Quantifying Transfer Rates of Salmonella and Escherichia coll O157:H7 between Fresh-Cut Produce and Common Kitchen Surfaces
Cross-contamination between foods and surfaces in food processing environments and home kitchens may play a significant role in foodborne disease transmission. This study quantifies the cross-contamination rates between a variety of fresh-cut produce and common kitchen surfaces (ceramic, stainless s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food protection 2013-09, Vol.76 (9), p.1530-1530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1530 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1530 |
container_title | Journal of food protection |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Jensen, Dane A Friedrich, Loretta M Harris, Linda J Danyluk, Michelle D Schaffner, Donald W |
description | Cross-contamination between foods and surfaces in food processing environments and home kitchens may play a significant role in foodborne disease transmission. This study quantifies the cross-contamination rates between a variety of fresh-cut produce and common kitchen surfaces (ceramic, stainless steel, glass, and plastic) using scenarios that differ by cross-contamination direction, surface type, produce type, and drying time/moisture level. A five-strain cocktail of rifampin-resistant Salmonella was used in transfer scenarios involving celery, carrot, and watermelon, and a five-strain cocktail of rifampin-resistant Escherichia coli 0157:H7 was used in transfer scenarios involving lettuce. Produce or surface coupons were placed in buffer-filled filter bags and homogenized or massaged, respectively, to recover cells. The resulting solutions were serially diluted in 0.1% peptone and surface plated onto tryptic soy agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin and bismuth sulfite agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin for Salmonella or sorbitol MacConkey agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin for E. coli 0157:H7. When the food contact surface was freshly inoculated, a high amount (>90%) of the inoculum was almost always transferred to the cut produce item. If the inoculated food contact surfaces were allowed to dry for 1 h, median transfer was generally >90% for carrots and watermelon but ranged from < 1 to ~70% for celery and lettuce. Freshly inoculated celery or lettuce transferred more bacteria (~2 to -25% of the inoculum) compared with freshly inoculated carrots or watermelon (approximately |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448223883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3085322571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p613-206cfa75e21a6d009ad93924f2b8f64870837d349cdc153c3f4427bc8169a5cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj8tKAzEYhYMoWKvvEHDjZiCTZHJxJ0Nri4Wq7cJdSTN_7JRpUpMJIr6842Xl6my-cztBo1JzXmii5SkaESZoQah6OUcXKe0JIVRTMUKfT9n4vnUfrX_F62h8chDxs-kh4eDwynSH4KHrDDa-wZNkdxBbu2sNtqHr8LKs5O1M4i307wAeTyOkXVHnHj_G0GQLP7Y6HIYU_ND2g93jVY7OWEiX6MyZLsHVn47RejpZ17Nisbyf13eL4ihKVlAirDOyAloa0RCiTaOZptzRrXKCK0kUkw3j2ja2rJhljnMqt1aVQpvKWjZGN7-xxxjeMqR-c2iT_f7kIeS0KTlXlDKl2IBe_0P3IUc_jBsoJgUj1VDxBY6SZ4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1437630515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying Transfer Rates of Salmonella and Escherichia coll O157:H7 between Fresh-Cut Produce and Common Kitchen Surfaces</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jensen, Dane A ; Friedrich, Loretta M ; Harris, Linda J ; Danyluk, Michelle D ; Schaffner, Donald W</creator><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Dane A ; Friedrich, Loretta M ; Harris, Linda J ; Danyluk, Michelle D ; Schaffner, Donald W</creatorcontrib><description>Cross-contamination between foods and surfaces in food processing environments and home kitchens may play a significant role in foodborne disease transmission. This study quantifies the cross-contamination rates between a variety of fresh-cut produce and common kitchen surfaces (ceramic, stainless steel, glass, and plastic) using scenarios that differ by cross-contamination direction, surface type, produce type, and drying time/moisture level. A five-strain cocktail of rifampin-resistant Salmonella was used in transfer scenarios involving celery, carrot, and watermelon, and a five-strain cocktail of rifampin-resistant Escherichia coli 0157:H7 was used in transfer scenarios involving lettuce. Produce or surface coupons were placed in buffer-filled filter bags and homogenized or massaged, respectively, to recover cells. The resulting solutions were serially diluted in 0.1% peptone and surface plated onto tryptic soy agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin and bismuth sulfite agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin for Salmonella or sorbitol MacConkey agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin for E. coli 0157:H7. When the food contact surface was freshly inoculated, a high amount (>90%) of the inoculum was almost always transferred to the cut produce item. If the inoculated food contact surfaces were allowed to dry for 1 h, median transfer was generally >90% for carrots and watermelon but ranged from < 1 to ~70% for celery and lettuce. Freshly inoculated celery or lettuce transferred more bacteria (~2 to -25% of the inoculum) compared with freshly inoculated carrots or watermelon (approximately <1 to 8%). After 1 h of drying, the rate of transfer from inoculated celery, carrot, and lettuce was <0.01 to ~5% and <1 to ~5% for watermelon. Surface moisture and direction of transfer have the greatest influence on microbial transfer rates. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Des Moines: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Agar ; Bacteria ; Citrullus lanatus ; Contamination ; Discount coupons ; Disease transmission ; Drying ; E coli ; Epidemics ; Food ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food safety ; Foodborne diseases ; Fruits ; Kitchens ; Lettuce ; Peptones ; Salmonella ; Stainless steel ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2013-09, Vol.76 (9), p.1530-1530</ispartof><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1437630515?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,64383,64385,64387,72239</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Dane A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Loretta M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Linda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danyluk, Michelle D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaffner, Donald W</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying Transfer Rates of Salmonella and Escherichia coll O157:H7 between Fresh-Cut Produce and Common Kitchen Surfaces</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><description>Cross-contamination between foods and surfaces in food processing environments and home kitchens may play a significant role in foodborne disease transmission. This study quantifies the cross-contamination rates between a variety of fresh-cut produce and common kitchen surfaces (ceramic, stainless steel, glass, and plastic) using scenarios that differ by cross-contamination direction, surface type, produce type, and drying time/moisture level. A five-strain cocktail of rifampin-resistant Salmonella was used in transfer scenarios involving celery, carrot, and watermelon, and a five-strain cocktail of rifampin-resistant Escherichia coli 0157:H7 was used in transfer scenarios involving lettuce. Produce or surface coupons were placed in buffer-filled filter bags and homogenized or massaged, respectively, to recover cells. The resulting solutions were serially diluted in 0.1% peptone and surface plated onto tryptic soy agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin and bismuth sulfite agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin for Salmonella or sorbitol MacConkey agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin for E. coli 0157:H7. When the food contact surface was freshly inoculated, a high amount (>90%) of the inoculum was almost always transferred to the cut produce item. If the inoculated food contact surfaces were allowed to dry for 1 h, median transfer was generally >90% for carrots and watermelon but ranged from < 1 to ~70% for celery and lettuce. Freshly inoculated celery or lettuce transferred more bacteria (~2 to -25% of the inoculum) compared with freshly inoculated carrots or watermelon (approximately <1 to 8%). After 1 h of drying, the rate of transfer from inoculated celery, carrot, and lettuce was <0.01 to ~5% and <1 to ~5% for watermelon. Surface moisture and direction of transfer have the greatest influence on microbial transfer rates. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Agar</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Citrullus lanatus</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Discount coupons</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Foodborne diseases</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Kitchens</subject><subject>Lettuce</subject><subject>Peptones</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj8tKAzEYhYMoWKvvEHDjZiCTZHJxJ0Nri4Wq7cJdSTN_7JRpUpMJIr6842Xl6my-cztBo1JzXmii5SkaESZoQah6OUcXKe0JIVRTMUKfT9n4vnUfrX_F62h8chDxs-kh4eDwynSH4KHrDDa-wZNkdxBbu2sNtqHr8LKs5O1M4i307wAeTyOkXVHnHj_G0GQLP7Y6HIYU_ND2g93jVY7OWEiX6MyZLsHVn47RejpZ17Nisbyf13eL4ihKVlAirDOyAloa0RCiTaOZptzRrXKCK0kUkw3j2ja2rJhljnMqt1aVQpvKWjZGN7-xxxjeMqR-c2iT_f7kIeS0KTlXlDKl2IBe_0P3IUc_jBsoJgUj1VDxBY6SZ4s</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Jensen, Dane A</creator><creator>Friedrich, Loretta M</creator><creator>Harris, Linda J</creator><creator>Danyluk, Michelle D</creator><creator>Schaffner, Donald W</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Quantifying Transfer Rates of Salmonella and Escherichia coll O157:H7 between Fresh-Cut Produce and Common Kitchen Surfaces</title><author>Jensen, Dane A ; Friedrich, Loretta M ; Harris, Linda J ; Danyluk, Michelle D ; Schaffner, Donald W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p613-206cfa75e21a6d009ad93924f2b8f64870837d349cdc153c3f4427bc8169a5cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agar</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Citrullus lanatus</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Discount coupons</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Foodborne diseases</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Kitchens</topic><topic>Lettuce</topic><topic>Peptones</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Dane A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Loretta M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Linda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danyluk, Michelle D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaffner, Donald W</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jensen, Dane A</au><au>Friedrich, Loretta M</au><au>Harris, Linda J</au><au>Danyluk, Michelle D</au><au>Schaffner, Donald W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying Transfer Rates of Salmonella and Escherichia coll O157:H7 between Fresh-Cut Produce and Common Kitchen Surfaces</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1530</spage><epage>1530</epage><pages>1530-1530</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><abstract>Cross-contamination between foods and surfaces in food processing environments and home kitchens may play a significant role in foodborne disease transmission. This study quantifies the cross-contamination rates between a variety of fresh-cut produce and common kitchen surfaces (ceramic, stainless steel, glass, and plastic) using scenarios that differ by cross-contamination direction, surface type, produce type, and drying time/moisture level. A five-strain cocktail of rifampin-resistant Salmonella was used in transfer scenarios involving celery, carrot, and watermelon, and a five-strain cocktail of rifampin-resistant Escherichia coli 0157:H7 was used in transfer scenarios involving lettuce. Produce or surface coupons were placed in buffer-filled filter bags and homogenized or massaged, respectively, to recover cells. The resulting solutions were serially diluted in 0.1% peptone and surface plated onto tryptic soy agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin and bismuth sulfite agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin for Salmonella or sorbitol MacConkey agar with 80 ng/ml rifampin for E. coli 0157:H7. When the food contact surface was freshly inoculated, a high amount (>90%) of the inoculum was almost always transferred to the cut produce item. If the inoculated food contact surfaces were allowed to dry for 1 h, median transfer was generally >90% for carrots and watermelon but ranged from < 1 to ~70% for celery and lettuce. Freshly inoculated celery or lettuce transferred more bacteria (~2 to -25% of the inoculum) compared with freshly inoculated carrots or watermelon (approximately <1 to 8%). After 1 h of drying, the rate of transfer from inoculated celery, carrot, and lettuce was <0.01 to ~5% and <1 to ~5% for watermelon. Surface moisture and direction of transfer have the greatest influence on microbial transfer rates. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Des Moines</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-028X |
ispartof | Journal of food protection, 2013-09, Vol.76 (9), p.1530-1530 |
issn | 0362-028X 1944-9097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448223883 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agar Bacteria Citrullus lanatus Contamination Discount coupons Disease transmission Drying E coli Epidemics Food Food contamination & poisoning Food safety Foodborne diseases Fruits Kitchens Lettuce Peptones Salmonella Stainless steel Vegetables |
title | Quantifying Transfer Rates of Salmonella and Escherichia coll O157:H7 between Fresh-Cut Produce and Common Kitchen Surfaces |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A55%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20Transfer%20Rates%20of%20Salmonella%20and%20Escherichia%20coll%20O157:H7%20between%20Fresh-Cut%20Produce%20and%20Common%20Kitchen%20Surfaces&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Jensen,%20Dane%20A&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1530&rft.epage=1530&rft.pages=1530-1530&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3085322571%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1437630515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |