology, 2013-10, Vol.17 (5), p.777-788</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c183t-c3fa0ef296c14bcdfedb0a062ce8a7fad021ac9e2494def72a4c5eb2ed35be073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27933913$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SAUNDERS, Christi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDIS, Amy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MECCA, Laurel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, Alex K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHAEFER, Laura A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILEC, Melissa M</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector</title><title>Journal of industrial ecology</title><description>Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole‐building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole‐building LCA.
In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self‐identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was “provides information about environmental impacts.” The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building‐related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Environment and sustainable development</subject><subject>Environmental impact studies</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial economics</subject><subject>Industrial production</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><issn>1088-1980</issn><issn>1530-9290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4Qu8QUJIKWM7bWJ2paKAVAQSsI6cyRhcuUmxk0X5etKHmM2dxbl3cRi7FDAS_d0uHeFISJD5ERuIsYJESw3H_Q95ngidwyk7i3EJINREwoC9TGvjN7-u_uLtN_G3YLB1SLyxfOEs8dkGPfFpjBTjiur2js8b7CJv6h1_3zlfbcvvhG0TztmJNT7SxSGH7HP-8DF7Shavj8-z6SJBkas2QWUNkJV6giItsbJUlWBgIpFyk1lTgRQGNclUpxXZTJoUx1RKqtS4JMjUkF3vd9eh-ekotsXKRSTvTU1NFwuRprnKJAD06M0exdDEGMgW6-BWJmwKAcXWWbF1Vuyc9fDVYddENN4GU6OL_w2ZaaW0UOoPCl1s3g</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>SAUNDERS, Christi L</creator><creator>LANDIS, Amy E</creator><creator>MECCA, Laurel P</creator><creator>JONES, Alex K</creator><creator>SCHAEFER, Laura A</creator><creator>BILEC, Melissa M</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector</title><author>SAUNDERS, Christi L ; LANDIS, Amy E ; MECCA, Laurel P ; JONES, Alex K ; SCHAEFER, Laura A ; BILEC, Melissa M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c183t-c3fa0ef296c14bcdfedb0a062ce8a7fad021ac9e2494def72a4c5eb2ed35be073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Environment and sustainable development</topic><topic>Environmental impact studies</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial economics</topic><topic>Industrial production</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SAUNDERS, Christi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDIS, Amy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MECCA, Laurel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, Alex K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHAEFER, Laura A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BILEC, Melissa M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of industrial ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SAUNDERS, Christi L</au><au>LANDIS, Amy E</au><au>MECCA, Laurel P</au><au>JONES, Alex K</au><au>SCHAEFER, Laura A</au><au>BILEC, Melissa M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector</atitle><jtitle>Journal of industrial ecology</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>777</spage><epage>788</epage><pages>777-788</pages><issn>1088-1980</issn><eissn>1530-9290</eissn><abstract>Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole‐building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole‐building LCA.
In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self‐identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was “provides information about environmental impacts.” The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building‐related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/jiec.12028</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1088-1980 |
ispartof | Journal of industrial ecology, 2013-10, Vol.17 (5), p.777-788 |
issn | 1088-1980 1530-9290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448372000 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Construction industry Environment and sustainable development Environmental impact studies Focus groups Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Industrial economics Industrial production Quantitative analysis |
title | Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment: Focus on the Building Sector |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A12%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20the%20Practice%20of%20Life%20Cycle%20Assessment:%20Focus%20on%20the%20Building%20Sector&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20industrial%20ecology&rft.au=SAUNDERS,%20Christi%20L&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=777&rft.epage=788&rft.pages=777-788&rft.issn=1088-1980&rft.eissn=1530-9290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jiec.12028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1448372000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448372000&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |