GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL
ABSTRACT The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | River research and applications 2013-11, Vol.29 (9), p.1175-1194 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1175 |
container_title | River research and applications |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Phillips, J. D. |
description | ABSTRACT
The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomorphic concepts of overfit and underfit streams. The qualitative predictions refer to whether channels experience aggradation, degradation or relative stability, and whether aggradation or degradation is dominated by width or depth. The model is based on transitions among seven possible fitness states, triggered by key thresholds of sediment supply versus transport capacity and shear stress versus shear strength, and requires that potential changes in sediment supply and water surface or energy‐grade slope also be accounted for. The fitness approach can be used where only relative values and changes are known, as is illustrated in three example applications from Texas. The flow‐channel fitness model synthesizes key elements from several existing approaches to predicting geomorphic responses to changes in flow and is intended to augment rather than replace quantitative approaches, providing a predictive tool where the data requirements and assumptions for quantitative models cannot be fully met. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rra.2602 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448218394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3102707571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4172-2450e27b4b59a0cfcb1d8f86153b97414583ef8f1d89db6ade694c375f7ab23b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAARYsoOKfgTyiI4EtnkqZN4tuY2Trsx2wr8y2kXQqdddPEof57Mx0TBCGQSzgcbq7jnEMwgACga63lAIUAHTg9GPiBB3FIDvc5YMfOiTFLACChjPac-wnPkiyfRdORm_NilqUFL9wyc0fRMJ3YOE3tKcqcDxN3HGfz4sYtI_4dvS2T8tgdT8uUF4WbZLc8PnWOGtkZdba7-87DmJejyIuzyXQ0jD2JIUEewgFQiFS4CpgEdVNXcEEbGtqiFSPYVqW-amhjX9miCuVChQzXPgkaIivkV37fufrxvuj160aZN_Hcmlp1nVyp9cYIiDFFkPoMW_TiD7pcb_TKtttSiEEMEf0V1nptjFaNeNHts9SfAgKx3VbYbcV2W4te7oTS1LJrtFzVrdnziNAAhwGwnPfDvbed-vzXJ_J8uPPu-Na8qY89L_WTCIn9u5inExElUYQf7xLB_C_kZo17</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1442914128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Phillips, J. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J. D.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomorphic concepts of overfit and underfit streams. The qualitative predictions refer to whether channels experience aggradation, degradation or relative stability, and whether aggradation or degradation is dominated by width or depth. The model is based on transitions among seven possible fitness states, triggered by key thresholds of sediment supply versus transport capacity and shear stress versus shear strength, and requires that potential changes in sediment supply and water surface or energy‐grade slope also be accounted for. The fitness approach can be used where only relative values and changes are known, as is illustrated in three example applications from Texas. The flow‐channel fitness model synthesizes key elements from several existing approaches to predicting geomorphic responses to changes in flow and is intended to augment rather than replace quantitative approaches, providing a predictive tool where the data requirements and assumptions for quantitative models cannot be fully met. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.2602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aggradation ; alluvial channels ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; channel change ; Channels ; Degradation ; Fitness ; flow-channel fitness ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; geomorphic response ; Geomorphology ; instream flows ; Mathematical models ; Sediments ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2013-11, Vol.29 (9), p.1175-1194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4172-2450e27b4b59a0cfcb1d8f86153b97414583ef8f1d89db6ade694c375f7ab23b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4172-2450e27b4b59a0cfcb1d8f86153b97414583ef8f1d89db6ade694c375f7ab23b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.2602$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.2602$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27854650$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J. D.</creatorcontrib><title>GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL</title><title>River research and applications</title><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomorphic concepts of overfit and underfit streams. The qualitative predictions refer to whether channels experience aggradation, degradation or relative stability, and whether aggradation or degradation is dominated by width or depth. The model is based on transitions among seven possible fitness states, triggered by key thresholds of sediment supply versus transport capacity and shear stress versus shear strength, and requires that potential changes in sediment supply and water surface or energy‐grade slope also be accounted for. The fitness approach can be used where only relative values and changes are known, as is illustrated in three example applications from Texas. The flow‐channel fitness model synthesizes key elements from several existing approaches to predicting geomorphic responses to changes in flow and is intended to augment rather than replace quantitative approaches, providing a predictive tool where the data requirements and assumptions for quantitative models cannot be fully met. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Aggradation</subject><subject>alluvial channels</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>channel change</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>flow-channel fitness</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>geomorphic response</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>instream flows</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAARYsoOKfgTyiI4EtnkqZN4tuY2Trsx2wr8y2kXQqdddPEof57Mx0TBCGQSzgcbq7jnEMwgACga63lAIUAHTg9GPiBB3FIDvc5YMfOiTFLACChjPac-wnPkiyfRdORm_NilqUFL9wyc0fRMJ3YOE3tKcqcDxN3HGfz4sYtI_4dvS2T8tgdT8uUF4WbZLc8PnWOGtkZdba7-87DmJejyIuzyXQ0jD2JIUEewgFQiFS4CpgEdVNXcEEbGtqiFSPYVqW-amhjX9miCuVChQzXPgkaIivkV37fufrxvuj160aZN_Hcmlp1nVyp9cYIiDFFkPoMW_TiD7pcb_TKtttSiEEMEf0V1nptjFaNeNHts9SfAgKx3VbYbcV2W4te7oTS1LJrtFzVrdnziNAAhwGwnPfDvbed-vzXJ_J8uPPu-Na8qY89L_WTCIn9u5inExElUYQf7xLB_C_kZo17</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Phillips, J. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL</title><author>Phillips, J. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4172-2450e27b4b59a0cfcb1d8f86153b97414583ef8f1d89db6ade694c375f7ab23b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aggradation</topic><topic>alluvial channels</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>channel change</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>flow-channel fitness</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>geomorphic response</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>instream flows</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, J. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><addtitle>River Res. Applic</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1175</spage><epage>1194</epage><pages>1175-1194</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
The flow‐channel fitness model is a conceptual and practical model for predicting the qualitative response of alluvial channels to modifications of flow regimes. ‘Fitness’ refers to the size of channels compared with the flows they convey, with the terminology derived from traditional geomorphic concepts of overfit and underfit streams. The qualitative predictions refer to whether channels experience aggradation, degradation or relative stability, and whether aggradation or degradation is dominated by width or depth. The model is based on transitions among seven possible fitness states, triggered by key thresholds of sediment supply versus transport capacity and shear stress versus shear strength, and requires that potential changes in sediment supply and water surface or energy‐grade slope also be accounted for. The fitness approach can be used where only relative values and changes are known, as is illustrated in three example applications from Texas. The flow‐channel fitness model synthesizes key elements from several existing approaches to predicting geomorphic responses to changes in flow and is intended to augment rather than replace quantitative approaches, providing a predictive tool where the data requirements and assumptions for quantitative models cannot be fully met. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.2602</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-1459 |
ispartof | River research and applications, 2013-11, Vol.29 (9), p.1175-1194 |
issn | 1535-1459 1535-1467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448218394 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aggradation alluvial channels Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences channel change Channels Degradation Fitness flow-channel fitness Fresh water ecosystems Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology geomorphic response Geomorphology instream flows Mathematical models Sediments Synecology |
title | GEOMORPHIC RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INSTREAM FLOWS: THE FLOW-CHANNEL FITNESS MODEL |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GEOMORPHIC%20RESPONSES%20TO%20CHANGES%20IN%20INSTREAM%20FLOWS:%20THE%20FLOW-CHANNEL%20FITNESS%20MODEL&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Phillips,%20J.%20D.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1175&rft.epage=1194&rft.pages=1175-1194&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.2602&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3102707571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1442914128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |