Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes
Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation 1986-01, Vol.58 (1), p.27-34 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 34 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Hannah, Sidney A. Austern, Barry M. Eralp, Atal E. Wise, Robert H. |
description | Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A conventional activated sludge system was operated in parallel as a control. Wastewater feed was spiked with 21 organics dissolved in toluene. Removal of ambient concentrations of five metals was also evaluated. The control typically removed 80 to 90% of volatiles and 85 to 95% of semivolatiles. The facultative lagoon was the best alternative process, followed by the aerated lagoon. Removals of a specific toxic pollutant depended on the properties of the chemical and its interactions with removal mechanisms used in each treatment process. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14481721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25042837</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25042837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g186t-b8b8924d4a5971fc173db5c6bdbdc821d207661efea1c5211093b479ab2c29da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9zM1KAzEUhuEgCtbqJQhZiLuB_E2SWUrxDyoWrbgcTjIZmTIzqTlprXdvocXVt3gfvhMyEVKYwihtTsmEMSULLpk8JxeIK8Yks9xOyMssDmtIkLttoG9hiFvoaWzpMu46Txex7zcZxozU_dL3bkc_AXP4gRwSXaYAeQhjposUfUAMeEnOWugxXB13Sj4e7pezp2L--vg8u5sXX9zqXDjrbCVUo6CsDG89N7JxpdeucY23gjeCGa15aANwXwrOWSWdMhU44UXVgJyS28PvOsXvTcBcDx360PcwhrjBmitluRF8D2-OENBD3yYYfYf1OnUDpN_aaqW0Nnt2fWArzDH9Z1EyJaw08g8ITmNO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14481721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hannah, Sidney A. ; Austern, Barry M. ; Eralp, Atal E. ; Wise, Robert H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Sidney A. ; Austern, Barry M. ; Eralp, Atal E. ; Wise, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><description>Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A conventional activated sludge system was operated in parallel as a control. Wastewater feed was spiked with 21 organics dissolved in toluene. Removal of ambient concentrations of five metals was also evaluated. The control typically removed 80 to 90% of volatiles and 85 to 95% of semivolatiles. The facultative lagoon was the best alternative process, followed by the aerated lagoon. Removals of a specific toxic pollutant depended on the properties of the chemical and its interactions with removal mechanisms used in each treatment process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-7467</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWPFA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Water Pollution Control Federation</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Applied sciences ; Chemical hazards ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Environmental agencies ; Exact sciences and technology ; Focus on: Toxic Chemicals ; General purification processes ; Lagoons ; Organic pollution ; Pollution ; Sludge ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water pollution ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, 1986-01, Vol.58 (1), p.27-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 Water Pollution Control Federation</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25042837$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25042837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8644667$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Sidney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austern, Barry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eralp, Atal E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes</title><title>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation</title><description>Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A conventional activated sludge system was operated in parallel as a control. Wastewater feed was spiked with 21 organics dissolved in toluene. Removal of ambient concentrations of five metals was also evaluated. The control typically removed 80 to 90% of volatiles and 85 to 95% of semivolatiles. The facultative lagoon was the best alternative process, followed by the aerated lagoon. Removals of a specific toxic pollutant depended on the properties of the chemical and its interactions with removal mechanisms used in each treatment process.</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Chemical hazards</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Focus on: Toxic Chemicals</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Lagoons</subject><subject>Organic pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1303</issn><issn>2327-7467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9zM1KAzEUhuEgCtbqJQhZiLuB_E2SWUrxDyoWrbgcTjIZmTIzqTlprXdvocXVt3gfvhMyEVKYwihtTsmEMSULLpk8JxeIK8Yks9xOyMssDmtIkLttoG9hiFvoaWzpMu46Txex7zcZxozU_dL3bkc_AXP4gRwSXaYAeQhjposUfUAMeEnOWugxXB13Sj4e7pezp2L--vg8u5sXX9zqXDjrbCVUo6CsDG89N7JxpdeucY23gjeCGa15aANwXwrOWSWdMhU44UXVgJyS28PvOsXvTcBcDx360PcwhrjBmitluRF8D2-OENBD3yYYfYf1OnUDpN_aaqW0Nnt2fWArzDH9Z1EyJaw08g8ITmNO</recordid><startdate>19860101</startdate><enddate>19860101</enddate><creator>Hannah, Sidney A.</creator><creator>Austern, Barry M.</creator><creator>Eralp, Atal E.</creator><creator>Wise, Robert H.</creator><general>Water Pollution Control Federation</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860101</creationdate><title>Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes</title><author>Hannah, Sidney A. ; Austern, Barry M. ; Eralp, Atal E. ; Wise, Robert H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g186t-b8b8924d4a5971fc173db5c6bdbdc821d207661efea1c5211093b479ab2c29da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Chemical hazards</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Focus on: Toxic Chemicals</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Lagoons</topic><topic>Organic pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Sidney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austern, Barry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eralp, Atal E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hannah, Sidney A.</au><au>Austern, Barry M.</au><au>Eralp, Atal E.</au><au>Wise, Robert H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes</atitle><jtitle>Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation</jtitle><date>1986-01-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>27-34</pages><issn>0043-1303</issn><eissn>2327-7467</eissn><coden>JWPFA5</coden><abstract>Five pilot-scale wastewater treatment processes that provided less than secondary treatment-primary clarification plus filtration, chemical clarification, high-rate trickling filter, aerated lagoon, and facultative lagoon-were evaluated for removal of priority pollutants from municipal wastewater. A conventional activated sludge system was operated in parallel as a control. Wastewater feed was spiked with 21 organics dissolved in toluene. Removal of ambient concentrations of five metals was also evaluated. The control typically removed 80 to 90% of volatiles and 85 to 95% of semivolatiles. The facultative lagoon was the best alternative process, followed by the aerated lagoon. Removals of a specific toxic pollutant depended on the properties of the chemical and its interactions with removal mechanisms used in each treatment process.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Water Pollution Control Federation</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1303 |
ispartof | Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, 1986-01, Vol.58 (1), p.27-34 |
issn | 0043-1303 2327-7467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14481721 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Activated sludge Applied sciences Chemical hazards Chemical oxygen demand Environmental agencies Exact sciences and technology Focus on: Toxic Chemicals General purification processes Lagoons Organic pollution Pollution Sludge Wastewater Wastewater treatment Wastewaters Water pollution Water treatment and pollution |
title | Comparative Removal of Toxic Pollutants by Six Wastewater Treatment Processes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T19%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Removal%20of%20Toxic%20Pollutants%20by%20Six%20Wastewater%20Treatment%20Processes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20-%20Water%20Pollution%20Control%20Federation&rft.au=Hannah,%20Sidney%20A.&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=27-34&rft.issn=0043-1303&rft.eissn=2327-7467&rft.coden=JWPFA5&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25042837%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14481721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25042837&rfr_iscdi=true |