A Faster and a Stronger Defense Response: One of the Key Elements in Grapevine Explaining Its Lower Level of Susceptibility to Esca?
Wood diseases like Esca are among the most damaging afflictions in grapevine. The defense mechanisms in this plant-pathogen interaction are not well understood. As some grapevine cultivars have been observed to be less susceptible to Esca than others, understanding the factors involved in this poten...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Phytopathology 2013-10, Vol.103 (10), p.1028-1034 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1034 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1028 |
| container_title | Phytopathology |
| container_volume | 103 |
| creator | LAMBERT, Carole IAN LI KIM KHIOOK LUCAS, Sylvia TELEF-MICOULEAU, Nadège MERILLON, Jean-Michel CLUZET, Stéphanie |
| description | Wood diseases like Esca are among the most damaging afflictions in grapevine. The defense mechanisms in this plant-pathogen interaction are not well understood. As some grapevine cultivars have been observed to be less susceptible to Esca than others, understanding the factors involved in this potentially stronger defense response can be of great interest. To lift part of this veil, we elicited Vitis vinifera plants of two cultivars less susceptible to Esca ('Merlot' and 'Carignan') and of one susceptible cultivar ('Cabernet Sauvignon'), and monitored their defense responses at the leaf level. Our model of elicitation consisted in grapevine cuttings absorbing a culture filtrate of one causal agent of Esca, Phaemoniella chlamydospora. This model might reflect the early events occurring in Esca-affected grapevines. The two least susceptible cultivars showed an earlier and stronger defense response than the susceptible one, particularly with regard to induction of the PAL and STS genes, and a higher accumulation of stilbene compounds and some pathogenesis-related proteins. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1094/PHYTO-11-12-0305-R |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448216623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1448216623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-6eb7d83340dc6f80fa32d036ed940091363d2f31ddfd0908e8bb73bf3dbf1fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-P0zAQxS0EYsvCF-CAfEHiEpixXSfhglZL94-oVNTtAU6WE48Xo9QJcbrQOx8cly1w5TQzmt97Gs1j7DnCa4Ravfl49XmzKhALFAVImBfrB2yGtZJFqSv1kM0AJBa1qj-dsCcpfQWAsprrx-xESI2llPMZ-3nGL2yaaOQ2Om75zTT28TaP78lTTMTXlIY-N2_5KhLvPZ--EP9Ae77oaEtxSjxEfjnage5CBhY_hs6GGOItv867Zf89ey3pjrqD9maXWhqm0IQuTHs-9XyRWvvuKXvkbZfo2bGess3FYnN-VSxXl9fnZ8uiVQhToakpXSWlAtdqX4G3UjiQmlytAGqUWjrhJTrnHdRQUdU0pWy8dI3HDJ-yV_e2w9h_21GazDbke7rORup3yaBSlUCthfwPVAoo50JhRsU92o59SiN5M4xha8e9QTCHnMzvnAyiQWEOOZl1Fr04-u-aLbm_kj_BZODlEbD5Q50fbWxD-seVpdJiXspfUxGbww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1432075241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Faster and a Stronger Defense Response: One of the Key Elements in Grapevine Explaining Its Lower Level of Susceptibility to Esca?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>LAMBERT, Carole ; IAN LI KIM KHIOOK ; LUCAS, Sylvia ; TELEF-MICOULEAU, Nadège ; MERILLON, Jean-Michel ; CLUZET, Stéphanie</creator><creatorcontrib>LAMBERT, Carole ; IAN LI KIM KHIOOK ; LUCAS, Sylvia ; TELEF-MICOULEAU, Nadège ; MERILLON, Jean-Michel ; CLUZET, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><description>Wood diseases like Esca are among the most damaging afflictions in grapevine. The defense mechanisms in this plant-pathogen interaction are not well understood. As some grapevine cultivars have been observed to be less susceptible to Esca than others, understanding the factors involved in this potentially stronger defense response can be of great interest. To lift part of this veil, we elicited Vitis vinifera plants of two cultivars less susceptible to Esca ('Merlot' and 'Carignan') and of one susceptible cultivar ('Cabernet Sauvignon'), and monitored their defense responses at the leaf level. Our model of elicitation consisted in grapevine cuttings absorbing a culture filtrate of one causal agent of Esca, Phaemoniella chlamydospora. This model might reflect the early events occurring in Esca-affected grapevines. The two least susceptible cultivars showed an earlier and stronger defense response than the susceptible one, particularly with regard to induction of the PAL and STS genes, and a higher accumulation of stilbene compounds and some pathogenesis-related proteins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-949X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7684</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-12-0305-R</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23617335</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHYTAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society</publisher><subject>Ascomycota ; Biological and medical sciences ; Disease Susceptibility ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gene Expression Regulation, Plant ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plant Diseases - genetics ; Plant Leaves - genetics ; Vitaceae ; Vitis - genetics ; Vitis vinifera</subject><ispartof>Phytopathology, 2013-10, Vol.103 (10), p.1028-1034</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-6eb7d83340dc6f80fa32d036ed940091363d2f31ddfd0908e8bb73bf3dbf1fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-6eb7d83340dc6f80fa32d036ed940091363d2f31ddfd0908e8bb73bf3dbf1fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3711,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27746257$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23617335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LAMBERT, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IAN LI KIM KHIOOK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUCAS, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TELEF-MICOULEAU, Nadège</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERILLON, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLUZET, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><title>A Faster and a Stronger Defense Response: One of the Key Elements in Grapevine Explaining Its Lower Level of Susceptibility to Esca?</title><title>Phytopathology</title><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><description>Wood diseases like Esca are among the most damaging afflictions in grapevine. The defense mechanisms in this plant-pathogen interaction are not well understood. As some grapevine cultivars have been observed to be less susceptible to Esca than others, understanding the factors involved in this potentially stronger defense response can be of great interest. To lift part of this veil, we elicited Vitis vinifera plants of two cultivars less susceptible to Esca ('Merlot' and 'Carignan') and of one susceptible cultivar ('Cabernet Sauvignon'), and monitored their defense responses at the leaf level. Our model of elicitation consisted in grapevine cuttings absorbing a culture filtrate of one causal agent of Esca, Phaemoniella chlamydospora. This model might reflect the early events occurring in Esca-affected grapevines. The two least susceptible cultivars showed an earlier and stronger defense response than the susceptible one, particularly with regard to induction of the PAL and STS genes, and a higher accumulation of stilbene compounds and some pathogenesis-related proteins.</description><subject>Ascomycota</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Disease Susceptibility</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - genetics</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - genetics</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><subject>Vitis - genetics</subject><subject>Vitis vinifera</subject><issn>0031-949X</issn><issn>1943-7684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU-P0zAQxS0EYsvCF-CAfEHiEpixXSfhglZL94-oVNTtAU6WE48Xo9QJcbrQOx8cly1w5TQzmt97Gs1j7DnCa4Ravfl49XmzKhALFAVImBfrB2yGtZJFqSv1kM0AJBa1qj-dsCcpfQWAsprrx-xESI2llPMZ-3nGL2yaaOQ2Om75zTT28TaP78lTTMTXlIY-N2_5KhLvPZ--EP9Ae77oaEtxSjxEfjnage5CBhY_hs6GGOItv867Zf89ey3pjrqD9maXWhqm0IQuTHs-9XyRWvvuKXvkbZfo2bGess3FYnN-VSxXl9fnZ8uiVQhToakpXSWlAtdqX4G3UjiQmlytAGqUWjrhJTrnHdRQUdU0pWy8dI3HDJ-yV_e2w9h_21GazDbke7rORup3yaBSlUCthfwPVAoo50JhRsU92o59SiN5M4xha8e9QTCHnMzvnAyiQWEOOZl1Fr04-u-aLbm_kj_BZODlEbD5Q50fbWxD-seVpdJiXspfUxGbww</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>LAMBERT, Carole</creator><creator>IAN LI KIM KHIOOK</creator><creator>LUCAS, Sylvia</creator><creator>TELEF-MICOULEAU, Nadège</creator><creator>MERILLON, Jean-Michel</creator><creator>CLUZET, Stéphanie</creator><general>American Phytopathological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>A Faster and a Stronger Defense Response: One of the Key Elements in Grapevine Explaining Its Lower Level of Susceptibility to Esca?</title><author>LAMBERT, Carole ; IAN LI KIM KHIOOK ; LUCAS, Sylvia ; TELEF-MICOULEAU, Nadège ; MERILLON, Jean-Michel ; CLUZET, Stéphanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-6eb7d83340dc6f80fa32d036ed940091363d2f31ddfd0908e8bb73bf3dbf1fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Ascomycota</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Disease Susceptibility</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - genetics</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - genetics</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><topic>Vitis - genetics</topic><topic>Vitis vinifera</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LAMBERT, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IAN LI KIM KHIOOK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUCAS, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TELEF-MICOULEAU, Nadège</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERILLON, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLUZET, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LAMBERT, Carole</au><au>IAN LI KIM KHIOOK</au><au>LUCAS, Sylvia</au><au>TELEF-MICOULEAU, Nadège</au><au>MERILLON, Jean-Michel</au><au>CLUZET, Stéphanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Faster and a Stronger Defense Response: One of the Key Elements in Grapevine Explaining Its Lower Level of Susceptibility to Esca?</atitle><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1028</spage><epage>1034</epage><pages>1028-1034</pages><issn>0031-949X</issn><eissn>1943-7684</eissn><coden>PHYTAJ</coden><abstract>Wood diseases like Esca are among the most damaging afflictions in grapevine. The defense mechanisms in this plant-pathogen interaction are not well understood. As some grapevine cultivars have been observed to be less susceptible to Esca than others, understanding the factors involved in this potentially stronger defense response can be of great interest. To lift part of this veil, we elicited Vitis vinifera plants of two cultivars less susceptible to Esca ('Merlot' and 'Carignan') and of one susceptible cultivar ('Cabernet Sauvignon'), and monitored their defense responses at the leaf level. Our model of elicitation consisted in grapevine cuttings absorbing a culture filtrate of one causal agent of Esca, Phaemoniella chlamydospora. This model might reflect the early events occurring in Esca-affected grapevines. The two least susceptible cultivars showed an earlier and stronger defense response than the susceptible one, particularly with regard to induction of the PAL and STS genes, and a higher accumulation of stilbene compounds and some pathogenesis-related proteins.</abstract><cop>St. Paul, MN</cop><pub>American Phytopathological Society</pub><pmid>23617335</pmid><doi>10.1094/PHYTO-11-12-0305-R</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-949X |
| ispartof | Phytopathology, 2013-10, Vol.103 (10), p.1028-1034 |
| issn | 0031-949X 1943-7684 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1448216623 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues |
| subjects | Ascomycota Biological and medical sciences Disease Susceptibility Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Plant Diseases - genetics Plant Leaves - genetics Vitaceae Vitis - genetics Vitis vinifera |
| title | A Faster and a Stronger Defense Response: One of the Key Elements in Grapevine Explaining Its Lower Level of Susceptibility to Esca? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A37%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Faster%20and%20a%20Stronger%20Defense%20Response:%20One%20of%20the%20Key%20Elements%20in%20Grapevine%20Explaining%20Its%20Lower%20Level%20of%20Susceptibility%20to%20Esca?&rft.jtitle=Phytopathology&rft.au=LAMBERT,%20Carole&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1028&rft.epage=1034&rft.pages=1028-1034&rft.issn=0031-949X&rft.eissn=1943-7684&rft.coden=PHYTAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PHYTO-11-12-0305-R&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1448216623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1432075241&rft_id=info:pmid/23617335&rfr_iscdi=true |