GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL

ABSTRACT The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:River research and applications 2013-11, Vol.29 (9), p.1175-1194
1. Verfasser: Phillips, J. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1194
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1175
container_title River research and applications
container_volume 29
creator Phillips, J. D.
description ABSTRACT The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomorphic concepts of overfit and underfit streams. The qualitative predictions refer to whether channels experience aggradation, degradation or relative stability, and whether aggradation or degradation is dominated by width or depth. The model is based on transitions among seven possible fitness states, triggered by key thresholds of sediment supply versus transport capacity and shear stress versus shear strength, and requires that potential changes in sediment supply and water surface or energy‐grade slope also be accounted for. The fitness approach can be used where only relative values and changes are known, as is illustrated in three example applications from Texas. The flow‐channel fitness model synthesizes key elements from several existing approaches to predicting geomorphic responses to changes in flow and is intended to augment rather than replace quantitative approaches, providing a predictive tool where the data requirements and assumptions for quantitative models cannot be fully met. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rra.2602
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448218394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3102707571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4172-2450e27b4b59a0cfcb1d8f86153b97414583ef8f1d89db6ade694c375f7ab23b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAARYsoOKfgTyiI4EtnkqZN4tuY2Trsx2wr8y2kXQqdddPEof57Mx0TBCGQSzgcbq7jnEMwgACga63lAIUAHTg9GPiBB3FIDvc5YMfOiTFLACChjPac-wnPkiyfRdORm_NilqUFL9wyc0fRMJ3YOE3tKcqcDxN3HGfz4sYtI_4dvS2T8tgdT8uUF4WbZLc8PnWOGtkZdba7-87DmJejyIuzyXQ0jD2JIUEewgFQiFS4CpgEdVNXcEEbGtqiFSPYVqW-amhjX9miCuVChQzXPgkaIivkV37fufrxvuj160aZN_Hcmlp1nVyp9cYIiDFFkPoMW_TiD7pcb_TKtttSiEEMEf0V1nptjFaNeNHts9SfAgKx3VbYbcV2W4te7oTS1LJrtFzVrdnziNAAhwGwnPfDvbed-vzXJ_J8uPPu-Na8qY89L_WTCIn9u5inExElUYQf7xLB_C_kZo17</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1442914128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Phillips, J. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J. D.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomorphic concepts of overfit and underfit streams. The qualitative predictions refer to whether channels experience aggradation, degradation or relative stability, and whether aggradation or degradation is dominated by width or depth. The model is based on transitions among seven possible fitness states, triggered by key thresholds of sediment supply versus transport capacity and shear stress versus shear strength, and requires that potential changes in sediment supply and water surface or energy‐grade slope also be accounted for. The fitness approach can be used where only relative values and changes are known, as is illustrated in three example applications from Texas. The flow‐channel fitness model synthesizes key elements from several existing approaches to predicting geomorphic responses to changes in flow and is intended to augment rather than replace quantitative approaches, providing a predictive tool where the data requirements and assumptions for quantitative models cannot be fully met. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.2602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aggradation ; alluvial channels ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; channel change ; Channels ; Degradation ; Fitness ; flow-channel fitness ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; geomorphic response ; Geomorphology ; instream flows ; Mathematical models ; Sediments ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2013-11, Vol.29 (9), p.1175-1194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4172-2450e27b4b59a0cfcb1d8f86153b97414583ef8f1d89db6ade694c375f7ab23b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4172-2450e27b4b59a0cfcb1d8f86153b97414583ef8f1d89db6ade694c375f7ab23b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.2602$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.2602$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27854650$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J. D.</creatorcontrib><title>GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL</title><title>River research and applications</title><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomorphic concepts of overfit and underfit streams. The qualitative predictions refer to whether channels experience aggradation, degradation or relative stability, and whether aggradation or degradation is dominated by width or depth. The model is based on transitions among seven possible fitness states, triggered by key thresholds of sediment supply versus transport capacity and shear stress versus shear strength, and requires that potential changes in sediment supply and water surface or energy‐grade slope also be accounted for. The fitness approach can be used where only relative values and changes are known, as is illustrated in three example applications from Texas. The flow‐channel fitness model synthesizes key elements from several existing approaches to predicting geomorphic responses to changes in flow and is intended to augment rather than replace quantitative approaches, providing a predictive tool where the data requirements and assumptions for quantitative models cannot be fully met. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Aggradation</subject><subject>alluvial channels</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>channel change</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>flow-channel fitness</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>geomorphic response</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>instream flows</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAARYsoOKfgTyiI4EtnkqZN4tuY2Trsx2wr8y2kXQqdddPEof57Mx0TBCGQSzgcbq7jnEMwgACga63lAIUAHTg9GPiBB3FIDvc5YMfOiTFLACChjPac-wnPkiyfRdORm_NilqUFL9wyc0fRMJ3YOE3tKcqcDxN3HGfz4sYtI_4dvS2T8tgdT8uUF4WbZLc8PnWOGtkZdba7-87DmJejyIuzyXQ0jD2JIUEewgFQiFS4CpgEdVNXcEEbGtqiFSPYVqW-amhjX9miCuVChQzXPgkaIivkV37fufrxvuj160aZN_Hcmlp1nVyp9cYIiDFFkPoMW_TiD7pcb_TKtttSiEEMEf0V1nptjFaNeNHts9SfAgKx3VbYbcV2W4te7oTS1LJrtFzVrdnziNAAhwGwnPfDvbed-vzXJ_J8uPPu-Na8qY89L_WTCIn9u5inExElUYQf7xLB_C_kZo17</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Phillips, J. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL</title><author>Phillips, J. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4172-2450e27b4b59a0cfcb1d8f86153b97414583ef8f1d89db6ade694c375f7ab23b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aggradation</topic><topic>alluvial channels</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>channel change</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>flow-channel fitness</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>geomorphic response</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>instream flows</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, J. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1175</spage><epage>1194</epage><pages>1175-1194</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomorphic concepts of overfit and underfit streams. The qualitative predictions refer to whether channels experience aggradation, degradation or relative stability, and whether aggradation or degradation is dominated by width or depth. The model is based on transitions among seven possible fitness states, triggered by key thresholds of sediment supply versus transport capacity and shear stress versus shear strength, and requires that potential changes in sediment supply and water surface or energy‐grade slope also be accounted for. The fitness approach can be used where only relative values and changes are known, as is illustrated in three example applications from Texas. The flow‐channel fitness model synthesizes key elements from several existing approaches to predicting geomorphic responses to changes in flow and is intended to augment rather than replace quantitative approaches, providing a predictive tool where the data requirements and assumptions for quantitative models cannot be fully met. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.2602</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-1459
ispartof River research and applications, 2013-11, Vol.29 (9), p.1175-1194
issn 1535-1459
1535-1467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448218394
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aggradation
alluvial channels
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
channel change
Channels
Degradation
Fitness
flow-channel fitness
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
geomorphic response
Geomorphology
instream flows
Mathematical models
Sediments
Synecology
title GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GEOMORPHIC%20RESPONSES%20TO%20CHANGES%20IN%20INSTREAM%20FLOWS:%20THE%20FLOW-CHANNEL%20FITNESS%20MODEL&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Phillips,%20J.%20D.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1175&rft.epage=1194&rft.pages=1175-1194&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.2602&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3102707571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1442914128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true