Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes

Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation 1986-01, Vol.58 (1), p.27-34
Hauptverfasser: Hannah, Sidney A., Austern, Barry M., Eralp, Atal E., Wise, Robert H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 27
container_title Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation
container_volume 58
creator Hannah, Sidney A.
Austern, Barry M.
Eralp, Atal E.
Wise, Robert H.
description Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A conventional activated sludge system was operated in parallel as a control. Wastewater feed was spiked with 21 organics dissolved in toluene. Removal of ambient concentrations of five metals was also evaluated. The control typically removed 80 to 90% of volatiles and 85 to 95% of semivolatiles. The facultative lagoon was the best alternative process, followed by the aerated lagoon. Removals of a specific toxic pollutant depended on the properties of the chemical and its interactions with removal mechanisms used in each treatment process.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14481721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25042837</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25042837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g186t-b8b8924d4a5971fc173db5c6bdbdc821d207661efea1c5211093b479ab2c29da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9zM1KAzEUhuEgCtbqJQhZiLuB_E2SWUrxDyoWrbgcTjIZmTIzqTlprXdvocXVt3gfvhMyEVKYwihtTsmEMSULLpk8JxeIK8Yks9xOyMssDmtIkLttoG9hiFvoaWzpMu46Txex7zcZxozU_dL3bkc_AXP4gRwSXaYAeQhjposUfUAMeEnOWugxXB13Sj4e7pezp2L--vg8u5sXX9zqXDjrbCVUo6CsDG89N7JxpdeucY23gjeCGa15aANwXwrOWSWdMhU44UXVgJyS28PvOsXvTcBcDx360PcwhrjBmitluRF8D2-OENBD3yYYfYf1OnUDpN_aaqW0Nnt2fWArzDH9Z1EyJaw08g8ITmNO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14481721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hannah, Sidney A. ; Austern, Barry M. ; Eralp, Atal E. ; Wise, Robert H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Sidney A. ; Austern, Barry M. ; Eralp, Atal E. ; Wise, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><description>Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A conventional activated sludge system was operated in parallel as a control. Wastewater feed was spiked with 21 organics dissolved in toluene. Removal of ambient concentrations of five metals was also evaluated. The control typically removed 80 to 90% of volatiles and 85 to 95% of semivolatiles. The facultative lagoon was the best alternative process, followed by the aerated lagoon. Removals of a specific toxic pollutant depended on the properties of the chemical and its interactions with removal mechanisms used in each treatment process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-7467</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWPFA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Water Pollution Control Federation</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Applied sciences ; Chemical hazards ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Environmental agencies ; Exact sciences and technology ; Focus on: Toxic Chemicals ; General purification processes ; Lagoons ; Organic pollution ; Pollution ; Sludge ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water pollution ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, 1986-01, Vol.58 (1), p.27-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 Water Pollution Control Federation</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25042837$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25042837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8644667$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Sidney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austern, Barry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eralp, Atal E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes</title><title>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation</title><description>Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A conventional activated sludge system was operated in parallel as a control. Wastewater feed was spiked with 21 organics dissolved in toluene. Removal of ambient concentrations of five metals was also evaluated. The control typically removed 80 to 90% of volatiles and 85 to 95% of semivolatiles. The facultative lagoon was the best alternative process, followed by the aerated lagoon. Removals of a specific toxic pollutant depended on the properties of the chemical and its interactions with removal mechanisms used in each treatment process.</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Chemical hazards</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Focus on: Toxic Chemicals</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Lagoons</subject><subject>Organic pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1303</issn><issn>2327-7467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9zM1KAzEUhuEgCtbqJQhZiLuB_E2SWUrxDyoWrbgcTjIZmTIzqTlprXdvocXVt3gfvhMyEVKYwihtTsmEMSULLpk8JxeIK8Yks9xOyMssDmtIkLttoG9hiFvoaWzpMu46Txex7zcZxozU_dL3bkc_AXP4gRwSXaYAeQhjposUfUAMeEnOWugxXB13Sj4e7pezp2L--vg8u5sXX9zqXDjrbCVUo6CsDG89N7JxpdeucY23gjeCGa15aANwXwrOWSWdMhU44UXVgJyS28PvOsXvTcBcDx360PcwhrjBmitluRF8D2-OENBD3yYYfYf1OnUDpN_aaqW0Nnt2fWArzDH9Z1EyJaw08g8ITmNO</recordid><startdate>19860101</startdate><enddate>19860101</enddate><creator>Hannah, Sidney A.</creator><creator>Austern, Barry M.</creator><creator>Eralp, Atal E.</creator><creator>Wise, Robert H.</creator><general>Water Pollution Control Federation</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860101</creationdate><title>Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes</title><author>Hannah, Sidney A. ; Austern, Barry M. ; Eralp, Atal E. ; Wise, Robert H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g186t-b8b8924d4a5971fc173db5c6bdbdc821d207661efea1c5211093b479ab2c29da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Chemical hazards</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Focus on: Toxic Chemicals</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Lagoons</topic><topic>Organic pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Sidney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austern, Barry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eralp, Atal E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hannah, Sidney A.</au><au>Austern, Barry M.</au><au>Eralp, Atal E.</au><au>Wise, Robert H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes</atitle><jtitle>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation</jtitle><date>1986-01-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>27-34</pages><issn>0043-1303</issn><eissn>2327-7467</eissn><coden>JWPFA5</coden><abstract>Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A conventional activated sludge system was operated in parallel as a control. Wastewater feed was spiked with 21 organics dissolved in toluene. Removal of ambient concentrations of five metals was also evaluated. The control typically removed 80 to 90% of volatiles and 85 to 95% of semivolatiles. The facultative lagoon was the best alternative process, followed by the aerated lagoon. Removals of a specific toxic pollutant depended on the properties of the chemical and its interactions with removal mechanisms used in each treatment process.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Water Pollution Control Federation</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1303
ispartof Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, 1986-01, Vol.58 (1), p.27-34
issn 0043-1303
2327-7467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14481721
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Activated sludge
Applied sciences
Chemical hazards
Chemical oxygen demand
Environmental agencies
Exact sciences and technology
Focus on: Toxic Chemicals
General purification processes
Lagoons
Organic pollution
Pollution
Sludge
Wastewater
Wastewater treatment
Wastewaters
Water pollution
Water treatment and pollution
title Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T19%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Removal%20of%20Toxic%20Pollutants%20by%20Six%20Wastewater%20Treatment%20Processes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20-%20Water%20Pollution%20Control%20Federation&rft.au=Hannah,%20Sidney%20A.&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=27-34&rft.issn=0043-1303&rft.eissn=2327-7467&rft.coden=JWPFA5&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25042837%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14481721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25042837&rfr_iscdi=true